Well, one is *lost* for now. We know who had it last, but are unable to establish reasonable contact with them, so that is on hold. One #1 is undiscovered though. Either somebody is hiding it, or it is in one of the remaining boxes.

Here's another update:

---

This should be pretty correct with what we know at the moment. There should be another update late this week once minerjones gets a few more shipments.

This topic has been moved to Digital goods.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1595742.0

In order for that to happen, you'd have to properly write up what you have. The way that that it is currently written is quite hard to decipher, and as you've stated some items may not even be listed (?). Don't forget this:

There are no security issues with the version 0.13.0 itself. What are you talking about exactly? If you're talking about the binary warning, that's nothing special. You should have been verifying the downloads from day 1. There's a good guide to verify the files.

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Ref. spam.

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Insubstantial thread.

I like how they depreciated the Windows XP and removed the internal miner. The latter was just sitting there for no valid reason.

There will be minor changes regarding Segwit between 0.13.0 and 0.13.1. In the meantime, it's time to check out the results of compact blocks.

---

Does anyone know whether the Linux repository has already been updated? I don't want to shut down the client just to verify that it isn't one more time (as I've done this yesterday).

What was said here:"all threads will be subject to deletion." is false. Only threads that are either against the rules (there were examples where people kept replying to referral spam; even NLC bots in Speculation section) and threads that are really insubstantial/duplicate/etc. get trashed. Otherwise, threads either get locked and/or archived which does not negatively impact your post count. It really comes down to where you post and what you post. I don't see why nonconstructive posts, or posts made in 'spammy threads' should be counted. The signature campaigns are supporting more than enough spam as it is.

Technically, there is no 'wrong' here as they're the manager, ergo they create the rules.

How surprising.

I understand their viewpoint. If they're doing it like this with everyone, then it is only fair to do it like this with you. This isn't a forum related matter, and thus I don't think it should be asked in meta. You could have sent a message to some of the other known campaign managers.

Generally it is not 'solved'/'out of date' threads that get removed (as in deleted or trashed). Those usually get locked and/or archived.

Bitcoin je pseduo-anoniman, to znači da možete da ostanete anonimni kompletno ukoliko znate što radite i nastojite se držati toga. Međutim, nije predstavljen kao način zaobilaženja poreza (iako je moguce, pogotovo gdje fali regulacije glede zakona). Postoje stranice poput localbitcoin, gdje se dogovorite sa anonimnom osobom (naravno gledate da imaju vec reputaciju tu) i mozete da "keš" da kupite Bitcoin. Postoje i druge alternative zavisno gdje živite (npr. Bitcoin-Bon u Austriji).

Mozda vam je najbolje da se pridružite #bitcoin-hr IRC kanalu gdje možete direktno postavljat pitanja meni i drugim ljudima u kanalu. Za to pročitajte ovu temu: IRC - #bitcoin-hr.

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Begging.

Najbolje bi bilo da malo razmislite o tome što vam nije jasno i sastavite jednu listi konkretnih pitanja ovdje pa cemo vam pomoci.

Electrum je SPV wallet. Hardware wallet su fizicki novcanici koji dolaze kao u raznim oblicima, npr. u obliku USB-a. Primjer takvog novcanika je Ledger. Međutim, to vam nije potrebno osim ako želite sačuvati veću količinu novca na duže periode. Electrum je vrlo dobar odabir SPV novčanika, i generalno za početnike.

O kojim stranicama govorimo? Zavisi koliko cijenite vašu privatnost i anonimnost. Ako govorite o stranicama na kojim se može kupiti Bitcoin (zvane "exchanges"), npr. Bitstamp, onda morate unijeti ispravne podatke te cete ih morati i dokumentacijom potvrditi.

Niste predvidjeli ništa, a i ako ima ovakva tema vec je zasigurno zastarjela. Samo nije mi baš jasno što želite ovdje, uputstva kako početi koristiti Bitcoin?

Želite pokrenuti neki svoj biznis sa Bitcoinom, npr. neka stranica za kockanje kao što je Primedice?

Ne postoji "Bitcoin račun". Postoje Bitcoin novčanici, raznih vrsta: hardware wallets, full wallets/clients, SPV, online wallets. Poredao sam ih prema preporučenosti s lijeva naprema desno (Napomena: Hardware wallets se moraju kupiti, a full wallets i SPV su besplatni za skinuti). Što se tiče prevara:
1) Zaobilazite cloud mining.
2) Zaobilazite investor-based-games i slične stranice koje davaju veliki povrat (ROI) u kratko vrijeme.
3) Zaobilazite nove članove na forumu bez poznatog iskustva u vezi trgovanja (to se može da vidi na "trust-rating").
4) Zaobilazite IPO/altcoin i slično, naročito ako ste bez iskustva.

---

Naravno pročitajte: [WIP] Neslužbena lista Bitcointalk.org pravila/smjernica/FAQ

---

Pretpostavljam da još niste pribavili Bitcoin, bilo to kupnjom ili drugim metodama?

O kakvoj "priči" vi pričate i što zapravo želite od ove teme? Kako stvari trenutno stoje, ova tema nema nekog smisla.

Nobody has to pretend anything.

Obviously not all of them, at some point the bot became a replacement. Anyhow, it's much easier to nuke accounts than you think.

Not sure why you're telling me this since I can't do anything about them. You should be talking to global moderators regarding those, not me.

We have.

---

Update: I see that people are very grateful when others answer their questions.

They are very busy and it is rather likely that you will not get a response at this time.

That was a wave of spam accounts by the same person. We have been manually banning them back then (I remember having a 5 second refresh timer on the member page) and then the situation started to calm down as we've started using a bot to do it for us. They are a thing of the past (for now).

With the appropriate rules and tools we can.

This is the secondary thread regarding moderation that I've seen recently regarding this sub-board. I'll have to repeat what I had said in the previous thread as it became inactive.

---

Have you taken a closer look at Bitcoin Discussion, Gambling, Economics (not the sub-board that we are in)? Compare the threads, their sizes in addition to their quality (although it's harder to compare as speculative talk is different) to the threads found there. You will see that many of the threads that should be dead but were revived by spammers - aka necro posting have been locked in addition to threads that are obsolete, or have grown too big due to spam. On the first page of this board, at the time of writing, there are 8 locked threads.

---

Additionally, what makes this harder is the lack of reports. Most of the work that has been done on this section was without reports. It would be really helpful, and I'd really appreciate it, if you helped out and started reporting anything that breaks the rules (including spam).

~Lauda

Nonsense. Human thinking is predictable, their password habits are usually weak/horrible and the adjective simplistic can be used for the majority as well.

Indeed.

I concur. They're also very bad at probabilities, hence why we get people from time to time worrying about address collision.

Replacing passwords with fingerprints is not safer.

Stating this, after we've experienced one of the largest 'hacks' (it's debatable what exactly happened, but let's ignore that since discussing it would be off-topic) in the history of Bitcoin, is very ignorant and ridiculous.