As I have said repeatedly, you requested a withdraw and have been paid 4 payments so far towards that withdraw. When funds come out of your account on a withdraw they are deducted from your deposited amount until the whole amount has been paid to you in full.

We do not Ninja edit anything, the users have and always will be notified of changes to the TOS. If we ever change them, emails are sent out to users with a time frame to accept them or to withdraw their funds before the implementation of any new terms of use Updates are posted to the website on the main page and in thier account dashboard as well as updates on other media outlets. Which actually is a lot more than the scope of the modifications of terms states in our TOS that we will do. The TOS are on the website in english, if you do not understand english in the upper right hand corner of the website you can change the language that the site is displayed in.

In addition to that, no changes have been made to the TOS since his deposit that would have effected his withdraw.

As I have replied to you many times, your account is in withdraw status, and it is being processed, you have collected 4 payments towards your withdraw already. You put your request in 60 days before your 90 day lock in period was reached. I can not and will not bump up your withdraw before others who have their request in at this time. Asking me to push your withdraw up past others who have already been waiting patiently for their withdraw is not fair to other members of the pool, and I can not do that. As I have replied many times, your withdraw is in process, and you have already collected some funds towards your withdraw as per our TOS. At this time, there is nothing more I can do for you but follow the rules.

And again I will post his so the OP can see what is important to his direct matter. Because Bruno wants to always bury the truth by trolling and his amazing copy and paste skills, I will re post this so the OP can see it. But do not worry Bruno will have plenty more where the others came from. Because deep down he idolizes me and what i am trying to do for people. I love you to Bruno.


The OP registered after any updates to the TOS were done SO he knew well in advance how the system worked.

He first put in his withdraw request 60 days before the 90 day lock in period was complete on his account. Which I clearly advised him of.

This was not the first time he has had an account and came up with a reason for withdraw, the first time he did this with a very similar reason, his withdraw went very smooth. However this time he had a conflict with the policy he deposited under.

PRINCIPAL DEPOSIT 90 DAY LOCK-IN PERIOD POLICY - EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2015

As you can well see all of his deposits were well after any update of our TOS.

He then proclaims his country is having a hard economic times, which since i am a good hearted person I look into, and find the exact opposite, that in fact his economy was doing very well and his Fiat was growing strength against the USD. I am not sure what exactly is going on locally where he is, but his country as a whole (as he stated my country is having bad economy) was doing very well when I cross referenced his claims.

Most recently I get a very inappropriate email from him filled with foul language and threats, so again I decide to take another look into his situation and if warranted I was willing to buy his account out. Upon looking into his withdraw address which is also his payout address I notice some very interesting things, all the payouts towards his withdraw are there in his wallet, as well as funds going to Poloneix and Yobit, and then I notice something even more interesting the funds coming back from the exchanges is smaller than the ones going out to them. Which tells me he is possibly loosing money on the trading from what i can see. and the last 2 transactions that went out to the exchanges did not come back at all which worried me for him.

I made a mistake when launching StakeMiners and allowed people to see I have a heart and a general ambition to help people, Looking into my past business ventures will show you I will go out of my way for people, and this is not a good quality in Crypto when trying to run a business, people see a kindness like that as a weakness and will scam you any way they can. This is exactly what people like Suchmoon, Gleb Gamow and the crew over at get Hashing are taking advantage of now.  

I was willing to buy his account with my own personal funds because if what he was saying abut his situation was as bad as he proclaimed I felt bad for the gentleman, however after just a few seconds of research everything I was reading was telling me slightly a different story.

His deposited amount has went down because he has been paid towards his withdraw, his first and second withdraw requests could not be processed because he was still in the 90 day lock in period he was advised about when he made his deposit. I was even willing to buy his account out and then he threatened me and cussed at me.

I am not this person Suchmoon and Gleb Gamow would like to portray and they know very very little about StakeMiners, its operations or me, neither of them are even adult enough to have a face to face meeting, or one on one or them two on one with me, so they can not possibly know what type of person I am.

Your withdraw will be and is being processed as per the TOS that you actually deposited under. I am sorry if you are experiencing a loss in your job and other personal situations, but StakeMiners was actually created to give you a recurring weekly income, that is exactly what we have tried to create for people, so people like you who are experiencing bad situations in their personal life have something, even if small, they can fall back on. Even some of the mid sized accounts generate enough income with us to pay for groceries, fuel for their car and even some utility bills to help get them thru hard times. I do apologize for your hard times right now, but we must hold firm to the TOS. We have other witdraws in front of yours and I can not ski8p them, even tho as your last email stated only you and I would know I was breaking the rules, I can not do that becasue the members withdraw being processed would know something was wrong when his withdraw this week was 0.1599 short.


Because beyond your belief you actually do not know anything about StakeMiners, its operations or how it works that's why. Those are the payment methods transactios IDs on their own explorer that's why. It is their internal system. The blockchain TXids would be found in his wallet where the initial funds were sent from.

Because Bruno wants to always bury the truth by trolling what the people have to say, I will repost this so the OP can see it. But do not worry Bruno will have plenty more where the others came from. Because deep down he idolizes me and what i am trying to do for people. I love you to Bruno.


The OP registered after any updates to the TOS were done SO he knew well in advance how the system worked.

He first put in his withdraw request 60 days before the 90 day lock in period was complete on his account. Which I clearly advised him of.

This was not the first time he has had an account and came up with a reason for withdraw, the first time he did this with a very similar reason, his withdraw went very smooth. However this time he had a conflict with the policy he deposited under.

PRINCIPAL DEPOSIT 90 DAY LOCK-IN PERIOD POLICY - EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2015

As you can well see all of his deposits were well after any update of our TOS.

He then proclaims his country is having a hard economic times, which since i am a good hearted person I look into, and find the exact opposite, that in fact his economy was doing very well and his Fiat was growing strength against the USD. I am not sure what exactly is going on locally where he is, but his country as a whole (as he stated my country is having bad economy) was doing very well when I cross referenced his claims.

Most recently I get a very inappropriate email from him filled with foul language and threats, so again I decide to take another look into his situation and if warranted I was willing to buy his account out. Upon looking into his withdraw address which is also his payout address I notice some very interesting things, all the payouts towards his withdraw are there in his wallet, as well as funds going to Poloneix and Yobit, and then I notice something even more interesting the funds coming back from the exchanges is smaller than the ones going out to them. Which tells me he is possibly loosing money on the trading from what i can see. and the last 2 transactions that went out to the exchanges did not come back at all which worried me for him.

I made a mistake when launching StakeMiners and allowed people to see I have a heart and a general ambition to help people, Looking into my past business ventures will show you I will go out of my way for people, and this is not a good quality in Crypto when trying to run a business, people see a kindness like that as a weakness and will scam you any way they can. This is exactly what people like Suchmoon, Gleb Gamow and the crew over at get Hashing are taking advantage of now.  

I was willing to buy his account with my own personal funds because if what he was saying abut his situation was as bad as he proclaimed I felt bad for the gentleman, however after just a few seconds of research everything I was reading was telling me slightly a different story.

His deposited amount has went down because he has been paid towards his withdraw, his first and second withdraw requests could not be processed because he was still in the 90 day lock in period he was advised about when he made his deposit. I was even willing to buy his account out and then he threatened me and cussed at me.

I am not this person Suchmoon and Gleb Gamow would like to portray and they know very very little about StakeMiners, its operations or me, neither of them are even adult enough to have a face to face meeting, or one on one or them two on one with me, so they can not possibly know what type of person I am.

Your withdraw will be and is being processed as per the TOS that you actually deposited under. I am sorry if you are experiencing a loss in your job and other personal situations, but StakeMiners was actually created to give you a recurring weekly income, that is exactly what we have tried to create for people, so people like you who are experiencing bad situations in their personal life have something, even if small, they can fall back on. Even some of the mid sized accounts generate enough income with us to pay for groceries, fuel for their car and even some utility bills to help get them thru hard times. I do apologize for your hard times right now, but we must hold firm to the TOS. We have other witdraws in front of yours and I can not ski8p them, even tho as your last email stated only you and I would know I was breaking the rules, I can not do that becasue the members withdraw being processed would know something was wrong when his withdraw this week was 0.1599 short.


Because beyond your belief you actually do not know anything about StakeMiners, its operations or how it works that's why. Those are the payment methods transactios IDs on their own explorer that's why. It is their internal system. The blockchain TXids would be found in his wallet where the initial funds were sent from.

The OP registered after any updates to the TOS were done SO he knew well in advance how the system worked.

He first put in his withdraw request 60 days before the 90 day lock in period was complete on his account. Which I clearly advised him of.

This was not the first time he has had an account and came up with a reason for withdraw, the first time he did this with a very similar reason, his withdraw went very smooth. However this time he had a conflict with the policy he deposited under.

PRINCIPAL DEPOSIT 90 DAY LOCK-IN PERIOD POLICY - EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2015

As you can well see all of his deposits were well after any update of our TOS.

He then proclaims his country is having a hard economic times, which since i am a good hearted person I look into, and find the exact opposite, that in fact his economy was doing very well and his Fiat was growing strength against the USD. I am not sure what exactly is going on locally where he is, but his country as a whole (as he stated my country is having bad economy) was doing very well when I cross referenced his claims.

Most recently I get a very inappropriate email from him filled with foul language and threats, so again I decide to take another look into his situation and if warranted I was willing to buy his account out. Upon looking into his withdraw address which is also his payout address I notice some very interesting things, all the payouts towards his withdraw are there in his wallet, as well as funds going to Poloneix and Yobit, and then I notice something even more interesting the funds coming back from the exchanges is smaller than the ones going out to them. Which tells me he is possibly loosing money on the trading from what i can see. and the last 2 transactions that went out to the exchanges did not come back at all which worried me for him.

I made a mistake when launching StakeMiners and allowed people to see I have a heart and a general ambition to help people, Looking into my past business ventures will show you I will go out of my way for people, and this is not a good quality in Crypto when trying to run a business, people see a kindness like that as a weakness and will scam you any way they can. This is exactly what people like Suchmoon, Gleb Gamow and the crew over at get Hashing are taking advantage of now.  

I was willing to buy his account with my own personal funds because if what he was saying abut his situation was as bad as he proclaimed I felt bad for the gentleman, however after just a few seconds of research everything I was reading was telling me slightly a different story.

His deposited amount has went down because he has been paid towards his withdraw, his first and second withdraw requests could not be processed because he was still in the 90 day lock in period he was advised about when he made his deposit. I was even willing to buy his account out and then he threatened me and cussed at me.

I am not this person Suchmoon and Gleb Gamow would like to portray and they know very very little about StakeMiners, its operations or me, neither of them are even adult enough to have a face to face meeting, or one on one or them two on one with me, so they can not possibly know what type of person I am.

Your withdraw will be and is being processed as per the TOS that you actually deposited under. I am sorry if you are experiencing a loss in your job and other personal situations, but StakeMiners was actually created to give you a recurring weekly income, that is exactly what we have tried to create for people, so people like you who are experiencing bad situations in their personal life have something, even if small, they can fall back on. Even some of the mid sized accounts generate enough income with us to pay for groceries, fuel for their car and even some utility bills to help get them thru hard times. I do apologize for your hard times right now, but we must hold firm to the TOS. We have other witdraws in front of yours and I can not ski8p them, even tho as your last email stated only you and I would know I was breaking the rules, I can not do that becasue the members withdraw being processed would know something was wrong when his withdraw this week was 0.1599 short.


Because beyond your belief you actually do not know anything about StakeMiners, its operations or how it works that's why. Those are the payment methods transactios IDs on their own explorer that's why. It is their internal system. The blockchain TXids would be found in his wallet where the initial funds were sent from.

We have a few spots for advertising we will be opening up soon on the site so we made a couple banners and want to make them available so anyone who wants can use them.

Here is one for Counter Strike



and one for Nuclear Dawn

Another Article on this.

Published by Slashdot on Tue, 16 Feb 2016

An anonymous reader writes:

 Today Google's online security team publicly disclosed a severe vulnerability in the Gnu C Library's DNS client. Due to the ubiquity of Glibc, this affects an astounding number of machines and software running on the internet, and raises questions about whether Glibc ought to still be the preferred C library when alternatives like musl are gaining maturity. As one example of the range of software affected, nearly every Bitcoin implementation is affected.Reader msm1267 adds some information about the vulnerability, discovered independently by security researchers at Red Hat as well as at


Google, which has since been patched:

  The flaw, CVE-2015-7547, is a stack-based buffer overflow in the glibc DNS client-side resolver that puts Linux machines at risk for remote code execution. The flaw is triggered when the getaddrinfo() library function is used, Google said today in its advisory. "A back of the envelope analysis shows that it should be possible to write correctly formed DNS responses with attacker controlled payloads that will penetrate a DNS cache hierarchy and therefore allow attackers to exploit machines behind such caches," Red Hat said in an advisory. It's likely that all Linux servers and web frameworks such as Rails, PHP and Python are affected, as well as Android apps running glibc. Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Google Unveils Glibc DNS Client Vulnerability, Many Bitcoin Implementations Affected

Posted on February 16, 2016 by Bingo Boingo   

Today Google's online security blog unveiled a buffer overflow in the Gnu C library's DNS client (archived). The vulnerability allows the getaddrinfo function to overflow opening the doors to all manner of malice. This vulnerability affects all Bitcoin implementations compiled against the GNU C library which invoke DNS. This includes Bitcoin Core and the clients programmed to eventually fork into altcoins including the "Bitcoin" XT and "Bitcoin" "Classic" network clients. The reference Bitcoin implementation maintained by the Bitcoin Foundation is unaffected as DNS was excised from that client,1 and scripts are available for building the reference implementation against the musl C library.2 It is strongly recommended that Bitcoin users patch their preferred client3 to remove DNS or move to a client maintained by a team that cares about security and eliminating unnecessary attack surfaces in advance.

1    The reference Client also had upnp excised before critical vulnerabilities in that code were publically exposed.

2    Most Flagship nodes running the reference client are built against musl rather than glibc.

3    You may have to do this yourself.

OFF TOPIC AGAIN, that belongs in one of the 5 accusation threads you have started against me. the topic is "Gleb Gamow Bruno Kucinskas Is a scammer, a thief, a Liar and an Extortionist Piggy Pig Pigdog" So lets get back to what is important. A question I have been asking since what may or so last year that you keep avoiding. And FYI most people saw right thru your posts and the ones who do ask me, And it si very few about my involvement get the answer, which is provided in your thread if I am not mistaken. You just refuse to accept it and continue on with your copy and paste skills of hiding. You see how even your own nonsense stops eve n you from seeing your own answers?

Anyone with the capacity to get online "Learnt" about bitcoin in 2009.

And no this thread is titled "Bruno Kucinskas Is a scammer, a thief, an Extortionist, etc., because..." , it is not about me it is about you, who insistantly opted to not address the issues pertaining to yourself!

NOW CAN YOU USE THIS THREAD FOR WHAT ITS FOR AND TELL US WHY YOU HAD TO STEAL A MANS 2800 DOLLARS, YOU GOT AN INSURANCE CLAIM AND CASHED THAT CHECK BUT REFUSED TO PAY THAT MAN THE MONEY YOU STOLE FROM HIM, after IT WAS HIM WHO ACTUALLY DID THE WORK TO FIGHT WITH THE SHIPPING COMPANY TO EVEN GET SAID INSURANCE CLAIM. THEN WHY YOU HAD TO HAVE SOMEONE ELSE PAY FOR THE STOLEN FUNDS AND IT TOOK YOU ALMOST 2 YEARS TO EVEN PAY HIM OFF??

Like I said

Bruno your avoiding again Let me help.

Dooglus you can step in any time bro, You got this ball rolling, lets see if Bruno can do as you state and Defend himself


See how you didnt answer the question nor defend yourself, but tried and distract the reaqders with useless ramblings and rediculous memes?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND MY POST NOW BRUNO??

He did not have to "Fight" with anything, he had to follow the TOS, which a mistake was made on our part and LOW AND BEHOLD we accepted the fault and did what was right.

NOW CAN YOU USE THIS THREAD FOR WHAT ITS FOR AND TELL US WHY YOU HAD TO STEAL A MANS 2800 DOLLARS, YOU GOT AN INSURANCE CLAIM AND CASHED THAT CHECK BUT REFUSED TO PAY THAT MAN THE MONEY YOU STOLE FROM HIM, after IT WAS HIM WHO ACTUALLY DID THE WORK TO FIGHT WITH THE SHIPPING COMPANY TO EVEN GET SAID INSURANCE CLAIM. THEN WHY YOU HAD TO HAVE SOMEONE ELSE PAY FOR THE STOLEN FUNDS AND IT TOOK YOU ALMOST 2 YEARS TO EVEN PAY HIM OFF??

I mean as per Dooglus request you are supposed to be defending yourself against the claims against YOU right. You have plenty of threads against me, lets use this one to defend YOU!

A lot of members have left StakeMiners wiht a profit, finally someone posted this info. He is neither endorsing or supporting STakeMiners, but he clearly shows he left with a 56% profit with us.

Losses in crypto is not an uncommon fact, I never lied to anyone,

SO the values of the coins dropped, what do you expect when things like cryptsy happen, and other stuff.

Has the lack of deposits stopped us from paying our members NOPE so I guess we cant be a ponzi can we, you need heavy recurring deposits in order to take those funds to pay others right...RIGHT!! so who is lying now?

And even tho the values of the coins have dropped, has that stopped us from making weekly payouts to our members NOPE We make payouts every week.

Does the low income suck becasue of the values? Heck yea it drops our income, And I dont like that.

Are we just accepting that l;ike every other service would? NO we are working the problem, doing what we can to strengthen our positions and doing what we can as a TEAM to increase our income.

I know a lot of you guys HATE that people like us who you all deem are not worthy to run a service, or you deem not worthy to be in crypto because of whatever nonsense reason it is you have, I know you hate we are doing it and continue to work hard. Take it as an example of how people reach out to help others progress, how a team works together for a common goal and wont let childish attacks keep us from providing a service people deserve.

EDIT BRUNO, this thread is not about me remember, you have that going elsewhere.

AND FYI I was dabbling in Forex since college, even tho you feel I didnt go to college, and that's fine you can have your opinion. But understand researching and learning is still being involved in something no matter if you want to accept it or not.

and another FYI you have more than one Forex accounts up there bro. Try and sort that out bro. But at least you have proven the gethashing boys to be lying in their claims I was not in Forex, because you have copies of more than one account up there I had. Thank you for disproving a lie you all said I made. PLEASE NOTE 2 of those accounts up there are live accounts and both are in the positive they are not in the red, thank you for proving that i was in forex but even better that I was there and making profit!!

There is no rule in the format of scam threads depicting we can not lock threads to keep well known trolls from trolling a thread with 12 of his accounts not to defend himself but hide bury facts.

That thread is 1 page long and provides more truth than his whatever.... what is it 100 pages who knows against me.

The thread is only updated when he does something that deserves it to be.

It is not full of opinion it is full of facts.

If Bruno could act like and adult I wouldn't have needed to lock it, but in his defense he started his own threads all of which he never even tried to defend himself, Just trolled on with more nonsense, thus, he has no defense.

How exactly do you defend yourself against a police report again? What that is not him in the police report, unfortunately it was he who pointed me to that police report.

All i did was take the array of stuff available about him thru searches just like the format says we are to do and I put themn all in one place so readers can see.

Ask yourself do you honestly think Bruno has the capicity to go in that thread address each of those concerns like an adult? Ill give you the answer, go quote in any of the parody he started against himself where he directly addresses all of those concerns. and Ill unlockl the thread,

he can start by explaining TRUTHFULLY why he stole 2800 dollars and scammed a guy by selling him a broken miner. Why he could nt just take the cash he stole and instantly pay him and why it took almost 2 years to pay the guy back who actually footed the bill to keep his butt out of jail.

Let him start there.

Yes let's do that

PROOF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN GETTING PAID FOR ALMOST A YEAR

Proof Bruno has helped anyone get anything in losses, or how any project he has done pays anyone in crypto.



...

..

Oh and then there was.....


Yep sorry there is no proof of such.

Bruno what actual proof have you shown so far I have scammed anyone, do you actually have that yet after a year of digging in my life, OH no you dont actually, How about some proof I have stolen from anyone, you have a side of that to go with the lack of proof on me actually being a scammer.... Nope you dont have that either, How about some actual lies that you can undeniably and actually prove, Yea again no you dont have that either. It is clear you cant put 2 and 2 together, I love how you take unrealted posts and try and make a lie. One of these days Ill waste the timne and correct you, But I wanna feed you just a little more rope maybe another years worth.

It is sad that over a year you have put into this project of yours and StakeMiners has paid over 127 BTC out to its members, Its sad over a year you wasted and you have proven nothing.

EDIT: I am sorry i wanted to double check what we have paid out (so I could not be accused of lying again LOL) so far it is 128+ BTC thats not bad for a little crappy site like mine is it Bruno? Dont you wish you could say the same?

I already noticed people starting to come back with clean reports, that is good, but unfortunately with the way this situation escalated and how it all happened, and the context of the viruses that were added, in addition with the changing of the names to avoid detection, I still have to question the reports now.

The fact is there was an increase in viruses from Jan 30th to Feb 07th, one of which was a purposeful change in name, this is suspicious to me. There could be an logical answer as to why we will have  to see what the devs explains as the reason.

Virus Total and any other antivirus software can only find what it is programmed to find, if a new variation of a virus comes out it may not detect it. There are some instances where certain antivirus detection software uses characteristics of a file to determine what is it like. For instance when you see "acts like" in the report. But those could be worked around as well. SO the nature of this situation still worries me.

I already deleted the other file before I installed it, but now I wonder what comes along with the download LOL At this point I would want to scan the file before it is downloaded. I think that too can be done thru Virus Total but Id rather see his comments about why the drastic changes, why the viruses had very small name changes without removing them in the first place, why there was an increased amount of viruses in such a short period and still i am very very curious as to why the address they say is yours, and even the one the user used above is a bitcoin address.

Ok I hate doing this, because I never want to ruin anything that may have potential but people need to be aware about what stuff is and what it could do.

DEV Please do not take this as an attack on your coin, just fix the problem so it does not exist, run a good productive coin that has a bright future without the risk of who knows how many users. I Have a friend who just got hacked from a situation just like this, got into his exchange account and everything. This stuff is real, please always be careful with new coins. Things like this can also keep you from being listed on good exchanges.



----------------------------------------------------------FIRST VIRUS---------------------------------------------------------

Risktool.Win64.Bitcoinminer (!c or any other addition)

When Trojan.BitcoinMiner is detected with a scan of Malwarebytes Anti-Malware your computer is infected with a Trojan horse. Once the Trojan.BitcoinMiner infected the target PC, it will use various ways to protect itself from being removed. This malware is designed by cybercriminals to use the GPU and CPU power to mine bitcoins on the infected system without your knowledge.

The presence of the trojan.bitcoinminer can significantly slow down your computer and is able to create a backdoor on the system to download other malicious programs into your computer. The infected computer can finally crash if the Trojan.BitcoinMiner is not completely removed.

The kind of malware (Trojan.BitcoinMiner) is detected by antivirus software under various names like the RiskTool.BitCoinMiner, Risktool.Win64.BitCoinminer, Win32.BitCoinMiner, Skodna.BitCoinMiner and ApplicUnsaf.Win32.BitCoinMiner. when the installed antivirus or other security software detects a variant of the Trojan.BitcoinMiner you can use the (Trojan.BitcoinMiner Removal Guide) below, all malware removal programs we recommend are completely free to use.

3 separate instances of this particular virus were found by virus total

Risktool.Win64.Bitcoinminer!c
RiskWare[RiskTool:not-a-virus]/Win64.BitCoinMiner
not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.ain

Notice how the names are easily changed yet the same virus has 3 instances, this is so if a virus detector removes one it knows, there is a chance the others may remain. This is very malicious in its own intent, trying to cover up the name and changing it so detectors will not be able to remove it. the even more suspicious is the report on the 30th of january reported only 1 instance

not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.aij

But then on feb 7th the system that picked up that instance picked up a new instance of the same virus

not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.ain
the difference is only 1 letter the J from the first report was changed to a N in the current report

doesn't change the virus its still the same virus.

----------------------------------------------------------SECOND VIRUS---------------------------------------------------------

BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.tc

BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.th is a virus detected by Microsoft Windows and several Antivirus or Anti-Malware software vendors. This BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.th threat is classified as PUP a Potentially Unwanted Program or PUA a Potentially Unwanted Programs because it inflicts and acts as a malicious threat into your Windows computer system.

BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.th is adware which is bundled using custom installers and dropped on your computer during the installation process. Most users have no idea how this BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.th threat is installed on there computer and what it is, until their Antivirus or Anti-Malware software detects it as a malicious threat or virus. Follow our instruction to remove this BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.th threat and protect your computer against another virus or adware infection.

This is the same instance as before name changes frequently,

report on jan 30th from the same systrem picked up BehavesLike.Win32.DirectDownminer.tc

The same system picked it up on Feb 07 as BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.tc

both being very similar to the original virus BehavesLike.Win32.Dropper.th.

----------------------------------------------------------THIRD VIRUS---------------------------------------------------------

Win.Adware.Agent-62042

Win.Adware.Agent is a program that contains adware, installs toolbars or will display pop-up advertisements on the computer.

Win.Adware.Agent it’s technically not a virus, but it does exhibit plenty of malicious traits, such as rootkit capabilities to hook deep into the operating system, browser hijacking, and in general just interfering with the user experience. The industry generally refers to it as a “PUP,” or potentially unwanted program.

The Win.Adware.Agent infection is designed specifically to make money. It generates web traffic, collects sales leads for other dubious sites, and will display advertisements and sponsored links within your web browser.

----------------------------------------------------------FOURTH VIRUS---------------------------------------------------------

Win32/Virus.RiskTool.e79

Microsoft security software detects and removes this threat.

This virus is a member of the Win32/Sality family. This family can delete Windows files with the extensions .SCR or .EXE.

This family can also end or close your antimalware software and other security-related processes.

This is an interesting little virus we have here that could try and close your security related process, to avoid detection, and remove the exe files that created it after the hacker is finished with getting what he needs accomplished on your PC as well as removing any .SCR or .EXE files he tells it to.

----------------------------------------------------------FIFTH VIRUS---------------------------------------------------------

Generic Suspicious

This is a Zero-Day Vulnerability back door trojan. a very intersting addition to the list of viruses. A Zero-Day Vulnerability virus is on in which the antivirus systems have zero days to plan and advise any mitigation against its exploitation. so usually by the time this particular virus has been found the damage is already done.

---------------------------------------------------------END REPORT----------------------------------------------------------

I agree man, I was looking into this wallet becasue it is POS and that is what we do. I always like finding new and productive coins to take to our BOI for research and discuss to be added.

We run 12 wallets, I am not so worried about the false negatives virus scanners give, however having 7 virus errors on virustotal should not happen. We run 12 wallets in our service and none of them have even 1 error on virus total. And when i see things like:

Win.Adware.Agent-62042

Risktool.Win64.Bitcoinminer!c

RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.ain

RiskWare/Win64.BitCoinMiner

The first thing that comes to mind are not the best.


Dev please address the 7 virus that show up in the virus scan, get them removed, and please move onto answering my other questions about your coin (why is it associated with a BTC address). I am not sure if your Thawte solution will do this, but I would rather see a clean report from virus total, than an increasing worse one. You went form 2 viruses showing up on the 30th of Jan to 7 showing up on the 7th of Feb. I still do not understand how that happened.

You need to make sure you have a clean report from virus total, you should not have any virus showing up there, as I said we run 12 wallets right now two of them fairly new with minimal updated to the original code and none of them have 1 single virus reporting on virus total.

I am not saying he is doing this and I have not researched the viruses to see exactly what they are, but some developers have been known to put keyloggers and other malicious additions in thier wallet EXE files, which will send information a hacker needs along with your wallet.dat files to any of your wallets, any text files on your computer which enables a hacker to open your wallet on any PC, send your coins out of your wallet, to another wallet, as well as steal all your login info for exchange sites, other crypto related sites, even your online banking sites, or online wallets. You have to be very careful these days, the best method is no viruses showing up, and even then its still not the safest. Just because something does not happen right now means nothing, the virus could still be collecting and recording information for all we know, A hacker can wait, for a long time before he executes the final hack.

Like I said I can not confirm exactly what those viruses are that are being displayed, what i do know is I run 12 wallets and none of them report 1 virus on virustotal.

In is defense a lot of good developers have been thru this and removed the bad stuff from the code and progressed very well with wonderful coins and great communities.