Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 06:38:10 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 [534] 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 ... 751 »
10661  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★ BitPoker.io - A New Poker Experience! - Levelled Faucet - LAUNCH GIVEAWAY ★ on: May 03, 2015, 02:42:12 AM
I think that it is clear that you do not know the definition of libel. Nothing in my previous statements would be considered to be libel even if proved to be false

As I said, I am not a lawyer, and the call was very quick.

I guess we will see..

Not all torts result in bodily harm. Some cause harm to one’s reputation instead. The tort of “defamation” encompasses any statement that damages one’s reputation. There are, however, several different forms of defamation. Libel, for example, is defamation that is written or published. Slander, on the other hand, is defamation that is orally conveyed. In many cases, a person whose reputation has been injured by a defamatory statement may sue the person who made the statement. This section includes resources explaining how defamation suits work. You’ll find articles on the elements of libel and slander, defenses to a defamation claim, and the statute of limitations for a defamation suit.

http://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/defamation-libel-slander.html

And sir might I remind you, unlike on this board, the onus of proof is on you.

For both the bitpoker.io account and the site its self.
In order for a defendant to be held liable for libel a plaintiff must prove a statement to be false. All of what I have posted can be reasonably construed as an opinion and as a result you would need to prove that what I said was in fact not my opinion at the time.
10662  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★ BitPoker.io - A New Poker Experience! - Levelled Faucet - LAUNCH GIVEAWAY ★ on: May 03, 2015, 02:29:52 AM

It seems that he claims to have sold his ownership stake in the site. I have updated my trust rating accordingly.
10663  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★ BitPoker.io - A New Poker Experience! - Levelled Faucet - LAUNCH GIVEAWAY ★ on: May 03, 2015, 02:15:47 AM
I am not allowed to comment on the other matter, after a quick call we were told we should not comment on it until after Monday once everything is reviewed.

Screen caps, comments etc.

but I can comment on

The most likely vector the site would scam would be that it would know all the player's hands and would bet/play accordingly

Are you serious?

I think your mind is as inaccurate as your "information", or maybe you simply can not read.

Here is a link .. http://www.briggsoft.com/pmavens.htm, maybe you should go read it.

It is 3rd party software, and  I do not know the hands until after the hand is finished and hand postback is called.

Again I state "check your facts before you post this BS"

I do believe your already in for enough, are you sure want to keep making more incorrect/false statements?

"that it would know all the player's hands and would bet/play accordingly" - that seems to me, to be an other misleading statement of fact and not an opinion, and as such, a continued statement of Defamation/Libel.

Screencapped and forwarded for review, as I am not a lawyer.

This action will pursued to the fullest extent allowable. Please feel free to continue posting.

I think that it is clear that you do not know the definition of libel. Nothing in my previous statements would be considered to be libel even if proved to be false
10664  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [FOR SALE] 17500CLAMS [WANT] Bitcoins on: May 03, 2015, 02:08:25 AM
Why don't you sell all these alt coins you stole from your main account

What are you referring to?

I think he already sold the 17500 CLAM this thread was talking about:

I was under the impression that he was attempting to sell the CLAMs in an off exchange deal. I was not aware that he already sold them on an exchange

The OP is an alt of TheGambler and close to 20 others. The CLAMs he was selling were likely stolen via his HYIP scams

He won these from www.Just-dice.com or at least a big chunk of them.
Do you know what his starting bankroll was? He "made" over 70 BTC on bitdice.me not long before he created this thread, here is a screenshot of his account at bit dice sometime before he withdrew his "winnings"

My starting deposit was 300 CLAMS on my first run to 3k and then 1,280 on my second run to 17.5k
I'm now 7.5k Up on CLAMS on Just-Dice and 84BTC up on BitDice. all of my earnings are from gambling i've made over 150btc in the past month, why do you think i am a scammer and why did you give me negative trust
That sounds suspicious to me. Do you have some kind of exploit?

No, if I did I would still be winning. I am now only on 7.5k profit due to an unlucky run yesterday. But even Dooglus' profit chart shows my 17.5k peak. I'm planning on staking/investing in JD when my clams come out of poloniex.
This still doesn't explain why you think I'm a scammer? 
Even hufflepuff has loosing streaks when he was scamming primedice in order to make it look like he was not cheating.

I have it on good authority that you are an alt of a serial scammer, research into your identity has allowed me to find a history of you scamming with various websites as far back as 2012
10665  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: [.321BTC/50BTC] Selling 50BTC in AUS... Cash In Hand/Branch Deposit/Bank Transfer on: May 03, 2015, 02:03:03 AM
I reached my PM limit. Just give it up dude. You lost, you got made

Give what up...
You started a transaction that you didn't fulfil and from what it seems like you have just tried to extract my address and phone number?
Lucky, im not stupid enough to send my real information to a guy who just signed up to this forum.
Best of luck to you, scammer.
Okay, if it really is fake then why don't you post what you gave me?

You can post it, who knows who's info it is. It's an old home address of mine and I know people live there. If you want to put their address on the public web go for it, I won't put them at risk to prove the info isn't mine... Then I'll be held responsible for what ever happens to it.
my phone number was (obviously) real and you can post that as well if you are that much of an arse. I don't see what I've done to deserve this treatment from you.
Maybe I can try to mediate something here. What exactly is levi1987 claiming that you did?

He is a serial scammer, a plague to the forum.

@dzeros - why don't you post the "fake" name that you gave me if it really isn't your identity

I know that he won't do this, and I would not either if I were acting as escrow, however it might be an idea for TC to repay some of dzeros victims with funds in escrow.
what are you guys talking about....
can you please explain why my rating is now -6 -1 and you've accused me of running high yield investment program scams?
all my earnings are from gambling. the last 1 months I've made over 150BTC profit from BitDice (84BTC) and Just-Dice (50+ BTC)... How can that be from scamming if the profit charts on JD and BitDice state otherwise.
That is a pretty massive amount to make across two different sites, especially considering your starting deposit at one of them. You may or may not be telling the truth about being up that much, however you have scammed massive amounts of money in the past, over several years, including before you joined this forum.

I am waiting on one last confirmation regarding something then will most likely post what I know shortly thereafter.
10666  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [FOR SALE] 17500CLAMS [WANT] Bitcoins on: May 03, 2015, 01:55:35 AM
Why don't you sell all these alt coins you stole from your main account

What are you referring to?

I think he already sold the 17500 CLAM this thread was talking about:

I was under the impression that he was attempting to sell the CLAMs in an off exchange deal. I was not aware that he already sold them on an exchange

The OP is an alt of TheGambler and close to 20 others. The CLAMs he was selling were likely stolen via his HYIP scams

He won these from www.Just-dice.com or at least a big chunk of them.
Do you know what his starting bankroll was? He "made" over 70 BTC on bitdice.me not long before he created this thread, here is a screenshot of his account at bit dice sometime before he withdrew his "winnings"

My starting deposit was 300 CLAMS on my first run to 3k and then 1,280 on my second run to 17.5k
I'm now 7.5k Up on CLAMS on Just-Dice and 84BTC up on BitDice. all of my earnings are from gambling i've made over 150btc in the past month, why do you think i am a scammer and why did you give me negative trust
That sounds suspicious to me. Do you have some kind of exploit?
10667  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [FOR SALE] 17500CLAMS [WANT] Bitcoins on: May 02, 2015, 11:13:58 PM
Why don't you sell all these alt coins you stole from your main account

What are you referring to?

I think he already sold the 17500 CLAM this thread was talking about:

I was under the impression that he was attempting to sell the CLAMs in an off exchange deal. I was not aware that he already sold them on an exchange

The OP is an alt of TheGambler and close to 20 others. The CLAMs he was selling were likely stolen via his HYIP scams

He won these from www.Just-dice.com or at least a big chunk of them.
Do you know what his starting bankroll was? He "made" over 70 BTC on bitdice.me not long before he created this thread, here is a screenshot of his account at bit dice sometime before he withdrew his "winnings"
10668  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★ BitPoker.io - A New Poker Experience! - Levelled Faucet - LAUNCH GIVEAWAY ★ on: May 02, 2015, 10:23:54 PM
I have a confidential source that confirmed the fact that TheGambler is running this site, which was corroborated by the posting history of shills in this thread. I don't want to give specifics as to how I know because I don't want to allow him to avoid detection in the future which I see that he is already attempting to do since the last time I posted proof it is him.

I am glad the site is getting zero attention, however if you deposit any funds onto the site, chances are you will not have a fair chance of winning

You Sir, are full of it..

I have no idea who this person you speak of is, but I do know the owner of this site is a relative of mine in Canada.

I told him about SWC, and he wanted to give it a shot. Once we are 100% all the tracking is working, he will ramp up the promotions.

The API is very unfriendly for reporting.

I did all the programming, we have deposits and withdraws going just fine.

The software is Poker Mavens so would you care to explain how you think players don't have a fair chance?

Now your calling Briggs software scammers as well?

And before you start calling me a scammer, I suggest you talk to players and owners of JD and BitDice.me, that is where I spend most of my time.

I do escrows all the time for people, but unlike you, I do it for free.

I give my software away for free and there has never been a single issue with it.

I suggest you get your facts straight before posting this BS.

I will review my prior claim and will revise it accordingly if it proves to be inaccurate. I don't know who you are nor what your abilities in programing are, however I don't have any reason to believe that there are issues with programming. The most likely vector the site would scam would be that it would know all the player's hands and would bet/play accordingly
10669  Other / Meta / Re: Please help me understand about "Trust" and how it works on this Forum. on: May 02, 2015, 09:54:31 PM
It looks like bassguitarman was recently added to Tomatocage's trust list which is what caused you to have negative trust by default.

The fact that an account was sold is not a reason to remove negative trust. You will need to try to work out the negative trust with bassguitarman and if necessary contact TC, however TC is unlikely to remove him if the rating is accurate.

How can you tell who added an account to the trust list.. Like how do you know it was TC who added bassguitarman?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full

The above link will show you your entire trust network by hierarchy, you find the person who is in your trust list then scroll up until you see whose name is slightly less indented
10670  Other / Meta / Re: Please help me understand about "Trust" and how it works on this Forum. on: May 02, 2015, 07:46:29 PM
It looks like bassguitarman was recently added to Tomatocage's trust list which is what caused you to have negative trust by default.

The fact that an account was sold is not a reason to remove negative trust. You will need to try to work out the negative trust with bassguitarman and if necessary contact TC, however TC is unlikely to remove him if the rating is accurate.
10671  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: JUST HAD 0.92329 BTC STOLEN - HOW??? on: May 02, 2015, 07:11:17 PM
Well it is somewhat unusual to have exactly zero bitcoin in your wallet IMO. Generally speaking when you buy something you are not going to be spending exactly all of what you have

OP claims that he was transferring the funds from his bitcoin exchange into his brand new electrum wallet (that was my interpretation anyway) and that the funds were immediately sweeped into the hackers address.

I have no idea if he is lying or not, unless you trust the OP a lot you shouldn't donate as there is no way we can know if OP is telling the truth.

That's not a brand new wallet:

I've had much more btc in that wallet in the past. And I only fire up my VM to check my electrum which isn't that often. WHY ME AND why now. This is bullshit!


Yup. He also claims to not be very tech savvy, however engages in things that would typically only be done by someone who is tech savvy
10672  Other / Meta / Re: Why can trust ratings be edited? on: May 02, 2015, 06:05:40 PM
1 - I am not sure this would be a good idea. All it would should is that a trade was done. It would also give people less of an incentive to resolve any scam allegations against them, making it more of a moot point to leave negative trust when someone scams. I will go with disagree
2 - There are many people who have acted honestly for a long time then decided to turn scammer. At the time a trust rating is left it would be possible that someone finds it reasonable to leave such rating. Also some people actively trade on the forum for a long time prior to being put on default trust so they might be more liberal in giving positive trust prior to being added to default trust. Disagree.
3 - Disagree. See response to 1
4 - Someone who has traded honestly over time should be shown as more trustworthy then someone who only recently traded honestly. This would also make it significantly easier to "farm" positive trust. Disagree
10673  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [FOR SALE] 17500CLAMS [WANT] Bitcoins on: May 02, 2015, 05:48:59 PM
Why don't you sell all these alt coins you stole from your main account

What are you referring to?

I think he already sold the 17500 CLAM this thread was talking about:


I was under the impression that he was attempting to sell the CLAMs in an off exchange deal. I was not aware that he already sold them on an exchange

The OP is an alt of TheGambler and close to 20 others. The CLAMs he was selling were likely stolen via his HYIP scams
10674  Other / Meta / Re: Why can trust ratings be edited? on: May 02, 2015, 05:39:19 PM
The "value" of positive trust increases over time. So if you leave a positive trust today, it will have very little affect on the trust score of the person receiving it. When calculating positive trust score, the number on the very right is multiplied times the number of months since their first trust rating and then divided by 10 in order to get the trust score (the number on the very left). As you can see in your example, the trust rating on the person you left positive trust for did not cause the very right number to increase at all.

I believe that this is the most recent formula as to how trust ratings are calculated. Please note that there is nothing in the formula that checks for conflicting trust reports sent by the same person (*the formula for how negative trust is calculated is not accurate)
10675  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: JUST HAD 0.92329 BTC STOLEN - HOW??? on: May 02, 2015, 05:29:27 PM
Well either way I'm fucked. Accepting donations to my sig.. Fuck my dignity. hah Sad

Based on the blockchain messages I would think that the hacker is likely reading this thread therefore I would suspect it was a more targeted attack as he likely knows the OP had an account here.
I think the chances are probably higher that the OP made the story up in order to try to get "donations". There are enough contradictions in this thread to suggest so.

The "hacker" only took funds from one address and having funds in only one address in an electrum wallet would be somewhat unusual, especially considering that change addresses are enabled by default.

He (the op) said :

can you send us a screenshot of your transaction log

Which one? From electrum? Or to electrum - because that came from an exchange.

Thanks

This is the transaction id: https://blockchain.info/it/tx/5cc872a7dc9bebb03290e9d537d57eba51056e764483a4f4ef4f6bc2bac66e0f

So I do not know if the OP is trolling or if he has really lost those bitcoins.


Well it is somewhat unusual to have exactly zero bitcoin in your wallet IMO. Generally speaking when you buy something you are not going to be spending exactly all of what you have
10676  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: JUST HAD 0.92329 BTC STOLEN - HOW??? on: May 02, 2015, 05:24:34 PM
Well either way I'm fucked. Accepting donations to my sig.. Fuck my dignity. hah Sad

Based on the blockchain messages I would think that the hacker is likely reading this thread therefore I would suspect it was a more targeted attack as he likely knows the OP had an account here.
I think the chances are probably higher that the OP made the story up in order to try to get "donations". There are enough contradictions in this thread to suggest so.

The "hacker" only took funds from one address and having funds in only one address in an electrum wallet would be somewhat unusual, especially considering that change addresses are enabled by default.
10677  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [FOR SALE] 17500CLAMS [WANT] Bitcoins on: May 02, 2015, 05:01:06 PM
Hello,

I am selling 17500 CLAMS for a flat rate of 0.0056TC per CLAM.

I am also selling at a flat sell rate of 0.005625BTC on Poloneix if you prefer a instant trade (1000CLAM walls at time, high fees)

If anyone is interested, PM me or contact me on skype: dzerosolutions

Thank you.
Why don't you sell all these alt coins you stole from your main account
10678  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [FOR SALE] 1200 DASH [WANT] Bitcoins on: May 02, 2015, 04:51:23 PM
Hello,

I am selling 1,200 DASH for a flat rate of 0.0125BTC per DASH.

If anyone is interested, PM me or my skype: dzerosolutions

Thank you.
Just to let anyone know this person is an alt of Moreia and you would likely be buying funds acquired from scamming on one of many of his HYIP scams (if that matters).

If you do trade with this person then it would be highly advisable to use escrow.
10679  Other / Meta / Re: Why can trust ratings be edited? on: May 02, 2015, 04:39:14 PM
If enough positive ratings are left on a profile then an account may appear to have positive/green trust when they are a scammer.

Haven't looked at how the rating numbers are calculated, but presumably leaving a negative feedback nulls the positive feedback left by the same user?
no, it does not.
Quote
It should be noted however that positive trust is often left upon the successful completion of a trade, so a serial scammer could simply be trading with someone who will often leave positive trust after a trade in order to farm their trust rating. 

Not being able to change/delete positive trust at a later date would discourage such trust spam/abuse. Would surely eliminate most of the "trust loan" spam.
Seems like a good idea?
The leaving of positive trust is what shows when someone completed a trade honestly. If someone were to complete many deals over time with the other user sometimes sending first then they are probably an honest trader.

The key is looking at more then just the trust score, you should read the comments that others have left in order to determine how much it would make sense for them to be trusted with
10680  Other / Meta / Re: Why can trust ratings be edited? on: May 02, 2015, 04:21:22 PM
If enough positive ratings are left on a profile then an account may appear to have positive/green trust when they are a scammer.

It should be noted however that positive trust is often left upon the successful completion of a trade, so a serial scammer could simply be trading with someone who will often leave positive trust after a trade in order to farm their trust rating. 
Pages: « 1 ... 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 [534] 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 ... 751 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!