I really like to announce the Coin is added to my Pool -BUT- at the moment looks like the genesis block of the chain is not propperly built:
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: CheckBlock() : first tx is not coinbase
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
I'm sorry for that !
Cookie
@Dev why did I get such Warnings and why is the daemon not accepting blocks ? Cookie The genesis block is properly built & you must use the python stratum. Why is a python stratum needed ? could you explain it on a techical way ? Cookie No answer here or did I missed it ? Could you explain why the node.js stratum didn't work ? Cookie Still no word on this problem ? Why don't you answer ? Cookie I dont have a massive amount of experience with pools & stratums so I would hate to lead you in the wrong direction. Maybe some of the other pool operators could shed some light on the subject? |
|
|
|
I couldn't run a master node Dev . i think i did something wrong at step 17.
What's the line after "-datadir=c:/username/youruser" ?
Are you trying to run 1 Masternode or more than 1? |
|
|
|
|
I noticed a bug in the My Masternodes tab that doesnt update it properly, I'm working on the fix as we speak along with a few checkpoints.
I'll be pushing to github with new releases soon!
|
|
|
|
GuidesMultiple masternodes from a single staking controller wallethttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1V9tti1eL2rTVVOQUNGS3V3YUU/view?usp=sharingSingle masternodeWith a Syndicate.conf file similar to this: rpcuser=YOUROWNUSERNAME
rpcpassword=REALLYSTRONGASSWORD
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=22348
port=9999
server=1
listen=1
daemon=1
logtimestamps=1
mnconflock=0
Follow the guide for MN1 & Masternode1 & do all of the steps above EXCEPT steps 9 - 18 After step 8, add this to your Syndicate.conf file masternode=1
masternodeaddr=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:9999
masternodeprivkey=
Then continue on to step 19 for Masternode1 Great Thanks, I set up 2 masternodes. . Your welcome! How did the guide work out for you? the guide was very helpful Thats good, I spent a lot of time trying to make it as easy as possible to understand.. |
|
|
|
GuidesMultiple masternodes from a single staking controller wallethttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1V9tti1eL2rTVVOQUNGS3V3YUU/view?usp=sharingSingle masternodeWith a Syndicate.conf file similar to this: rpcuser=YOUROWNUSERNAME
rpcpassword=REALLYSTRONGASSWORD
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=22348
port=9999
server=1
listen=1
daemon=1
logtimestamps=1
mnconflock=0
Follow the guide for MN1 & Masternode1 & do all of the steps above EXCEPT steps 9 - 18 After step 8, add this to your Syndicate.conf file masternode=1
masternodeaddr=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:9999
masternodeprivkey=
Then continue on to step 19 for Masternode1 Great Thanks, I set up 2 masternodes. . Your welcome! How did the guide work out for you? |
|
|
|
Exchange?
They'll come in due time  |
|
|
|
GuidesMultiple masternodes from a single staking controller wallethttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1V9tti1eL2rTVVOQUNGS3V3YUU/view?usp=sharingSingle masternodeWith a Syndicate.conf file similar to this: rpcuser=YOUROWNUSERNAME
rpcpassword=REALLYSTRONGASSWORD
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=22348
port=9999
server=1
listen=1
daemon=1
logtimestamps=1
mnconflock=0
Follow the guide for MN1 & Masternode1 & do all of the steps above EXCEPT steps 9 - 18 After step 8, add this to your Syndicate.conf file masternode=1
masternodeaddr=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:9999
masternodeprivkey=
Then continue on to step 19 for Masternode1 |
|
|
|
How do i set up a master node?
I am compiling the guides together now, they'll be up soon! |
|
|
|
Dev, read my previous post. It's running from extracted ZIP file, contains the exe and dll binaries, instead of SETUP file. No offence, FALSE POSITIVE or NOT, the app thread of your codes are not clean for some process. That's why some AV that have abilities to scan file only may passed as clean. And may not for some AV which have abilities to scan more deeper into each threads could match for some threads may intends to become suspicious behaviors. I wish I could confirm your codes, caused I'm not one of Qt dev, and have no Qt environment. I love coins, but I'm concern for security issues which may impact to my whole system. Thanks for understanding. Regards, d.mas Youre more than welcome to download the zip & scan the exe alone..the inno script compiler was creating the false positives, the details of the first virus total scan even recognized it. Here is the exe alone. https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/f1ef191375397ed59bdcc46e7c69bb3502a3c609ca7b8b59dd604ec1c260bede/analysis/1465956137/ |
|
|
|
400 Blocks of the early bird mining reward left! |
|
|
|
 Spybot S&D shows nothing! Wallet is all good on my PC I like the difficulty graph.. Thats great to hear! |
|
|
|
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs. Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone. I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time. Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it. Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically.. There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files. Have you tried to compile statically with Qtwebkit? That is just an excuse and has nothing to do with the fact that 99% of QT wallets are compiled statically. If you can't do it with Qtwebkit perhaps you should try one of the other methods available. You are correct, 99% of them are compiled statically, but how many of the statically compiled wallets use qtwebkit? Qtwebkit is needed for the block explorer & future updates. What other method would you like me to use? |
|
|
|
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs. Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone. I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time. Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it. Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically.. There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files. Have you tried to compile statically with Qtwebkit? |
|
|
|
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs. Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone. I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time. Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it. Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically.. |
|
|
|
"blocks" : 312,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00001526,
"blockvalue" : 1000000000,
"netmhashps" : 22645.98651430,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"testnet" : false
}
i don't see high difficulty !!
I am working on correcting the difficulty from the console. The wallet has a difficulty graph built into it that is displaying the difficulty properly. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1511215.msg15206562#msg15206562about 20 MH/s is mining at 300 difficulty for block 313 Well if your story about the virus is to be believed the coin launch is still a complete failure. You now have one wallet with over 30% of the total coin supply and two miners on suprnova with 90% of the hashrate. This coin is DOA. It's pointless for anyone to start mining. There are still 56,658 blocks to be mined, and about 9,513,750 coins left. About 4.5% of the coins have been mined so far. How is it pointless to begin mining?Once a few more pools open back up more people will have the opportunity to spread the hashrate. Are you serious? Failed launch. It's that simple. Edit: And in a little over 100 blocks the block reward halves. I really like to announce the Coin is added to my Pool -BUT- at the moment looks like the genesis block of the chain is not propperly built:
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: CheckBlock() : first tx is not coinbase
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
I'm sorry for that !
Cookie
@Dev why did I get such Warnings and why is the daemon not accepting blocks ? Cookie The genesis block is properly built & you must use the python stratum. What about trojan? There truly is no trojan, I'm hoping someone credible could do a code review to prove that. I am uploading a new setup that was not built with Inno Script so hopefully that resolves the issue. A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries. Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs. Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone. I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time. |
|
|
|
"blocks" : 312,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00001526,
"blockvalue" : 1000000000,
"netmhashps" : 22645.98651430,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"testnet" : false
}
i don't see high difficulty !!
I am working on correcting the difficulty from the console. The wallet has a difficulty graph built into it that is displaying the difficulty properly. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1511215.msg15206562#msg15206562about 20 MH/s is mining at 300 difficulty for block 313 Well if your story about the virus is to be believed the coin launch is still a complete failure. You now have one wallet with over 30% of the total coin supply and two miners on suprnova with 90% of the hashrate. This coin is DOA. It's pointless for anyone to start mining. There are still 56,658 blocks to be mined, and about 9,513,750 coins left. About 4.5% of the coins have been mined so far. How is it pointless to begin mining? Once a few more pools open back up more people will have the opportunity to spread the hashrate. |
|
|
|
"blocks" : 312,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00001526,
"blockvalue" : 1000000000,
"netmhashps" : 22645.98651430,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"testnet" : false
}
i don't see high difficulty !!
I am working on correcting the difficulty from the console. The wallet has a difficulty graph built into it that is displaying the difficulty properly. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1511215.msg15206562#msg15206562about 20 MH/s is mining at 300 difficulty for block 313 |
|
|
|
Okey fuck this coin.
1.st wallet with "virus"
2.nd New wallet not syncing
3.rd someone is mining
This is NO PREMINE? wtf we all know who is mining this shi.t
and now what after 1 day its gonna work and no more profitable to mine and i will need to buy? I want to mine coin from 0 if i spend almost 24h on forum and got new coin i want to mine it as well.
You know what? GTFO with this bull.shit and btw
Not even mentioned in op rpc port etc etc wtf is this? who is mining this when nobody know even port to connect?
1. There is no virus. I am inviting anyone & everyone to review the code.2. The wallet is not syncing because mining stopped at a high difficulty, which is why its taking long for the next block to be found. 3. There is no premine https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L12984. The RPC port & port is listed on the OP. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
