If you are requiring collateral what is the point in restricting who can request loans from you?

The point of collateral is that it protects you completely from a default so if they default you can easily recoup your losses by selling the collateral

+1 on this. It has been asked many times to have special subforums for domains, no one has any real interest in most of the domains listed of sale here and they only clutter up the auctions and digital goods sections. 

I don't think redsn0w is interested in buying this. He is only pointing out that it is smart to use escrow for this kind of transaction as you do not have any reputation on this forum.

Also just to let you know: PayPal is very reversible so even if you do "cash out" a stolen credit card to paypal, the funds could easily get reversed.

This also appears to be illegal which is against the forum rules.

The account was never hacked. It might have been sold again though, although I kind of doubt it.

He should be able to participate in bit mixer (or any campaign) just fine

If it didn't give a message and it didn't give a timeframe then it was more then likely permanent. It was more then likely for the same reason as the last time you were banned (most likely insubstantial posts + paid sig) as I don't see any other reason for you to get banned based on your post history

All collateral should be held by a trusted third party. Also it makes it much easier to confirm if someone has defaulted if you use a unique repayment address for each loan.

without any kind of timeframe then you were probably banned on a permanent basis. If you did not present any basis as to why you were banned in error then it is unlikely that you will be unbanned on an immediate basis although if you come back in the future then you *may* get unbanned if you ask nicely and demonstrate that you learned your lesion.

It is not ban evading as long as you only post in meta and the purpose of your posts is only to appeal your ban.

If you were previously banned for 14 days then I would guess that you would most likely be banned for 60 days now. You should see the duration of the ban in the red message at the top of your screen when you login.....at least this is where I understand the message to be.

looking at your post history I see that you make a lot of very short posts, they probably are what I would call "two liners" (that is a little bit longer then a one liner but still very short). Although, after looking at your post history, it looks like your posts since what was most likely your last ban were actually one liners.

Prior to your last ban you also seem to have been using the 'return' key in order to make short posts look longer then they really are by creating a new line after only ~1/3 of a line.

I would suggest putting more effort into your posts.

It would probably help if you were to post your username so your posts could be looked at

are you looking to borrow 1 BTC or .1 BTC ? If it is the later can you sign a message from 18Hftg7gAFd7HjNhKHiw8nik8G8ffF9oMW which you have posted multiple times in the past (and also happens to be the address you are requesting the loan to be sent to). The message should read:
Also can you get marcotheminer to guarantee that he will send BTC to the repayment address for your signature earnings in the event that you default on the loan?

That is very interesting that amazon was so quick to restore the gift card. I wonder if this is how people like amazon4u are able to offer such large discounts.

I am also surprised that LBC was not able to somehow protect you from being scammed with their escrow

I looked at 16Jt2jyCB28tJdToJCaAPUZW5HNJUxcEAg on blockchain.info and saw that b7e816f8f4d97df210f226903aa982c8c4ad85da479c3a1ed7b46150990d43b6 has inputs from both 16Jt2jyCB28tJdToJCaAPUZW5HNJUxcEAg which is the address that he posted his loan request on and 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 which is connected to superSTAR777. If a tx has inputs from both addresses, then it was signed by both private keys that control the addresses.

I don't think posting style is a good indicator as many people probably have similar posting styles

This is probably not a good idea with all the negative trust that he has.

He is an alt of superSTAR777 who has scammed many people under a number of alts

The more solid proof is the fact that 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 and 16Jt2jyCB28tJdToJCaAPUZW5HNJUxcEAg signed tx b7e816f8f4d97df210f226903aa982c8c4ad85da479c3a1ed7b46150990d43b6 and 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 can be tied to superstar777. Just because he sent money to superSTAR777 does not mean that they are the same person, just that they did business together

Posting my warning here as well as it is relevant

You will not necessarily win if you change your betting pattern. The site will obviously not win every bet, however they will have a higher house edge then advertised. IIRC, the server seed will change on every roll and it is not displayed by default so they know if you look at the server seed or not so they can easily change it after the fact if you did not look at it prior to rolling.

To address the short posts that I write, sometimes that is all that I need to write in order to get the point across, there is no need to fluff my posts with extra garbage.

It should also be noted that my posts do add something unique to the conversation and are in no way a "plus one" or a "wow great" post.

Looking at your last few posts:
I think it is fairly safe to say that you did not read the OP in this thread very throughly. There is really not any actual content in this post. If you read the OP, you would see that the prizes are bitcoin, and although it is always nice to win money, there is really nothing unique about winning money, and I don't think it is fair to say the prizes are excellent when the OP doesn't even say how much each prize is worth. The OP also says that he will start with easy "puzzles" at first and explains what would need to be used analyzed to claim the prize, which makes your point about wishing you knew how to hack a moot point

This post literally ads nothing to the conversation. The OP was created by a newbie that created his account only weeks ago so it is unlikely that there was any kind of prior relationship with this person. As a result there is little point on congratulating someone on their "first" faucet.

I somewhat doubt that you actually have an account there. I have also noticed that you tend to make very short sentences and start a new line after each very short sentence in order to make your posts appear to be longer then they are. If you were to take out the starting of new lines then the above post becomes what is below
Your post goes from appearing to be 4 lines to actually being 2 lines

I am not sure if there is any reason to make this post. It was posted in a thread in currency exchange. From the looks of it, you don't have any actual intention to do business with this person in the immediate future and are not doing anything to warn his potential trading partners.

This is just a few examples of your recent posts and is by no means an all inclusive list

No I am not interested. If you had read my post, you would see that I am advocating not to buy the account you are selling. Even if the referrals are not fake/fabricated by the owners of the site, the site is still a scam and your referrals will eventually figure this out and stop playing there

I don't think it would be a very good idea for anyone to buy a 999Dice account as they are a scam site and you might as well be associated with the owners of the site who simply changed the DB to reflect that you have a lot of referrals but in reality, once you get payment for the account, the referral earnings stop