Are we going to 16,000$ before moving to ATH ?
No |
|
|
|
For all the WO bulls out there, those wearing the silly caps and posting almost exclusively in one thread, here are my current concerns. After a month of price being overbought, we have now confirmed a rejection from returning to overbought levels. While price remains in bullish territory, a break below 55 could see a re-test of bearish price strength:  , the $17.9K support level still needs to be broken by the bears with confidence and follow through. There's a good chance we bounce from the 21 Day MA again (blue line, bull trend moving average) like we did a few days ago, creating a textbook bullish higher low. But if we don't, and we end up back at $16K, it's not going to be pretty. I'm still 95% in. Ironically the 3.5% I sold at $18K from the previous break-down I now no longer need due to a tax based administrative error  It does mean that capital is now back in the order books trying to pick up a wick on a low liquidity exchange pair  It's soon time for strong hands. If you need to sell a % or two to make you feel better about a correction that could go as deep as 25-35% ($13-15K), now is the time to think about it. Then why don't you sell now and buy back at enormous profit. Just imagine...you can double your stash and be able to afford a "SILLY HAT"of your own  |
|
|
|
 JJG? |
|
|
|
CME gap  Between 17015-18275 Its a gap for ants |
|
|
|
whatever all that means.
Don't be such a negative Nancy |
|
|
|
@APompilano We are watching simple supply and demand economics play out. Bitcoiners aren’t selling their Bitcoin. The halving cut incoming supply. There is a significant increase in demand. Price has to go up to accommodate. This isn’t rocket science. https://twitter.com/apompliano/status/1331591543556345856?s=21No its rocket science and math |
|
|
|
|
The battle for 20k continues.....
|
|
|
|
Wow perhaps we should do a wo gf ass challenge? A woer posts a pic of his gf/wife (bf for Bawb) ass with BTC price written on it and also write a username of a woer he challenges... Bunch of degenerates in this place. I agree.  I don't see a problem |
|
|
|
I guess people dump there alts for the most secure blockchain BTC . Makes sense to me
I don't think "people" are behind this pump but to each his own. Only the clever ones  (dump alts for btc) |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is where its at don't you know?  Yeah it is doing great but I am wondering... why alts don't follow... Even ltc kinda follows btc even though not as strong but grin is either still dumping or staying same. I guess people dump there alts for the most secure blockchain BTC . Makes sense to me |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is where its at don't you know? |
|
|
|
The short opportunities continue to grow as fake news fuels the bitcoin HOAX. Little Shatoshi's project has failed as I proved years ago, but the fake news keeps fooling people into losing their money. Smart money will enter high leveraged short positions and keep them open in preparation for the epic meltdown soon to come. Bitcoin shorts will be the greatest trade, possibly in the history of the world.
I don't trade |
|
|
|
Congratulations everybody Bitcoin's market cap has reached a new all-time high. Fake news! RIGGED!  |
|
|
|
|
The battle for 20K continues
|
|
|
|
|
Let that be a lesson to you PayPal bitcoin virgin's
|
|
|
|
Shit is happening  |
|
|
|
All Bitcoin forks are counterfeit derivatives of original bitcoin (BTC). Including, Bitcoin Cash, BCH, BCHN, BCHA, ABC, BSV etc. A second version would be a massive development and maintenance hassle for me. It's hard enough maintaining backward compatibility while upgrading the network without a second version locking things in. If the second version screwed up, the user experience would reflect badly on both, although it would at least reinforce to users the importance of staying with the official version. If someone was getting ready to fork a second version, I would have to air a lot of disclaimers about the risks of using a minority version. This is a design where the majority version wins if there's any disagreement, and that can be pretty ugly for the minority version and I'd rather not go into it, and I don't have to as long as there's only one version.
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
...snip...
Bitcoin is BTC at https://bitcoin.org AAAannnd the only Satoshi compatible version is? - not SegWitbtc - sorry Since when did you get appointed Satoshi's spokeswoman? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
