Although the statement "Flatten Palestine!" has NEVER been made by Israel or Jewish clerics (and hence rings completely false), statements such as ...

"Kill All The Jews"
"Destroy Isreal"

...are accepted and commonplace.  Let's take a look at just some of these statements in 2013.

1. “Israel’s leaders sometimes threaten Iran, but they know that if they do a damn thing, the Islamic Republic will raze Tel Aviv and Haifa to the ground.”

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran

2. “The Imam [Khomeini] set long-term goals for the day the occupying Zionist regime is no longer in the region. The formula for this move must be discussed in the government.”

Hasan Rouhani, President of Iran.

3. “The Army of Iran can by itself destroy Israel.”

Maj. Gen. Ataollah Salehi, Commander-in-Chief of the Iranian Army

4. “According to the Supreme Leader’s statement marking Nowruz, if Israel acts foolishly, Tel Aviv and Haifa will be annihilated….The armed forces are prepared with all their power to execute the orders of the Supreme Leader in minimum time.”

Gen. Mohammad Hejazi, Deputy Chief of Staff
5. “Our battalions are named Imam Ali, Imam Hussein and Bayt al-Maqdis [Jerusalem] to clarify our final destination to the Basiji. We will not abandon our [armed] struggle until the annihilation of Israel and until we will be able to pray in al-Aqsa mosque.”

Brig. Gen. Mohammad Reza Naqdi, Commander of the Basij militia
6. “The enemies are talking about the options [they have] on the table. They should know that the first option on our table is the annihilation of Israel.”

Ayatollah Hossein Nouri Hamedani, Lecturer at religious seminary in Qom
Ayatollah Hossein Nouri Hamedani, Lecturer at religious seminary in Qom
7. “We must spare no effort in liberating holy Jerusalem and cutting off the hands of the infidels from this holy site.”

Ayatollah Mohammad Reza Mahdavi Kani, Assembly of Experts Chairman
8. “The Zionist regime will soon be destroyed, and this generation will be witness to its destruction.”

Hojatoleslam Ali Shirazi, Supreme Leader’s representative in the Revolutionary Guards
9. “The issue of Palestine is an Islamic issue. The Islamic world must come together to destroy the false Israeli regime….If this happens, nothing will be left of Israel.”

Ayatollah Mohammed Ali Movahedi-Kermani, Tehran’s interim Friday Imam
10. “As the Supreme Leader has stated, if the Zionists cause any problems for Iran, Haifa and Tel Aviv will be annihilated.”

Maj. Gen. Yahya Rahim Safavi, Senior Military Adviser to the Supreme Leader
11. “Iran has long-range missiles that can reach 1,500 kilometers….The Supreme Leader maintained that ‘every combatant Palestinian group that fights the Zionist regime will receive the support of the Iranian regime.’”

Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami, Member of the Presidium of the Assembly of Experts
12. “The only way to subdue the enemies is by refusing to compromise on the goals of the resistance and to remain strong; the future of criminal nations such as the Zionists will be erased from the history books.”

Hojatoleslam Mohammad Hassan Akhtari, Hizbullah Operations Liaison, Former Ambassador to Syria
13. “If once the destruction and demise of occupying Israel was an impossible and unattainable dream, today thanks to the historic and intelligent actions of Imam Khomeini, it has become possible and is actually in the process of occurring.”

Iranian Ministry of Defense statement
14. “The day will come when the Islamic people in the region will destroy Israel and save the world from this Zionist base.”

Hojateleslam Alireza Panahian, Advisor to Office of the Supreme Leader in Universities
15. “The day is near in which the sword of resistance and Islamic Awakening will cut off the blood supply of the occupiers of the holy land of Palestine.”

Revolutionary Guards statement
16. “Every Muslim who does not want to fight Israel is violating religious law and essentially forgetting Israel’s crimes over the past 60 years on Islamic soil.”

Mohammad Dehghan, Member of the Majlis Executive Committee
17. “The only solution to the Palestine problem is the destruction of the Zionist regime….We view the wondrous resistance as the only way towards a victorious and inspiring battle against the false, illegitimate Zionist regime.”

Basij organization media outlet, Fars Province
18. “[The United States and Israel] should not make a mistake, because if they make even the smallest mistake, we will not remain silent and will annihilate Haifa and Tel Aviv.”

Esmail Kowsari, Deputy Chairman of the Majlis Foreign Policy Commission
19. “The destruction of Israel is the idea of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and is one of the pillars of the Iranian Islamic regime. We cannot claim that we have no intention of going to war with Israel!”

B52 aircraft routinely flew just a couple hundred feet above the ground at Mach 0.5, which is about 375 miles per hour, about 500 feet per second.  Waterjet cutters velocity of water stream is 1000 feet per second and higher.  The analogy to waterjet cutters is correct, the jet stream simply has a velocity and a momentum component.

You happen to be wrong about (bolded above).  Ever heard it said that a person falling off a bridge into water hits a surface as hard as concrete?  It's strictly a matter of momentum and inertia.  A "liquid" like kerosene at 500 feet per second tends to continue going  exactly in the direct of its momentum.  It does not just "flow around things," on the contrary diverting that stream takes energy.

You are proving the opposite of what you think is true.

Apparently not many people are interested.  Only 75 have signed the petition.

What is wrong in a future oriented sense in your statements is that data should float between nationalities, with no segment of a meaningful whole within one country's boundary.  And it should be "owned" by no company.

So where are all the pieces?

Pretty hard to hide a plane that's been shot down.

Pretty hard to hid the searchers for the debris.  There would be hundreds of them and dozens of helicopters.  Over a big area.  And body parts everywhere...

And since the fighter jets were not armed, they would have had to ram the planes.  Where are the pieces of the fighter jets?  What about the families of the dead pilots of the fighter jets?

I don't think you can present this theory well and make it hold up.  There are simply too many loose ends that won't wrap up nicely.  Too many flaws in the theory, for it to explain what happened.

And one of my relatives had just walked out of the tower to the starbucks across the street when the plane hit.  So?

So Cheney gave an order, but that DOESN'T mean a jet shot the 4th plane down.  

Here's what the LA Times had to say about that.

...Cheney did not hesitate. He authorized fighter aircraft "to engage the inbound plane."

In the decision to issue a lethal order without precedent in American history -- to shoot down a plane filled with American civilians -- Cheney both struggled with the confusion of that morning and personified it, according to a staff report issued Thursday by the national commission investigating the terrorist attacks.

The order given by Cheney was never received by the fighter pilots, and, in the end, it came too late to interrupt the assault.

Perhaps in his haste to act -- President Bush was in Florida at the time -- Cheney might have shortcut White House protocol, the report said. The normal chain of command for military "engage" orders goes from the president to the secretary of Defense, and not through the vice president, it said.

Although Cheney said he conferred with the president before giving the order, the commission staff could not confirm that a phone call took place in that time frame. Several minutes after giving the order, Cheney informed Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld that he had done so.

"So we've got a couple of aircraft up there that have those instructions at the present time?" Rumsfeld asked.

"That is correct," Cheney replied. "And it's my understanding they've already taken a couple of aircraft out." That understanding turned out to be mistaken.

Anyway, SO WHAT?  I'm okay if the jets had rammed the planes.  They didn't have ammo IIRC, so that's what they would have had to do.  Meaning the pilots would have probably been killed.  But it didn't happen.  I can't see why something like this would have been covered up if it had happened.  People would understand that the MUSLIM TERRORISTS' EVIL INTENTIONS needed to be fought.

Apparently the logic here is "If a wooden telephone pole cuts an airplane wing off in a ground test, then a jet ramming a building cannot cut the 14" steel beams."

The right way to figure this is simply impact velocity and total momentum of impact, which is based on the ballistic coefficient.  At time of impact of high velocity aluminum with a steel beam, the aluminum instantly turns to liquid and continues forward in the same direction.   One example is waterjet cutters.  High velocity water cuts steel, stone, etc.

Analogy with the tree is false due to difference in impact velocities.  Tree impact looks like at the most 100 mph, jets hitting skyscrapers more than four times that.  Remember that each doubling of the speed quadruples the momentum.....

"You're in the wrong line!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1c5iH_SWTg0

+1

Because people have agendas.  Because people that hate the Evil Jews, or the Great Satan, would like to cast doubt on reality, both making the objects of their hate look hateful, and diverting attention from killers, murderers and terrorists.

That's totally a stupid video.  

No, those are not soldiers.  Not only are they not IDF soldiers, they are not any kind of soldiers.

By the way, one reason I am not sympathetic to the Demands of Palestine is that, well Pakistan was formed about the same time with 10x the number of refugees.  So why no outrage there?

Then there's Arafat. 

I figured it out.  The Big Guy In The Sky sent Gabriel down at the right time, but he decided to go visit his old buddy Angel that ran the Dark Side, and got thouroughly smashed on some pretty good crack. Stayed around down there for a while and lost track of time.  But see, down there time runs backward, that's how they get to experience hell fire over and over.  So that time ran backwards, and he was hitting some pretty good shit.

Hey, what's a hundred years or two? 

So?  It didn't get shot down.

What difference does it make what order he gave?

Two situations.

1.  "Fire at my command."
2.  "Fire at will."

#1 is almost always the way things work, look at how engagement in Afganishtan was handled.

So he set a standing order, more like #2.  But your video leaps then to the conclusion that "giving the order" implies "they shot it down on his order."  That makes NO SENSE.

Well, ya.  Actually I'd like to go visit the "Holy Lands" (Israel) sometime.  I'm sure I'd be welcome as a friendly Atheist.  Betcha lots of the people there would be right on the same wavelength.

Mecca now.....

Actually your rendition here is remarkably similar to Nassab Taleb's introductory story in "Black Swan," about the turkeys.

Read a summary of it here.

http://www.mymoneyblog.com/talebs-thanksgiving-turkey.html

You see, the facts you have presented imply the exact opposite of what you think they do.

That's all partly true HOWEVER - If I refute the statement "It's highly unlikely that being struck by a jet loaded with fuel would cause a skyscraper to fall" and show that in fact it's entirely likely it would, that is falsified and doesn't even add to the likely or unlikely accumulation of odd statistical events.

I would argue that the alleged accumulation of odd statistical events is actually not even odd and does not accumulate much at all.

EG, some people start a war.  On the first day of the offensive "odd things happen."

Really?  What the hell would one expect?

That's my attitude entirely.  I am only noting that of posters, a fair minority are highly "anti Jew."  We can presume their nationalities and religious beliefs pretty easily.  But you really don't run into a  lot of "Anti Jordanians" or "Anti-Egypt" or "Anti-Palestine" voices.

As just one example, Muslims would like to play the "Victim" card.  They are victims, they say - of Islamophobia.  They will say this with a straight face and in the next paragraph display JewPhobia.  Essentially the message is "I play victim," "you/they can't."

They will say "Respect (my) religion, don't insult Mohammed," then literally erupt with hatred and slander of Israel.

Congradulations, this is much better looking than other links that have been provided.

It's the same basic arguments, though.  The "Evil Jews".  Notably lots of facts and references completely missing.   Presents "Innuendo" as "Evidence."

Seems to purport that Evil Jews planted explosives, too.  So as far as the physical aspects of the theory this is pretty much bunko - assuming the planes were a cover for the explosives going off.

Well, does working the Web trying to spread the Evil Jews Theories pay well?

Just curious.

Any of a large number of threads on this forum suggest a much lower bar for hostility and violence against Jews than other groups.  This is both explicit and implicit, both purposeful and unintentional.   Quite an interesting phenomena.

Hey, another "It's the Evil Jews" theorist.

But, unfortunately, there is zero need for "infiltration of the government" for "pulling off 9/11."  There was zero necessity for "an inside job."

Without these premises, your theory collapses.