Yea it is roughly a dollar worth of bitcoin, but ideally the person I am doing the work for will be satisfied with my performance and send some kind of a tip. Also the small amount requested prevents freeloaders from taking advantage of your skills.

Well if someone wants some kind of information that requires some level of work to get and would only be beneficial to him then it should be expected that he would pay for such research. I am surprised that so many people were willing to count how much potential activity the OP has for free, although I am fairly certain that a number of people that responded on here did not actually check lol.

Yea too bad this is bullshit. There is no way that the two of you agreed on such a random price. Both the fiat amount and the bitcoin amount are far from round numbers and I would never believe that a seller would be asking for .02156587 BTC for an account

It is not going to be possible to enforce the clause in the deal that the seller is going to refund the buyer in the event of the card does not work. Additionally accepting paypal is a horribly stupid thing to accept.

I would put the chances of both parties attempting to scam eachother at well over 80%

Confirmed. I will release the collateral (your account) as soon as the transaction has one confirmation.

edit: the tx now has one confirmation. The account has been returned to the "real" iron marvel

LOL what? I think you have me confused with yourself buddy. Especially the bolded part. Every time you are asked something your response has nothing to do with the question and is basically nothing more then a sound bite.

at this point you are just trolling. Just go back to claiming there are conspiracy theories to try to get you kicked off default trust. You have caused this thread to go way off topic.

No you claimed that it could be my original account. Why don't you speculate how this would be possible.

Why don't you explain how Joseph can possibly be my main account (as in an account that I was using prior to me starting to use my quickseller account)

you are right, you didn't claim that Joseph was my original account

Oh wait actually you did lol.

You are also right that people can vote multiple times as I don't doubt that scammers have done in this case, especially those whose scams I have busted.

Your lack of specific evidence for any of your arguments does not give them any credibility especially considering that by your own admission you are using a throwaway account.

My signature deal is a fixed rate deal so I am not receiving additional payment for making these posts, the special deal I got is one of the perks that come with having the general respect of the community and having a reputation of being able to detect scams, and otherwise being a high profile member of the community.

I think one of the requirements to become an admin is to be able to count how much activity an account should have. If you can't do that without help then I don't think you can pass the test.

You really are an idiot and really do not like listening. Re-read the thread, if you still think it was entrapment then read it again, if your mind is still not changed then learn the definition of entrapment, if still not changed then read the thread again, if your mind is still not changed then continue to re-read the thread.

If you are claiming that josef2000 is my main/first account then it would be impossible that he would have registered after I registered (your specific claim was that he is my main account). Additionally you present nothing more then speculation that we are the same person and you base that speculation on the fact that he disagrees with you.

Edit: I am surprised as to how many people have voted in the poll. So far 43 people have voted after only ~50 hours while 80 people voted in the replacing default trust thread after 5 days, and that proposal was much more controversial then me being in default trust.

You claimed that I was trying to entrap the OP when my proposition was not illegal nor would be a scam. In order for something to be considered entrapment, one needs to try to get someone to do something illegal.

If you want to go back to your police officer analogy, that what I did was similar to a police officer asking someone to start a legit business with someone but asking for him that persons' assets be disclosed.

Yes the OP is an alt of moreia. He even admits it above (actually he claims moreia is an alt of the OP, but that is a distinction without a difference).

No it is not frustrating, I know exactly who you are. The more accurate adjective would be baffling.

What is frustrating is the fact you are using invalid logic and reasoning to make your arguements. I had thought that you were able to act reasonably, however I think I was wrong.

I am not a scammer. I was trying to start a business that the OP was an expert in. There is a good reason to out the OPs alts because he is a scammer. There is no reason to out my alts.

I am saying that your main account often speaks out against the trust system since a specific change was made to it which you did not agree with. I see no reason to want to hide behind an alt to make arguements to change/remove the trust system.

Did you buy the lealana coin from one of smoothies auctions or from his website?

Also why/how are you selling the pictures cheaper then what they can otherwise be purchased for?

See my above post. He is trying to push his agenda so hard that he can't even use logic to make his arguments.

I repeat that I was not trying to get him to scam. If you were to read my further conversation with him then you would have seen that I explicitly said that the ponzi game was going to be run in a fair way and that scamming was not an option (I don't doubt this this why he initially declined my offer).

It is an accepted practice to give negative trust to any accounts of a scammer which what the plan was to do.

You clearly do not have an understanding of the legal definition of entrapment as the above would indicate that the OP was going to start additional ponzis with or without my proposition (and he did start additional ponzis after my proposition without my involvement). Either that or you are trying to push your agenda so hard that you fail to use any logic in your argument.

Additionally I am not sure why you are using this account when you speak out so freely against the default trust system with your "main" account.

You have no trade history lol. While I think there is a good chance you are an alt of the OP, it would be stupid for anyone to send first to you