Then fuck off if that's what you would do. If you had CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence like I said you would let the case build until it's solid. That is that
I believe I have solidified that
do you see the contradiction here? im out of this thread, too much shit lately with the QS debacle. |
|
|
|
Then fuck off if that's what you would do
man you seem really angry for someone whos confident enough to talk this much shit. after that im going to go ahead and assume youre trolling. thread isnt worth the attention. |
|
|
|
Trust me I know that. That is why I am working on how to properly format this evidence because the circumstancial evidence I had relied a lot on setting him up (Which he walked right fucking into) and watching how he replied. Based off his reactions I'm 100% certain I know who manages that account
I can't wait to see what more bullshit accusations are going to come out. You already tried to steal my email account (LOL). You could accuse me with that if nobody was watching you get set up from teamviewer So they saw you change my email password? lol, you know I can reset that using my phone shithead? No they saw you walk right into the set-up I previously told them (Which there is also proof of cause I'm not a young "adult" like yourself) and then they watched you react exactly the way I suspected you would. I'll fill out a proper scam report when I can do more than talk shit. I'm just letting everyone know you are busted before I risk you getting out of this and not being doxed. youre going to have to say who "them" is, from the way youre wording your posts and with the knowledge that you are not the original owner of that account, im inclined to think that youre trolling. you could be right, but youre keeping what youre saying so vague and just saying "OMG WARDRICK IS SCAMMER." exactly where did he scam? how much did he scam user x for? when? also iirc wardrick's identity is known to some of the people on here. I don't think he scammed anyone off this account. I've had circumstantial evidence linking him to another account as I said and now I believe I have solidified that. Scam report in a few days or you'll know I was wrong. I wouldn't post if I didn't have evidence I believed. if you have "solid evidence" why are you stalling? also, "i did this and he reacted this way" or "he types like this guy here and here and sometimes here" isnt really evidence. I'll fill out a proper scam report when I can do more than talk shit.
so, if you can only talk shit right now, do you actually have evidence? if i were in your position and actually had evidence, i would be posting that, not trying to win a dick waving contest on a forum. I don't think he scammed anyone off this account. I've had circumstantial evidence linking him to another account as I said and now I believe I have solidified that. Scam report in a few days or you'll know I was wrong. I wouldn't post if I didn't have evidence I believed.
I have other accounts here I don't deny that. Which do you think are mine?  And who is this "DT level 1" witness you speak of? Never a day on bitcointalk without some annoying asshat attacking you and hacking you. And if you don't change the email account password back I'm going to give you negative. i didnt see him specify a depth 1 DT user, correct me if im wrong. but to whoever does currently own shadow_runner, that would be theft of his email account (which can be recovered i assume) if you do not turn the account back over. |
|
|
|
Trust me I know that. That is why I am working on how to properly format this evidence because the circumstancial evidence I had relied a lot on setting him up (Which he walked right fucking into) and watching how he replied. Based off his reactions I'm 100% certain I know who manages that account
I can't wait to see what more bullshit accusations are going to come out. You already tried to steal my email account (LOL). You could accuse me with that if nobody was watching you get set up from teamviewer So they saw you change my email password? lol, you know I can reset that using my phone shithead? No they saw you walk right into the set-up I previously told them (Which there is also proof of cause I'm not a young "adult" like yourself) and then they watched you react exactly the way I suspected you would. I'll fill out a proper scam report when I can do more than talk shit. I'm just letting everyone know you are busted before I risk you getting out of this and not being doxed. youre going to have to say who "them" is, from the way youre wording your posts and with the knowledge that you are not the original owner of that account, im inclined to think that youre trolling. you could be right, but youre keeping what youre saying so vague and just saying "OMG WARDRICK IS SCAMMER." exactly where did he scam? how much did he scam user x for? when? also iirc wardrick's identity is known to some of the people on here. that is, if the person posting from the account is the same as the original owner of the account. not saying i think its been hacked, but its just a possibility. |
|
|
|
Just change the email to another and add a much unpredictable secret question which is hard to guess.
and dox the IP address for the people using it , i can see that it is distributed IP which is much easily provided by local LAN cables.
ip addresses can easily be faked, it isnt really definitive evidence. THIS USER IS A SCAMMER! I will not be posting any evidence yet. I am in communication with someone helping properly format all of this info.
whatever evidence you post should be absolutely solid, i doubt wardrick would give access to that email account if he had something to hide. He can simple try to hack his account and staging all this scene. Who knows? It is just an assumption like yours @Wardrick.
with the shit that's been happening on the forum these last few days, i really wouldnt be surprised. just more drama. |
|
|
|
I feel all MODs deserve to be in the DT list
i disagree, their ability to moderate and clean up the forum has no correlation to their ability to detect and tag suspicious users, nor does it mean they should automatically be trusted. take a look at the incident with EAL and the primedice giveaways for example. |
|
|
|
Feminism goes hand in hand with Liberalism. They are both mental illnesses. Nothing that mace and tasers can't fix.
That is a very fascist thing to say. Would you want to live in a society where maces and tasers are used to "fix" everything? Violence is rarely an answer. Mace and tasers are used in self defense, most of the time by women... 3rd wave feminism is fascism. Are you analogizing self defense to fascism? how is it self defense when the loud minority of feminazis are actively attacking everything they disagree with at the time (considering their opinions seems to change quite often  )? fascism comes pretty close to what feminism has moved towards. I didn't say it was self defense, he did. Also, it depends. Not all feminists are the same. The ones that trespass on private property to stage topless protests over some irrelevant issue while we are at a three trillion dollar war are definitely a threat because they continue to exhaust government resources, as well as consume valuable time that law enforcement could be spending on serious cases like homicide, armed robberies, etc are indeed at the brink of fascism. i think wilikon was saying it was fascism, but that aside, cant agree more with your point here; the attention these "activists" draw is a detriment to resources that would be much better be utilized elsewhere. as for your statement "not alll feminists are the same," i would also agree; there are definitely level-headed, reasonable and sane women that advocate for equality. however, the loud minority tend to shout over that and give feminism a bad image. not everything is bad about the topless protests though on a side note, i suspect that a women ruled version of nazi germany is the ultimate goal of these feminists feminazis. slightly related note, this trend of the loud minority taking over as the negative voice in what used to be positive movements is becoming more common then it should ever be. pretty tired so im not even sure if im rambling at this point. |
|
|
|
Give someone access it will clear your name from the circumstantial evidence linking you to another account. If this is fake I think the proof will be sufficient as is with that added on.
I can assure you this is not fake. I am being attacked by another member here from the Washington area. I will PM you the password to the email account as it only contains emails from bitcointalk anyway. you should change the email on your forum account for a bit if youre going to do that, password reset and all. |
|
|
|
Feminism goes hand in hand with Liberalism. They are both mental illnesses. Nothing that mace and tasers can't fix.
That is a very fascist thing to say. Would you want to live in a society where maces and tasers are used to "fix" everything? Violence is rarely an answer. Mace and tasers are used in self defense, most of the time by women... 3rd wave feminism is fascism. Are you analogizing self defense to fascism? how is it self defense when the loud minority of feminazis are actively attacking everything they disagree with at the time (considering their opinions seems to change quite often )? fascism comes pretty close to what feminism has moved towards. |
|
|
|
I think that it would be better if a casino/game used real money like bitcoin instead of tokens. Tokens can be manipulated by the casino/game owner, but bitcoin can't be manipulated.
i dont understand what you mean by that; if the bitcoin is credited to the account balance, its the same if it were credits/tokens being added to your balance, assuming that the token to bitcoin or whatever currency conversion rate was consistent. after youve sent the money to the casino's wallet, they are free to do whatever they wish with that balance, be it honor your deposit or set it to zero. for the most part, i havent seen a casino that utilizes a token system, the closest that comes to that is using chips in real casinos, but even then those chips are representative of constant fiat values. |
|
|
|
this is already much worse in europe, its not just in some schools but enshrined into law everywhere. if you say something that offends sodomites or people of colour you can be fined or even imprisoned.
this is more or less going back to something i posted here some days ago about microaggressions; while it is a university's job to prepare students for the harsh "real world," they are effectively babying these students. i can understand things like blatant racism or hate speech being disallowed, but disallowing what is essentially free speech goes to a whole different level of what shouldnt be. i havent read up on europe's situation regarding things like this, but i do hope it doesnt get that severe in the US, censorship is already a problem as it is. |
|
|
|
Can we get a TL:DR?
Universities, like businesses, are entitled to define the attitudes that are expressed and the discussions that are had as long as it doesn't discriminate against protected classes (i.e., race, age, etc.) If their students or customers don't like those attitudes or discussions they can go to a different university or business. University of California is not limiting people's rights, they're defining their culture.
No. 140 characters or less are for people who can't read or think. Everyone in this this forum can. Of course if one likes to form an opinion without reading anything... That's OK too... ill go ahead and disagree with that statement, but just that statement. there's a lot on this forum and the world in general that leads me to think otherwise.  that said, this article looks interesting, ill be reading it in bits and pieces over the next hour. |
|
|
|
scrypt was proven to be a ponzi some time ago, and a few weeks back they were "hacked," which marked its collapse. old news.
does the fact that its hold news dis credit my issue nor my opinion ? english please |
|
|
|
|
scrypt was proven to be a ponzi some time ago, and a few weeks back they were "hacked," which marked its collapse. old news.
|
|
|
|
Coinosaurus is clearly in the wrong here. The signature at the beggining looks way too photoshoped to be real. You can even see the white gap there . Razerglass clearly said he will pay 0.035 which is allready a lot of money for a signature in my book. Wrong are you my friend . The signature it's not photoshoped ,it's real and matches 100% with that picture ,you can check it by your self pretty much what happened through pm as well, razerglass never agreed to actually buy the sig code for .125, and coinnosaurus simply sent without confirming that he would be selling it. Coinosaurus is clearly in the wrong here. The signature at the beggining looks way too photoshoped to be real. You can even see the white gap there . Razerglass clearly said he will pay 0.035 which is allready a lot of money for a signature in my book. I believe that guy sent over the code without verifying just to force Razerglass to pay him and evade the contest while he is at it. Like the famous quote from the X-files said 'trust no one' Razerglass. Also Coinosaurus If you werent happy with 0.035 why did you send him the code without double checking to make sure you would get 0.125 and not 0.035 like he said??Yes exactly. Thats a good point, one I've been trying to get across. I repeat, he said that he will pay another guy 0.035 ,thats why I sent him the code you jumped the gun, and im assuming you were thinking that "if i send him the code now without him saying 'yes i will buy this from you for x price' he will HAVE to pay me instead of the other guy." youre overreacting to your own mistake from what i see. |
|
|
|
i had played forex and all my money turned into lost ,because i left open orders when i went sleep ,those made me avoid any kind of gambling sites,controled by others, its amazing the coin doesnt moove when market is open and when we go sleep the markets wake up and dump or pump enought to catch some orders...
forex is not a game , how do you play foex  ? I think he meant that he lost money trading or lost gambling with sites like secondstrade. i dont think so, judging from the post's language, knowhow was probably trying to trade altcoins, and mistakenly left some order open that resulted in a loss for him. i mightve thought forex too is he didnt say "pump and dump." |
|
|
|
There is no strategy in dice. One just need to hope that they are lucky with a winning streak before they cash out from the dice site. Dice and casino games are designed to make all players lose in the long run so you may be lucky and win something but if you keep playing then you will loose all of your money at end.
There is no real strategy in dice game just luck required if you are unlucky then please stay away.
this exactly. i really dont understand why people cant seem to grasp the part bolded. anyone who says there is a "guaranteed strategy" or "profitable martingale" or some other bs is delusional. gambling is about pure chance when there is no skill involved and the games are vs the house. the only time when gambling can be profitable in the long run is when it is player vs player, where skill is a factor. There is strategy in dice sites.
no. |
|
|
|
What the hell is Steam fees ?
Anyway could you please proof that they are not carded I'am interested on this , I don't want them to get revoked after a while because it kind sounds phishy when you sell 100 Euro worth on Steam for only 60$ BTC rates .
most likely fees associated with using the steam market to "transfer funds" by listing a worthless item at a high price. its really inefficient though, fees are like 15% iirc. as for if those funds can be charged back, im not too sure, as a chargeback on those added funds would affect other people if those funds were used for purchases already (on the community market, not paid to valve.) |
|
|
|
Gambling on 50% odds is ok ..like horse racing ..it is 50% or tossing coin also fair.
but online casinos r rigid.
weather or not gambling is wrong or right isnt a question about its fairness, thats another matter altogether, even if casino games are designed for the casino to profit at the end of the day. its a fact that people's lives are destroyed by gambling their life away, its comparable to alcoholism or any other addiction. however, i imagine casinos bring some sort of revenue to the governments that allow them to exist, so not much chance of them becoming illegal. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
