Is it the beginning of some kind of cold war led by China? The primary purpose of these bilateral trades isn't only to cut costs in my opinion, and China probably is doing its best to lessen the dominance of the US dollar over the world economy by initiating these trades with different nations, they know that other countries will follow suit knowing they can do it to reduce costs and to become a bit more independent when it comes to using a currency for international trade.

I wonder how will things be if USD isn't the leading currency of the world and isn't used for the pricing of almost everything that you see or buy locally or internationally either through the internet or in real life.

Well, you are probably right that people from higher age groups tend to forget things very easily which can sometimes be troublesome if they are investing in Bitcoin, especially if they are doing it for a short or mid term. Those who wish to invest for the long-term, wouldn't really have much issues if they simply store them in a hardware wallet and keep the private keys somewhere safe, and also tell someone else about them.

If they don't tell anyone about them, and if something unfortunate happens, the Bitcoins will be lost forever. If they write it down in their will, that will also be a good way to transfer their investment to their children or grandchildren.

The ones who make the market conditions worse are called panic sellers, and they are the ones who can never in their lives earn any profit from crypto unless or until they learn to have patience and control over their emotions. By the way, why does a bear market encourage anyone to buy altcoins? Bitcoins are also cheap in a bear market, and you can't get anything better than cheap Bitcoins, can you?

Just buy when the sats are cheap and hold for as long as you can and you should be good. Diversification is a good thing too in a bear market since you never know which token shoots through the roof when the bull market hits.

No post is considered spam or ignored unless it is actually spam, which means it has already been posted and if it's a question, already answered. You can find out about that with a simple forum search from the home page of the forum (so that the search function searches the whole forum for the keyword provided). If you find out that the question or concern you haven't already been discussed, go ahead and ask/post it, and it will receive the necessary responses.

To OP, as mentioned by many, a very vital thing that you forgot to mention which newbies commit most of the time and I've caught a lot of them doing it myself, that is plagiarism. Never copy-paste things, unless you are using them as a reference and mentioning the source.

I don't really understand how a concept can work for sending or receiving Bitcoins offline while the blockchain network is totally online and cannot be used without internet access. Even the text message method doesn't sound realistic to me. How come to a text message that is sent over a mobile network can reach the blockchain and make a transaction from it?

The concepts most probably didn't work or succeed and that's why they were never announced or used publicly or they could at least get some popularity if they were viable solutions. Cryptocurrencies simply cannot work without the internet because they are digital, simple as that.

That doesn't always happen that the title of the post comes to them, because I've seen a lot of times where people have totally different content within the post while the title is referring to something totally different, and that becomes misleading. It is not always too easy to come up with a perfect title and some people lack these skills.

One needs to work on their writing and understanding abilities in order to come up with perfect titles for posts and threads so that their title can match the content of their post. It is not easy but it is something that one can learn over time.

It also doesn't mean that the story is real, I mean we can clearly see that there are a lot of FUDs and attacks happening on Binance lately, and there's no surprise after the crash of FTX, Binance was probably the next target, now we can't really be sure if who is the one targeting it, whether it's FTX behind the scenes, the large authorities or someone unknown.

We can't really be sure if all these stories are true and aren't simply a part of a master plan to take Binance down. I don't think that it can be a coincidence that every couple of days, new bad news comes out about Binance.

I don't really think this was necessary at all. In a public socializing platform, if you post something, people will comment on all sorts of things but that doesn't mean you should take all of them seriously and act according to them, you should only do what you think is necessary. Let people say whatever they want to say, you should only focus on what you are doing if you think you are doing it correctly.

Your investments whether they are for your own self or for someone from your family, are your private matters and aren't to be shared publicly even if you are asked to do so. It was your own decision, and you don't need to prove anything to anyone.

I don't really think that this kind of scams existed for years since wallet connecting feature hasn't really been around for very long, and it is a relatively new technology that came to being after the introduction of decentralized platforms. Scammers are smart, and they use methods that are popular and used by a large quantity of people from everywhere.

They chose to use a decentralized platform technique this time to scam newbies by making them believe that they can get a lot of money by gambling on their platform or by playing some games available on their platform, but none of it is true and all they need is a wallet getting connected and that's it.

For it to go to or above $30k, it will need to first cross $29k which has become the newest resistance after $25k. It has gone near it a couple of times but hasn't yet been successful in going above it. It might be because of the less buying pressure after it reached $28k because people mostly like to buy it lower and stop buying when it is going up.

Considering that, I don't feel like it will cross $30k before the end of this month, because it has already started dropping below a little bit from $28k, and it will probably go around $26k before rallying up again.

People tend to ignore the fact that they can buy Bitcoin in portions and with any amount that they can afford to spend on it. And they also ignore the fact that the price of Bitcoin will eventually be higher than where it is today one day in the future for sure. So even if it drops back, it will at least go higher than where it is right now for once even if it doesn't stay up for very long.

So it's probably the best decision to do DCA whenever you feel that the price is good for buying more. Remember, you are never late if you are investing in Bitcoin, as it has the ability to surprise you in the future.

Even if crypto fits the bill very well as per the criteria mentioned, what about volatility? Don't you think that could be an issue for countries that would show interest in using it as their reserve currency and using it as payment for global trades? What would happen if the price falls significantly just like it did in the past? How would the countries behave in a situation like that?

I believe this is one of the reasons why Bitcoin will probably fail as a reserve currency unless every country accepts the fact that they will face a loss of monetary value every time the price falls.

Well, sometimes it does work when you walk up to a software house or a company and drop your CV letting them know that you are looking for a job and what position you are willing to work in, but as you said, it's not really required since almost all the companies even the smallest ones are available online or at least have their social media handles where they can be reached out.

I believe having interviews on-site is much better than having them online if you are interviewing for a job within the same city that you're living in because you may face problems in online interviews sometimes with an internet connection or any other issue can disturb your interview and you may lose the opportunity.

The reason why investing in altcoins is that you never know what the outcome will be. If you do your research and analyze a project before making an investment, that might make your investment less risky but even after that, it will still be a risk. Those who don't do any research and analysis before investing in altcoins will probably face the consequences.

As you said, the best way is simply to choose Bitcoin as the main asset for investment and then spread the remaining capital among the top and trusted altcoins out there, like ETH, BNB, LTC, and many more.

The ultimate goal is to have enough savings for the future, now whether you plan to achieve that by saving up and holding Bitcoins or by investing your earned capital into other businesses to achieve your goal. Some people prefer the first option where they only accumulate and hold Bitcoins and other assets, while some like it more when the money is invested in real-world businesses like real estate, etc.

If I talk about my choice, I prefer both. I believe I should have some of my money in Bitcoin while part of it should be invested in real estate, maybe gold too, and any other business that I find profitable around where I live. That way, I will be profiting from Bitcoin in the long run if the price increases significantly, and I'll also have other sources if it doesn't go very well.

Governments are there more than just helping the poor but they can also bring peace when there are wars. When I say war, it can also be a miss-understanding of one or two people in our locality. There are small government establishments placed on our localities to solved these mini-conflicts. Government may help to solve the poverty but we shouldn't totally rely on them.

There are things that will also depend on the people in order to make the action more effective. Unfortunately, not all governments are like this but there are corrupt governments who can only think about themselves but I think the people on these countries can still do something to improve their lives.

Well, though you are partly right that the models are created by humans and can also be defeated by humans, it's basically not a fight between an AI model and humans, but it is more like humans vs humans because those that will defeat the models will be facing the model's abilities that are actually being utilized by another human behind the model.

So this war basically is between humans where one will try to utilize the abilities of an invention while the other will try to beat it with luck and the advantage it has over it that's the house edge every casino has.

The messing up of some of the banks including Silicon Valley Bank and some others has actually proved to be a good thing for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general. As soon as the banks started shaking, the price of Bitcoin started going up and crossed $28k by now and we are expecting the bullish trend to continue from here and at least cross $30k.

It has been almost a year since we have seen Bitcoin at the price where it is right now, and it surely is a great feeling it gives you positive vibes thinking that Bitcoin might cross its all-time high within this year.

Lol, in one sentence you are saying that it is risky to invest in new cryptocurrencies, and in the second sentence you contradict your own sentence by suggesting a Ponzi scheme that pays 60% per month which is a probable scam and extreme risk. I think there are only two ways that I can think of why you are doing this.

You are either the creator of that Ponzi scheme project and looking for investors because you are in desperate need of money, or you are too naïve and actually joined such a project at someone else's suggestion or using their referral link. If it's the first case, this is definitely not going to work here, and if it's the second case, I would suggest you stop using that service immediately and withdraw your funds if you can which I don't think will be an option for you anymore.

I agree with this 270 while you are playing at home with pitch is also not bad at all mean things looking for better end from India but if veteran Rohit Sharma is still had no mind set how to chase like this then you can't expect better things from other players he needs to understand every time going with aggressive way is not favorable from this match hopefully now they will be checked their mistakes and try to fix this all before world cup because now they have no enough time to do more experiments.

Start was good but as India lost first few wickets then suddenly things gone out of their hands and Australia done good comeback in leadership of Steven Smith which is good as captain and have good record in past as well SKY complete his hat-trick of golden ducks in ODI which is also another achievement for this number 1 ranked player in T20I.