It seems pretty universal in this thread (and I agree too) that backing out of a deal because you don't agree to everyone's terms is certainly not a breach of trust (no harm was done and no money/info was lost) and doesn't deserve negative feedback.
-snip-
If you bothered to read the entire thread, instead of just
spamming your signature with shit posts, you would see that the OP did have his conditions met. The issue is not that any money was lost, the issue is that he was trying to steal information (either that or he was hoping that I would not respond quickly and the seller would agree to not use escrow - and when I did respond quickly, he wanted to use some flimsy excuse not to use my escrow services with the hope that the seller would agree to trade without escrow).
The terms that he originally sent did not specifically state that the account details must be validated
prior to him funding escrow. The terms stated that if I would be able to confirm the account details as described then I should send an escrow address.
I have explained numerous times why the specific way the OP wanted to trade to go would not protect both parties.
As I mentioned a number of times above, the OP's scammy request was fulfilled yet he still did not go through with the trade. Even after the OP made this thread the seller made numerous
attempts to get the deal closed but declined to do so. Looking at the
security log, I can say with a good amount of confidence that the account did not have a chance of ownership after the deal was canceled.
A more accurate version of the events would be as follows:
1 - All parties reach an agreement as to the terms of the trade
2 - The OP changes the terms of the trade that remove protection of both the escrow and the other party he is trading with
3 - The changed terms were fulfilled
4 - The OP backs out of the trade.
Imagine going to a retail store and you asked to verify if they had an item and if it matched the description. you asked many questions if they had discounts if they offer insurance etc, Before buying but than you decide never mind you don't want it any more for what ever reason or maybe the reason was they offered insurance and when your at the check out the insurance price they quoted was different at the time of purchase. And then the store manager called you names and stated false information about you then kicked you out of the store for not buying item, when you were interested.
Yea that is what Quickseller basically did.
He is the store manager.
quickseller didn't like him wasting his time, so the best thing to do was to say negative feedback here you come.
You are an idiot. Your scenario could not be farther from what any party claims to have happened. You are clearly trying to distort facts because you are upset that I caught you
trying to borrow more bitcoin then what you thought the collateral was worth 
Show Posts
