Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 01:46:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ... 299 »
1001  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Words on the blockchain on: June 18, 2016, 01:25:03 PM
Here is how I did it when I was Bitcoin young and foolish:

http://blockchain.info/tx/bf40e4a1c2546747bc800a085e7145d921a9f402aaf4040c155ff5d0df9cc999

Which reads:

Code:
11When1DieBuryMeDeepLayTwoXVEY5jv 0.00000001 BTC
11SpeakersAtMyFeetAPairofXXTyrHor 0.00000001 BTC
11HeadphonesonMyHeadAndXXXXYUSvnd 0.00000001 BTC
11ALwaysPLayTheGratefuLDeadWdq4Xo 0.00000001 BTC
                                  0.00000004 BTC

Again, please don't do this because it bloats the blockchain with unprunable crap.
Can you show me how you did that, what did you paste in to the hash search on blockchain
I used a service, now defunct, called etchablock.com.  You can see all of their transactions here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1EtchrGAQGeVbqDRssTTLeYJxWSeYAyaiw
1002  Economy / Digital goods / Re: wtb Legendery account on: June 17, 2016, 12:34:01 PM
You do not deserve a legendary account at any price until you learn to spell legendary and fix the title of this thread.
1003  Economy / Economics / Re: Estimating the energy/power consumption of the Bitcoin Network on: June 17, 2016, 12:29:11 PM
Just been thinking about this thread some more and it is possible that policies to increase the cost of electricity would come into effect if bitcoin started to use too much of the world's energy resources. These could be targeted at miners specifically. That would have a dampening effect on the above numbers.
That might happen but it would have to be a purely politically motivated punitive decision, not an economic one.

I say this because normally the more energy you use the less you pay for electricity.  Today, industrial consumers of electricity pay less than residential consumers for the same amount of energy and huge industrial users often negotiate an even smaller price due to their massive consumption.

Now what power generation systems really hate is someone who uses huge amount of power on an intermittent basis - like an electric furnace to produce steel.  This is because their peak demands affect the amount of base power generation needed and cause them to have to produce a lot of power that never gets used.  Power generation can not be simply "switched on and off".  Coal and especially nuclear plants have to be left running even when there is low demand and they are overproducing power.  Natural gas generation has a relatively quick "warm up" cycle time so they can be switched on for higher demand seasons like summer air conditioning and turned off during lower demand.  (Note that this pushes a demand cycle back into the natural gas production and delivery system that has to be taken into account there.)

What power generation companies love is a consumer that uses a ton of energy at a very steady rate, someone who can say I need X MW 24/7/365 - like Bitcoin mining for example.  This increases base demand 24/7 so it is a very efficient consumer.  Therefore, economically speaking, very large Bitcoin mining operations should in theory be able to negotiate and receive the very best rates for their power - better than just about any other consumer.
1004  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: How can we trade more bitcoins? on: June 16, 2016, 11:17:46 AM
Everan426,

I am confused.  Did you join Richfund?  Are you now working there?  If you now work there why don't you have an email address there?

Richfund is the biggest bitcoin hedge fund company in China. The CEO is well-respected among Chinese bitcoin community. They have arbitrage services with the biggest exchanges such as Bifinex, Kraken, Huobi and others. The website is richfund.pe. They are trying to expand their otc trading and has done many successful trading. They are willing to do trade over localbitcoin for their escrow service and are willing to cover the 1% localbitcoin trading fee. Their mission, to the best of my understanding, is to help other professional and large bitcoin traders profit. Of course they will make profit too but it is lower than the traders they work with (because they will pay the 1% localbitcoin fee). Ultimately, they want to set up a network of professional traders.
Hi,

I bought a lot of bitcoin back in 2013 and would like to start trading large amount. I do like to waste my time on small amount but willing to do it to build trust for a long term trading relationship. Since I have already sold a good portion of my bitcoin holding, I'm also in the market to buy bitcoin through international wire transfer. I accept all the major fiat currencies.

If you are a trader looking to scale up his trading volume, I think we can trade on regular basis.

Cheers,

Hi, I'm sorry for the late reply. Our website is www.richfund.pe

If you are still interested in trading, I'm more than happy to discuss it further with you via Skype. My skype username is Kong Gao Richfund or by my email kong4726@qq.com
Richfund provides three services that we believe are helping to advance bitcoin adoption: 1) market-making for exchanges to help exchanges develop and get new users, 2) automated arbitrage to help reduce price volatility for merchant adoption, and 3) OTC trading by offering competitive rate (bitfinex +/-2%) to help otc traders scale up their trading volume.

You can visit our website at www.richfund.pe

Whatever happened to JEON?  Last post April 12, 2016, 08:40:42 AM:

welcome to Richfund
Is he now your boss?  If so you should ask him for an email account at the company. Wink
1005  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Reduction in empty blocks on: June 16, 2016, 12:27:13 AM
Empty blocks have reduced significantly since the start of the year. Anyone know a simple reason why?
Coz I annoyed F2Pool and they did something about their empty blocks.
Then a thank you is in order.  So, thanks.
1006  Other / Off-topic / Re: I just became a legend :) on: June 16, 2016, 12:22:47 AM
Yes, legendary status is handed out randomly after you meet the minimum threshold so Spoetnik could be legendary any day now.

Except of course for the fact that he is being ground down under the bootheals of "the man" Wink
1007  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: How can we trade more bitcoins? on: June 14, 2016, 06:32:30 AM
Read every post in this thread.  Do your own research.  Assume it is a scam until you can prove it otherwise.
1008  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 12, 2016, 03:46:01 PM
Burt, it may shock you to learn that teenagers getting popped for illegal possession typically spend more time in lockup than you did. Get nailed on Friday, and you've got yourself an all-expense weekend stay at Teh Man's house. A delightful fete, surrounded by fellow freedom fighters, chatting about daring khrymez over tasty baloney & cheese sammiches.
Yes, that is what I said.  I was appalled by the entire corporate run human warehousing system from top to bottom.  It was much larger and nefarious than I could have imagined without having experienced it - yes for just four day thank God.  We are in agreement here.  Point of fact, as you stated: they tried to round up all the indicted "Bitcoin criminals" from their "operation avalanche" on Friday so that they could force them to spend the entire weekend in lockup before they could be brought before a judge.  I just happened to be out of town on that Friday so they could not arrest me until Monday at my client's office after I got back.  This irritated them no end.

tale of woe and inhuman torment, suburban-dad-cum-money-launderer spends a day in lockup
Homeland Security investigated me and my family for 18 months.  At the end of all that investigative effort they still did not know that my wife is an attorney and exactly what my business of 30 years does.  Both of these things are very easy to determine.  After 18 months of investigation, 4 years of bank records, every text I ever received or sent (including all deleted texts) the best they could come up with for the indictment was 18-1960.  I was never charged with money laundering.  After 18 months of investigation, undercover operations, placing a tracker on my car, etc. the lead investigator and the AUSA assumed they could add a money laundering charge after they were able to confiscate the millions of dollars in Bitcoins they promised to find during the raid on my house and business.  They did not find the millions they promised or the evidence they promised because there wasn't any.  The fact there was no money laundering and no huge payoff for their coffers made them hopping mad the day of the raid.
1009  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 12, 2016, 01:56:50 PM
Very glad to here the charges were dropped, best of wishes to BurtW!
Same here! Were his assets returned to him after they were taken by homeland? It's horrible to see people of the forum disappear.
Except for the $40,000 in cash and $40,000 in Bitcoins everything else was returned.

There have been a few high profile members that have just disappeared never to return.  The case that worries me the most is DeathAndTaxes (16028 posts, 1218 activity, Donator status, Date Registered: September 04, 2011, Last Active: April 22, 2015)  This is a very suspicious disappearance of a great guy who I really respected.  I have tried a few times to contact him but to no avail.
1010  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 12, 2016, 01:34:45 PM
Not a federal case

I couldn't afford a real attorney

In case still unclear, poor != brave

So it was not a Federal felony case and you were too poor to afford an attorney.  Therefore you had no assets worth seizing.  You were not charged with a paperwork "crime" where civil asset forfeiture attached and did not have all your personal and corporate property seized in a separate civil asset forfeiture case.  You were not the target of a case centered on taking assets because you had none.  You were not charged as and treated as a terrorist under the patriot act.

Therefore my original comment was correct:  you have not faced anything like my situation.

The day I was arrested they did not have to and would not tell me why I was being arrested because I was arrested under a sealed arrest warrant under the anti-terrorism AML part of the patriot act.  They did tell me they were going to search my house and sent 22 cars full of agents to my house to execute an all day search.  When I asked them what they were searching for they told me they did not have to tell me what they were searching for because they had a sealed search warrant.  Since they did not find what they were looking for at my home they asked for and were granted a separate sealed search for my corporate offices over the phone that day.

After 24 hours in Denver county jail I was brought before the judge and was finally told what I was charged with and why I was arrested (18-1960 operating a MTB without a license).  So did you spend 24 hours in jail not knowing why you were there?  Did you spend 12 hours just in the intake room because the jailers could not figure out why you were there and could not admit you into the jail until they figured out why you were arrested?

This brings me to the point you raised about poor != brave.  I agree with you.  You have a very good point.  When I was brought in front of the judge after spending 24 hours in jail I was not the only one there for processing that day.  There were about 20 or so people in the box that had been arrested on federal charges (mostly drugs and some weapons charges).

The judge started with the first guy on the list and here is how the entire interaction went with everyone except me:

Quote
Judge:  You are charged with X, do you have representation?

Prisoner:  No.

Judge:  The prisoner is declared indigent, we will find you an attorney, go back to jail until we do.  Next.

Out of the 20 people arrested that day I was the only one with representation.  My interaction went something like this:

Quote
Judge:  You are charged with 18-1960, operating a money transmittal business without a license (I was finally told why I was arrested!) do you have representation?

Me:  Yes. (My wife had cached in our IRAs in order to raise the $50,000 retainer in the 24 hours since my arrest).

Judge:  (looks totally baffled, taken aback, like this has never happened before and he does not know what to do next) Uh, well, uh OK, move over to this table then.

I am taken out of the box with all the other prisoners and am moved to the table with my lawyer.  He shows me a piece of paper which shows the charges against me - first time I had seen it.

My attorney:  we would like to discuss bail, Mr. Wagner is ...

Judge cuts him off:  Ms. Korver (the prosecutor) What is the state's desire?

Korver:  The state requests the maximum time to allow us to find all his assets and make sure he does not hide any.  Six days.

Judge:  OK, prisoner will be held over until Monday and be scheduled to be brought back for a bond hearing.  Next.

You are correct.  Poor people are arrested in droves.  I felt sorry for them for a lot of reasons but at that time my get wrenching realization, having spent just one night in jail, was that all those people, and many more before them and many more after them, were going to have to go back to jail until they found an attorney for them and as we all know that could take days.   Days in jail just waiting to get an attorney assigned and get the process started.  

I felt very blessed to have savings, a wife that was able to back me up while I was in jail, a bank that was able to get the IRA cashed out in that short of a time period and on and on.  If fact this entire experience has taught me just how blessed I am and had made me more grateful than ever for my friends and family.

I'm pretty shocked to see some of the comments in this thread.  BurtW has nothing to prove here, and those of you attacking him should be ashamed of yourselves for attacking a victim.

Greg,  

This guy does not bother me at all, just an amateur troll probably increasing his post count so he can sell the account.  He is a great foil for the discussion and is very supportive in avidly bumping my thread for me so all is good.

I really appreciate your support.  You are one of the people here that I respect the most so your post really meant a lot to me.

Thanks.  
1011  Other / Off-topic / Re: I just became a legend :) on: June 12, 2016, 01:54:26 AM
Welcome to the club.
1012  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 11:43:06 PM
So, someone must risk going to jail and total financial ruin in front of a jury in order to impress you?  Have you personally had to face five years in prison on a coin flip?  Even if you have and even if you did take it to trail so what?  My wife and I did struggle with the whole thing over many months.  We went back and forth on it.  Sometimes thinking we should get our day in court to prove beyond doubt that they were wrong and risk five the years in prison.  You can sit there behind you keyboard in your easy chair anonymously spouting your shit but your opinion simply does not matter.

Let's hear your story of bravery and bravado "proved my innocence at all cost" against a similar situation.

Can't regale you with tales of my daring-do, always having thanked my lucky stars for plea deals. At the time, a public defender was all I could afford.
On the other hand, I never trotted out my family to help me beg on the internet to cover my legal expenses, and never plead out when I was 100% innocent.
Should I bother mentioning that I never told sob stories about the US legal system failing me, after opting out of a jury trial & having agreed to a deal?
So you have never face a situation even remotely similar to mine.  Fair enough.

What part of "I have, but handled it differently" didn't come across?
I see.  I misunderstood you.  So, you used a public defender in a complex Federal felony case?  I assumed the charges were for DUI or something like that - my bad.  At any rate anyone who would use a public defender in a Federal felony case is much braver than I am.  I don't have the stones to trust my life to someone who basically works for the prosecution and can't be truly adversarial on my behalf without risking all future deals with the prosecution.

My hat's off to you o brave one.  You showed me.

You are also, obviously, more principled than me due to your hard stance on never pleading or dealing when you were totally innocent.  I love your "I am innocent and willing to pay whatever it takes to prove it" stance.  Good for you.  

I tip my hat to you o principled one.  You showed me.

1013  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Why is all mining not powered by solar? on: June 11, 2016, 09:45:54 PM
There's a strong argument to be made that the vast majority of industrial mining operations use hydropower.

HaoBTC (25MW) in Western China uses cheap hydro from a nearby private dam.
MegaBigPower (32MW), Hashplex (1MW), ASICSPACE (1MW), and numerous other datacenters in Washington State use cheap hydro.
Great North Data (1-10MW) in Labrador uses cheap hydro from a large dam project.
KnC's mines in Boden, Sweden (50MW in all) use cheap hydro.
The only major exception IIRC is the megamine that Bitmain operates in China (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region), which I'm fairly sure sucks its electricity from a coal-powered grid.

Solar is too expensive at the moment for bitcoin mining.
Interesting.  So Bitcoin is "green" after all the hand wringing.
1014  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 09:43:01 PM
So, someone must risk going to jail and total financial ruin in front of a jury in order to impress you?  Have you personally had to face five years in prison on a coin flip?  Even if you have and even if you did take it to trail so what?  My wife and I did struggle with the whole thing over many months.  We went back and forth on it.  Sometimes thinking we should get our day in court to prove beyond doubt that they were wrong and risk five the years in prison.  You can sit there behind you keyboard in your easy chair anonymously spouting your shit but your opinion simply does not matter.

Let's hear your story of bravery and bravado "proved my innocence at all cost" against a similar situation.

Can't regale you with tales of my daring-do, always having thanked my lucky stars for plea deals. At the time, a public defender was all I could afford.
On the other hand, I never trotted out my family to help me beg on the internet to cover my legal expenses, and never plead out when I was 100% innocent.
Should I bother mentioning that I never told sob stories about the US legal system failing me, after opting out of a jury trial & having agreed to a deal?
So you have never faced a situation even remotely similar to mine.  Fair enough.
1015  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 08:58:27 PM
I have read your post above. You chose to plead out, and then grumble about it.
I would buy your ideological protestations if you, certain of being in the right, took your case to the jury. You didn't. So I do not.
First, I did not plead out.  Yes, they pretty much immediately offered a lesser felony if I admitted guilt.  I did not.  Eventually they offered a small misdemeanor if only I would admit guilt.  I refuse their offer.  After many months and almost $200,000 in legal fees they decided to drop the case against me and against all the seized property if I agreed to let them keep part of the seized property (basically to save face on their part).  This was not a plea deal.  In a plea deal you must admit guilt.  I did not.  This was a straight payoff to avoid the huge costs of fighting something like this.  You may be sitting on $400,000 in liquid assets you would be willing to spend on justice by a committee of people who are not smart enough to get out of jury duty, don't want to be there, take what the judge says as gospel, and wouldn't know a Bitcoin from a hole in the ground - that may be your situation - it is not mine.  In the end we decided for our family's sake the cost and risk was not worth it.

Maybe you don't realize this but even if I won all the cases they do not pay your legal fees and there is no recourse to get your legal fees reimbursed.  And to add insult to injury even if you win, legal costs are generally not tax deductible.  Add that to your calculations there Mr. "you should take it to trial if you are innocent".

So, someone must risk going to jail and total financial ruin in front of a jury in order to impress you?  Have you personally had to face five years in prison on a coin flip?  Even if you have and even if you did take it to trail so what?  My wife and I did struggle with the whole thing over many months.  We went back and forth on it.  Sometimes thinking we should get our day in court to prove beyond doubt that they were wrong and risk the five years in prison.  You can sit there behind you keyboard in your easy chair anonymously spouting your shit but your opinion simply does not matter.

Let's hear your story of bravery and bravado Mr. "proved my innocence at all cost" against a similar situation.
1016  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 07:41:27 PM
I don't want you to say anything. Consider that saying nothing is an improvement on what you did say.
Why are you upset? If I, somehow, cheapened your feelings for Burt by telling you that they're normal and common, I'm really sorry.
Accept my apology plz? Are we good?

@BurtW, I honestly didn't know that cooking meth was against the law. I thought they'd, at least, send me a "cease & desist," but no! Jackboots pulled up in a party van, some bullshit about ignorance of the law not being an excuse Roll Eyes
Cooking meth is against the law.  Ignorance of the law is not an excuse.  If you cook meth you should be arrested and put in jail because you have broken the law.  End of story.  My case was not a matter of law - it was a matter of opinion on whether it was a business or not.  There is no opinion whether cooking meth is against the law or not - it is.

Read my post above.
1017  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 07:29:28 PM
Wow that thread took a turn.  Legal?  Illegal?  Not even close.

I was trading Bitcoins.  I was operating under the assumption that what I was doing was not a business.  They claimed it was.  The regulations are very "clear" on this point:  if it is not a business I did not need a business license, if it was a business I needed a business license.

Now who decides if it is a business or not?  Regulations clearly state "whether is is a business or not is a matter of fact and circumstance".  OK, fine.  Then who is the decider of "fact and circumstance"?  In the US system the decider of "fact and circumstance" is the jury.

I claimed it was not a business, they claimed it was.  It is not illegal to claim it is not a business and technically they did nothing wrong in claiming it was a business.  Both my attorney and the prosecutor stated that "this is a toss up".  They both knew and stated that it could go either way.  My claim might have been declared correct by the jury and I would have been acquitted of all criminal charges against me.  Of course their claim might have been declared correct and then I could have been sentenced to up to 5 years in prison and up to a $250,000 fine.

Now realize that even if my claim is declared correct by the jury this does not settle all the civil suits that have been filed against the property seized.  So even if the jury decided with my side (a 50/50 proposition according to both sides) I would still be facing up to an additional $100,000 in attorny's fees to prove my property was innocent in a totally separate civil court.

Faced with the option of taking this to trail and flipping a coin followed by additional expenses to clear my property on the one hand and just donating $40,000 in cash and $40,000 in Bitcoin to the federal asset forfeiture slush fund what would you do?

This had nothing to do with legal versus illegal.  Only an opinion of whether what I was doing was a business or not.

What should they have and would they have done if they did not think they could just walk away with the loot?

Send me a cease and desist letter explaining that they thought what I was doing might be a business and to get a fucking free license if I wanted to continue doing it.
1018  Economy / Speculation / Re: 1 Bitcoin = $1,000,000 on: June 11, 2016, 07:04:04 PM
Each person own 1 Bitcoin and hold on to it for 20+ years.

Bitcoin is the best investment of all time. Owning Bitcoin is better than owning a house.
We know that that is not going to happen at all, so do not get your hopes up for something like this to happen because it will not. To many people would become rich if that happens.

Its is not possible for bitcoin price to be $1,000,000. It cannot happen in next 100 + years also. I must say that no one can think of such a bitcoin price in dream also.
It is inevitable that one Bitcoin will be worth $1,000,000 some day because by design $1,000,000 some day in the future will eventually have the purchasing power of $500 today.  Bitcoin has the opposite design and one Bitcoin should increase in purchasing power over time.  Eventually the rising purchasing power of Bitcoin will intersect with the falling purchasing power of the dollar and one BTC will be worth $1,000,000.

When this will happen is the real question.
1019  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested (update: charges dropped!) on: June 11, 2016, 03:05:35 PM
I knew I had found one of the Royal Knights at one point.  Found him again, Royal Knight #13:

Quote
Inducted as Royal Knight #13 of the Black Asphalt (2009)

It is a major accomplishment, not easy to do, and I am sure he is very proud of it.

http://www.bernalillocountysheriff.com/cmdstaff.html
1020  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BurtW arrested on: June 11, 2016, 03:00:24 PM
That piece on Desert Snow is pretty interesting, just finished reading it... It's odd that a system like Black Asphalt runs freely online.
Not only that but they give out awards to their students and LEO will use these awards on their resumes.

https://www.desertsnow.com/pages/view/6

Now most of the stuff they have to do and seize to get the award could be argued as "a good thing" but this requirement:

Quote
*QUALIFIED INCIDENTS / SEIZURES:
US Currency – Successful forfeiture of more than $5,000

is a little bit shady.

As for the phone, let's imagine that the phone is seized and you manage to get the funds there moved after the phone being seized, is it valid in the eyes of the law comparing the transaction timestamp on the blockchain to the time when the seize occurred?

As for giving them the password or the moved funds... Shouldn't it be "and" instead of "or"? Because you can give them the password after the funds have already been swept.
Yes, they will look at the time of the move relative to the seizure.

They (Homeland Security) are not as bright as they are made out to be on TV but not quite as stupid as you might want them to be.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ... 299 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!