I think capitalism is obviously the only way to prosper because capitalism thinking actually matches with the inner instinct of every human. Capitalism was once considered a problem and the reason for that was everyone wasn't given an equal opportunity to mint their way in capitalism, if you are born as a slave you'll be a slave and a son of rich capitalist will always be richer, but sooner with every person trying to make their own fortune these definitions have changed, infact capitalists now themselves make sure to do enough charity in society, it's just about giving equal opportunities, we need government or socialist intervention to give everyone equal opportunities and over that it's your merit, you can't just distribute everything equally.

What a last over that was, Obviously that was a NO BALL, and it's okay as an umpire to miss that, but keeping that ego of not referring to the third umpire for this is absolute stupidity on the part of Umpire, we saw in the day before yesterday's game as well that the Umpires did go upstairs when they were unable to determine about the height, and when you have the technology you should definitely use it. Even though Rishab Pant was wrong, but that's a very normal reaction from anyone. I remember Dhoni stepped on the field in one such situation a few years back, if someone so calm & Experienced like him can do this, you can't expect Rishab Pant to stay cool.

Haha, All these are Blogs that rely on SEO & fan Following for their bread and butter, why would they ever dare to fight with MSD Fanbase by keeping him on number 2? Also, It's not that any of these blogs have mentioned any statistics or anything, Anyways it's just about opinions, I have personally seen ABD & Russell overturning more matches any day than Dhoni in totality at least if you talk about modern cricket which I count post-2010.

I think bitcoin obviously might not grow as exponentially now as it has grown from 2010 or maybe 2013, but is it going to go sideways forever? No, I don't think that too. I think it's just a phase of the whole cycle, and this thing always happens, bitcoin moves sideways then even touches the lowest points but then recollects itself and touches even greater heights, you might not see such big gains from bitcoin now like 50x-60x, but getting doubled tripled or even5x from here in next 3-4 years isn't a very tedious task for bitcoin to be honest, all it requires is huge whale accumulation and then huge adoption as well.

What I have seen from my experience is trading bots will always eventually run you into losses, especially the ones which are readymade available in the market, you will see them going well for a long time, and then suddenly you will see all your earnings getting wiped out in just one or two trades, this could be due to some bug in the code because these trading companies don't really put so much effort in getting the code audited from end to end. I have seen big companies making tons of money from cryptobots but they make money because they generally have their own trading bots which they get tailor-made from in-house coders only.

Trust me it's a good venture only for that 1% of people who have the right mindset, right knowledge and obviously a bit of luck as well, if your friend is making profits and even if he tells you all his strategy there are still high chances you'll not start making money in markets through trading. It is Mathematics if you do it mechanically but the problem is emotions which humans have which makes it difficult to trade in volatile situations, you will tend to  over do/ overthink whenever you are in the trade, you will have your biases and rigidness, learning trading is a very long and hectic activity, give yourself atleast an year only learning trading to become succesful in trading.

I don't know how true this news is but obviously this is going to come one day, governments want some excuse or the other to close Cryptos, they know to maintain financial autonomy with them they need to keep a check on completely decentralised Cryptos and there is nothing more decentralised as bitcoin if they would ban it eventually the rest of the market is won't be able to flourish back for a long time too. Otherwise we all know the net carbon footprint of bitcoins isn't much different than that of the fiat and banking system.

All of this looks so justified to be honest, if you will not create a healthy environment for the businesses of a certain community they will obviously find other countries to prosper their businesses, they are two big brains of India but now will use their brains for some other countries, I am sure WazirX isn't going to go anywhere it has huge market potential in India and after a certain time it will have the power and client base to face off with the government as well on regulation relating to crypto.

I half heartedly put my money on Mumbai in this match because I thought it's really impossible to lose 7 matches consecutively for any team be it the worst team of the tournament but here I am now repenting on my choice , if Dhoni wouldn't have hit that 4 i would have got 2 points cause I chose narrow win for Mumbai.
I don't want to break hearts of Dhoni Fans but he is way way past his prime and not at all a finisher of "Modern Cricket" I'd rather call someone like Russel or Devillers best finishers of Modern cricket, 2-3 matches that CSK lost in this season were primarily because of slow batting towards finishing the chase, Dhoni did play really well in this match, and obviously a winning knock after so long his fans have all the rights to go crazy.

I don't think you should calculate in this manner, rather than this way just simply take the trade with a stop loss and take profit, your stop loss should be defined by the maximum amount of money you are willing to lose on the trade, based on this amount you should start and end the trade  if it does not goes into profit, adding up to profitable trades is a good idea but this is successful only in case of a few patterns like in cases of breakout you might not get a chance to enter on a second point because move could be so quick.

ROI for startups? Lol. If you would see most of the scaled startups around 80% of them are unprofitable even at the EBITDA level which is Earnings before Interest Depreciation & Amortization. This means they are running on zero ROI in fact most of them are just burning cash. Startups these days are more about increasing your revenues even if that comes at a huge acquisition cost, also some startups don't even work for revenue, they are running and scaling due to their increasing consumer base, so I don't think you should worry a lot about ROI in the initial stages of a startup, Focus on improving customer acquisition, retention & satisfaction and just try to avoid cash-burning, try liquidating your equity a bit by finding investors because that would be the only quick way to scale up your business.

Even though Miller was the main reason why GT clinched this match, but you have to say it was Rashid Khan in Jordan's over which actually changed the course of the match completely, I doubt that even if Miller would have been in place of Khan would he have been able to make 25 runs in that over? Rashid Khan was unbelievable and that also with the burden of captaincy on his shoulder, GT is looking like a marvelous team with each and every player in form, even without Pandya in the middle order they chased such a big target. I think Rashid Khan can try doing Sunil Narine stuff now if he can bat so well occasionally, can add some quick runs to the total initially and save your better batsmen to finish things off while chasing a total.

I've always imagined that one day such a thing would definitely be possible, We currently use the indirect method of electing our leaders and then allow them to make decisions for us, but in near future after a few decades, the information won't be a barrier at all at that point in time everyone would have that mind and ability to correctly participate in every decision of the government through a voting system. Currently the challenge isn't the technology but the lack of awareness and information which might lead to wrong decisions and decisions taken under undue influence. But yes such a thing would be like a miracle a few decades down the line.

Not a single doubt in that, just like bitcoin it can be pseudonymous, you can map a voting has and a public key which voted for you, but database which connects each public key to identity of the users should not be in any domain and should be highly classified.

Using stop-loss is the only way to actually become a successful trader other than that there is no way to be successful to be very honest, yes you are right that the market may do stop loss hunting and hit your stop loss just to come back up the very next moment, there are two solutions for it, either just consider it as a normal market play and adjust your success ratio accordingly, or put a mental stop loss in your mind instead of a system stop loss, people generally put mental stop loss so that they can sell after the close of the candle to ensure it's not just hunting, but this obviously makes things difficult, as you might just keep the trade emotionally instead of letting it go. Also, chances are you might end up selling at a much lower price waiting for the candle to close. So it's all upto you to choose one way out because eventually, you have to adjust yourself according to the market.

Security issues with banks are quite different from issues that can take place with crypto wallets, With banks the biggest challenge is physical robbery rest all the problems are secondary while with the wallets the problem is hacking, but the truth is decentralized wallets are pretty difficult to get hacked, eventually if you want to hack out some coins you'll have to goof up the blockchain altogether which is really difficult because the consensus would just never match, the only way to scam people is make a fake wallet or fake copy of some original wallet and broadcast transactions in some other address than what is input by the users, but if you fall prey to this I would call this as your mistake to download wallets from unverified sources.

Interestingly the only default made was that payment was made in Rubles instead of dollars which I don't really think is a very big default for a country that is in such a flux situation, they have sanction imposed from everywhere so naturally their currency is under a great hit at this time, so technically they will have to pay in some alternate way and Paying in your own currency is the easiest way, European agencies would obviously call this as a default in their attempt to disregard the Russian economy but I think one should consider the situation of both the sides before making any opinion.

You mean to say all the money printed during the fiscal deficit was actually collected by Exchanges and kept in treasury to mint USDT or USDC? But how then will there be no money left in the economy? Technically speaking these exchanges also must be holding some bank account only, so if they have put their money in any bank account it is flowing in the economy only and is being used in the economy itself, I don't really think this sort of scenario, and also why would someone buy USDC then? It's price is anyways not going to grow no matter how much bull run comes in.

KL Rahul played so well today, and how ironic it is that when his girlfriend and her father came to see his match, he got out on golden duck  and today made a classic century in the very next match. Anyways MI worries are just not coming to an end, I understand their bowling is weak but 6 consecutive losses is actually a very bad record to have by your side. Two big problems I feel are lack of good lower order and obviously lack of good death bowling alongside Bumrah, both of these things are key deciders in any T20 match you got to have atleast one out of two, after Pollard there is no one who can bat with him till the target which creates unnecessary burden on one side. It's obviously too difficult now for MI to qualify into the playoffs.

I agree with you, infact I think even winning should be questioned, every trade that you make should definitely be questioned, this is why good traders always recommend trade journals, these journals help you keep record of all types of trades, whether good or bad and most importantly help you record the reasons for the same so that whenever you encounter the same situation once again, you know what to do and what not to do.

Earlier I used to think Subramanian Swamy is a liar and merely a conspiracy theorist, especially after his speeches against Raghuram Rajan and then when he spoke in the case of Sushant Singh Rajput, but to be honest some of his talks do make sense, in this case he absolutely does makes sense, government is trying to ban something that it is not ready to recognise, this is sheer foolishness, no law in India recognises or as a matter of fact define Cryptocurrencies or digital currencies, so very definition of the currencies can be questioned in the court of law, only the IMMAI vs RBI case has given some definition in case law other than that we don't really have anything.

I believe you can put 20% in SOL, 20% in Near, these are two protocols which are advanced and have good future potentials, 20% go with bitcoin and 10% you can buy some small shitcoins Here and there as per your choice or buzz around the market, the remaining 30% you should keep in USDT to average out any shake off that comes in the market in next few weeks or months or buy it when we see a small correction after the next all time high. this way you'll be hedged against market falling and at the same time riding the market profits as well.