I would guess that even with a casino, even with defi, even with a stablecoin, whatever tron does there aren't enough people who trust them to put their money in there. The only thing that made people use tron at least a bit, was the fact that it was the cheapest network to move USDT around, and many people used that, but nowadays there are other stablecoins people use on other networks and that is the way it goes for the time being.

I feel like on-chain is gone, satoshidice was the only one that worked, erikvoorhees made all the money he could and since primedice-justdice period there hasn't been any successful one that stands today, and won't be one.

He "was" the one that helped them, I mean just because he did, doesn't mean he should get a contract forever, that makes no sense at all. It would be a lot smarter if they could get rid of him right now and get someone who can continue to provide something.

Just the other day AD was on some show or something and he was talking about how he didn't picked up a ball since April, that is all you need to know about him and why he is a bad player, plus he gets injured all the time, even if you keep him and he plays well, there is a chance he could get injured. It is much better to get rid of him now, and get a player that will get you the ring this year, instead of the one that got it 2-3 years ago.

USDC got a bit more attention because of two main reasons. One of them is the fact that Luna dropped so there are a lot of people who are not trusting stablecoins all that much, and fear what if the same thing happens to other ones as well, not the same method of course because USDT, USDC, BUSD are not algo stablecoins, but still a risk.

Second reason is that USA is a big nation with a ton of money, and USDC is made by the biggest (and even listed on Nasdaq) crypto company in the world, that creates a trust and since UST caused people to lose trust, finding the place that you can trust created a good reason for people to pick that one over the others.

The weird thing is that they got rid of Mane very quickly. I do not know why they did that, but instead of getting Nunez they could have made a lot more money if they kept Mane instead, would be cheaper to just sign him, and would be saving themselves another transfer.

In any case, what is done is done, and they rarely ever player with a striker, they have players who are playing in "forward" positions, like on offense, but they do not have pure strikers like mbappe, ronaldo, haaland those type of players are lacking. With nunez they "may" have found something like that and I am guessing that it is going to be fine for them, wouldn't be a bad idea at all.

This is one of the most "original" comments that I have ever seen here and I would lvoe to give it a reward like oscars if I could, PAPER CUT ON BUTT CHEEK is a great band name as well lol, thinking more punk because of the gothic and depressive under tone All jokes aside, I agree that paper money or banknotes as they are called, will not be available for too long.

It is not used that much even today and the more elder people start to pass away, the more younger generation will become older generation and thats when we will start to not use crypto at all. I am guessing that the best thing we can do right now would be to let time handle all of this, we do not need to do anything.

I highly suggest not to do this because it requires you to be online plenty of times to make a profit out of this. If you are online and do this once a day, then you are going to end up with a problem and it will not be profitable, if you do it 18 times in a single day then it will definitely be amazing for you.

Can you be online for up to 18 hrs in a single day? I doubt that would work. In that case we have reward points bonus as well, which you can get, and then do that, and then do the satoshi one and then reward etc etc in a cycle and make more, but I feel like that is way too much work for a little gain, just collect the reward points and turn them into BTC once you reach 100k.

This is the path I have taken as well, and even though it is 20k right now, I still have absolutely no reason to sell right now and would never sell. This doesn't mean that I am not upset about the price drop, of course I am upset about the price drop, why wouldn't I be? I have all my investments in just bitcoin these days, sold everything else and holding bitcoin only, so when that falls it does make me feel shitty about it for sure.

But, just because I am upset that it went down, doesn't change the data and the idea that bitcoin wins in the long run, me being upset has absolutely no relevance to profit making at all. This is why I do not sell just because I feel something, emotions have no place in trading.

I think their defense is not a "weakness" but more like a system thing. I have said many times that Bayern is too used to dominate in the league which is a problem for them in the UCL competition. It means that they are used to playing with a system that likes to dominate the other team, and when they face a team that is hard, they just end up not knowing what to do.

What do you expect from a team of defenders that end up not even defending anyone because they are dominating so hard that opponents rarely come to attack, and then suddenly face teams that will constantly attack. That defense will not be ready for such a thing after active training type of games in the league.

There are a lot of people who like to gamble during the season, european one, where it's from late august to early June or even may basically, and that is a lot better for them because it's all the big clubs and teams play. And that is a very good thing because you see PSG, city, Liverpool, bayern, juventus, milan, chelsea, real, Barcelona etc etc etc all these huge names all play during the same weeks.

This means you can make 10 different bets, all on the same day, all for teams that have 300-400 or more million dollar worth clubs. You can't have that during summer, sure you can still gamble and find some games, but they won't be as big as the European ones.

Whatever people say, I still think that Wiggins is a better third wheel than Draymond. I never really liked Draymond and I feel like he was there just because of his passing ability and his defense, which is definitely something they needed and fit the needs of the team so perfectly that they let him be.

But, he is a dirty player as we all know, he always uses his brain to find the weakest spot and tries to get away with many things. Dude could be the main reason why they lost 2016 title as well, he kicked everyone in the league, got punished and missed a finals game. So, I have to say that Curry-Klay-Wiggins sounds a lot better to me.

It still works against weaker opponents for sure, but when there is a team that is close to their level, or better than them, then it becomes a bit of a problem since it would take Bayern to not make a single mistake and be super rapid against the other team as well.

I mean think about it this way, if there is a team they face which has even close levels of talent, and know how to do counter attacking, they could absurd any of Bayerns attacks and then they could use that to their advantage and get chances to score. This is what happened to them this year, and that is why they are not winning every year as well, it takes a bit of matchup chance for them to win it.

I still understand people who didn't expected Warriors to win the title, that makes sense if they missed out completely. The main reason was the fact that people didn't really expected much from Wiggins, nobody knew Poole will be this good, neither would Looney would be, people assumed the main trio got old, and Klay was coming off from an injury half way through the season. All of these combined makes it harder for Warriors to win it this year, one of the titles that they deserved the most.

I remember people hated Warriors when they won with Durant on the team and I get it, they were the best team and ADDED Durant to that roster after a 73 win season, but this one is much different ,they really worked very hard t oget it and they deserve every ounce of joy.

It's obvious that the "talent" he has can't go away, even when players are 50+ years old, they know how to play and their brain still tells them what should be done. It is the fact that their bodies start to get brittle and injured easily that gets them to retire eventually, do not know when but they usually do it around 40 years old.

However, Ronaldo took care of his body like a temple just like Lebron James did in NBA, which means that Ronaldo may still be one of the best, because he has both the talent and the body for keep going. I am guessing that he may not be as good as he was when he was 30, but he is still one of the best strikers there are out there.

This is what I believe; you can make games, but make games that people will want to spend money on. The most common example is that people played Fortnite right? They spent billions on it as well but they didn't really cared about making a return, so why would they think about the same thing in the future when there is an NFT situation going on?

I have to say that there is a chance that we could have an NFT game situation going on, which would make it possible for some NFT project to create games and then people would love the game so much that they wouldn't care about the profit part at all. This has been said many times, but when that happens, it is going to change the NFT world for sure.

I assume that the point is not to make them stop completely, because you can't do that, even if you do that with one casino, they could go to another casino and that is why it is not just about making it completely impossible for them to gamble. It is just making it a bit harder for them to gamble the way they do.

Like for example if you are addicted, many psychologists suggest changing your routine, saying things like "go for a walk" is not good because you are walking, it is good because you are doing something that you normally do not do, the walking part is just an example there, plus it is healthy so you know, win-win. Same here, if you gamble at one place the same way for years, and then can't, even if you switch up somewhere else, it would make it harder for you, hence maybe give you a small tiny chance of quitting all together.

The aggressive interest rate hikes are because of inflation. We have been in an inflation for a while now, due to pandemic free money printing period. Not that this is a better option, but at least it is more controllable situation. With the interests so high, people would take their money out of the markets, and into the interests, which will leave a lot less money available for the world to use. In this regard, everything will stagger, the growth will stop and inflation will go down.

Of course, it will bring poverty with it as well, people who are wealthy got the money and put it on interest, people who are poor, will be living in fear of not knowing when the next money will come, but it will get better hopefully.

Every team has periods where they spend like 7 million on an untested player from some youth system in another nation and turn out to be a great marvelous player, or a player that has been a superstar so far and buy him and turns out to be bad.

Look at Hazard for Madrid, even Madrid that usually finds players who are actually amazing and rarely makes any mistakes, even with Bale got so much out of him before he turned to be bad, but Hazard was just straight up bad player for them. So, I have to say that Arsenal could make amazing transfers, or terrible ones, only time will tell and we will not know even if we see the names and the prices.

Which makes sense, I mean if they can't get him, why offer more than what he should be worth? Get someone else instead. We are not short on good midfielders, you can spend like 100 million and build a whole midfield for yourself at that level, there are players going for 20-30-40 million euro at these days and it could be done for sure.

This means now they have a clean slate, they can't get De Jong, so they can try to argue against any team that they do not want their players THAT badly, and could move on, so each time they offer a team some money, they will have the advantage of moving on and finding another target and keep doing that until they find a proper player.

I do agree that they do not need any attacking players at all, they have enough and with that in mind Rasford will probably get some minutes. Teams playing in Premier league end up playing too many games, both in league, then cup games, then champions league (in united case not so much) and so forth which ends up being 50+ games a year.

So, one player could literally play 30 games and then another for the same position could play 20 games all season, hence why most teams that are rich, end up getting 2 players for the same position. All in all, I am guessing that the best thing to do for United would be focusing on defense and midfield for now.

I do agree that he is a fantastic young star and he will be a great contribution, but even while agreeing to all of that, 75 million seems like a big number isn't it? I mean it could even reach as high as 100 million if they won everything for example, and that is just way too much money. Don't get me wrong, they are building the next super star level team with diaz and nunez and all that when salah and mane end up being gone, which doesn't look like impossible at this point.

I would guess that if they keep this up and keep getting young stars like this and keep Klopp at the head, then they are going to keep being awesome like this for another decade. But only if every transfer they make, turn out to be a good one and not a bust.