This is a very large loan amount. I am not sure that Magic8Ball is going to be able to sell a hero account for 2+ BTC if/when you default on this loan.

This is not a hotel. It is not the staffs' job to make you feel welcome, and in a lot of cases people will not be welcome (e.g. if they break the rules).

It is fairly clear that you are a scammer as you are refusing to use escrow which is designed to protect both the buyer and the seller from getting scammed.

If you are worried that the buyer is going to claim the non-receipt of the product then you should insure the package you send to the buyer in the amount of the value of the product so the buyer can file a claim with the shipping company when they claim that the goods are lost/stolen/damaged/ect.

Proof of revenue is not going to protect the lender. TBH if you have the revenue that you claim to have you will most likely be better off getting a loan from the bank. You will probably get much better terms anyway, and they have additional resources available to them to protect themselves from deadbeats.

Most people on here do not need any kind of advertising so the "free advertising" will have little value to them.

If you do in fact collateral (your posts suggest that you do not) then I would also be able to give this loan (along with the several others that have offered)

The negative stands. I have taken the opinions of others into consideration and they were not able to change my mind. Most of the people who are advocating for the removal of my trust are not reputable in my eyes.
Okay then. Case closed.
no

I think this is the wrong approach. If you are simply finding sections where a lot of people make a lot of useless posts and then exclude payment for those sections then the spammers will simply find other sections to spam in.

A better solution would be to simply do a better job of screening potential participants and to do a better job of managing participants professionally by warning and/or removing participants when they start to make a large number of insubstantial posts.

I am not sure how active MiningBuddy and tysat are at moderating however I don't think I see them posting very often. Maybe the newbie section needs another moderator?

Other sections with a lot of problems regarding insubstantial posts (the politics and the off topic sections) do not have any moderators at all, so maybe it is a lack of moderator problem.

They will give you a signed message with very specific terms that is signed by their 1Bitmixer..... address. If there is a problem then you present the signed message that you saved then they can give you the proper amount of coins to the output addresses.

If they released this kind of information then it would be possible to determine their addresses which would make their service less effective.

LOL oops.

Yes. I generally have adopted the practice of not giving out trust for smaller loans as of recently unless I otherwise deem them to be trustworthy. Although I think a lot of the loans requested on here are actually for gambling

You are on default trust and he most likely is looking to get the loan from someone on default trust so he knows his collateral is safe can buy trust

edit: I am not sure why so many people are jumping at this when he isn't offering to pay any interest. The lack of interest payment means that the loan is not going to be worth your time, you are still taking (a small amount of) risk, and you will still need to pay a tx fee

You are right that there is no guarantee that Marco will payout the full amount due however without any legit reason why he would deny payment then marco would simply be scamming, and certain pressure can be given to get him to pay what is due the account.

Even if the loan is not repaid then the account should be able to be sold for more then then loan amount

I am sorry but why are you running this contest? Are you in some way related to girlbtc.com? I hope you realize that there is a significant amount of controversy surrounding their site

I will agree to keep your signature the same, however I would need to reserve the right to change the 'other contact info' so I can collect the signature campaign earnings in the event that you do not repay your loan. In the event that you repay prior to the due date then I will return the account back to you along with any signature campaign earning I receive on your behalf. In the event that you default on the loan then both the signature campaign earnings and the account would become my property. I would also need a signed message to confirm ownership of the account.

I would be careful with this person as he has a history of making vague deals that end up with him paying you much less then the seller anticipated. Dealing with him with or without escrow is not recommended.

Scams are not banned. Unless some other rule was broken during that timeframe (I have no idea if one was, but I am going to go out on a limb and say that one was not) then a ban would not have been appropriate.

Your post doesn't even make any sense. But yes I am correct. No lender should fund any loan to you without sufficient collateral. Your account (provided you can provide a signed message confirming ownership) would be sufficient collateral, but anything less then that would not be

I don't care about your prior deals. I care about protecting myself. My conditions would allow me to protect myself.  If you could agree to my conditions then I could most likely fill your loan and your account would be returned to you assuming you repay your loan prior to when your signature campaign pays out.

Funding a no collateral loan is very risky in every situation.

denied. Negative trust.

Why don't you give your account as collateral and allow the lender to change the payout address of the signature earnings.  Then the lender would get both the account and your earnings when (not if) you default on your loan.

Then if your were to repay the loan you would get the signature earnings back along with your account. Either way the lender would profit.

like I said, if you are willing to sell them for that little then most people would be willing to just use them themselves.

A good amount of time for an escrow to hold funds would be as long as a potential buyer takes to spend funds in a store. If a buyer is buying a $25 gift card then it should take a week or so, if they buy a larger gift card then it should take $25 per week to spend. If the cards go bad before being able to spend the entire balance then funds should be returned to the buyer.

like I said, any account with this kind of history has less of a value then accounts that have a stronger post history. Assuming that the other 9 accounts have a stronger post history then I would suggest enrolling #10 in a campaign like bitmixer and making ~50-100 posts that clearly have a good amount of effort put into them and then selling it.

right. Lol. Collecting. "Not a scam"

Like I said anyone buying from the OP is going to get scammed when the gift cards stop working.

I personally think Starbucks coffee is way overpriced however if I had the choice between selling their gift card for <.20 on the dollar and actually spending their gift cards then I would gladly spend their gift cards.