Any money spent to eliminate terrorists is money well spent.
Right now America has two military enemies: Iran and Russia and one frenemy: China.
When Russia did the same think they are against it and supported the Ukraine whereas Palestine ask for the same but US is supporting and financing the invasion so it shows the double standards of US. At the end of the day Innocent lives were taken and the money used to finance is also coming from the innocent tax payers working hard and pay tax to government. You got it backwards. Ukraine never attacked Russia before 2022. Russia has been attacking Ukraine since Feb. 2014. The US is on the side that is fighting (Palestinian, Iranian, Russian) terrorists. There is no double standard. Israel has been attacked by terrorists on a daily basis. So is Ukraine. All the lying is quite annoying isn't it? Reminds me of .... Reminds me of .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOGG_osOoVg |
|
|
|
...I have told them of the need to invest more in Bitcoins instead of investing all their money into skin care, hairs, bags, clothes and Jewelry....
Clearly all skin care, hairs, bags, clothes and jewelry should be abolished due to their super negative influence on right thinking. |
|
|
|
.... You are not interesting to me as an interlocutor, because you have nothing in your head except propaganda shit, slogans and chants. ...Lol.  These days, in online discussions, the actual live humans are few... |
|
|
|
It would appear that Target is the current boycott to watch as people are unhappy with the 'tucking' clothing and pro-trans products being marketed to children. The left has finally gotten the right to start taking boycotts seriously. All it took was a man dressed up like a woman on a beer can. Do you think this boycott will be as effective as the Budweiser boycott? Target executives are already having emergency meetings to try and get ahead of this issue as they do not want their sales to reflect a 25% decline like Bud Light. https://www.thestreet.com/retailers/target-faces-bud-light-like-woke-backlash-boycott-callsGreat! Go woke, go broke. Hammer them with boycotts. Why stop with Bud Light? This is not a "light" boycott; it is full strength, no mercy type boycott. Target's got nothing other stores don't have. We don't need them, and they don't deserve our money. Just look at their behavior - https://babylonbee.com/video/target-dog-attempts-to-get-girl-to-change-her-genderRepeat the mantra: GO WOKE, GO BROKE! |
|
|
|
....For example they predict US to only have oil for about 5 years (meaning till about 2025)....
No "they" do not; or if "they" do, they are fools. |
|
|
|
...
Elon Musk, ...has a net worth of over $260,000 billion and is still climbing...
no |
|
|
|
In 100 years, I could imagine a society where young people are expected to find a gender identity in the same way as they find other aspects of themselves, and maybe their gender identity changes a few times over their lives. Imagining such a society doesn't bother me at all. I think it's totally workable ...
Sure but it's a lot simpler to go in the other direction: Instead of 86/whatever genders, just one. Hello, Komrade. |
|
|
|
You may not promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease. This cannot be implemented - how will someone defend against accusations by claiming I am "stroking out"? What!! So I can’t say things suck as spik, kike, retard, nigger, mudslime, chink, christcuck, cracker, bug people, gook, cockroaches, pajeet, poo in loos, bongs, burgers, Muhammad was a pedo, you will never be a real woman, dialate, sodomites will go to hell, etc.?? They are too weak to handle criticism here? Sounds like a shit website.. Of course, some saw this coming and bugged out. |
|
|
|
... He is a little bit of more than these: Mafia Commission TrialThe Mafia Commission Trial (in full, United States v. Anthony Salerno, et al)[1] was a criminal trial in New York City, United States, that lasted from February 25, 1985, until November 19, 1986. Using evidence obtained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 11 organized crime figures, including the heads of New York's so-called "Five Families," were indicted by United States Attorney Rudolph Giuliani under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) on charges including extortion, labor racketeering, and murder. Eight of them were convicted under RICO, and most of them were sentenced to 100 years in prison on January 13, 1987, the maximum possible sentence under that law. I am laughing my ass off at those clueless turds trying to picture him as a clown. ... It's simply a tactic. Ridicule. Part of a weird effort to secure a new POTUS in the court of public opinion. But the Kraken is now out. The SCOTUS has the Texas case. That does not necessarily mean that Trump will win the four states in question. This is important because it represents a way forward out of what I described as "the shitshow". It DOES NOT ask the SC to decide the election for Trump. A) The US right now is the joke of the entire world. They watch a classical insurrection take place here. The sort of thing people in many countries have tragically, lived through. The Texas case requires the four defective, suspect states votes to be redone in a logical and dignified manner. Should this happen, the US will be showing the world a sane way out, and we'll regain their respect. Even perhaps teach them something. B) If the SC does not find for the Plaintiff, the stolen election stands. 70 million Americans will never forget it and the country will be divided as never before. It won't go away, and these people will essentially consider Trump a martyr. If the SC finds for the Plaintiff, the four states legislatures will produce their electors per the Constitution. Trump voters will accept that regardless of whether the result is for or against their wishes. The Democrat overlords will have no rationale basis to call their little BLM / Antifa thugs back into the streets. Not that it would matter if they did. SUMMARY: The Texas lawsuit presents a rational and dignified way out of a sordid mess. And the whole world will be watching. Oh, and the same thugs and cheats are going to try to steal the election of 1-5 for the two senators of Georgia. All equipment, ballot boxes, and procedures as used in the presidential election now remain in place in Georgia. There should be a way to handle that, but I do not know, those seats may be successfully stolen. I think I'll be offline a couple days. I'm a bit tired of the oppressive atmosphere. |
|
|
|
I stopped watching TV a while ago, there are just too many ADs. In my opinion we shouldn't be forced to watch an Ad every 15 minutes, it's too much. ...
But the News is every bit as believable as the Ads! |
|
|
|
....
i feel all potential nominees need to submit their tax returns before even starting the primaries/caucuses
to atleast give people and IRS many months to find out how dodgy someone is at handling money. managing things, honesty and trust
Tax returns don't show any of those factors. |
|
|
|
It's nice to see you actually remembering your scripts, and practicing them.
......
Why thanx bro! I'll put it to music and send you the link so you can update your favorites playlist... Okay, but be warned you are going to be down between Lightning Hopkins and Zhou Tonged |
|
|
|
even after a sex change operation (it only replaces genitals) the other muscles in arms and legs are still masculine. ...
Bet if you tried to restrict them to mens' sports they'd bitch. And bitch they would. I guess those that approved for such participation are professionals and have their bases but, the fact that the makings of man's body was already in place, one signal genital doesn't alter the whole thing. I know people would argue that some women are more muscular than men but in those cases are often due to genetic mutation or steroid enhanced muscle development. Science will always tell you, a man has 40+ percent of the body as muscles while a woman has just about 20-28 percent. This explains for the soft body nature of a woman and in sports, it'd often about the muscles. Allowing transgender participation is just an introduction of bias and that isn't good for the spirit of a good sportsmanship. Yes. Although there will always be exceptions; some women runners have very little body fat. I have know a couple that were very strong. But those exceptions should be the winners and rightfully so. |
|
|
|
Are you ready to receive that schooling?
Absolutely. I'm not so sure you're ready yet to accept Trump's loss though. I assume this is the bargaining stage. I don't recall if depression comes before or after. Have you felt depressed at all lately? For me, the prospect on 11-4 was and remains a six month shitshow, and yeah, that is depressing. But that is regardless of who emerges as POTUS. Any sane person would see that. Here is your situation. The intense, heavy pushing of the narrative in the media that "Biden is Pres Elect", the media helping by banning conservative content, many other things now do not matter. At all. You have a conservative leaning SCOTUS, at least 18 states presenting a plea to that body to solve a problem. The problem involves as Defendant, 4 status with Republican legislatures (but apparent Democratic control of critical election organization.) So three bunches of "Republicans" are going to solve this between themselves. I can guess how three bunches of Democrats would handle such a thing. About the next 24 hours is the timeframe to place your bets at those market odds of what was it? 10:1? You've been advised. |
|
|
|
even after a sex change operation (it only replaces genitals) the other muscles in arms and legs are still masculine. ...
Bet if you tried to restrict them to mens' sports they'd bitch. |
|
|
|
Am I forgetting something?
The meme-worthy swatting of Donald's hand... Democrats totally misinterpreted that affectionate gesture. So, you've got a woman who is not a bit frightened of swatting the most powerful man on the planet. I for one find that rather interesting and humorous. But I'm sure there is a possible negative take on it? |
|
|
|
Likely the four states' congress would each pick electors; if they chose not to the US Congress would pick them.
....SCOTUS might oblige to provide some schooling on the subject. Are you ready to receive that schooling? |
|
|
|
Texas requests the following in it's SCOTUS case. The real world implications of these short arguments may not be obvious. The decision as to what to do to comply with the SCOTUS ruling would be up to those states. Likely the four states' congress would each pick electors; if they chose not to the US Congress would pick them. Ted Cruz may argue this case. I wonder how strong a defense the defendants will make. They don't have to make a defense at all. A ruling for Texas doesn't take away the right of the state to choose it's electors, but requires the results of the dirty 11-3 voting process to not be used to pick them. May be interesting to hear the arguments and rebuttals. Although the strength of the constitutional arguments in the plea are most important, some rebuttals are arguable. Expect the SC to rule 5-4 to grant the plea of the State of Texas. Really it should be 9-0. The simplest outcome of this would be the Republican congress of the four states to each produce a set of Trump electors, and Trump becomes POTUS on 1-20. Other outcomes are possible that also lead to Trump winning, and of course SC could not find for Texas, or find for Texas in part. The defendant states could get deadlocked and toss the problem to the US House, where one would expect the full house vote to be pro-Trump. But if Pelosi stalled that, she could wind up POTUS, whether for a day, a week, whatever; until the SC required swift action. I think that's right. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff States respectfully request that this Court issue the following relief:
A. Declare that Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
B. Declare that any electoral college votes cast by such presidential electors appointed in Defendant States Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and cannot be counted.
C. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College.
D. Enjoin Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College and authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors.
E. If any of Defendant States have already appointed presidential electors to the Electoral College using the 2020 election results, direct such States’ legislatures, pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 and U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2, to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment, or to appoint no presidential electors at all.
F. Enjoin the Defendant States from certifying presidential electors or otherwise meeting for purposes of the electoral college pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 5, 3 U.S.C. § 7, or applicable law pending further order of this Court.
G. Award costs to Plaintiff State.
H. Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf? |
|
|
|
... something is off. And I can't find any more information, weird. Oh, BTW, 17 isn't half of the states, that would be 25...
Not if we hired some of your proven track record "counting experts" and let them use their favorite Dominion machines. ...
This is so true.
And what with him getting ....
You can’t make this shit up.
It's nice to see you actually remembering your scripts, and practicing them. ALINSKY'S RULES FOR RADICALS
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
But you need to strive harder, and practice more. Be sure the bitter, aggrieved tone is dominant in the argument. Also problematic is that Alinsky did not advocate random babbling on the Internet, but direct confrontation. So you are not even following the directives. Wow, that's the shortest news article I've ever seen... something is off. And I can't find any more information, weird. Oh, BTW, 17 isn't half of the states, that would be 25. But it really depends on what those 17 states are, which the story doesn't mention. It's nice to see you at least trying to understand what is actually going on. This link explains the merits of the case. Responses from the four states are due today at 3pm. IMHO this is a well formed set of arguments that the SCOTUS can act on. https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/if-election-issues-are-not-fixed-elected-state-republicans-must-refuse-to-certify/This discussion has more info and links to the actual court documents. https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/12/texas-sues-pennsylvania-georgia-michigan-and-wisconsin-in-u-s-supreme-court-to-have-legislatures-appoint-electors/My prediction of a total six month shitshow remains... FEAR THE KRAKEN! THE KRAKEN IS HERE! |
|
|
|
I could not resist that reply. But I'm pretty sure I know the answer to the riddle; was the school dumb or was I dumb?
It's not a matter of being "dumb" so much as valuing education. Maybe your school was dumb, but in that case you should have graduated easily. But did the Kraken have problems in high school? Did they laugh at him too? He should have graduated easily. Let it all out. Can't imagine how frustrated you must feel right now. Odd, I don't feel frustrated at all, and don't have anything to "let out." Standard Alinsky playbook you got there. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
