https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332491

Anshar is an alt of Candystripes and received the appropriate negative feedback from badbear. He is wearing a bit-x signature. You should make sure that he does not receive payment from your campaign to avoid paying a scammer.

Why did you include a reference to New Orleans if you are looking for shipping to the EU?

There was a person not long ago who was giving out their shipping address to people who were selling physical coins, were claiming they would be able to pay for them in the very near future and then never ended up paying for them - likely in hopes the coins would be shipped out without payment.

I would say that anyone considering to sell any coins should be very careful in any situation

I guess I will spam my signature just one time on this thread as a witness. Per armory, your signature is valid

Sometimes when I am posting, my browser randomly starts putting my text were it is not intended and this is not always noticed.

I assume you are referring to blazr. My understanding is that you were running an exchange that did get "hacked" slash had a back door and customer funds were stolen slash went missing.......somewhat similar to what happened with inputs/coinlenders and TF

Well the fact that you are a troll or not does not really matter in regards to the case in hand.

If they are friends, then it is completely understandable for BAC to stick up for MYRKLE, no, if they are friends then shame on BAC if he did not stick up for MYRKLE, however that does not mean that he should be giving negative trust to people in order to shut them up about thefts that he has previously carried out that negatively affected the community.

camelson participated in my signature campaign but he asked to be removed after he was accused of signature spamming by someone (that was not a moderator).

I don't think camelson is the best poster and he is probably somewhat of a troll but I don't think the negative trust is appropriate.

I have somewhat gotten the impression that BAC is friends with MRYKLE.

I don't think the negative trust should be seen by people by default, and if the negative trust is not removed in the very near future then I agree that he should be removed from the default trust network.

I do think that TECSHARE is probably going to get another negative, if he does it won't be appropriate though

A set is a silver single, a gold+silver single, a silver half and a silver tenth, all graded MS-67.

I am not sure what a set is worth although 10 btc is a lot of money and the set has been for sale for barely 24 hours and not splitting them up could make it so less people can afford to buy them all (full disclosure: my offer of 8 btc is all I can afford ATM and still stands and I asked to buy just the tenth but blazed probably smartly declined)

You were banned for three days for bump spam? Do you know if the bumps were actually made within less then 24 hours of each other?

Some of these people are trying to find information that might protect a potential trading partner. For example warning that a newbie selling a gift card might have purchased it with a stolen credit card. But yea, I know what you mean when people ask a lot of random questions, the answers to which often would not sway most people one way or another in deciding to buy

I would like this idea. I had previously proposed(original) something similar to this a few weeks ago - my actual proposal would be to completely disable signatures for a certain period of time starting when they were banned for signature spamming (insubstantial posts + paid sig) and to have it reenabled sometime after they can start posting again. My idea was later somewhat rebutted by SaltySpitoon in that it would stop people from displaying their PGP keys, etc., and this would be a good rebuttal to that rebuttal in that people could still easily display things like a link to their PGP key but would effectively prevent people from participating in signature deals.

exactly. A good amount of the time, anyone with a paid signature who is posting in the auction section and not making a bid post alone, is more likely then not spamming and doesn't actually have any interest in winning the auction. There is sometimes legit conversation in auction threads, however I think it is pretty rare

I would disagree. You are posting in the lending section not the digital goods section. By posting here you are attracting people who are expecting to get their money back, not who are expecting to go through the trouble of reselling a full member account with a poor posting history

A source of mine told me this and I have seen this posted elsewhere as well. BumbleBeeTC does seem to have similar interests as Candystripes, however there does not appear to be any blockchain evidence linking the account to Candy.

Does anyone have evidence to back this up?

Your account has participated in a lot of giveaways. You also very recently became a full member (two posts ago). Are you sure you are not simply trying to sell your account?

What collateral are you offering? It is generally best to be as transparent as possible when dealing with loans as there are a lot of people who attemp to scam.

This is not true. If there is a time on the ban message then you will need to wait for that time to expire. If there is no time then an admin will need to unban you; there is no set criteria to get unbanned however I would say it would be fair to say that it would need to be a long time since you got banned, didn't evade your ban and you asked nicely.

By posting outside of meta you are evading your ban which is against the rules.

He is obviously not using cash. Idk if the receipts are fake or if he is embezzling money from cvs (or 7-11 or ect) or if he is doing some scam where he buys something with a credit card, returns it and tricks the clerk into saying he paid with cash.

I would say most likely the receipts are fake.

I replied to your reply however it is not necessary to post here every time you send me a PM

3.15

that is a good way to scam an account seller out of their account. The buyer would only need to claim that the password does not work and you would likely get at least part of your money back. When trading accounts both the account and funds should go through escrow.

I will send an escrow address via PM however I am going to require that I receive the account details and then will change them and forward them to the buyer in order to prevent any disputes.