Is it reliable service bitcoin mixing? You don't give the reasons why it is become your favorite mixer and it is new services i have said it on other thread, no one will believe in it and there are no info about mixmybitcoins.com. The most reliable bitcoins mixer is [banned mixer] because they could gave the prove about 2000 BTC in reserve, it can be checked on their thread. |
|
|
|
The exchange rate on the Indian exchanges is 130-140$ higher compared to the American exchanges. Currently the difference between Bitfinex and Btc Trade India is more than 140$ per bitcoin, and I intend to take some advantage of that. If my math is right, on a trade of 16btc I will make more than 2K. God bless India. Of course You can do arbitase, but there are some problem if you want do it, at least 3 problem in my opinion 1. You must use payment method for withdrawal the fiat money are like paypal or other 2. You must have partner Indian people and he must be trusted or your money will be lost 3. You must use large of capital and 2K is not enough because you just get $140/ bitcoin and be shared with your partner. And you must pay fees too. |
|
|
|
Thank sir. Received payment. Got you, Who are you? Be ready on blacklist SMAS, you are farming account on here, i guess.  I am confirmation the payment, thanks Mr Yahoo. I was part of the campaign, but I already asked permission from Yahoo that I was leaving it after getting payment. Here is my bitcoin address 1HMMkZhWZmE7UYjKeWQ4yXcNDoPTHAQDEZ. I was paid in this transaction ID https://blockchain.info/tx/4171eb01aa5060eeb4674ab768e7e64452a8c156fa26b3a2e5c66ff1b872f5c0. Don't go throwing accusations. You didn't even bother to check the signature campaign's spreadsheet. :/ Ok brother, i am sorry and i don't know about your agreement with Mr. Yahoo, but Let's wait answers from him everything depend on Mr Yahoo right now. Good luck for your new signature campaign. |
|
|
|
Thank sir. Received payment. Got you, Who are you? Be ready on blacklist SMAS, you are farming account on here, i guess. I am confirmation the payment, thanks Mr Yahoo. And i have got one user for SMAS list. |
|
|
|
Not all cloudmining are a scam some can work but if you need to invest some bitcoins to only get a little more back then you invested this must be something wrong this and so making it more like a scam. So by doing the math the miner sell 1 bitcoins worth of hashing power to you for 1.50 bitcoins then who's making more bitcoins then
Yep, you are right Not all cloud mining are a scam. But unfortunately people in here considered bitcoins cloud mining service that doesn't make profit for them it is mean scam service, they just are looking for profitable cloud mining cloud mining service include me and you can not be change their mind. Or maybe you will share info about making profit via cloud mining, please share on here. Thanks |
|
|
|
Well... it is new services and i am doubt about this service, do you have official thread at here? Give me the link, i will make research about it and we can talking about it,for make sure everything will be fine, because right now there are new services bitcoins mixing services that trying scam is like this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1695257.msg17008739#msg17008739 |
|
|
|
I have received the payment, it is good start and i don't know what i have to do, but positive feedback is your. Thank you very much Mr Yahoo |
|
|
|
Waduh ada-ada saja, wkwkwkw..... Dapat kabar dari mana gan? Ada linknya gk, kalau faucetbox bangkrut. Makasih gan atas infonya, moga yang dapat kasih info lain.
ini gan link resminya https://faucetbox.com/en/closingTerima kasih gan, mungkin ini bangkrut karena harga bitcoin melonjak naik sedangkan penghasilan dari iklan sedikit dan tidak bisa menutupi ongkos, gak tau gan untuk kedepannya nasib faucets kalau kaya begini. |
|
|
|
|
If we are mining bitcoin save the coins become good choice because old miners save the coins then price going up, but if we are mining altcoins more good exchange them to bitcoins and always hold it (bitcoin) we just sell for pay electric cost and internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin is the world's provision with the possibility of private money that are able to compete with the publicly supported fiat to be used.
The point was put by the Prof. Ferdinando Ametrano, who are currently Bitcoin Block Chain and Teacher Technology at the Politecnico di Milano.
Speaking at ether.camp of the Bloc chain: conference of money in London, Ametrano compared the impact that it can have on Bitcoin the future of the civilization to that of the gold. He therefore called the crypto-coin "digital gold."
Distinction between Bitcoin and Ethereum
When asked if he makes a distinction between Ethereum and Bitcoin while teaching, Ametrano says he is looking in alternative currencies as a valuable experience, but shares the same opinion with Nobel Prize winner Friedrich Hayek, who Out at a time seemed private money will compete in the most relevant, most useful and performing currency market that can be used set.
We are in a moment in time with negative interest rates, we would probably be the end of a phase in the currency monetary policy of fiduciary currency. I mean, I see negative interest rates as a failure of the current governance model. So here is the right time in history to private alternatives, private money that can compete to do with the so-called government money.
So what happens in the crypto room and it is just fantastic. Now if you ask me what I think it will be victorious, I see Bitcoin with a huge advantage and I have some concerns about the idea of the Turing Whole Ethernet global computing. But I may be wrong and I would just like for the world to test and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the various alternatives. The main point is that we can finally rebel against the monopoly of money, which have always abused authority and power in history.
More competition, more power
Ametrano believes that even the most mature platforms exceed Bitcoin, their experience comments would be for the evolution of the Bitcoin platform.
This is the market, which is what is good in the market: competition, providing new features. So it is not like pro-something or against something. I am only in favor of the dream of competing with private money Hayek. Now, if you ask me, I have my own idea where private money better suited to meet might be the need of the current economic situation. But that's my opinion. The one that is good to have the competition.
Needs your opinion about it, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Being should it will not become problem in the future for him because of sells his cattle for bitcoins and being should he has done calculating about the risk to making investment into bitcoins and be ready lost of value in bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Hi all!
CPU Mining becomes popular. That night, we migrate web interfaces to a more powerful server. The mining continues without interruptions.
Thank you for your patience.
I could not opened the website because of slow loading and then i have been canceled it, do you know what is going on? You must check it due to i can't see anything about your services. Thanks for your answers. |
|
|
|
|
Waduh ada-ada saja, wkwkwkw..... Dapat kabar dari mana gan? Ada linknya gk, kalau faucetbox bangkrut. Makasih gan atas infonya, moga yang dapat kasih info lain.
|
|
|
|
At least the transactions are going more fast right now and the queue is smaller
Can you imagine if we have more users of bitcoin? Will be a mess.
Yea but if we don't have much users of bitcoins, it is mean bitcoin will be die slowly, more better many users of bitcoins slow transaction than there are no people who use bitcoins. Because people of transaction can be fixed by the developers of bitcoins, but there are no users of bitcoins, it is mean die. |
|
|
|
The network problem we experienced was 2 days ago for less than a couple hours. Nothing was lost but a few pools mined orphans until they upgraded. It is now gone and resolved it is completely unrelated to what is going on with ETH. ETC is being unjustly exposed to FUD from ETH issues.
There is good news from the developer of ETC on Twitter The $ETC network is running normally and has a healthy hash rate of around 425 GH/s. https://t.co/wdouGh5K4oSo don't worry for ETC community. |
|
|
|
No, it's cloud mining, won't be 5% discount that will make this kind of investment worth. Everything cloud minings offer there is a trick hidden, after you make your investment you discover it won't be so good as you imagined before.
In my opinion, it doesn't worth... Better to do any other useful thing with your money or just hold it.
Yup, making investment on there is very dangerous for right now, there are many statement from other users that it is not worth and my opinion more safe doesn't put the money on there. |
|
|
|
EthereumTransactions accidentally creating two separate chains.
the Ethereum network has a defect, causing the markets to stop execution of transactions with the ETH. Two main clients of the network deployment - Geth and parity - are out of sync, accidentally creating two separate channels running in parallel.
What happened?
Accidental splitting of the network is largely the result of a very recent network upgrade. The development team has just remedied the weaknesses repealing some optimizations, but has resulted in the division of a network error into a slightly different approach for both clients. As said in a press release the Ethereum team was Geth's back-log reminders to disregard during a distance operation from the empty accounts to EYE.
To have exchanges stopped this reason Ethereum receive deposits and recordings. Meanwhile, the mining pools were invited to move to parity or stop mining.
Ethereum quickly identified a fix and test now.
Our code base is very clean and well maintained. Still natural complexity brings more errors and this project is extremely sensitive to all kinds of insects. The parity is really clean and minimalist design is based on a lot of previous experience (rewrites are always better quality, this is the reason why we do a lot of refactoring). I'm really glad that we around as a security assurance while constantly adding complexity with all the new features. I would say geth is more focused on progress while parity is more about safety and performance, which is probably the best combination we have right now.
How to solve it?
The Geth team is currently coding a patch to determine the behavior of Geth similar to that of parity.
A source close to the Ethereum that it will probably be necessary to reverse a portion of the transaction into one of the strings formed after the moment the cleavage took place. Rolling back the chain formed by the geth would mean that all transactions will be canceled after the defective block, while the resources of the respective users charged.
However, in a statement said after the new version, users will simply need to run the new geth as they passed synchronized fork, and it will go back to the point of the fork and synchronization from there.
The Ethereum community remains committed and expresses its full support: "It is incredibly strong compared to other brands. If the participants and investors Ethereum ICO as well, I am quite confident that the developers are making the possibilities they have .
Vitalik has released new updated geth issues, and i think the problem was getting fixed now. And i may think will better if you put the source for that.  Are you sure? I didn't saw on the their forum, and my source is from ethereum forum. Where do you get it? It will be better to put the source too. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Try enerycoin it is going to be the next best thing. It will conserve your blocks and not waste confirmations like what happened 48 hours ago. Unfortunately it is not just about the block problem, more than it bitcoin has been survive and it is not scam coin but enerycoin there are no people who know about it and it is can become scam coin, the people won't burn their money to unknowing coin. |
|
|
|
Japanese Bitcoin exchanges and their customers will soon be covered for the first time through a Tokyo product launched on the basis of insurance company Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance.
As reported by the regional Nikkei publication, coverage will be offered against damage and loss of violation or hacks, ranging from ¥ 10 billion to 1 yen (between $ 88,000 and $ 8.8 million) carried. Especially the coverage also includes corporate casualty losses and employee internal errors, a BitPay clause certainly prefer following a theft of 5,000 Bitcoins in 2015 as a result of a phishing attack. The company Bitcoin payments was arguing with its insurance company which refused to lose anything to cover less than 1 million as a result of the theft.
In addition, the insurer will pay for the cost as a result of an incident such as communicating with clients in the scenario of a break or facing damages that are applied to other countries.
This is good news for development and security of bitcoin and will affect positively for user to have such insurance, but I didn't get it about the range of losses from 10 billion to 1 yen, and BitPay following hackers attacked in 2015 and then bitcoin payment arguing to refused to cover less than 1 Million. I mean if the insurance company stated to covered losses between those range (10 B to 1 yen) why less than 1 Million not include, I'm sorry not following correctly but could you mention link of the news, so we can fully understand this. I am sorry, it is still unofficial statement so i don't have enough source of details, that is wh i made it, hopelly there are other users who can make it more complete and there are people from Japan that can do it. |
|
|
|
|
EthereumTransactions accidentally creating two separate chains.
the Ethereum network has a defect, causing the markets to stop execution of transactions with the ETH. Two main clients of the network deployment - Geth and parity - are out of sync, accidentally creating two separate channels running in parallel.
What happened?
Accidental splitting of the network is largely the result of a very recent network upgrade. The development team has just remedied the weaknesses repealing some optimizations, but has resulted in the division of a network error into a slightly different approach for both clients. As said in a press release the Ethereum team was Geth's back-log reminders to disregard during a distance operation from the empty accounts to EYE.
To have exchanges stopped this reason Ethereum receive deposits and recordings. Meanwhile, the mining pools were invited to move to parity or stop mining.
Ethereum quickly identified a fix and test now.
Our code base is very clean and well maintained. Still natural complexity brings more errors and this project is extremely sensitive to all kinds of insects. The parity is really clean and minimalist design is based on a lot of previous experience (rewrites are always better quality, this is the reason why we do a lot of refactoring). I'm really glad that we around as a security assurance while constantly adding complexity with all the new features. I would say geth is more focused on progress while parity is more about safety and performance, which is probably the best combination we have right now.
How to solve it?
The Geth team is currently coding a patch to determine the behavior of Geth similar to that of parity.
A source close to the Ethereum that it will probably be necessary to reverse a portion of the transaction into one of the strings formed after the moment the cleavage took place. Rolling back the chain formed by the geth would mean that all transactions will be canceled after the defective block, while the resources of the respective users charged.
However, in a statement said after the new version, users will simply need to run the new geth as they passed synchronized fork, and it will go back to the point of the fork and synchronization from there.
The Ethereum community remains committed and expresses its full support: "It is incredibly strong compared to other brands. If the participants and investors Ethereum ICO as well, I am quite confident that the developers are making the possibilities they have .
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
