But I still don't understand how is this an argument to the in-equality in Islam where men are given more power over women.
Women's right should be the same, if a man is allowed to have 4 wives at the same time and fuck with them, than the women should also be allowed to have 4 husbands and fuck with all of them, if that is what they prefer.
Because there is no equality and men make the rules to suit their own perversions and desires. Men are jealous and possessive creatures and wouldn't be able to handle If a women was to have multiple partners and if they did they would call them sluts and shame them, but of course it's ok for men to do this because that's what they desire. Always double standards in religions. |
|
|
|
|
Payment recieved. Thanks. Can I rejoin?
If so
Postcount: 346
|
|
|
|
Can you update my posts on the spreadsheet. I should have done enough now. Thanks.
I'll update the post counts in a couple of hours. I'm traveling right now on mobile but I should have things wrapped up in two hours or so. Ok. Thanks. Counted them and deducted relevant ones and fairly certain I've done enough now but want confirmation just to be sure. |
|
|
|
Sorry about that one random typo douche. Working 18 hours straight on university work, computer programming, and business development without sleep can screw with your focus.
I don't really believe any of that, but douche? Seriously? Are you sure you're old enough to be at university? Regardless and irrelevant of that care to actually back up your initial claims instead of just childish insults and accusing people of being dumb? |
|
|
|
In its dealings with the community of believers at Mount Carmel, the central government abandoned the moral promise of a free society, and, as all tyrannies eventually do, ignored its own standards of law and ethics. But it paid the price of losing some measure of public confidence, which is already at historic lows. A government that governs by fear alone eventually finds itself unable to govern at all.
by Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)
The Free Market
March 1994
Good post, wow. Thanks for making it worthwhile to sort through all the shit posters like this: Name me these American citizens who've been tortured before?
Would "suffering" prior to mass-murder count as "torture" in your world?
No it wouldn't. Waco is entirely different and not relevant here (unless once they got them out they holed them up and tortured information out of them). Care to actually elaborate on that rather than providing a hollow "wow good post" shitpost yourself? I guess you think police brutality is also the same as CIA torture or no? |
|
|
|
|
Can you update my posts on the spreadsheet. I should have done enough now. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Whitehouse
Thanks for the awesome promotion.
|
|
|
|
Name me these American citizens who've been tortured before?
Would "suffering" prior to mass-murder count as "torture" in your world?
No it wouldn't. Waco is entirely different and not relevant here (unless once they got them out they holed them up and tortured information out of them). |
|
|
|
Not at all. Are you a child or just a troll? How does any of that apply to what I just said. I find it pretty funny and ironic considering it applies to your other posts in this thread. Try harder.
There are 10quadrillion particles in the universe that we can observe, but it seems your mother selected the most moronic and disgusting ones and put them into one idiot... Wow, you really got me with that one. These attempts at 'putdowns' aren't even relevant to anything I've said here. Do you get all these from your Big Book of Infantile Moronic Insults or something? If you're going to attempt to insult someone at least make them relevant because it makes you look very immature and quite silly. |
|
|
|
Pretty sure snowden will face lifetime or death sentence ( chances for the latter arent high though)
I don't think that the judges will award him a death sentence, which would immediately make him a martyr. A life without parole is possible. And he will be facing the worst of the CIA torture methods.No he wont. The CIA or anyone else wont lay a hand on him. They're not going to torture their own citizens. Is this sarcasm or are you really that dumb? Governments don't give a crap if you're a citizen or not... you get in there way, they're going to do whatever they have to do to shut you up. I'm not the one who is dumb here. If you're going to accuse people of being dumb you might want to know the difference between there/they're/their. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Name me these American citizens who've been tortured before? If they even laid a finger on him he'd get off free on all charges not to mention sued for quite a substantial amount of money. |
|
|
|
Not at all. Are you a child or just a troll? How does any of that apply to what I just said. I find it pretty funny and ironic considering it applies to your other posts in this thread. Try harder. |
|
|
|
|
*looks at feedback* Badbear Probable alt of WoodCollector
Funny how you're seemingly severely butthurt with everyone single person that WoodCollector was?
|
|
|
|
yet there remains a silver lining among these darkweb services: their ability to provide an alternative to and undermine the profitability of real-world, entrenched organized crime.
Does it? Who do you think are selling their wares on Silk Road? Innocent computer geeks? I agree with the principles of Silk Road as a free market but it still largely organized crime gangs selling the drugs. They just move from the street to the deepweb where they're safer. Tormarkets may make the world governments rethink their drug policies, though. |
|
|
|
Pretty sure snowden will face lifetime or death sentence ( chances for the latter arent high though)
I don't think that the judges will award him a death sentence, which would immediately make him a martyr. A life without parole is possible. And he will be facing the worst of the CIA torture methods.No he wont. The CIA or anyone else wont lay a hand on him. They're not going to torture their own citizens. |
|
|
|
|
Scammers don't even get banned here so I doubt people pretending (or not) to be girls will get you banned. Might get you negative trust if you're found to be doing so for likely bad reasons (ie to scam) but that's hard to prove usually.
|
|
|
|
Where you don't have to register your phone number like yahoo mail or gmail.... yet also legitimate and secure
I don't think you have to use your phone number with hotmail or outlook or whatever its called nowadays (at least you didn't the last time I used it), but I wouldn't say it's the best account that's for sure but it meets your criteria at least. gave up hotmail/outlook as i could not skip 2 factor (phone number). personaly using https://www.inbox.com/what about https://unseen.is/ (closed source Anonymous ?) Can you not use an alt email address for that? Think that's what I did but don't remember being mandatory. Did you look to see if there was a skip this step button? |
|
|
|
Video isn't available in my country bullshit. How long is the interview with Snowden? I might just download the episode if it worthwhile seeing. Will Snowden really come back to US? Isn't he afraid?
I doubt he will ever come back which is pretty sad. He was labeled a traitor by the government so coming back would not be in his best interest. Being labeled a traitor is the least of his worries. It's being tried as one that he probably has no interest as he's almost certainly going to get found guilty and locked away for a very long time. |
|
|
|
Maybe in the next few years these exchange will drop and a few new "decentralized" exchange will be created (only to trade btc <>altcoin). The problem with decentralized exchange (FIAT side) is that the fiat money are too big problematic due the chargeback possibility, the stolen of bank, credit card etc....
Decentralized exchanges can be even more risky. Look at what happened to Silk Road 2.0, which was a decentralized market place. Hackers stole the credentials of sellers with good reputation, and then used these accounts to scam ordinary users. then openbazar is doomed(which is bad because openbazar is another thing that could potentially rise the price of bitcoin), if they don't implement something automatized, a bot that check if connection is secure between two user and also work as escrow How is it doomed? Even if openbazzar doesn't work perfectly new improved marketplaces will pop up that attempt to fix previous flaws. They will continue to evolve and adapt until perfect. Maybe in the next few years these exchange will drop and a few new "decentralized" exchange will be created (only to trade btc <>altcoin). The problem with decentralized exchange (FIAT side) is that the fiat money are too big problematic due the chargeback possibility, the stolen of bank, credit card etc....
Decentralized exchanges can be even more risky. Look at what happened to Silk Road 2.0, which was a decentralized market place. Hackers stole the credentials of sellers with good reputation, and then used these accounts to scam ordinary users. Was Silkroad 2.0 decentralized? No, it was centralized. If it was decentralized it would probably be still running and there would have been no owner to arrest. |
|
|
|
These DEA agents aren't even good to themselves, haha  always "catching" crime. They are the ones who make crime! A sad example that shows that power corrupts. You are not getting it. If the society is crime-free, then these DEA guys will lose their jobs. So it is natural to expect them to create crime scenes, once the crime graph starts to go down. I think this is a ridiculous proposition and complete conspiracy theory. The gov don't have to worry about crime rates dropping to the point of 'creating' more crime otherwise the feds/police becoming redundant and unnecessary. There's plenty of crime committed without having to create more to remain employed and relevant not to mention the ridiculous laws that create it in the first place (drug prohibition for example). You are not getting it. The private prison industry in the United States is a multi-billion dollar business. Reduce the number of convicts, and thousands will lose their jobs. And police departments get more funding, when the crime rates spiral out of control. Everything is interconnected. No, I get the privatized prison system, but what I'm not buying is your conspiracy theory that they're creating crime scenes merely to fill prisons when crime rate drops. That's just something you made up. There will never be a shortage of poor people they can lock up for minor crimes. |
|
|
|
Its as simple as that, whoever has the conviction to believe in honest money will eventually end up very wealthy.
its hard to hold through all the booms and busts, just ask anyone who bought at 1$ and sold at 10$.
Some say conviction others say delusion. I think there's a good chance that those who believe in bitcoin will see a great return at some point in the future but its by no means guaranteed. I certainly believe in the potential of bitcoin but the real question is do the rest of the world? Sadly the general public don't seem to be the smartest among us. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
