For those 2 lazy to click the link ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fmcqg1ld.png&t=663&c=T18c2Mf-S_KOhQ) ZK is a game-changer.
|
|
|
Arlyn not to be a dusche but lately you lack internal communication a lot. If you need one more person to organise that inside your team and keep the loop with the community, I have already suggested you to pick one up from the community after interviews for however would like to do it and is found worthy from the team.
Can we please discuss XC-related topics elsewhere? This is the wrong thread. We don't lack internal communication, and you're not really in a position to tell. We've heard your suggestion and will consider it on independent grounds. Synechist, this is your response to an XC supporter showing genuine concern? Who do you work for anyways, Block or XC? The reason cryptico wrote there was because you only post in Block's thread these days and never on XC's thread. The way you have been treating some of XC's longest supporters lately has been off-putting. Please rethink your strategy.
|
|
|
Something tells me ZK will be released soon... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
From XCtalk: TORSTICK ARRIVED CONFIRMED BY DAN THEY WILL SHIP TOMORROW:http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/243-tor-stick-update/Regarding New ISO from Dan : I am in the process of building a new ISO with an updated blockchain, customized firewall script [Tor Only traffic], and the latest REV2 in production at this time.
DanCheers for the update Cryptico ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) (not that i want a tor stick, just nice to hear something is happening) It shouldn't be my role though..Arlyn where are you? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) He seems to be more concerned with BLOCK than with XC these days.
|
|
|
I love how XC raises over 950 BTC for the ITO, then they go silent for days. They must be hard at work!
Wait a minute...
|
|
|
I nominate Rynomster, the lead developer of ShadowCash (SDC)
|
|
|
Will ZK effectively end all competing privacy-centric altcoins (purely from an anon-technological standpoint)?
I guess what I am trying to ask is this: Is ZK the holy-grail of anonymity? And will it leave all other currently available anon-tech (such as DRK, XMR, XC, etc) obsolete, inferior, & nonsensical to use?
Yes. Can you elaborate on that a little more please? Why "Yes"? Thanks
|
|
|
Will ZK effectively end all competing privacy-centric altcoins (purely from an anon-tech standpoint)?
I guess what I am trying to ask is this: Is ZK the holy-grail of anonymity? And will it leave all other currently available anon-tech (such as DRK, XMR, XC, etc) obsolete, inferior, & nonsensical to use?
|
|
|
The dictatorship at XC with no communication to XC foundation on what's happening development wise is exactly why we left.The XC fanboys now make up a story that Antoun and I extorted XC funds. We never received even one XC coin for our work and efforts on the foundation and the foundation is supposed to know what developments are happening,but instead,nothing was communicated to us. Absolute alienation from the XC team and a great shame for the XC community.
LOL, what did you EVER do for XC? You and your friend Antoun contributed NOTHING. You expect privileged information and free XC for zero contribution? You're an absolute idiot silverkinguk.
|
|
|
SynEbonics: another abusive post and you're out.
Longenecker: I will now request permission to prove what I've just stated.
No-one can stop you getting out, but that wouldn't make it less based on the facts.
Arlyn, you don't need permission to defend or prove anything. But like I said, there is no rational defense for this decision.
|
|
|
Dan said last night that the XC thread will be reopened today with testnet updates posted for the XC wallet (including stealth addresses). Can you confirm this synechist? Thanks
|
|
|
Seriously, why have no final / official numbers been posted? How are people suppose to trade if they do not have this information?
|
|
|
Guys, I re picked up a few XC while the coins were in the 30k region... I did not pick up enough to be overly bothered, but if you do keep the XC thread closed much longer.. I think XC will die. You do more for the trolls by shutting the thread than having it open as a soap box, it is almost like you are letting them win... There Seem to be some really strange decisions going on with XC at the moment... Really cannot see the strategic direction at the moment, and as for blocknet, I think its the nail in the coffin as opposed to the silver bullet, but we shall see...
OPEN THE XC THREAD
|
|
|
When is the XC thread going to be reopened?
|
|
|
Nobody can force him what to do. If he was at all confident in his coin's technology he wouldn't bow down to such whales. Especially the types of whales involved. No whale should be able to dictate the decisions the dev team make. It's the reason why they pulled out of Blocknet.
In fairness to Shadow and rynomster, any dev team that had access to the documents that Shadow had would have likely pulled out from the BlockNET as well while the opportunity was still there. You can't really fault them for making that decision.
|
|
|
coingateway has been around and reputable (with nothing to suggest otherwise) for months now.
|
|
|
So because of FUD week, there are approximately 950-1000 BTC sold for blocks out there, out of the potential 2500BTC in announcement. Our blocks are way more valued than they would have been ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Yep, the markcap for BLOCK is around $325,000... which is peanuts. The FUD actually helped believers of BlockNET.
|
|
|
So, the ITO was a success? Do we have official numbers?
|
|
|
|