hello i am getting an error when running shadowcoind. maybe someone can help? shadowcoind: wallet.cpp:6490: bool CWallet::GetKeyFromPool(CPubKey&, bool): Assertion `false' failed. |
|
|
|
|
UPDATE:
we are down for a planned server migration. i will update this thread when we are back up
|
|
|
|
Tyke, out of curiosity, are you making any real money with these books? As I notice you are putting a lot of time, effort and even some printing money. In my eyes this is like a lost cause.
Each of these books took about 2-3 months to research and write. I have made a modest return from sales, especially from the first book I published on 24/12/14. I never personally view writing about cryptocurrency a waste of time. I hope you understand. Kind regards, Christopher P. Thompson How many copies did you sell? Inquiring mind would like to know. Can you give us a ballpark figure? |
|
|
|
|
whats the status on this testing bug that requires special compiling options? is anyone working on this?
|
|
|
|
I would like to have the ability to sell some of my Bitcoins and transfer the fiat to a Thailand Bangkok Bank account.
From a bit of Googling, it looks like bx.in.th and bitcoin.co.th are both reputable exchanges. Does anyone have any experience with either of these? Or, is there another you would recommend?
Thanks for the advice!
what about localbitcoins.com? |
|
|
|
Is there anyone who still trusts Cryptsy at this point? Why are we still talking about them?
Because they still have millions in customer funds. |
|
|
|
|
2.0 is so 2000s prepare for crypto 3.0!!!!!
|
|
|
|
You obviously do not understand how Nubits or Bitshares holds its peg if you think this. This statement is pure blasphemy I'm not even going to waste my time refuting it. Everyone can do their own research.
I bet I can throw piles of shit at the glass also. Maybe even with the elegant rhetorical technique you display. Yet in the church of baghodlers i am fine with being a blasphemer. Maybe you can tone it down, maybe even have a civil conversation with me. Im not resorting to ad hominims yet (well maybe a little). Let us both settle this with intellect and grace not our dick size (cuz you know ill win  ). Sorry, I am used to having to defend myself from trolls on here so often that I treat everyone as such until I know they are not a troll. I thought for certain you were a troll because the bolded is false, and shows either an attempt at FUD or a misunderstanding of how Nubits works. Nubits does indeed have systematic risks. The italicized is also an opinion, but it seemed you were stating it as fact. No one, because they can buy 1 bitUSD for $1.053 USD right now on Bitshares' decentralized exchange.
$1.053 USD is a 5.3% variance. As i check on coinmarketcap now i see it listed at 1.04usd or a 4% variance. Compare that to Tether (USDT) at 1.00 USD and NuBits (NBT) at $ 0.997296 or .27% variance. NuBits is a superior system as it more closely maintains the peg (according to data on CMC) and does not have the systematic risk associated with BitUSD and other bitshares collateralized assets.I am not arguing that Nubits more closely maintains the peg, as it does. It also has liquidity better figured out. I think both solutions have different pros and cons and there is no one superior solution. I see smartcoins' pros as allowing for the easy issuance of many different assets (gold, silver, nasdaq, s&p, etc.. unlimited), and that they are collateralized at least by 200% worth of BTS. To create many different Nubits-style assets is unrealistic and there is a reason they (NuShares) are only planning on releasing a few FIAT Nubit-style tokens. It also allows for leveraged trading among other things... Smartcoins can earn interest, etc... NuBits and any other cryptocoin also allow leverage. The Systematic risk i am referring to is the black swan 50% drop. This happens pretty often in the cryptocurrency scene. I think it is a major risk that is glossed over. It is true that Nubit style assets are more difficult to create and maintain, but it really depends on the size of the crypto-marketplace. If things were to grow substantially to the size of main stream marketplace. then i could see 10s or 100s of assets. the issue is that atm there simply isnt a strong demand so its not practical. I don't hold any of either. But i think for scalability Nubits is a much more elegant design. |
|
|
|
Is it good news or bad news
bad news for anybody who has deposits with them, good for competing exchanges |
|
|
|
You obviously do not understand how Nubits or Bitshares holds its peg if you think this. This statement is pure blasphemy I'm not even going to waste my time refuting it. Everyone can do their own research.
I bet I can throw piles of shit at the glass also. Maybe even with the elegant rhetorical technique you display. Yet in the church of baghodlers i am fine with being a blasphemer. Maybe you can tone it down, maybe even have a civil conversation with me. Im not resorting to ad hominims yet (well maybe a little). Let us both settle this with intellect and grace not our dick size (cuz you know ill win ). |
|
|
|
In short term, because i'm bad with english, Just a question did our ANC sended via craptsy are lost ?  95% probability they are lost. |
|
|
|
|
how about 2% a YEAR. which is consistent with target fiat inflation rates
|
|
|
|
No one, because they can buy 1 bitUSD for $1.053 USD right now on Bitshares' decentralized exchange.
$1.053 USD is a 5.3% variance. As i check on coinmarketcap now i see it listed at 1.04usd or a 4% variance. Compare that to Tether (USDT) at 1.00 USD and NuBits (NBT) at $ 0.997296 or .27% variance. NuBits is a superior system as it more closely maintains the peg (according to data on CMC)and does not have the systematic risk associated with BitUSD and other bitshares collateralized assets. |
|
|
|
For business
Paypal is cheaper
stopped reading there. you obviously have no idea on fee structures of payment processors. paypal's fee is a lot less than 20% The business they grow is the business they own - and for this the BitSharesholders charge 20% for maintaining the world's most cost effective blockchain platform. |
|
|
|
|
We have reached 100 registered users. Onwards to 1000!
|
|
|
|
|
ANNOUNCEMENT:
We are in the process of migrating to new server with lots of cool stuff like RAID and FDE. This migration will probably be happening later this week or weekend. I anticipate, at most, a few hours of downtime while we move everything over. I will update this thread when when that happens.
|
|
|
|
found this image on twitter, but as of this now it seems to be back up.  give them a few more weeks to buy those tickets to a non-juristiction country |
|
|
|
I'm sorry for promoting vircurex all the time, but they actually ARE trying to get things pushed forward. They had wallet services offline for two or three weeks, but went back to business and that's the only time I have had problems with withdrawals. Vircurex now also claims they have paid back some of the frozen funds for year 2015 (cannot be much, but anyways). Vircurex just reloaded their ANC blockchain and they actually DO something to get deposits/withdrawals working. Then we have Craptsy that is the most fraudulent exchange there is atm who claims that the blockchain has problems...
However, consider trading ANC there. It works. If you are in doubt, you could just use very small amounts. I never exceed a total of 1BTC over there and fees for withdrawing ANC are very low (0.1 ANC). I'm not affiliated with vircurex in any way, but the more exchanges there are for a coin, the more valueble the coin usually gets.And yes, I know that Abyss will start yelling at me once again, but actually, I am way too lazy to install I2P on every computer I have and I guess most people won't do that unless they actually really are in need to be very anonymous.
I think lazyness should not be an excuse but i understand that at the end of the day many people do not run i2p (even though they should). For a clearnet Anoncoin exchange I would recommend cryptopia, they run an excellent service. Vircurex is simply a bad deal. so top 3 ANC/BTC Exchange picks: 1) ExchangeD.I2P 2) Cryptopia 3) BTC38 TO Avoid: Vircurex - for losing millions of costumer funds Craptsy - freezing withdrawals on a bunch of coins and shutting down Anoncoin trading Abyss, you should provide a read-only view for your exchange, so that anyone could inspect the buys/sells. A simple web interface should be enough (from where you could promote your I2P platform). Maybe there is such an interface already? If not, it could increase interest yes the exchange is accessible over the clearnet at http://exchanged.i2p.xyz but it is run by a third party who i cannot vouch for. Also there is full API with docs. http://exchanged.i2p.xyz/en/apiIs it down? I just see a blank page it is up and works fine but the i2p.xyz inproxy service is not very reliable. try refreshing until you see something. or better yet install i2p |
|
|
|
I'm sorry for promoting vircurex all the time, but they actually ARE trying to get things pushed forward. They had wallet services offline for two or three weeks, but went back to business and that's the only time I have had problems with withdrawals. Vircurex now also claims they have paid back some of the frozen funds for year 2015 (cannot be much, but anyways). Vircurex just reloaded their ANC blockchain and they actually DO something to get deposits/withdrawals working. Then we have Craptsy that is the most fraudulent exchange there is atm who claims that the blockchain has problems...
However, consider trading ANC there. It works. If you are in doubt, you could just use very small amounts. I never exceed a total of 1BTC over there and fees for withdrawing ANC are very low (0.1 ANC). I'm not affiliated with vircurex in any way, but the more exchanges there are for a coin, the more valueble the coin usually gets.And yes, I know that Abyss will start yelling at me once again, but actually, I am way too lazy to install I2P on every computer I have and I guess most people won't do that unless they actually really are in need to be very anonymous.
I think lazyness should not be an excuse but i understand that at the end of the day many people do not run i2p (even though they should). For a clearnet Anoncoin exchange I would recommend cryptopia, they run an excellent service. Vircurex is simply a bad deal. so top 3 ANC/BTC Exchange picks: 1) ExchangeD.I2P 2) Cryptopia 3) BTC38 TO Avoid: Vircurex - for losing millions of costumer funds Craptsy - freezing withdrawals on a bunch of coins and shutting down Anoncoin trading Abyss, you should provide a read-only view for your exchange, so that anyone could inspect the buys/sells. A simple web interface should be enough (from where you could promote your I2P platform). Maybe there is such an interface already? If not, it could increase interest yes the exchange is accessible over the clearnet at http://exchanged.i2p.xyz but it is run by a third party who i cannot vouch for. Also there is full API with docs. http://exchanged.i2p.xyz/en/api |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
