Which of the following nightly builds do I need for Xubunty 14.04LTS - https://nightly.privacysolutions.no/Anoncoin-Linux - I got the top one build 100 and get the following error ./anoncoin-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libdb_cxx-5.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I've installed I used to use the Ubuntu launchpad but can't seem to find a link to it anymore? Found the launchpad and just used that - https://launchpad.net/~anoncoin/+archive/ubuntu/anoncoin - you should advertise that on your website. As it will make things a lot easier for the average *buntu user. |
|
|
|
Which of the following nightly builds do I need for Xubunty 14.04LTS - https://nightly.privacysolutions.no/Anoncoin-Linux - I got the top one build 100 and get the following error ./anoncoin-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libdb_cxx-5.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I've installed I used to use the Ubuntu launchpad but can't seem to find a link to it anymore? |
|
|
|
Thanks for the links, was the infaltion idea of charts B in the graphs in the above link chosen. Or has it yet to still be decided. |
|
|
|
|
I'm sure this info is somewhere but I couldn't easily find it. When is the first block reward reduction for Monero and how much will it reduce by. I'm guessing at the end of Q2 next year but I'm not sure how big the reduction will be. I know that ~84% of all XMR will be hashed within four years or probably within three and half years from now.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree in that if the targets in the roadmap had some clearly defined public deadlines then everyone would feel better. Even if those time frames for those deadlines were given a lot of extra leeway.
|
|
|
|
This Christmas I am definitely buying gifts from Lush for the women in my life after their €12k donation to FairCoop  |
|
|
|
|
My I2p only node has been up ten days now and has five peers.
|
|
|
|
How is it going
Fair coin needs to get listed on an exchange now mintpal has closed. Some people are trying for bittrex, but a coin now needs 0.2 bitcoin's worth of trades a day to stay listed on there. Bittrex has become even more aggressive at removing coins over the last few months. There's two exchanges currently listed in the threads OP - https://www.vaultex.io/market/21 - and - https://alcurex.org/index.php/crypto/FAIR_BTC |
|
|
|
|
The problem with adopting SHA256d as part of the auxPoW myriad is that potentially none of the bitcoin pools of any size add ANC merge-mining. Therefor making the ANC SHA256d relative hashrate tiny compared to the network total hashrate. So in effect making the chances of an attack taking place on that network more likely. Out of any of the pools with >1% of the total network hashrate only - GHash.io - merge-mines anything but NMC. While a lot of BTC pools don't currently merge-mine anything at all. You may be better using NeoScrypt and merge-mining with Feathercoin. As that is currently the largest GPU biased network not including X11/Darkcoin. Or possibly using Cryptonight to merge-mine with Monero although I strongly feel that most of that network hashrate is made up of botnets. Choosing only three networks to auxPoW with is a good idea IMHO. Then further down the line after the new networks miners adopt ANC merge-mining then looking at potentially increasing the number of auxPoW networks to five and then possibly even seven can be looked at in more detail. I'm not saying SHA256d should be completely ruled out just that ANC may struggle to attract a network size considered relatively secure.
|
|
|
|
|
The next block reward halving should take place around summer/autumn 2016. After Q2 next year some very large and institutional buyers should start to try and price that event in. So we may not see the next bubble and correction until after that event happening late 2016. After the first major bubble in 2011 to ~$30USD that peak bubble price wasn't matched for nearly two years.
I wouldn't recommend mostly investing in any altcoin. Some are good for short to medium term speculation though. I'd say no more of your cryptocurrency savings than 10% at the most in a basket of innovate altcoins. Also all of the innovate altcoins will eventually be merged into Bitcoin sidechains and treechains.
|
|
|
|
I agree, without official confirmation from the Vertcoin dev team members mentioned in the OP. Then I would be very careful before installing any closed source software released from a newbie account. You can see our team members in the website ( zerovert.org ). We don't care if you want to call us as scam coin because we don't, and we are looking ahead to improve current Zerovert in term of performance, and security. But good luck, you only live once. I'm personally not calling this a scam coin 'yet'. I'm just warning people to think very carefully before installing any closed source software released by an anonymous BTT account. The cryptocurrency scene was built up on opensource principles and foundations. The sooner you release a road map for it to become 100% opensource the better. I've been following Zerocoin development for quite some time now so am genuinely interested in this coin. Has Poramin officially confirmed that this is his project? If so do you have a link to the statement? |
|
|
|
Compare http://whois.domaintools.com/vertcoin.org
to http://whois.domaintools.com/zerovert.org
Why is Poramin open about his identity on Vertcoin's domain registration yet guards it under Zerovert? Why did the Poramin username just pop up on bitcointalk and created on October 26th? Why have we not heard anything in the official Vertcoin thread? If Poramin really is behind this would he confirm it on his linkedin or facebook? Or update his own Vertcoin thread? Sorry but it's all really fishy to me. I agree, without offical confirmation from the Vertcoin dev team members mentioned in the OP. Then I would be very careful before installing any closed source software released from a newbie account. |
|
|
|
Maybe we can have a Zerocoin bitcoin sidechain eventually. So you could go from Anoncoin to Zerocoin to Bitcoin and vice versa all in decentralised trustless way. How would altchains merge with sidechains on a protocol level?Altchain is a generic term that includes both altcoins and sidechains. If you mean “Can an altcoin chain be a sidechain too?” The answer is yes. You can read more about this in section “6.1 Hashpower attack resistance”, in the point “Subsidy”. If one wanted to turn an existing altchain into a sidechain or sidechain-compatible altchain, it would need to (just like Bitcoin) either use a softfork or federated pegging. Once that is in place, it would be up to the other sidechains whether they wish to accept that altchain’s assets being moved in or not in addition to (or instead of) bitcoins. If the current altchain is also desired to accept other assets (like bitcoins) being transferred in as a parallel asset to its native altcoin, it would be easiest done as a hardfork. https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/sidechains-bitcoin-2-0-revolution-highlights-reddit-ama/ |
|
|
|
I was as disappointed as anyone with the recent ZeroCoin delays and prior communication but still have failth in Gnosis and Meeh to deliver.
My biggest concern is time. Others will eventually implement ZeroCoin (or another zero knowledge solution) and I want ANC to be first. Today a C++ developer messaged me offering to help (subject to some time constraints for the next few months) and I passed along the message to Meeh and Gnosis.
If anyone else can help with coding (Gnosis says that is the area he needs the most help as the math end is his strong suit) please be vocal about it.
If there is a long term, trusted community member prepared to hold donation funds in escrow please say something as well.
I think I've already offered to hold the funds in newly created wallets. I can discuss in private the wallet management details. I've managed a large wallet for - www.redstarmining.com - for almost three years now safely. Amongst other large wallet held for other previous projects I've started that are now completed. |
|
|
|
Ireland's RTE Long Wave radio station on 252kHz is to close down this January. That's 18kHz of bandwidth that could cover all of the British Isles and reach all it's 68Million people from a single transmitter. Plus I'd imagine that Northern France and maybe the low countries could also receive the transmission. The blockchain plus a Digital Radio Mondiale coded audio station could be broadcast with the 18kHz of bandwidth using the Digital Radio Mondiale codec. Or more data like alternative blockchains could potentially be transmitted instead. LW transmissions have good penetration into large buildings. So an external antenna on the outside of the building would not be needed. Yes. Ideally blockchain data, plus other useful data, can be transmitted if bandwidth is available. For example, the next probable goal for transmission would be live bitcoin transaction data. This enables mining (assuming you have an uplink somewhere), by delivering a "full feed" of bitcoin protocol data. After blocks + TXs, there are plenty of other useful things one can imagine. With the full 18kHz of bandwidth at 252kHz LW it looks like you could potentially transmit up to ~25kbps (Mode D) to ~60kbps (Mode A) using the Digital Radio Mondiale codec. So almost 11MB could be transmitted per hour in Mode D. Or about 1.8GB per week in Mode D. Which is about 94GB per year in mode D. |
|
|
|
|
Newbie accounts trolling this thread again. As soon as one newbie troll account is completely shown for who they are. Another brand new newbie account comes on the attack. Am I spotting a pattern here? If so who's paying them or what's their real agenda? Is their ungiving commitment really a truly benevolent effort to save netizens from the malicious Anoncoin devs or is it possibly that their motives may be altruistic. It's always newbie throw away accounts in this pattern so I'll let the readers be the judge of that.
I'm unhappy for the recent delay but Gnosis has a new roadmap and seems committed to completing it so far. This isn't the first time a major delay to the roadmap has happened so not entirely unexpected by long time lurkers of this thread. Although implementing a trustless Zerocoin implementation is no easy feat. Or someone else would have already done it. With a trustless Zerocoin implementation seen as the true holy grail of transaction anonymity and all.
|
|
|
|
At this point it looks like the 'cryptsy problem' was actually the 'anc problem'. Now k1ll3r or however the little retard spells his name will keep coming up with excuses or lame fixes.
Anoncoin was a good coin. It has been sabotaged from within by its own devs.
There are lots of highly competent groups working on anonymous coins and yet anc devs cling to the broken zerocoin that will deliver nothing even if it works as intended. Of course there are a legion of shills repeating endlessly 'hurrah for anc, its trustless, read the wiki' etc etc
fucking bunch of conmen
‘Internet Trolls’ Are Actually Jerks in Real Life Too, According to Studystopthecensors has some undeniable arguments. Most of the recent investors like me lost a bunch of BTC. What's your point in being cynical? Where to draw the line? What is gambling and what is investing when it comes to altcoins? Most people who buy alt coins don't invest, they gamble. And those who loose more often then they win tend to be bad at it. But most people overestimate their own abilities and they also tend to be sore losers. I've bought all my ANC at around 50k satoshi so I'm still good to cash out now and stop supporting this project. I agree most of the people very upset here are not really investors they were gambling on speculation. Hurling insults and trolling never solved anything. Trolls usually do it for the attention only. So he bought in high and had to sell low and he's blaming everyone but himself for the error and misjudgment. No one in this thread sold any kind of investment or promise of price rises. If you've been following the thread long enough or really done your homework. You'd find this is not the first major delay Anoncoin has hit with the Zerocoin roadmap. So this delay should have really been factored in to anyone's gambling plan. What kind of disingenuous stupidity does it take to pretend you are 'investing' while others are 'speculating'? Coins are highly speculative. Semantic games just show how manipulative some scumbags are. Whether gambling, speculating or investing there is a bare minimum of ethical responsibility the house has toward clients. There has been overwhelming evidence for quite some time that anc devs and some others outside the dev circle have not even an ethics roadmap. They are following some devious agenda at the expense of the public. People like you mathew3 and fuckbuddy are the most disgusting. You call critics 'trolls' so you don't have to address their complaints. You and those like you are the scum who turned fiat to trash and now you are polluting crypto with your disease. Zerocoin is fatally flawed. It is not suitable for use as an anonymizer. I have only a basic college education and I figured that out some time ago. It is not possible that every single anc dev as well as most of the people on this forum are below the intelligence threshold needed to see that. There is deliberate deception in promoting zc, some agenda. Anc still is salvageable. It has a history and a following. Step one is to decide what the goal is. Is the goal to sabotage the 'anonymous' brand? It sure as fuck looks that way. I'm still up while you're obviously massively down and that seems to be difference. I'm all for critical reviews but slander is just trolling for attention. Hence probably my last reply to someone so desperate for attention. |
|
|
|
At this point it looks like the 'cryptsy problem' was actually the 'anc problem'. Now k1ll3r or however the little retard spells his name will keep coming up with excuses or lame fixes.
Anoncoin was a good coin. It has been sabotaged from within by its own devs.
There are lots of highly competent groups working on anonymous coins and yet anc devs cling to the broken zerocoin that will deliver nothing even if it works as intended. Of course there are a legion of shills repeating endlessly 'hurrah for anc, its trustless, read the wiki' etc etc
fucking bunch of conmen
‘Internet Trolls’ Are Actually Jerks in Real Life Too, According to Studystopthecensors has some undeniable arguments. Most of the recent investors like me lost a bunch of BTC. What's your point in being cynical? Where to draw the line? What is gambling and what is investing when it comes to altcoins? Most people who buy alt coins don't invest, they gamble. And those who loose more often then they win tend to be bad at it. But most people overestimate their own abilities and they also tend to be sore losers. I've bought all my ANC at around 50k satoshi so I'm still good to cash out now and stop supporting this project. I agree most of the people very upset here are not really investors they were gambling on speculation. Hurling insults and trolling never solved anything. Trolls usually do it for the attention only. So he bought in high and had to sell low and he's blaming everyone but himself for the error and misjudgment. No one in this thread sold any kind of investment or promise of price rises. If you've been following the thread long enough or really done your homework. You'd find this is not the first major delay Anoncoin has hit with the Zerocoin roadmap. So this delay should have really been factored in to anyone's gambling plan. |
|
|
|
At this point it looks like the 'cryptsy problem' was actually the 'anc problem'. Now k1ll3r or however the little retard spells his name will keep coming up with excuses or lame fixes.
Anoncoin was a good coin. It has been sabotaged from within by its own devs.
There are lots of highly competent groups working on anonymous coins and yet anc devs cling to the broken zerocoin that will deliver nothing even if it works as intended. Of course there are a legion of shills repeating endlessly 'hurrah for anc, its trustless, read the wiki' etc etc
fucking bunch of conmen
‘Internet Trolls’ Are Actually Jerks in Real Life Too, According to Study |
|
|
|
Thank you to the XC guys for working hard to make this technology possible and thank you for recognizing the best tech in the crypto industry and bringing them all together! Go APEX!
They're not selling a product the ITO is to fund the development of it of which the OP poster said they don't even have a time-scale for release yet. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
