canaan,
Yours 2,128.21THs hashrate is great! Stay with us!

 7,239.65THs total for now..

 d57heinz,

please check at prev page
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13281317#msg13281317

Exactly.

Actually it depends on country where this avocado grown. There are some 12v and 24v avocado's forks available.

I agree with Kano about p2pool concept, but the reason is not centralization only - but as I told before some online wallets do not accept generated transactions (I'd prefer Core but some guys want their BTC directly to exchanges), and another reason that some hardware like Antminer S5s often fails and hangs with direct connection to p2pool and their owners not so experienced to resolve this issue , but they still want too use p2pool for their reasons. In case p2pool software will be redesigned in some way and rewritten - it may resolve this.  We were talking about here a few pages before but there are no enthusiasts who can do it. 

Yeah!! We've got one more.

Everything still within 5Nd range https://kano.is/index.php?k=shifts

Use bitcoind 8333 port, but not RPC port 8332

Guys any updates about December firmware?  Maybe someone was seen Bitmain notes about this? What improvements?  I do not dream about Official Release Notes We know some info about Sep and Oct firmware but what about Dec?

Look's like not a big deal in case you are domain owner so you may add as many A-records as you need to DNS zone.
pool1.antpool.com = 1.1.1.1 (f2pool)
pool2.antpool.com = 2.2.2.2 (btcchina)
pool3.antpool.com = 3.3.3.3 (kano.is)

Even kind of vhosts implementation (if done) inside stratum protocol is not a solution as it is easy to bring up DNS server for this reason and spoof some zones and records.

Exactly. The main and the most important thing - this is open source solution.  I do not know ANY other quite large open-source pool. I mean from Top 10 statistics but not some small pool owners with MPOS or UNOMP for example.  We do not know what software used at Slush, F2Pool, Antpool, BTCC and we can estimate its decency based on Payouts only.

Edit: P2POOL is another open source solution for sure, and this is great concept. But unfortunately it has some design and performance flaws (IMHO) and it is not perfect only for this reason. Current hashrate is also not the best with lighting fast growing difficulty.

Sure I got this.
Another solution (or almost the same?) is also ckpool based, this may be not so elegant as yours but looks like it may work.

One guy asked me about how to configure ckpool in proxy mode for multiple users to deal with p2pool network.
As these users do not want to install and have Core wallet but they use online wallets which not accepts generated transactions.  So in this test enviroment ckpool works like a gateway and uses the single connection from ckproxy to p2pool network and single worker (payout address).  Is this the same what you doing?

In this case original Payout module and pplns_process() calculations of ckpool will be useless for this exact case (p2pool) and it need to be rewritten because ckpool will never know about solved p2pool Block and payouts will be never calculated based on received payout from p2pool network to specified address. But in case of single node owner with multiple miners (own devices) payout is not a problem. For different miners (persons) ckpool still can be  adopted for completely another payment module and another Block detection mechanism.  
PS: I do not ask you to do it for sure, just told it is possible if someone need this solution.

So.. This is local node w/ bitcoind, p2pool and ckpool on the same server, it is running well with no DOA shares for now and I am pretty sure only because this is LOCAL node but not remote.
I still do not have statistics for long period but for 12 hours now and just 2 workers but maybe it doesn't as soon as ckproxy running well . I have made conclusion for some time of using p2pool that it is necessary to have own local node with the shortest round trip delay, in this case DOA hashrate and DOA shares are minimal.   Another issue is GBT latency but this is not related to this particular task.

Guys, it is time to eat some chicken and drink some wine as yesterday   Time to have a block

This is not running now, just saved screenshot. 

ps: sorry for picture size, uploaded from tablet

Why every 6 hours? Just do not stop eat

Actually 53 minutes and 2 'live' shares are not enough for statistics.
For the best p2pool performance it is much better to run own local node near your miners, here is example:



This was private node with 100% fee for testing purposes.  Lower miners qty per one node works much better also.


The same node with remote miners with good connectivity and ping below 40ms give you also quite a lot of DOA hashrate about ~10% and more DOA shares also. But I never tried p2pool w/ ckproxy.. I think this kind of design issue..

Looks like next block is not expected to be soon... (
Black Hawk Down.. dirty games of SPV friends?

Edit: pool reachable again, 20min was unavailable

Welcome to the United States to meet your own server and all others

Hehe great idea, I do have valid US Visa for next 2 years to meet Legendary Kano

Kano, for sure I know how to check if I got paid Thank you  
But I just talking about kind of convenience.  No probs if still not implemented.
I've started mining of kano.is pool just a few days ago and I do not know if it worked before present moment.
To be honest I haven't read all 300 pages sorry for this