Bitcoin Forum
June 01, 2024, 12:25:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 [532] 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 ... 751 »
10621  Other / Meta / Re: Please unlock busminer account on: May 05, 2015, 12:55:56 PM


It so happened that a couple of months ago, blocked my account busminer, admit that he was guilty and strong HYIP carried away ... I promise no longer any HYIP and referral links and other violations of the rules of the conference, this account as very dear to me and I hope I will be able to get it back,really I hope your indulgence and understanding.

ps

I wrote several times to banappeals-w6pquw43@theymos.e4ward.com
If you were banned for anything to do with HYIP spam then I vote you go away forever. HYIP spam/scams have been plaguing the forum for a long time now and has made it overall worse.
10622  Economy / Auctions / Re: Selling this account on: May 05, 2015, 12:42:01 PM
People usually create a new account in order to sell their accounts so their identity is not revealed. The value of known sold accounts are often lower then accounts that are not known to be sold.
10623  Economy / Reputation / Re: hinglemc <------anyone/everyone I have ever scammed pls come forward on: May 05, 2015, 08:24:41 AM
Here is another, more specific threat:

!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!

I mean first I have to learn about computers

but by like 2024 I will deface your myspace page to the point of it being entirely unrecognizable

bewildering all of your friends who frequent it

in the meantime perhaps I'll just pay your coworker twenty bucks to tie your shoelaces together at lunch so you look like a jerk infront of everybody

and then at the end of the day when you get to your car -- as you turn the ignition -- all of the lights/radio/windshieldwipersNcrap go off all over the place as you yell out in slow motion NNNNNOoooooooooooooooooooooo

and recognize instantly that this must be the work of hingle mccringleberry

as you stumble out of your car and fall to your knees, yelling at God, begging for mercy from this disproportionate ghoulish wrath

and then like me and four of my boys jump out with supersoakers and douse you with liquid water with like ice in the fkn reserve tanks
and show no mercy to your smartphone devices as they crackle beneath the water
hisssssssssssssssssssssssssss

-_-

as mr burns said to the vending machine that wouldnt take his dollar

youve made a powerful enemy today
I reported this one to Salty
10624  Economy / Reputation / Re: hinglemc <------anyone/everyone I have ever scammed pls come forward on: May 05, 2015, 07:41:57 AM
This is technically not a scam, however you made an empty threat to me via PM. IMO this is a pretty good representation of how much you should be trusted

!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!

you will remember this mistake
10625  Other / Meta / Re: Selling Bitcointalk Trust - which subforum to use? on: May 04, 2015, 11:51:40 PM

That all said, there were a lot of rational details that people overlooked here, so their panties got into a wad for nothing. First the OP didn't have a default trust account, they had no understanding of how the trust system worked. If they did have a trusted account, it was most likely on trust depth 3/4 which would be relatively meaningless. We don't know how much the OP was charging for trust and we don't know if their trusted account had any weight at all.
I asked him how much he was charging, however he refused to answer, and is more evidence that he was trolling as opposed to actually selling trust.

I actually hoped that they did have a trusted account, because the only way to see how it would have all played out.
They most likely did not have an account on default trust considering that he was banned for ban evading it would be likely that as of when he created the account that his other accounts were already banned, and as a result would be unable to leave positive trust (he was actually banned multiple times making it even less likely that is "main" account is both on default trust and not banned).
I have a few theories on why selling trust isn't profitable either, but we would have had to see it in action.
The reason is the same that it does not make sense to buy a trusted account and then scam. Default trust accounts have additional value because they are on default trust. It is unlikely that someone is going to be able to sell enough trust in order to make up the additional value their account has for being on default trust. It would be easy to detect when someone is selling trust, especially considering that someone could simply buy trust on an alt account and then whoever ends up leaving that person positive trust is the person selling trust and can be easily called out, and as a result would likely be removed from the default trust network. I was actually about to do this right before the OP was banned, but abandoned the idea once I saw that he was banned.


There have been some people in the past who have essentially been selling trust either via their escrow service or other services they offer (that are often overpriced). Many of them have been removed from default trust for a variety of reasons, while some others remain. Some people who are clearly trying to farm trust attempt to use these people's services.

The fact that trust is being defacto traded via various services makes the decision to leave positive trust for someone a much more complex question then it should be. If I had left positive trust for everyone that I provided escrow services to, on every occasion that I escrowed for them then a number of people who I personally find sketchy would show as having significant amounts of positive trust because of me which is not something I want.
10626  Economy / Lending / Re: grtthegreat's LENDING SERVICE [S/H/L ONLY] [15% ROI] on: May 04, 2015, 07:07:43 PM
It is probably a good idea to use a different repayment address for each loan. This will prevent two people from claiming that they repaid you with the same transaction. It will also help with privacy of both you and your borrowers.
10627  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller left himself positive trust using an alt account on: May 04, 2015, 05:48:15 PM

Actually this is just Blazedout419 trying to rickroll us.   I'd have expected something a little more serious from him.  Blazedout419, you probably will think this stuff is less of a joke when Quickseller eventually goes after you and tries to ruin your reputation without cause.
blazed has a spotless record both here and in IRC. I have traded with him a number of times and have trusted him with a good amount of money.

Actually now that I think about it, he is one of two people that I had sent first when trading with, everyone else I made them either send first or use escrow.

I would personally be surprised if blazed was ever involved in a scam.

That's fine.  You vouch for him.  I've got no problem with blazedout either.  I did business with him in the past as an advertizer for SliverWallets (unless I'm confusing him with someone else).  The issue here is him making light of the trouble you're making for other people.
The only people I am making trouble for is scammers. I didn't actually leave myself positive trust, not only that but doing so wouldn't even make any sense because the account that left me positive trust is likely on no ones trust list.

His spreadsheet does sum up everything very well
10628  Other / Archival / Re: [WTB] bitcointalk accounts (bulk) on: May 04, 2015, 05:32:14 PM
a lot of good account coming in. i am spending 10btc for these account today. if you have bulk even better

all prices non negotiable

i have already bought some senior account so not buying any more senior, just jr member, member, full member
you are trying to buy 10 BTC worth of accounts? Why could you possibly need so many accounts? That is more accounts then I have ever owned at one time and more then anyone that I know has owned at once.

I also am doubting that you actually purchased any senior accounts considering that no passwords of senior accounts have changed since you created this thread.
10629  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller left himself positive trust using an alt account on: May 04, 2015, 05:22:28 PM

Actually this is just Blazedout419 trying to rickroll us.   I'd have expected something a little more serious from him.  Blazedout419, you probably will think this stuff is less of a joke when Quickseller eventually goes after you and tries to ruin your reputation without cause.
blazed has a spotless record both here and in IRC. I have traded with him a number of times and have trusted him with a good amount of money.

Actually now that I think about it, he is one of two people that I had sent first when trading with, everyone else I made them either send first or use escrow.

I would personally be surprised if blazed was ever involved in a scam.
10630  Other / Off-topic / Re: Quickseller... on: May 04, 2015, 04:33:44 PM
So many threads all over the place I figured I would consolidate everything into 1 spreadsheet that clearly lists all the issues -> http://bit.ly/IqT6zt



edit: I think this sums everything up pretty well.
10631  Economy / Gambling / Re: BITDICE.ME - CRYPTO CASINO - DICE - BLACKJACK - >100BTC MAX PROFIT - 1 YEAR OLD on: May 04, 2015, 06:22:53 AM
Can you confirm if bitdice.me owns/controls the address 16HseYWh9AoaqkoWHszHgEEMin5Zzqh9u5 and if so to provide some kind of supporting evidence/backup?

I will ask the admin if the address belongs to BitDice. Anything wrong with the address or transactions on it ?
P.S Feel free to PM me if you have any questions

I already spoke with Alex and he confirmed that the above address does not belong to bitdice.me. Thanks for the replay
10632  Other / Meta / Re: I saw food in my profile? on: May 04, 2015, 05:09:14 AM
Can someone explain why it's there? Huh
You must be very hungry. I would suggest eating cake, more specifically I would suggest eating birthday cake.
10633  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility on: May 04, 2015, 02:22:18 AM
Hey, thanks MZ, is this somewhere in the trust thread and I didn't see it?  How did you know this?

Theymos posted it somewhere, but I don't remember the link. 

Actually I found it - it's right here in this thread.  Smiley

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035687.msg11193212#msg11193212
He actually responded to that exact quote, the response was several days after theymos had posted that statement.  Roll Eyes

LOL!  I didn't catch that either, because I modified my quote to not show it.

I even spent 10 minutes searching google.   Undecided
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035687.msg11257211#msg11257211

Above is the post where he replied. I personally wouldn't spend any time searching for answers for that person, I have had him tagged as a spammer for a long time and I doubt he has any actual interest in the answer to any questions he asks.

I personally have also had much better luck in finding things with the forum search as it allows you to search specific threads and specific subs.
10634  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility on: May 04, 2015, 02:11:15 AM
Hey, thanks MZ, is this somewhere in the trust thread and I didn't see it?  How did you know this?

Theymos posted it somewhere, but I don't remember the link. 

Actually I found it - it's right here in this thread.  Smiley

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035687.msg11193212#msg11193212
He actually responded to that exact quote, the response was several days after theymos had posted that statement.  Roll Eyes
10635  Economy / Gambling / Re: BITDICE.ME - CRYPTO CASINO - DICE - BLACKJACK - >100BTC MAX PROFIT - 1 YEAR OLD on: May 03, 2015, 10:17:25 PM
Can you confirm if bitdice.me owns/controls the address 16HseYWh9AoaqkoWHszHgEEMin5Zzqh9u5 and if so to provide some kind of supporting evidence/backup?
10636  Economy / Lending / Re: Need Loan to pay vendor fee on: May 03, 2015, 10:12:24 PM
When someone contacted me to act as escrow to buy your instagram account (with you copied on the PM), you replied saying that the account was sold. I would think that it would make sense that you would already have the "vender fee" from that sale

!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!

So we are doing a deal between me and celius for that instagram account.
QS, mind setting up the escrow agreement?

Willing to  pay his asking price for the account.

!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!

1ECnFsLiSmMynH2h2e16dRwTgkKWgYWigo ill send you the account info once payment has been done
I already sold it
I got accounts to Bangbros XXXpawn Mia Khalifa Bangbros Live Girls Gone wild just for $3 dollars
10637  Economy / Lending / Re: ★★★[Quick Loans] [Short Term Loans] [No Interest] [COLLATERAL] Rony_90★★★ on: May 03, 2015, 09:00:22 PM
Need to loan 2 btc (or something close to it)
% interest: your call
term: 3-4 weeks (your call)
address: 1Ert2D5imVbJeUoMcwVmeS9kf1DxzVtPBH

plans are to take over a coin and host giveaways and pay coders to add features.

also looking to build my trust rating.. taking my account more seriously now. I have FIAT i will convert to btc if I do not make your money back on time.


could really use your help!

(willing to work and negotiate with you here)
How many places are you going to spam this loan request? The fact that you are so flexible on so many terms is a pretty good indication that you have no intention of repaying your loan IMO
10638  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Brand New 2014 2015 movies + Mayweather Pacquiao full fight on: May 03, 2015, 05:33:24 PM
You should finish one trade before opening several new ones. You are offering to sell many different things, but are not replying to buyer son any of them. This is starting to seem suspicious.
He can only send up to 5 PM's per hour so that may be why he is not responding to offers via PM. There is no rule against trying to sell multiple items at once. There are reports however that the OP is refusing to use escrow so you probably should trade with caution.
10639  Other / Meta / Re: taking loan with multiple accounts and put their accounts as collateral on: May 03, 2015, 04:58:13 PM
@Botany : I forgot scams aren't moderated.

@Vod : Honestly I'm talking this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1021034.msg11052314#msg11052314
those account belong to loan scammers, I gave a sign and told to lender about that, but he keeps accepting their loan request.

If it is not againts the rules, I won't ruin someone's business and  bother lending section anymore.

Honestly, even though Neotex is encouraging scams, I don't think he will stop accepting as he is profiting from it. Get accounts for low price and sell it - Profit!!!
Bingo. As long as the lender only lends a small enough amount that the loan is below the market price of the account then the lender will actually profit more if the loan is not repaid then if the loan is repaid. Most of the loans I have given when I took the accounts as collateral ended up not being repaid, however I was able to sell most of them for prices significantly above the repayment amount with minimal effort in all cases except one.

Using your account as collateral is not against the rules. Having more the one account is not against the rules.

As long as the lender ensures (beyond reasonable doubt) that the account wasn't hacked then used as collateral.

This may be a stupid question, but how are the accounts sold. Whenever I see an account for sale, everybody wants the seller to send a signed message from a BTC address that was posted a few months back to prove that the account wasn't hacked. If someone takes possession of an account that was pledged as collateral, how does he prove that the account is now his and wasn't hacked?

I think he should only provide the 'first' signed message(by the real owner - or previous owner). Unless he will also buy the private key (of the bitcoin address) from the seller and he will be able to sign all the bitcoin message that he wants.

So if I understand you correctly, you use the same signed message that the original owner gave you. Is that correct?
That is correct. The signed message should include who the account is being pledged/sold to. You would then sign a message from a known address that you(the person who purchased the account) had previously posted in order to transfer ownership from the original owner to you to the new buyer
10640  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: JUST HAD 0.92329 BTC STOLEN - HOW??? on: May 03, 2015, 04:36:03 PM
By the way, looks like this wasn't the first time OP said he got hacked:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=202087.0

Umm.... something suspicious is going on here methinks.
It looks like in that case his account was hacked, but no money was stolen. That could have been another attempt to get attention

I would think it would be unlikely that the account would both get hacked and recovered inside of ~7 hours (the time between the OP was made in that thread and the time it was last edited).
Pages: « 1 ... 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 [532] 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 ... 751 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!