maybe you should not be rude. I asked a question politely. And didn't need a rude response. There is a lot of information to read here. And when i was a member before there was not the merit system. So please if your not going to be helpful in a courteous way keep your comments to yourself. Thank you
Look, it's not hard. The info you were looking for was literally the first thing at the top of the thread. Anyone reading this thread would literally get the answer in seconds. The fact that you had to ask that question instead of searching yourself just shows that you were lazy. My answer was simple and direct: read first, ask later if you have any doubts. I remember when a person could ask a question to this community without being berated and ridiculed for it. Times have changed. With the effort takes to talk shit to someone that is less informed than you, you could just be helpful instead and promote some positive vibes around here. The quality of this forum is deteriorating. Not just from the newbies either. I'm seeing more and more posts from high ranking members that are no better than the spammy newbie accounts. I, for one. still believe this should be a place that a person should feel comfortable asking legitimate questions without having to worry about whether or not their question is good enough for the "veterans". SMH.
|
|
|
After reading the article, I realized adding blockchain to VR probably involves text and numbers. The Cardboard VR resolution is pretty low. Would it not be too hard to read text and numbers in low resolution VR?
And how would users interact with text and numbers?
After reading the article, I realized adding blockchain to VR probably involves text and numbers. The Cardboard VR resolution is pretty low. Would it not be too hard to read text and numbers in low resolution VR?
And how would users interact with text and numbers?
I haven't really used vr yet but why that would be hard to read? You can still scale text with low resolution. Right? Well lets be honest the cardboard wont be the best experience, but it's possible and reading the text will be indeed low resolution compared to for example the Oculus and HTC. Simple cause the process power and lenses are less optimal, same with gaming you will have computers that run a game on low stats and others on Ultra. Our goal is the build the future platform for many VR users and the future glasses get cheaper and better Oculus go is a good example. In cardboard isn't there a risk may chase away people? It is giving very low quality and people who is trying that can think vr is not that good. I don't think is actually recommending Cardboard. Just saying if nothing else is available, then it would be accessible still. It would be smart to let Cardboard users know that they are viewing in a low quality resolution and will have a limited experience. This way people will be motivated to upgrade.
|
|
|
in effect, if the tokens are cheaper on the exchanges, why buy them during the ico? if no one buys it during the ico, how does the project go forward? to be developed without funds? i think anyway ehf is already at a good point with fundraising...
It is the problem of 2018 for icos. People don't want to buy because exchanges would be cheaper and projects can't gather Money because of that. To be fair, 2017 ICOs were really overrated and money coming their way was too generous. I think what projects manage to raise now is the realistic amount. Just look at regular kick starters, they dont get nearly as much money ICOs got last year. That's true. In 2017, you could literally start a thread with the words "We are doing an ICO because we want to build stuff. We're real good at building stuff" along with a wallet address and nothing else and still raise a few BTC within one week! It was crazy.
|
|
|
Do you have a Facebook page? I tried to search this on Facebook but found nothing. It's not essential forum in anyway but i would have just followed it.
I think they don't have it and I think they don't really put much effort on promoting this project digitally. They don't have a bounty campaign, they don't have an airdrop, and also they only have around 1300 followers on their twitter. As we all know theyre focusing on private sale and private deal which are the best ways at the moment. I prefer 1300 real followers or even 130 real followers to 120.000 followers come for the airdrop. Same thing is appliable for all other social media accounts. Hallelujah. That is a philosophy I wish everyone would live by. Airdrops are fine. But making people sign up for your social accounts to get one has always bugged me.
|
|
|
true. but not everyone that participates in ICOs knows how to enter in the contract address at a dex to find out if the tokens are being sold cheaper.
|
|
|
After reading the article, I realized adding blockchain to VR probably involves text and numbers. The Cardboard VR resolution is pretty low. Would it not be too hard to read text and numbers in low resolution VR?
And how would users interact with text and numbers?
After reading the article, I realized adding blockchain to VR probably involves text and numbers. The Cardboard VR resolution is pretty low. Would it not be too hard to read text and numbers in low resolution VR?
And how would users interact with text and numbers?
I haven't really used vr yet but why that would be hard to read? You can still scale text with low resolution. Right? Well lets be honest the cardboard wont be the best experience, but it's possible and reading the text will be indeed low resolution compared to for example the Oculus and HTC. Simple cause the process power and lenses are less optimal, same with gaming you will have computers that run a game on low stats and others on Ultra. Our goal is the build the future platform for many VR users and the future glasses get cheaper and better Oculus go is a good example. This is a good approach. It makes sense to allow everyone the opportunity to be a part of this. If a person can't afford a high end headset then that's fine, they would be happy with a lower resolution experience.
|
|
|
To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps. Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease) I've witnessed this too. I have met guys at these events that have spent 5-10 million just traveling and attending these things.
|
|
|
Seriously.... When was the last time any of you received this promotion? It's been several months for me. I am not just a bonus hunter either. I have deposited at both sites several times. If this is a waste of time, you need to tell people and close this thread. At the very least, stop calling it a "daily promotion" and start calling it a "when you feel like it promotion."
|
|
|
qvvaser109
12345678900987654321
|
|
|
qwaser109
Hey Lightlord.... I haven't received this promo for a few months. If it is dead, I would kindly suggest locking it down. It doesn't make sense to clog up the server with the constant posts here if there is no more promotion.
I'd understand. Most people would. When you started this, there was not that many people posting here every day.
|
|
|
I have a hard time taking giveaways or contests from newbie accounts seriously. Especially the ones that don't provide any reference to make us trust more. That doesn't mean I don't want a PS though. Can you give more detail?
|
|
|
Nice referral capture page. I especially like how you hid your referral links inside of your subdomains. That is one of my favorite referral protection methods. Is there really prizes for your free games or is that just the bait? I will sign up for 2/4 of your affiliate links because I never had accounts there. Nice work.
|
|
|
My BitDice username is: Qwaser109
|
|
|
I've seen somewhat similar promising projects in the VR domain but unfortunately I think they are having technical difficulties with development and maybe CosmosCR can be competitive and beat them to the finish line. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I would love to see them work and grow side by side rather than crushing one another. A healthy competition is good for everyone. Absolutely. Blockchain has ushered in a new era of business and along with it, a new mindset on the way companies in the same industry compete. There is more of a collaborative approach I've noticed. In this crazy new world we are no longer scrambling over each other to snatch up whatever we can of the limited value that is placed there by the 1%. Now that we figured out to create our own value it doesn't make sense to fight over it anymore. That's how I see it anyways.
|
|
|
|