Should be fine as long as we are not talking about cracked/stolen licenses. Hopefully this answers your question.

This is to be decided on a case-by-case basis. AFAIK in most cases, selling codes of such type only breaks the T&Cs of the service and is not illegal. The forum only disallows the sale of illegal items and does not enforce the T&Cs of other services. Note: Do not sell codes to any kind of potentially malicious software.

---

What Antivirus software are we talking about? It should be legal.

The username sounded familiar at first, but I didn't look into their posting history until just now. Even if Fatanut were an alt, I still would not paint them red. If you take a closer look, they are often constructive and very helpful (e.g. signature overview thread). I would potentially paint them red if there was proof that they were behind an army of accounts (e.g. linked to or behind all of these). Viyamore admitted ownership of ajrah, but not the others via PM.

---

Generally, I'm not against having an alt account or two. However, if a person has e.g. two accounts and is using both to generate signature earnings by posting half-baked nonsense then I find this very shady. Anyone that breaks the 'no alt' rule in some campaign should definitely be tagged red and blacklisted from all campaigns permanently IMO.

No, not exactly. They were supposed to put a stop to the redundant questions that keep being asked and abused by signature spammers even though the answers already exist. Regarding this thread, I was planning on doing a *update* to it and posting it myself as self-moderated (not necessarily stickied). However, if you are able to find the time to update this one, then there's likely no need (even though I'd still suggest a *restart* with self-moderated thread).

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Duplicate of https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671594 .

Okay this is going to be surely interesting, whoever is behind this account. I already expect a lot of *spam* from both ex-participants, and participants from other campaigns due to lack of moderation. Time to get some snacks.

---

Update: For the record, I have not moved this thread. It was reported, and I let another moderator handle it (I do not know who it was).

You aren't using Bitcoin properly, i.e. your fee is too low. The highest time that an experienced user can reach is ~1 hour (due to the block generation function).

That's likely not going to change. Besides, the store could accept zero-confirmation transactions for smaller amounts of $. They will probably have a video recording of you doing the purchase anyways, so attempting to double spend would be unwise (hence the risk is *almost* mitigated indirectly).

This topic has been moved to Archival.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1470894.0

This topic has been moved to Archival.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1466072.0

Which is shady behavior in its own regard.

As a *wise* escrow scammer used to say, you should not expect private messages to remain private unless they're encrypted via PGP.

Attacking someone will make this only worse for you.

---

Tagged all besides Fatanut & watching in case of new (pro or contra) evidence. Check your post, some weird formatting puts Fatanut's link to the very right (I almost missed it the first time).

Actually, I've suggested that particular design to digicoinuser the day that someone linked it in the coin-collectors chatroom [1]. It looks amazing, and it would likely be even better in the original color (IMO). This capsule is probably a Bitcoin variant IIRC, but you could probably add any kind of QR code if you've wanted to. I guess with more interest, the average price could be lower @digicoinuser?

---

[1] Design: http://www.ebay.com/itm/121963004242

Have you tried talking to them directly? Quite some time has passed since you received some of these ratings. If there was ever any chance of getting some of them removed, I'd start with handling "Trust abuse" as two negative ratings on your are regarding this.

I guess Kluge left you a negative rating due to the negative rating that you left on their profile (1 more after). This is my best guess judging by the dates of trust ratings. So you did do something.

Absurd assumptions such as this one would likely get you more trouble if anything.

This post is useless and is not relevant at all to anything that has been said here. Just let the franky1 from the other shift do the talking, you're only ruining your own image.

---

Once again, there is nothing wrong with a pruned node and it has been clearly stated that it is different from a full node.

That's related to bandwidth then, not storage. I don't see how this is a problem though, as you're usually presented with two choices:
1) Run a full client and do full validation.
2) Run a SPV wallet without full validation.

The total blockchain size will keep getting higher which will keep making 1 harder.

Nobody claimed that they were, ergo strawman.

There's nothing wrong with a pruned node.

0.25 BTC

False. Transaction time is almost instant, and confirmation time is 10 minutes on average.

The question was not whether Segwit will active or not, was it?

If the owner wants to act like a fool, let them be.

Congratulations of opening up your own service/sale of various custom good. I'll be keeping a close eye on this, hence the post. Good luck with your endeavor.

I've handled this already, i.e. removed him from the blacklist.

Ajrah is currently banned, and hatuferu got banned in the last round of bans. I have put all of these in the permanent blacklist with your reference. Thank you.

You could have at least read the OP before applying:

---

Update: Fair point I guess.

So, if I for any reason wanted to sell my account with 1 month subscription remaining for less than $5 that would be considered cracked? Note: This is just a hypothetical scenario to show why picking a limit is harder than it seems.

Yes, this is likely a 99% positive indicator that the accounts have been cracked. I would not mind doing something about this, but ultimately it is up to theymos.