and it's official:
BIP91 ACTIVATED! Non-SegWit signaling blocks will be orphaned.
That can't be right; Luke Jr told us that this was all to delay segwit. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
...and some facts are speculative...
I'm not sure that there's any English dictionary that would support that. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) This is not a dictionary concept. So, don't try to act as if facts are black and white, like math, especially when we are incorporating human renditions of facts. Hardly any human has access to perfect information, even though some persons may be more endowed in this arena than others, and maybe depending on the subject matter, too, so almost everyone has to infer a certain amount of information, even when it comes to facts. My bad, I didn't realize that we were ignoring generally accepted meanings of the words we use and just making up things as we go along. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Meanwhile, in the real world... "facts" are objectively provable and things that are "speculative" are subjectively open to interpretation (and quite literally the exact opposite of facts). Edit: I get the feeling that people like you are the reason that, in the last decade, "literally" has become its own antonym. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
...and some facts are speculative...
I'm not sure that there's any English dictionary that would support that. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
http://m.uploadedit.com/ba3s/1500768576272.txtWell, I guess I didn't want those last 75 blocks anyway. Who needs coin when you can burn electric in summer and get nothing in return? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) unbreakablecoin-cli getinfo { "version" : 100300, "protocolversion" : 70002, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 0.09952430, "blocks" : 72399, "timeoffset" : 0, "connections" : 3, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 85889647.53910752, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1470833979, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "relayfee" : 0.00005000, "errors" : "WARNING: Inconsistent checkpoint found! Stop enforcing checkpoints and notify developers to resolve the issue." }
|
|
|
...I wonder though what you think about Antpool, GBMiners, Kano CKPool and Slush registering as "No!" under the Witness Commitment heading at xbt.eu
They didn't "registering as 'No!'". The site reads and the site returns No!
|
|
|
URL is irrelevant, it's the content that matters...
It's called sarcasm... Mainly, I fail to see why it's even a post. For years, Maxwell has - argued against any sizable increase
- argued that one of the key reasons to keep blocks small is to keep fees high, and
- argued that we should "_decrease_ the [tx] limit below...300k/txn/day level"
I'm not sure why it matters that he still holds the same relative position he's held for so long (or why he matters, even)....
|
|
|
Because when I want valid, reliable Bitcoin information, the first place I go is /r/ Buttcoin ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
@m1n3m1n3m1n3 Did you ever get any action from your NH ticket? They closed mine without even so much as a reply. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
Is BTC.com owned by Bitmain? These guys are signalling SW instead of BIP91. Not that it's a huge issue now, but I was just curious.
Coinbase EzrY/BTC.COM/NYA/...4$
|
|
|
Unbreakablecoin wallet is back online at Bittrex. ...
Yeah, everyone that t didn't already know, knew that after you posted it 10 days ago. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Some specific reason for the repost (other than spamming for ispace)? ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
...Your scenario is a lot luck-based...
And what scenario in Bitcoin isn't? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Where is announcement for NEW D3 dash miner ?
Certainly not inside the S9 thread. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
...R/bitcoin has about 4,500 users online right now (biased against larger blocks) and r/btc has about 1,000 users online (biased in favour of larger blocks)...
Given that one of those is massively censored (and the other is spawned off of that censorship), it's neither a good nor accurate measure of anything (nor is it even meaningful in any way, given the general biases inherent in each).
|
|
|
I'm sleepy and I forgot, please remind me....these segwit improvements of fitting 6 billion GB into a 1MB block start when?
|
|
|
... so I'll just quote from reddit...
In a world where reddit didn't exist, would any of the last or following months been contentious?
|
|
|
Antpool with 9:12; they must have kicked that covert asicboost into high gear. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Funny, but even you know that asicboost doesn't speed up mining. I know it more than most, but I couldn't help myself. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Antpool with 9:12; they must have kicked that covert asicboost into high gear. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Is there a decent Chrome extension for that? I've been going through a couple of them and they look like they're either paid, spyware or both. ... No clue, I used Chrome for about 5 minutes nearly a decade ago. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
...No one has ever an double Spend alltime since eMark exists...
It's been done several times, with as many as 11 confirms. But don't allow me to disrupt your delusions.... ...I need a PROOF where and the whole time eMark exists there was an DOUBLEspend...
Having read your multiple stages of denial, delusion and irrational anger, I'm not convinced that you'd even understand the proof if someone explained it to you with flowcharts and a laser-pointer. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
...heyyyy , nothing new ?...
Nope, nothing new, eMark is still the same double-spendable shitcoin it's always been. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
|