... and this is what's known as Default Trust abuse:  using their position on DT1 to attempt to silence those who would expose their Default Trust abuse. You're looking more and more guilty as the hours go by. That's what I'm talking about with your lazy brain. You're just obsessed with the DT1 position, and yet all you see is an abuse. LoL. Please don't forget that its My Personal Trust List and I'm free to do what I want as long as it fits on my judgements. Also you are free to do the same: ~cabalism13 Perhaps you should leave the alt investigation to the rest of us, after all, why would you *just now* distrust a user who has been banned since the 13th of February 2020: This thread is supposed to be about theyoungmillionaire (user=1180530) defaulting on his loan, everything unrealted should be discussed in different thread. I creates a thread for Timelord2067: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260128.msg54737028#msg54737028
And, 😌 please guys stop flooding this thread with irrelevant replies, You're definitely not helping and so do I. Whatever comes into the plate, then that's that already. Let this thread be in peace, until we find out where the shitty scammer is. |
|
|
|
|
@Timelord2067
I created this thread only for you, you might want to continue your investigation here and also the non-sense of having you ~on my list ( really don't know what's wrong with your brain, as you consider it as an abuse )
Note: I appreciate your works on exposing alts and shills of spammers scammers, but try to listen what the others says especially if its the truth, no need to push on your accusations IMO
Continue here, I really find it irrelevant on DireWolfM14's thread. Also some kitties are being 🤪 crazy lazy, and it's slowly turning into an off-topic discussion.
Thread won't be moderated. Trolls are welcome but good luck for it might get deleted by Mods.
|
|
|
|
This just in from another thread dealing with multiple trust issues: Another example of cabalism13's questionable DT activities: Week 15 cabalism13 distrusts tecshare Week 17 tecshare distrusts cabalism13 Week 22 cabalism13 changes their distrust of tecshare to trust Week 24 tecshare removes their distrust of cabalism13 Week 34 cab removes 18 of their 30 trust list (including tecshare) Kinda irrelevant IMO, this shouldn't be here, instead on the Reputation Section. Also it wasn't questionable, trust list isn't moderated, I would do whatever I want to. I will remove/place someone whom I want to whenever I want. It's my personal list. Besides, I wasn't on the DT1 by that time, so it's not that important. Further reading on the issue begins with this post. Move on bud. You won't be getting anywhere with that. You might want to ask Tecshare if he has a problem with that, concerning of our past, LoL. And I'm pretty sure he doesn't even mind me especially now, it has been in separate ways. P. S. I just don't want you getting other users on some kind of mess especially if they are innocent. It doesn't have any connection with TYM's loan scandal. |
|
|
|
Kinda irrelevant IMO, this shouldn't be here, instead on the Reputation Section. Also it wasn't questionable, trust list isn't moderated, I would do whatever I want to. I will remove/place someone whom I want to whenever I want. It's my personal list.
Besides, I wasn't on the DT1 by that time, so it's not that important.
You might want to have a read of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg54732978#msg54732978 and the ramifications of abusing the Default Trust Network.
Given how "tight knit" the Philippines section is purportedly, with "everyone knowing everyone else" it's surprising none of you can say who TYM is or where they are. Not so tight knit after all.I am not obligated to follow that, especially because we don't have any rules about this. Actually I do have one mistake on the past which has a concern to Lucius. If the public doesn't want him to on DT2 then I think they should have just excluded him and yet I did something that was out of my own decision. Now, I won't be concerning myself on what you guys want anymore unless it is really necessary. Just like before, getting used to: on using ~ would be a better help to the community. The only abuse is when a user is just being a lich and so he does it the same way like the others. |
|
|
|
cabalism13 adds 13 UID's to their trust list which is being discovered to be a tactic for some users to add a dozen UID's in the hope they will in turn add them in a follow-for-follow move to gain trust.
.Cute. 😂 And so, just by looking at this, the reason that I remove is that they didn't trust me back? 🤣 🤣 🤣 Another example of cabalism13's questionable DT activities: Week 15 cabalism13 distrusts tecshare Week 17 tecshare distrusts cabalism13 Week 22 cabalism13 changes their distrust of tecshare to trust Week 24 tecshare removes their distrust of cabalism13 Week 34 cab removes 18 of their 30 trust list (including tecshare) Kinda irrelevant IMO, this shouldn't be here, instead on the Reputation Section. Also it wasn't questionable, trust list isn't moderated, I would do whatever I want to. I will remove/place someone whom I want to whenever I want. It's my personal list. Besides, I wasn't on the DT1 by that time, so it's not that important.
Like what I said, this is useless.
theyoungmillionaire is probably one of the other accounts in that voting block, but which is the alt?
probably? yeah, probably speaking... 🤔
@cryptoaddictchie & @cabalism13
I haven't said any of these users are alts,...
Yep, you're still just accusing... |
|
|
|
This investigation is still ongoing.
I find this useless. Just to be prank mate,... trust is what we use whenever we had multiple transactions for a long time... Even though it is seen as back scratching LoL, doesn't care about that. Merits 👉 Backscratching? Yes because I told them to make good use of their sMerits as much as possible to our Local Community. (Ever Since I gathered many sMerits) I would love to, since it’s a support to the Filipinos, it's just that I don't have merit yet. Thanks for the heads up on post. Trust 👉 Backscratching? Again? Might be, or No. IMO, just like what I'm doing most on my trustlist were users whom I had transactions for several times. And some are just the other DTs who gain public trust. It's definitely not an abuse. Well, it might be look like that because you're looking on a position were DT1 is involve. Silent26 👉 the last info the I get was from this (he still uses the forum but not that active just like before) "Working" or "Working on" means you're in the progress of reporting and yes, you need to check and review the posts of those users one by one.
"Done" means you've reported the users already. Don't worry if Mods still not taking any actions on the users you've reported, just put "Done" when your finish reporting.
Sorry for the late response mate.
~Silent26
 Hey mate, it's been a while? What took you so long?  Hey buddy, what's up. Yeah it's been months since the last time I became inactive in the forum. It's really sad that I missed a lot of discussions. Well, you know, student's life. I really prioritised studying, these past months that I didn't managed to visit Bitcointalk was my thesis days/months. So busy until now, I'm currently in my on-job training with my website project for about another 3 months. Well, its a relief that I have some feeling that I will graduate soon Anyway thanks for greeting me back buddy. ~Silent26 (well no one will force you to believe that) crwth 👉 not an alt, many of us can confirm that. (I call you guys to speak on this useless investigation)
Have you guys ever thought, what if TYM is really not here anymore and you've been accusing users continuously... 🤔 Damn. Not all has alts, just remember that. I'm telling you, this won't go anywhere, and we, too, even want to help Dire to get that criminal but not in a way of accusing some users to be alts or connected with them. LoL 
Regarding other accounts involved I am no contact with them.
Regarding trust list since its not moderated we cant actually used that as something like an evidence. If you found this biased then, the whole Philippine Coinsph users with bitcointalk forum accounts can prove that I am right and only telling the truth.
Count me in. |
|
|
|
Another Bug  Type of Bug: Transaction BugDescription: Withdrawal TransactionJust made a withdrawal transaction this afternoon and I also clicked the fast but instead it takes a while longer than expected. Longer than I've ever expected. Usually, back on the old site it only takes 25 minutes to one hour as maximum before you can receive your funds. But right now, it's already midnight LoL. FortuneJack Account: cabalism13
Type of Bug: Interface BugDescription: Viewing of BalanceBefore I withdraw my balance was 0.00899999, before I notice something wasn't right because as far as I remember the reward was 0.001 which I should be receiving 0.005, but instead it was 0.00499999 then after I withdraw I saw my transaction history as 0.009. Please look at the image below. FortuneJack Account: cabalism13
Type of Bug: Interface BugDescription: Transaction HistoryAfter I make a withdrawal transaction, I notice something unusual which I remember only appears on a calculator... (Take Note: I'm using my laptop) Please look at the image below. FortuneJack Account: cabalism13
Type of Bug: Interface BugDescription: Transaction HistoryWhen I looked back on my transaction history I tried to click the arrow to see the status of my transaction because I am still not receiving it after 7 hours. But then it doesn't appear and only gives a blank. Please look at the image below. FortuneJack Account: cabalism13 |
|
|
|
Hi Dear Community,
Thank you for participation, we have completed the first payout yesterday and we are processing more bugs today as well, please be understandable than on weekends process might go a little slow and payments could be processed on Monday.
Also, I have read about the idea of providing the spreadsheet of bugs and we are looking into it, the idea is good and we will try to find a way to do it best. Shortly, will update on this on Monday as well.
Cheers,
FJ.
Thanks FJ, amI mean we 😁 are glad to be of help. Good Day! Still looking for bugs,... 😉 |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1605387Current Amount of Posts: 3000 Amount of EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 102 BTC Address: 3LjVmpw2wDWawaPGa8Lj5JYjYciXDAePbW #iloveyou3000 (what a coincidence) Hoping to get transfered.
...
CM... Regarding the signature code, does it really don't have any [/center]? |
|
|
|
@Hhampuz, how do we know if our reported bugs has been approved or confirmed by FortuneJack, will there be a spreadsheet or update on the page 2 after the OP post? Thank you.
I think it should be @FortuneJack besides it is them whose going to confirm our reports. They should atleast came up with a spreadsheet with the details that has been reported and if they're accepted or not. And whether to be classified if it falls on interface bugs, integration etc. With this we can avoid the repetitive reports. |
|
|
|
This is only an observation:
...
UID's who also do merit back-scratching with TYM.
I did. D#%& TYM. I thought it was a lot LoL. It was only 19...
Just to give you a bit info about this issue, regarding TYM. He really do things anonymously, though the only lead that I can remember is the transaction between crwth, where you can see the email and the first name... 🤔 Though I'm still not sure if TYM used coins for that transaction. And to sum up, crwth has nothing to do about this issue, its a whole different person again. finaleshot2016 and jademaxsuy is the users whom I don't know personally. This is just a mere back scratching on our local. Also AFAIK. They only had few transactions or might be its the only one, when TYM needs BTC in exchange of PHP.
I don't also think back scratching would help and be obvious in these accounts to be accused as alts... What you guys should do is to investigate the addresses thatbhebused in the past and just like what Coin_trader has said, Coin.ph might be able to help. If only we could get the email and first name used on the account. I think I am also a victim, now I really don't know if he fooled me over the things that he said before: -a businessman -starting business -lost btcs during dumped -the photo of him and with some certain whotheguyis  -flights anytime anywhere (the whole convo has been wiped out by him)
In any case I would also like to help Dire on this. Its really a big money. I do hope the scammers here such as him get into prison. Such a bad influence. |
|
|
|
Now, where to use the 25 Free spins aside from the 5 games? This can be a bug as well.
You could atleast try the slots on casino. I've been testing those yesterday with the demo feature and it has somewhat gets spins whenever you hit some patterns |
|
|
|
Few days back I have one withdrawal and this was without any decuction so I am sure now they are not taking any fees and its all free of charge.
I think the same too. Lets just wait till their account confirms the same. I just received a confirmation from FJ, and yes they don't still charge fees on both deposit and withdrawal transactions. |
|
|
|
Just found a New One. Type of Bug: Transaction BugDescription: Withdrawal(Note: FJ doesn't charged any fees on both Deposit and Withdrawal) I tried to withdraw my 0.004 as the minimum amount needed and yet can't proceed as it gives error. And yet, it says... Blockchain Transaction fees will be deducted from your withdrawal amount Fortune Jack username: cabalism13
Type of Bug: Transaction BugDescription: WithdrawalI tried to withdraw the minimum balance even though I have more than 0.004 and yet I can't make a withdrawal transaction. Fortune Jack username: cabalism13 |
|
|
|
From now on, the casino will cover all BTC transaction fees concerning deposits and withdrawals made on our website.
Is this still up? Or am I missing the update somewhere? Please enlighten me. Thanks. Been wondering for I have seen this at the new site: Blockchain transaction fee will be deducted from your withdrawal amount
So I can't withdraw my 0.004Balance 😂 |
|
|
|
It is a deposit bonus, sir. You deposit 1mBTC and get 25 Free Spins, I think It was clear in opening post. Let me deposit spins manually on you.
Oh, I see, my bad. I thought deposit bonus was only referred by getting BTCs as bonus 😂 anyways thanks! And yeah, now it's working in my end. Thanks for the update and Good Day!
For example: someone deposited 5mbtc since he do it on one deposit he only gets 25free spin right? Cause Hhampuz stated that for every deposit at least 1mBTC, but if someone make deposit separately of that 5mBTC he will supposed to received 125 free spins. Is that right? Thanks.
Oh, and here I'm the greedy one LoL. I thought 25spins for every 1mbtc 😂 so it was per deposit 😅 greedy me. |
|
|
|
Here with update, so I think we have solved it and you can try and use the bonus code now.
Sorry for this issue guys, please write me your usernames cabalism13 and cryptoaddictchie and will deposit free spins manually.
I've got 4mbtcs... 😁 Still the same with my username: cabalism13Thanks FJ! I guess better to say Boss David 😁😁😁 Will wait then I'll try something new to finds bugs and errors 😊 Edit: It's still not working Boss...  (nevermind my wife's photo 😂 currently talking to her)
Edit Again... I tried using "Bitcointalk" instead of "BITCOINTALK" "bitcointalk" And I've got something that wasn't supposed to be I guess... It's deposit bonus instead of Free spins...  Oh and after I activated it, I thought aomething will happen... But... No Luck 🤣 it's still a Live Bug 🐛  |
|
|
|
~snip
Ive tried it also after my deposit check in. Also same, I think @cabalism13 mentioned it already aboved that he also encountered it.... Damn, this is something unexpected, let me check this out again and will let you know asap. Yeah, I did. And actually I already tried numerous times and I already deposited 4mbtc but still I don't have any free spins. The only thing that can activated is the default Bonuses on your account (50% Bonus and can be withdrawn after x30 wagered) |
|
|
|
Type of Bug: Interface Bug Description: Error on Entering Bonus Code "BITCOINTALK" "bitcointalk" doesn't work as a Bonus Code. I tried using the code before and after making a deposit To claim a bonus, it must first be activated BEFORE the applicable deposit is placed. To do so, click on “Account” and then “Bonus", then clicking the “Activate” button next to the Bonus. Alternatively, click the “I Have the Bonus Code” button, and then enter the code (again, before you deposit.) Fortune Jack username: cabalism13 
Type of Bug: Interface Bug Description:Login IssueSMS Verification ( No Resend ) Button Only received verification once, asking for another code is impossible unless you go back to the old site. Fortune Jack username: cabalism13
Type of Bug: Interface Bug Description: Medium HyperlinkError 410... Content Under Investigation/Suspended! Fortune Jack username: cabalism13
Type of Bug: Interface Bug Description: Unresponsive Game PageGame page isn't responsive when you minimize it using desktop, it doesn't show well. As an addition when you open it using your mobile it's way better then using a desktop, but the thing is when you try to open it on desktop mode on your mobile it turns back like the one on desktop. Fortune Jack username: cabalism13    
Type of Bug: Interface Bug Description: Filtered GamesGoing to Live Casino then clicking the tabs to filter out games, both poker,baccarat, wheel and other has the same results. Fortune Jack username: cabalism13   
Type of Bug: Interface Bug / Integration Bug Description: Error on Live Casino Game doesn't load/show. Specific from BetGamesTV Provider-LiveWarOfBets -LiveBetOnPoker -LiveDice -LiveLucky7 -LiveLucky5 -Speedy7 -LiveBaccarat -LiveWheelOfFortune -LiveLucky6 {"success":false,"payload":[],"error":{"error_code":7,"error_message":"Fundist API database error on session save"}} 
Type of Bug: Interface Bug / Integration Bug Description: Error on Live Casino Game doesn't load/show. Specific from XPG ProviderInvalid Game Data Provided  FortuneJack Account : cabalism13
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
