The only way to prove ownership is to sign a message from an old address associated with the account. There is no risk of any kind of loss of privacy when you sign a message. If you are offering to prove ownership in any other way then it is far from concrete evidence of ownership.

As long as you use escrow to hold any collateral that is being used to secure your account then you will be good. If you are not willing to use escrow to hold the collateral then people will think you are just trying to steal their collateral by taking it and then never sending the loan

All collateral should be held by a trusted third party. Also what is the point of making it a requirement to not have negative trust if you are if you are asking for collateral.

.05

LOL. Do you really expect someone to pay you 85 BTC for all those domains?

I am not an admin. If you want to keep the answer to my question private then don't bother giving me the answer because I am telling you now that I do not agree to keep it private.

You also need to know that a PM is not a private message, it is a personal message (a message sent to me personally). Any PM you send or receive can be read by either theymos or BadBear (although I don't think they go around reeding other people's PM's), and theymos can be compelled to provide content of PM's via a valid court order.

If you want information to remain private then you must PGP encrypt it to the recipient's PGP key

Well according to this thread you already made a thread appealing your ban and from the looks of it your appeal was not granted. You can also look at your OP in that thread to see why you were banned.

It looks like the units of evil function is working well if it was asking you to pay a fee.

Why were your other accounts banned?

The units of evil feature is designed so that people who have been banned multiple times and people who evade their ban will have more difficulty creating new accounts

The prestige for full members is really not very much because it doesn't take very much to become a full member. However If you were talking about a hero member, a legendary member, or even a senior member it might be a different story because there are much more rare

You could have sold the account, received money for it and then later came back to claim that it was hacked. You went inactive on the account almost immediately after you supposedly downloaded malware, and then claimed your account was hacked almost immediately after you sold it.  
Like I said, it is circumstantial evidence.

---

---

Out of curiosity, did you ever input your password, or have your password stored on your computer between the time you allegedly downloaded the malware and when it was sold?  

The campaign manger said that he sent the payment details to devthedev and then some time later devthedev posted a TXID of the payment, so I would assume that he was the one what signed and pushed the payment.

But if devthedev were to run away with the escrow funds, wouldn't the owners of da dice be responsible to pay the participants?

A newbie account can only post once every 6 minutes while a full member can post close to two times per minute (?). You can also have links and "unlimited' (up to 4,000 characters) length signature. You will also have the prestige of have a "full member" account instead of a brand new account

You had mentioned that you would only consider a campaign escrowed if the person sending the payments is different from the person holding the funds to pay everyone. By that definition devthedev is not escrowing da dice because he is both holding funds and paying out the participants. It looks like rollin switched to guitarplinker (or does he own the site/is closely affiliated with the site?)

You don't actually post to archival. A thread will be moved there by a marketplace moderator once a sales thread is closed. You would expect the number of posts that a person has in archival to increase over time even if they have not posted in any marketplace thread in a long time.

devthedev is the one who pays out the da dice signature campaign, and I assume the same is true for the other campaigns he manages as well.

I think theymos/BadBear should look into the matter and say if it is reasonable to say that the account was hacked or if it is too difficult to say one way or another.

If the OP cannot sign a message from an address associated with the account today, then it would explain his lack of ability to sign a message from an address associated with the account when the account was sold.

I would say the evidence provided and claims to be able to provide in order to prove ownership is circumstantial at best. The timeline is almost a perfect match of someone trying to scam (referring to the OP)

That is correct, however I think it is safe to say that a good number of people would hesitate before either pressing charges against or calling the police on a 15 year old

How do you know he was not reselling HBOGo accounts?

He should have pressed charges long before he started scamming to recover his money. It is not necessarily true that he was laundering money via those HBOGo accounts, he could have just been a reseller

edit: I take it that you pretty much are officially not going to be repaying him, am I correct?

You were given negative feedback because I was able to confirm that you are a scammer. I gave you the option to either repay the people you stole from or to give evidence that you in fact did not scam the people who claimed that you stole from them.

You essentially admitted to scamming and even agreed to repay the people you stole from, but you have not done so as of now.

If you are not a scammer then there is no reason to worry about getting negative trust from me when you buy an account from me