I am not further responding to this thread. The feedback is valid and you are trolling.

Good luck with your smear campaign. It is not going to work though.  

I'd recommend dropping it because you are trolling at this point and all you have been posting on is quickseller threads recently and adding nothing of value to any conversations. The trolling is most likely going to get you banned eventually.

Lol. You didn't trade with RubberTow. He is obviously a scammer and is likely an alt of you :d

Well it is a good thing we are using a trust feedback system and not a trade feedback system, otherwise the feedback I left would be wrong.

I don't think anyone is dumb enough to accept PayPal from you anyway. It has enough of a reputation of being a haven for scammers that no one is going to accept it without huge amounts of (positive) reputation.

He isn't buying accounts, he is accepting accounts as collateral for loans. Although a lot of the time that is a distinction without a difference

It would probably be advisable to not trade with the OP period. He was previously selling guides regarding comiting fraud with PayPal and is likely now using that guide himself.

I'd suggest that you insist on using escrow as there will most likely be a lot of people more then willing to trade with you, often times pretending to be a trusted member (if using Skype).

As mentioned above, it would be smart to list your physical location, what rate you are looking for and proof of funds.

I Would probably lower the value of full member accounts. I recently auctioned one for .065 btc, although it was a short auction.

The fact that it takes such a short time to become a full member and that so many people have been farming accounts means that full members tend to go for a lot less then their earnings potential

I believe after 30 days (from your first purchase) you can purchase up to $10,000 per day which works out to be roughly 40 BTC per day. You can also have the above limit increased if you meet certain criteria (I think you need to certify that you have a certain level of assets)

I don't need to watch your bank account to know the funds are not legit. It is more then obvious what you are doing.

Anyone doing business with you is facilitating a crime.

Correct, assuming it has not since been sold. However a good amount of the time when people use accounts as collateral for a loan they are really disguising it as a loan but are really selling it, at least in most cases when the account does not already have a good amount of reputation.

No they are not. It is ludicrous to think that someone would seriously buy bitcoin for a 400% premium with their own actual money, especially when they are doing so via a way that is easily reversible method and when they could easily buy bitcoin with with at most a 10% premium quickly with cash.

I think that it should be more then obvious that the funds were not acquired legitimately if you are willing to sell a PayPal account with $6,000 on it for $1,300 as if the funds were legit then you would simply withdraw the funds to your bank account

this would not be a good idea. If you want to trade with the OP then escrow should be used, although it is probably too risky to accept PayPal from you.

The OP apparently fell for it. It is interesting how spam bots are linking to a scam forum. I always thought they were for SEO for spammy sites.

Cyrsub never repaid the loan. They are almost certanly not alts. Equinox most likely sold the account months ago after he extended the due date by a week.

"Ban reason: talking shit" lol.

You are right, you should only use an escrow whose level of trust you can verify and that you can reasonably conclude is real. Otherwise you are going to get scammed.

I suspect that many forums try to run scams where the owner of the forum has alt accounts and uses himself as escrow only to run away with your money.

As I have mentioned previously, it really isn't anyone's business which accounts I own currently or what I have owned in the past. All I will say that I do not own any account that I have received trust from and all the trust I have on my profile was either the result of a trade or the result of someone leaving unsolicited feedback.

As others have pointed out the sections that deluxeCITY has posted in are different then the ones I frequent and I appearently take care about spelling in grammar while he appearently does not.

Nothing about the situation is against the rules nor is it scammy behavior nor is it unethical

What if you are buying something like a mining contract or something else that produces income in terms of Bitcoin (like a Bitcoin talk account)? Or what if you purchased something like gold or silver bars? What you suggest makes sense only if you are dealing in terms of dollars however when dealing in other pricing methods this is going to be bad for one of the parties.

That guy has nothing but negative trust and neutrals that contain warnings. When exactly did you make this agreement?

Even without the negative trust, I can't see why it would be a good idea to pay that guy upfront for anything

All collateral should be held by a trusted third party.

Just because you are dealing with an older member does not mean you should have additional trust with then when there is a lack of trade history.