I don't see a specific reason why gamblers get to win. The class one belong is not convincingly a good factor for the winning opportunity in gambling. Everyone losses and some can't control themselves. I understand that some responsible rich players knows the essence of gambling for fun and not seeing it as a means of winning big. But it's also possibly known to us that rich people are quick to take loans, because they have access to it. A good number of rich people ranging from musicians to business owners are known for their involvement in loans for their gambling activities. Which attitude, is not right for anybody.

When gambling as a rich person they wager lots of money regularly, and the figures is enough to reduce drastically their wealth to smaller amount. Gambling doesn't increase wealth, it only reduces the money. Rich players are exposed to gambling risks as much as the low income earners. The low income players have better chances of stopping when their money is exhausted. But the rich people hardly get their money exhausted and when it happens they'll have lots of places or people to get loan, till they earn a fresh money to replace them. Hence the rich earn more and lose more as such. Anybody can win big, regardless of their financial class.

KYC is getting global everyday and lots of casinos are utilizing the method in form of obeying the law. On the side of the players, nobody actually wants to undergo the KYC process for any reason. Nothing beneficial for the players who submit their KYC. It's just a way of regulating the activities of some players and also tracking the underaged players. Government can't stop it, due to the benefits they make through it. Submitting a meaningful information like KYC online is risky, at least for privacy purposes.

The server where the data is being stored could be tempered by a malicious third party, that's why players tend to fabricate information and submit. Casinos have no option than doing what the government wants. If the KYC policy is removed by the government, casinos wouldn't mind stop asking for the documents. Because they know that competitors will utilize the medium as a way of getting new customers, due to the no KYC policy, being something everyone online is looking out for. No essence still asking for KYC when no mandate is on casinos to provide their personal information.

Mentally unstable people can execute gambling activities but not in a clear and acceptable manner. They could be compulsive or reckless in the process because they do not care about themselves anymore. The game doesn't seem risky to them either, it's just a compulsory activity that is meant to be carried out at their end. However, like you said, merely looking at them gamble, one could figure out that the person is mentally disordered, due to their body language and some differences in behavior. If the player got mentally disordered through gambling, he may not be aggressive towards other gamblers who think like him.

They can only get bothered when family friends tend to correct them inappropriately about their gambling behavior. But someone who has been struggling with mental disorder before involving himself into gambling, should be avoided and not disturb when in the gambling house. As he could get aggressive both with the gamblers like himself. Personally, would feel comfortable disturbing such a person or trying to correct him while in the casino. Preferably, gamblers should be let to be on their own, unless they seek out for help in predicting a match.

If the government lift the mandatory KYC rule then new casinos will use it as a marketing strategy to attract new players to their platform. Existing casino might follow similar methods, if the rate of people who go to no KYC casinos are high. Every effect depends on the marketing trend. Lots of players preferred no KYC, but since no platform supports it, due to the government, people began to adapt to the KYC rule. However, casinos were able to handle fraudulent activities long before the institution of a compulsory KYC policy by the government.

In my understanding, what casinos benefits from the data people submit to them is marketing. With the information casinos can easily know who to target when advertising. They'll be able to know the number of young people and aged players who use the casino. Although, lots of framed up documents exist in the platform. Especially from underaged gamblers. But the government may not think of doing such a thing. They also benefit from those data. It helps them track fraudulent activities like money laundering. Halting it would affect their investigative purposes.

No plan in gambling that guarantees constant success. Although, success could be being able to retain a responsible gambling habit. But if success in your response means that a gambler would constantly win if he has a strong plan, I think that's not correct. A lot of players have tried within their jurisdiction to harness a creative and effective gambling strategy that could yield them lots of wins, but end up failing. Because the casino also wins when the players lose. They control the game and result, if you were putting on their shoes wouldn't you prefer to win always, and watch the players lose more.

However, I think when a gambler is determined to win, he is not on the right track of gambling. Determination is mainly on things that are certainly achievable. Winning in a casino is achievable but still disappears back to the house. Therefore, focusing on winning or doubling money could be a means of losing more in the game. As you said, gambling is a game of chance, and should be enjoyed. That is being happy with the outcomes notminding if it's win or loss. The chances of winning are so slim on the gambler, if losing makes a player sad that means the casino will persistently make him sad to no end.

Casino go bankrupt easily if not well managed. Paying winners huge amount of money everyday is not simple. The house also takes care of staff, security, developers and all of it. That's why they tend to milk lots of gamblers by offering a slim housing edge. Cex on the other hand is not easy to maintain, because of the fluctuating prices of cryptocurrencies, they could get into trouble as well. Looking at the business world, every platform that solves a problem is capable of being profitable. Can't say for sure if casinos make more money than exchanges. What matters is the number of users, regardless of the niche. A casino with lesser users wouldn't get compared to a cex with lots of traders.

No business that doesn't harness a downside what is most crucial is being able to manage and maintain the platform. Humans are too numerous, and demands lots of products. Some do want multiple things, not like gamblers wouldn't use cex and vice versa. If a person is looking to start up such business he is meant to begin with what he's able to run or manage. Online casino costs lots of money to get licensed and build. Therefore, paying those players, the casino has to stay prepared financially not to go bankrupt. Don't know of online casinos that have gone bankrupt but offline casinos have such problems often times. There is an increasingly number of online users, making online casino profitable to run. Yet it doesn't make it less risky to manage. It's all about determination.

Gambling is risk itself, and without enough control a gambler will develop lots of trouble gambling. However, it's true that gamblers should take risk, if they deserve to win, but such risk is not always commended for players who are not experienced. Some players who risk huge amount of money on a game they are not sure of could be causing themselves lots of problem on the long run. However, it's not simple to play gambling without losing money in some painful way. Due to the need to take some risks.

That is why taking risks in gambling should not be a primary aim of a player. No good thing come with no attribute of risk. But that's not in the gambling niche. It is not certain the risk will yield results. Other factors like crypto or shares is risky, but could yield sure profits on the long run. Gambling consumes all the player's money and leaves him with none to continue his risky gambling strategy. So in this context, gamblers can take risks sparingly, with an amount they can lose. Anything other than that is riskier and could affect the player's economy.

Who knows the clear plan? Some players are not opportune to know about this clear plan people always talk about. The gaming system for most people revolves around money. And that's the only plan they have in mind before engaging into gambling. Although, not everyone had in mind to lose out big in the process it all comes as a surprise to them, thereby risking the finance of the person in a jeefy. The quick loss of money is what actually cause the anxiety and the curiosity to win back the lost money. However, I think that some players who out of their interest in gambling also thought of doing it for a short time then sleep, but got carried away to the extent of gambling while asleep.

It sounds funny, but happens. Hence, gambling while tired only makes a player to lose big against his intentions. Isn't it heartbreaking to wake up to a blinking screen that shows a huge loss of money. The player would feel sad because it wasn't his intention to wager all that amount. Because his conscious wasn't on the game, he had to lose to the house. Gamblers can change their perspectives of gambling to something more meaningful, other than gambling recklessly with no control. There should be time for gambling. And that time is when the player is comfortably certain he's accomplished all his tasks and nothing bothers him.

Aside that he is not causing any trouble, I think such a player is not meant to hit problem gambling. Looking at the description, he could be mentally unstable, and if he turns out to be addicted to the game his mental problem would skyrocket because addiction also causes mental disorder. However, he gambles in a place where people don't mind how he looks provided he pays his bills, no problem. Yet such a person needs help and should be attended to as you mentioned. Nothing is wrong in accepting him into the place he is human and should be respected.

But, in a case where he is causing trouble to himself, that's not fair. Not saying the gaming house should look into his wellbeing or whether he is a compulsive player, but his family, I believe he belongs to one, should help him on that. On another flip, the player could be living a boring life due to his appearance, few people would love to associate with him, hence gambling could be his way of entertaining himself. Thinking of him, staying around people is his best choice. Regardless, many would look down on him, but someday same person will win big, provided he is not compulsive.

This cash-in feature is confusing as it may seem, because it wasn't in existence and people were able to wait until their predicted games are over to determine if they won or not. The notion of the cash-in feature is quite very demanding of the prediction of the players even after they are done picking teams. It's weary predicting what to do at the middle of the games. Both ways, taking the funds or allowing the game play can cause regrets. As you may know how the human emotions works, if after the cash in and the team wins the gambler would feel bad regarding that he has no patience to wait for the game to be completed.

However, it's right to take what's available, and leave, instead of losing it all. Wouldn't delay to cash-in if it were to be my game, as gambling is not guaranteed, whenever an opportunity to cash in a good amount, they will be no delay. Although, waiting for the complete game could be temptingly disturbing, especially after the whole game and we end up winning. What if the game ends negatively, the player losses out, that would be worse because he has nothing to show. Looking at the both sides of it, gamblers are better off taking the available funds.

Of course a gambler can be lucky enough to win all the times, if he gambles everyday. What is most crucial is the fact that some daily gamblers don't mind about their results. Many are influenced by the funds that could be won in the process of playing everyday. However, when a person decides to utilize this form of gambling, he is meant to be observant of his results. Because a player can't continue playing if he has no money left on him. The best thing for gamblers is being able to realize that money is lost quickly if losses are chased after. If gambling promised daily wins then everyone including myself would have been into everyday gambling.

How would the house benefit from it, if that happens to be the case. The real thing is being able to enjoy the process not running from it. Those who gamble everyday, and are able to enjoy it by limiting their losses, can continue with the routine. Provided time is made out for quality rest. Myself when tired my thoughts don't feel satisfactory due to the stress on the brain. A player who plays each day, can get tired along the line and begin to make mistakes. So, taking a break remains the ultimate and wagering small amount of money. No need being greedy!

Right, gambler's feelings get controlled by the results of their game. Have noticed some players who allow their results to influence the way they feel. Although didn't add any relevant response on this, because they don't look addicted. However, assuming a player around me gets too violent regarding his results, it's my obligation to get him back on track. As it'll be a thing of failure on my end if a close friend loses his control on gambling and wagers all his funds. The problem will as well be mine to solve. Sometime when a broke gambler needs money to gamble, he runs to his friends and most time get supported due to the framed up lies from him.

It's not wrong to assist someone, but at times when the person is popularly known for his compulsive gambling, it's right to help him by reducing how funds is issued to him. Because the more money is handed out to the player he would make moves on wagering the whole money. The best way to be of help to such players is by restricting their finances. If the person have some money with him, talking to him about things he needs to buy in his home can change his thoughts and allow him focus on a fresh idea of spending money other than throwing all of it on casinos.

Addicts have to undergo those stress because of the loss of money and it's not simple to stay with no sustainable amount of money. It causes anxiety on the gambler, thereby, leading to compulsive gambling, to regain his funds back to himself. I've also noticed that while addicts suffer much losses it's crucial to look into the differences in the gaming method of the player. Some gamblers think of gambling as a means of making quick money. Instead, they forget about gambling as a way of losing money quickly.

In the pursuit of earning huge amount in gambling, players underscore gambling as a money generator. Regardless of the signs of losses, shown on the screen. The player would continue to loss as he's deceived with the thoughts of recovering all his funds at a go. However, if the person continually spends time in the casino he would get more of the troubles. Which is the main reason the player needs to pass a message to close people as regards to help and healing. Although, such impulses don't allow the gambler enough time to think of his mistakes. Those mistakes doesn't look like one to them, due to the loss of thoughts and self control the player feels.

It's not necessarily mandatory for gamblers to read all the terms and conditions. There are some sections where players need to have an eye on, like the withdrawal policy, use of VPN, restricted locations, gaming providers. These few important aspect of the TOS helps the player to fully understand the type of Casino he's into. Whether they serve, actually, what he wants or not. However, due to the lengthy words used in building those write up, lots of players skip reading them. I'd only do such a thing if money is not involved in the platform.

But, for gambling, could remember reading the TOS of some casinos in the past and realized that it's quite not as lengthy as we assume. When you scroll past it, without reading, the whole structure looks like the words have no end. But when reading through it, you'll notice the length is not much, because you'll skip the sections that is not important to you. Like what they have to say about underaged players, addicted people, money laundering etc. lots of them are not crucial to read, skipping through them will help the reader to scan through the important aspects of the terms and conditions. It's always helpful to have read them. Because money is involved.

That's right, those critics need to be taught few things about responsible gambling. Their problem with gambling is as regards to addiction. What it does to a player, how addiction can ruin people's finances etc are the few reason why the non gamblers tend to say annoying things to gamblers. However, what people say doesn't add up to my habit provided it doesn't hurt them or affect their emotions. The problematic development of non gamblers is their ignorance to the benefits of gambling. If they had the idea of responsible players, their first comment whenever a gambler is sighted would have been whether the player is responsible or not.

Generally, in most societies, it's assumed that gamblers are failures. And most people had this thoughts while growing up. Now as adult they still think that every gambler would end up addicted or compulsive. That's the reason most of them still have wrong perspectives on gamblers. Gamblers on the other hand should develop a thick skin, because those stigmas won't stop now. Being able to withstand it, would help bring out the confidence to convince the critic that gambling responsibly doesn't lead a person to problem. They can also realize that gambling has different benefits aside chasing money.

Yes, there is need to completely know what's wrong with the player before determining the right form of helping him. Don't actually know why some addicted players tend to remain greedy, in their condition. Assuming addicted players are not affected mentally and do not involuntarily wagers money chasing loss, their healing process wouldn't have been a big deal. However, any implemented method of help towards an addicted player still helps in making the person have a clearer rethink on his current state of mind and gambling behavior. Some also try to question themselves about their financial troubles caused by addiction.

Lots of addicted players spend uncountable time gambling. Probably, the player's money will get finished for playing with no limit. Once the player begins to look into his current situation and question himself briefly on that, his problem  can be made easier. Sometimes when trying to help a person, it gets difficult if the person doesn't work alongside us to achieve such a goal. But, an addicted person who explains his troubles to a helper will facilitate his healing process. And would get better, soon.

It's still unclear to me why influencers are being blamed for promoting gambling sites. Those who are to be tackled are the underaged players who don't mind their age and participate in gambling with fake identities. In some countries it's a felony, but due to the online settings they'll hardly get noticed and banned. Gambling is restricted for underaged people, and such majors like KYC has been made by the government and casinos to winnow out younger people from using online casinos. If the kids boycott it then the fault should be labeled on them, not the promoter.

A lot of ads are being placed online some are worse than gambling, yet the viewer still has the ability to ignore such ads and focus on what brought them on social media. The only issue with influencers is that they don't use same medium used in promoting gambling to discuss about responsible gambling. I think it'll help reduce the rate at which some young people would follow gambling ads. Their main aim is money, they don't care of the risks, if nobody talks to underaged players about risk and uncertainty of gambling results, most of them will wager blindly. Thereby, getting themselves into bigger troubles. Hence, if influencers should take it upon themselves to recuperate the brain of naive kids, their gambling thought might get removed.

One deposit is enough to gamble for days, but greed and curiosity makes gamblers to abuse their bankroll, wagering huge amount of money that demands they need to deposit more money. If a player controls his bank roll and wagers few cents, he could have enough left to play another day. Thereby enjoying his daily gambling habit. In the process he could add up his wins to the bankroll. Enabling him more time to gamble with the previous deposits for a long time. Most daily gamblers think of gambling and winning immediately, but truthfully daily gambling takes time for a person to win big.

No proven method of gambling that guarantees better opportunity of winning. Players should expect similar losing results regardless of how often they tend to gamble. If a player is interested in manipulating the gambling results by gambling everyday he's only making  a dreadful mistake. If mismanaged, gambling everyday can be destructive to the player's family and lifestyle. And lots of people mismanage the daily gambling habit, to an extent of addiction. I think such players should focus more on managing their funds and time. Creating limitations helps in reducing the excessive engagement in daily gambling. Which is detrimental to the gambling success of the player. I mean staying out of addiction.

In the process of trying to double funds the player can make mistakes in his gambling session. Due to the expectations he's got within him that in all gaming session he's meant to win double his bankroll. Such thoughts are deceiving in gambling. As those expectations don't show up often times. If a player starts out his game hoping to double his money, and gets disappointed with lots of losses. He will hardly end the session, as his aim have not been achieved. Although it's achievable, yet hard to maintain. Not every gambler would be capable to stop a session immediately he's doubled his money.

That's a problem that could erupt and the player will still have to go with no profits. However, I don't perceive this as a gambling strategy, it's just some form of expectations. Which is driving lots of people to gamble away their money, with no proper aim of enjoying the game. All they wanted is double the money. Hence, the game wouldn't be fun if they get to lose all their money. Gamblers who posses such purpose of gambling may not be satisfied with their gambling experience. Because what they want is not gotten easily. It could happen once a while. Especially, when the player least expected it, and the surprising wins entices the player to try again, till he losses his funds.

Was not aware of this, did it get to mainstream? From the look of things it seems to me that moonpay is the first to run such negotiations with PayPal. As of 2018 PayPal users had a hard time dealing with Bitcoin. Could remember losing out on closed deals due to payment barrier; PayPal users unable to pay because I accept BTC. Was it global or just US?