Latest posts of: EcuaMobi

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 190 »

1161

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Nice try by Kyle1836 [ alt of Alex1212 ]

on: June 24, 2015, 03:50:49 PM

Quote from: kralle on June 24, 2015, 03:14:36 PM Short and quick , i did message Kyle1836 to buy some paypal funds from him, his reply was how much i need since now he have more funds He asked me to sign a message that i own the bitcoins but honestly i am not sure if i can do that on PD !? Anyway he did a misstake and replied me from Alex1212 and asked for escrow , but i NEVER send a message to this user ^^ Nice try Kyle1836 already has a feedback by Tomatocage pointing out he's a shill of Alex1212: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=442454 This just confirms it, you shouldn't even try to deal with him to start with, even less so with PayPal!

1162

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: feryjhie Loan Defaulter

on: June 24, 2015, 02:38:17 PM

Quote from: Hexcoin on June 24, 2015, 02:36:37 PM Quote from: cryptoforcause on June 24, 2015, 01:46:57 PM feryjhie defaulted a loan given to him by aahzmundus. Loan Thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1085658.0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1085658.msg11576496#msg11576496 Scammer's Profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=329895 He needs to pay 0.05 + 20% interest = 0.06 BTC The loan thread is locked, the loan is due on june 16 and the lender was last online june 16, the thread was locked on june 10. It is still possible that feryjhie is trying to contact the lender about the loan. Better if you could send him a pm and remind him about the loan I see the posted repayment address has no TX: 1BQX9omgBkAXoL9sdvhrxxoC6FExy5psLq I've left a negative feedback for the moment and I've PM'd feryjhie asking him to post here with details. I'll update/remove my feedback if required.

1163

Economy / Lending / Re: Ecuamobi to lend .35 BTC to be paid back .38 BTC on or before the 23rd.

on: June 23, 2015, 07:47:33 PM

Quote from: onewiseguy on June 23, 2015, 07:37:16 PM Paid Thanks https://blockchain.info/tx-index/dcf629fac8a6901343fae343694d0ff72f84bac76686aafe454726c1b971f6a1 Thanks onewiseguy. I confirm I received it and the loan was fully repaid.

1164

Other / Meta / Re: User creating massive amounts of referral spam - EmpoEX

on: June 23, 2015, 07:00:53 PM

There's a new one promoting a slightly different domain (ghsminer[dot]com/?ref=xxxx), obviously by the same owner/hacker: dazza12 \| Last posts

1165

Bitcoin / Mycelium / Re: Mycelium Bitcoin Wallet

on: June 23, 2015, 04:30:02 PM

Quote from: trasla on June 23, 2015, 01:33:26 PM Being able to show a second receiving address isnt the big deal - but managing those addresses is. Not because we do not scan ahead, we do that anyway. But how should we know which addresses have been given out to users? You would want to label addresses for expected payments, and be able to mark them as "free" again maybe etc. Maybe showing next five receiving addresses would be okay for some people, but it will be another button potentially confusing people, and then you lose your notes saying which address you gave to whom, and dont know where you should receive next. I am not sure how to implement this best - and between all the nice tasks, have not found time to really think it through. If someone wants to help, draft a proposal describing how it should be done, and put it up for discussion. If its unproblematic from a usability point of view, I do not see a reason to not implement it. One option could be: On Accounts, user touches the HD Account and on menu there's an option 'Show (unused) addresses'. The list of 5 or 20 addresses is shown. User can select an address to copy, share or go to the 'Receiving' screen (where the QR code is shown) with that specific address. They can also hold it and edit its label. To mark the address as free the user can just update the label to blank/null. Internally the app would have a SQLite table to store those labels. Of course when restoring the wallet from the seed there would be no way to restore the labels. To solve this there can be an option to export labels as json/xml with its correspondent import option. It would use a simple format which just lists the addresses along with the labels. There can be an option to store labels on the cloud. While no keys/seeds would be uploaded there could be some privacy issues so this could be off by default. Let me know if I misunderstood the problem or there are issues on my proposal.

1166

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [EDU] Bitcoin-related Scam Websites

on: June 23, 2015, 01:16:28 PM

Please add SellBitcoin.us It has all the red flags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1096692.0

1167

Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: i got a app to compress images in adroid like 25% the size but cant put into BTC

on: June 23, 2015, 01:55:10 AM

Quote from: muhrohmat on June 22, 2015, 11:41:35 PM well the app its being made and legalized into android but that app its only sellable into the shop of apps and that does not gives btc is ther a pratical way to buy app into android from BTC? I'm not sure I understand you. Do you want to publish your app on Google Play and allow users to buy it with bitcoin? Unfortunately it's not allowed to use any payment method other than Google's: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy.html Quote Developers charging for apps and downloads from Google Play must do so by using Google Play's payment system https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/2651410?hl=en If you try to accept bitcoin payments most probably your app will be removed from Google Play. You'd need to distribute your app via other channels. For example you can offer the APK file here and sell codes (with BTC) to unlock it. There are some ways but not through Google Play at the moment. I hope they will include that payment method in the future.

1168

Economy / Lending / Re: Three Day Loan of 0.21886513 with collateral.

on: June 23, 2015, 01:33:34 AM

jay12, it has been established that your EXMO account is not a valid collateral. Now read this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577765.0 Especially "If you completely ignore this sticky and make a loan request with no [valid] collateral, without having massive trust on the forum, the chances of you getting negative trusted feedback and therefore having a Trade with Extreme Caution tag is almost 100%." and what is considered valid collateral. If you can't offer any valid collateral I strongly suggest you to lock this thread and move it to Archival, otherwise all you'll get is negative feedback.

1169

Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Sell Bitcoin for PayPal - www.SellBitcoin.us

on: June 22, 2015, 07:33:50 PM

Quote from: Sellbitcoinus on June 22, 2015, 02:43:57 PM SellBitcoin.us is fully automated exchange service and available 24/7/365. We provides instant conversion to and from Bitcoin and other popular e-currencies. Sell Bitcoin for PayPal - Friendly support available 24 hours online. www.SellBitcoin.us is the one thing missing from the cryptocurrency world - easy, fast and secure exchanges of the most popular cryptocurrencies. Your site says "SellBitcoin.us (SellBitcoin.us Ltd.) is a company made by Mike Maples,Jr." along with a picture. You mean Mike Maples as in @m2jr, right? I really doubt a site so unprofessional and without SSL was created by him. Please post a link to your site from the account @m2jr. Until you do that your site must be considered a scam. Even if the site were legit, you need to gain some trust first. Nobody will/should send first to a new site, there's no guarantee they will receive anything in return. Always use escrow.

1170

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer still with green trust

on: June 22, 2015, 06:23:31 PM

Quote from: --Encrypted-- on June 22, 2015, 06:08:03 PM Quote from: trinaldao on June 22, 2015, 08:13:06 AM now he get -1: -1 / +1 Warning: Trade with extreme caution! http://prntscr.com/7jutjt https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119416 this one still have neutral trust. Vod actually tagged him but he's no longer on default trust and you're on depth 2, OP. why don't you leave some feedback? Vod is still on default trust (under dooglus) and OP is not on depth 2 (he's on depth 4). You're seeing a different (non-default) trust list because you have Quickseller on your list. Both bobolini and jinjuro are now red when using default trust.

1171

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Pharma [XPH] | Scrypt | Masternodes | Real team | Online store

on: June 22, 2015, 03:26:36 PM

Quote from: Pharma on June 14, 2015, 07:12:57 PM Good evening, community. We didn't say that our pharmaceutical company calls Pharma store. Pharma-store project was created exactly for crypto-society. We don't want this experiment to interfere our existing offline business. SkyValeey spent a lot of efforts to blackmail us and spends a lot of efforts now to avenge for the fact we didn't make a deal. As soon as we fix all the legal questions and open the store, you will see all our documents and we will reveal the offline business behind us. Any update on this? If the claimed company is not "Pharma Store" then what is it? While SkyValeey was blackmailing and thus deserves a negative feedback it doesn't mean what he said is not true. Pharma please post the company documents. I've left a neutral feedback meanwhile.

1172

Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Hero member Skyvalley found scam yet offered thrm to keep it live if they pay hi

on: June 22, 2015, 11:38:41 AM

And now Skyvalley claims all the people who have given a negative rating to him because of his extortion attempt are "defending the scam" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=157178

1173

Economy / Lending / Re: Loan from EquaMobi

on: June 22, 2015, 11:30:38 AM

Quote from: romano2 on June 22, 2015, 05:46:22 AM Loan re-paid , please send the account details back, thanks ! txn : https://blockchain.info/tx/08d49fb61d87ef8bbfc2d441897e0614612b8f0607b955e09ce48ab81b1ffb3d Thank you romano! I confirm I've received it. Unfortunately right now I don't have access to my password manager. I will return your account as soon as I do which I expect to be in about 3-4 hours. I'm sorry about that. Edit: I've PM'd you the credentials. Again, I'm sorry for the delay.

1174

Other / Meta / Re: should luke-jr be on Default Trust?

on: June 21, 2015, 04:29:46 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on June 21, 2015, 04:20:47 PM P.S. You will note anderl and danielpbarron have also given me subjectively-bogus negative ratings, but since they did not lie, they do not have distrust from me for that reason alone. It seems to me an important reason for you not to give them negative trust is because they're not trusted and therefore they don't affect your own trust. The 2 users you did give negative trust are very trusted otherwise. If you hadn't given them negative trust to them you'd have negative trust given by people with dark green trust and thay would definitely affect you. Of course maybe I'm wrong but I find it hard believing that you accept "He cant think logically" isn't a lie while you insist "Tried to censor the Bitcoin network" is.

1175

Other / Meta / Re: should luke-jr be on Default Trust?

on: June 21, 2015, 03:47:57 PM

Quote from: XinXan on June 21, 2015, 03:43:38 PM Quote from: hilariousandco on June 21, 2015, 02:20:23 PM Quote from: erikalui on June 21, 2015, 02:05:33 PM If a person is a liar, it makes them a scammer? That's just a rating left for personal issues and without any reference link as well. BipolarBob has proved to be a genuine user and has helped in donating money as well and how does he become a scammer just because he offers "too good to be true" deals. It's clearly abusing the trust system. I think you could argue initially the feedback was arguably justified and I was always thinking I wouldn't be surprised if he did at some point scam, but I think after a certain while the feedback should have been removed or changed to neutral as doubts were removed. So in other words he is still going to be on dt? I mean wasnt quickseller removed because he supposedly abused the system? Isnt this guy doing the exact same thing with almost 50% of his ratings? Quickseller was removed from default trust because BadBear (and later Tomatocage) decided to remove him from their personal trust list, not because admins (although BadBear is an Admin he removed him as a personal decision, not as Admin) or someone else removed him, that's not how the system works. Luke-jr will be removed if theymos and dserrano5 decide to do so.

1176

Bitcoin / Mycelium / Re: Mycelium Bitcoin Wallet

on: June 21, 2015, 02:14:19 PM

Quote from: Rassah on June 21, 2015, 02:03:48 PM You can't generate new addresses because the standard doesn't allow for that. The scan ahead is 20 addresses. We could probably add that feature, but would still have to restrict you to 20 addresses tops (and if you have 20 empty ones every few addresses, it will slow your balance synchronization down). One thing you can do is give someone an address, then create a transaction where you send some money to yourself, which would create a new address, and repeat this for as many addresses as you need. It would just cost you a transaction fee (pick Economic). I think 20 addresses would be enough on most cases, I know it would be for me. I'd really like that feature. Anyway the self-sending trick could be used only if more than 20 addresses are required. I use a different address per transaction and then I can prove the payment wasn't done yet if that specific address doesn't have any transaction. Sending funds to myself to that address could be a problem because the other party could argue they made that payment. I know I could sign from the originating address to disprove it but it wouldn't be comfortable to use this method as standard.

1177

Economy / Lending / Re: Need loan .1btc No Collateral

on: June 20, 2015, 10:14:22 PM

Quote from: waterpile on June 20, 2015, 10:09:04 PM Quote from: EcuaMobi on June 20, 2015, 10:08:25 PM Quote from: waterpile on June 20, 2015, 10:06:48 PM BTC addy: 18Hftg7gAFd7HjNhKHiw8nik8G8ffF9oMW repayment date: June 30, 2015 repayment amount: .13 I can do this. Please confirm and I'll send it. EcuaMobi will be funding this loan Thank you! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've sent 0.1 BTC (TX: 07a8a4b197385d2a3fdb6e8c134556ccbf66a46174a16d1335fb3c2cca4d354e) as a loan to waterpile. Please pay back 0.13 BTC to my address 1MCbxf7qvxCy9T6PpkKuW6sx11trShBouL by 2015-06-30 Thanks, EcuaMobi 2015-06-20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iQIVAwUBVYXlkbCsztesCz6AAQJX+Q/6AlfY1jksVEDKKjgxvVc8EBEIulVk1nue GLDsZLpKTJ7OZt+scSrs/pq4oz7W7woo4wo4vJS+SY7yNdOmtAeWmylku9gpARgV P+oVMV3Dxa/Sq7SfOCEU8XXyVQ4uWEW04I0GxBz/EenmJc5RkwlrPIBQr5FYatAQ G9ZSn+hwzdjj99YZ3G/Jm6VPdnGUNh9jdbuUm1fwJLenW5DoWe8jLLLCJXt05xw8 ZbQqB4asgrqD4XrXQWkXytJkJJN2LaE16h8oBjPw8WC+sCG66STQmS3Q0fPdbs29 SPsS3R9gtPHJSRKRVN88tJw1Z52EFbR2oHcLUlPHQy/OHEo80/bcxQBeV9ywOyGG 47qSIUzZO5FPkOoF/2FgHYWAO34DsMJucZd1pdiyARD/drHfjTX1mVDPZdw0lZi/ kb/g5/bUmaRRXzLvFzCdvCZsyX3hH/zGelqPw9/MZSNCSSvouHDrQwYNyb+uDbPC kq3jhHPK2WPgH5gy8mEJnaOVlKRDZ5HSiYRWYjs7S36qK/zt/Nk81Ke0XXJFEI5q +iPXnN6MBgs8yRI2jHlutCe2Tp4DW58UPQNH/NBWVXaUwC1QiyMbW2pUv6ej8tcX SXZoK2OYNxC7/ObHCNR/qK7AiZ+Z2IgvHy5yV1oTOnD1hjo6rphtY6SC5zpr1ciE YqiF4dbg7h4= =Pgwl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1178

Economy / Lending / Re: Need loan .1btc No Collateral

on: June 20, 2015, 10:08:25 PM

Quote from: waterpile on June 20, 2015, 10:06:48 PM BTC addy: 18Hftg7gAFd7HjNhKHiw8nik8G8ffF9oMW repayment date: June 30, 2015 repayment amount: .13 I can do this. Please confirm and I'll send it.

1179

Economy / Lending / Re: Ecuamobi to lend .35 BTC to be paid back .38 BTC on or before the 23rd.

on: June 20, 2015, 09:05:11 PM

Quote from: ACCTseller on June 20, 2015, 08:55:00 PM Is he taking your account as collateral, or is this going to be an unsecured loan? If it is the former then this would probably not be a horrible idea, however if it is the later, then this loan is likely going to be somewhat risky as it does not appear that onewiseguy has been trusted with this much money in the past. Although to be fair, I do see that ecuamobi has traded with the OP in the past for larger amounts and the OP does have a number of apparent trades under his belt, although many of them are from untrusted people and many have been for small amounts. It is the later. OP had the change to scam me 0.672 BTC on a previous deal and he didn't, he paid me as agreed. So I trust him for this amount. Quote from: onewiseguy on June 20, 2015, 08:57:39 PM 1QEmgSL1qxGqvDicnnqKy6ng5e99bDnctq I am Onewiseguy todays date 20th June '15, ecuamobi has agreed to lend .35 BTC amount to be paid with interest .38 BTC on or before the 23rd June '15 ILMIz1sNF4L4LEG2EIw3D8jITtjsPhmBRce7H2LM2HTzHm Zjkz+6wHZOqWoN1N7A1LPs/P8mZx+L+J/O9DWCfXc= Verified, address was posted here. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've sent 0.35 BTC (TX 1d0a4b82c75bf54172945ba2b296c4390bb36ad0c14c79015e9570466c95839e) as a loan to onewiseguy. Please pay back 0.38 BTC to my address 1CudaWA3yWPnpH9Ym7y2ri5BcdhTT4oNmn by 2015-06-23 Thanks, EcuaMobi 2015-06-20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iQIVAwUBVYXVcLCsztesCz6AAQKpthAAhaHKcE9DNBbMDuJ5oXnwZCp22fHUtFro aMvMdY8qYYEk0gtLYCjRp0GNcoXnK3KsgjUE6pV+JlW8O0mynAsUFMj34XCUv6I0 cKi3i78Wdgk/2lXUpPiWXo1ce2w0glGNaX8e0v75mowI4JLn+0PSH3ubrDJp57Lo jg6o/eeu4KPFkULYzrpYpujt5GGlbVW95iwXwiW+S4y+ydtySufHciWi609bzhE/ zlzpP+KwiP22/km78MXfrw877XNSPXZSaYHnuqs95Z8WUT/pB/scl/oeXEjqA1oC geeIggOlz9cpfw9wU8jMv68vtJ9tPUPbXWmJ1JMKjlbfR1XHNFrtUt6VeLU4SVMy sbyZd4xw8SI1X6dhBTvv2X0BCxZTWnoizSHZJZHPlcdf08czLCE7HwCi3t1/Lubl K35uWqONyhnI5ckAt7r1iJ74vLd98JRiWdWvv/O++fxVXwqA6upE6WO528ovJ/zz RFxonD40shziHgaTFr5gWk2skBiPi74FAhud2vEyYur8LuJq1CdCaV275oe7mKB7 3ZDJAM5XPxj8IrDqcxIseH74SC9M0FLVd+ijrEMHV5RrX+bjmmoaA3/09R6wOc18 2OIvkKrnEpgZat286/8YvMPZ12keyoJf8KlpF0SuUoy4tptuiDfeXCAWtMaRGZ3J WFizGwxHjqI= =Yr+N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1180

Economy / Auctions / Re: Quickseller's Signature Space - One Month [Ends July 1 7PM EST][May end earlier]

on: June 20, 2015, 06:50:18 PM

I bid BTC0.04

Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 190 »