|
Update:
Nodes Updated
- Solaris v2.2.0.0
- Dash v 12.2.2
|
|
|
|
Hey buddy, you need to add X17 to the site! There's a few coins there that are flying atm!
it will be added with some other algorithms and many many coins, once the new hardware arrives and put to work. |
|
|
|
Hi BHteam,
Friend, i am not pointing you in any wrong way.. I am just trying to give my feedback to improve the site.take it as positive dont think like, i am asking for a lot with free website.. i am just trying to give feedback and be part atleast in improvising the site. Thats it. How ever i am happy with the information i am getting from your site.keep the good work
Edit your previous post and delete the images pls.Thank u
The images are removed. Thank you for the feedback  Don't get me wrong, I want and need feedback like yours to make the site better. Like I said - keep pointing things out and it will become a better service for the users. |
|
|
|
UFO 0.10 has been updated to leave Assembly disabled by default, if you are having trouble compiling then pull the latest changes to your repo, run autogen, configure and make clean. On a brand new Ubuntu 16.04.3 server with the latest UFO 0.10 I followed these steps to compile the client, this includes more packages than are strictly needed but some will come into play on later version. add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
apt update
apt upgrade
apt install pkg-config build-essential libtool autotools-dev autoconf libssl-dev libboost-all-dev libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev libminiupnpc-dev git bsdmainutils python3 libevent-dev libzmq3-dev
git clone https://github.com/Bushstar/UFO-Project.git
cd UFO-Project/
./configure --without-gui --with-miniupnpc
make
strip src/ufod
strip src/ufo-cli
strip src/ufo-tx I've also used the above change in the code to compile the client with assembly support with. ./configure --without-gui --with-miniupnpc --enable-asm --enable-static --disable-shared The proof that assembly is compiled in comes when you run the client with the message. The following of course requires SSE2 support which is enabled by default but will show as disabled without assembly. SSE2 optimisations enabled And if there was a release for Linux on github, it would have been so much better. Just saying. I made the old 0.9 version work again. Will update to 0.10 at some point. |
|
|
|
Hello BHteam,
Thanks..let me check..i have been checking almost 100/hr crypto-coinz.and almost mad..more over..i guess, due to calc mistakes, most people are changing to what ever shows profitable..today most people joined to ELM after your calc showed $$$ profit per D3..suddenly network increased to 4Ths from 300Mhs... EVen same happening on MAG. so i guess you people should maintain ,double check,triple check what ever your calc shows..as it deals with money.. :-) so one day if we mine on some wrong algo by seeing most profitable..then if get less, then we loose. Also you are taking reference of BTC prices from CEX.io but coinmarketcap gives good pricing data.but CEX i think giving wrong info always >20K/BTC.. infact coinmarket shows BTC around 18K. also add few more variables like,exchange fees, and BTC tx fees.so it makes much more realistic earnings
and a request delete images from previous post..Thanks
Hey, I understand what you are saying, and I have done what is needed to fix the calculations as soon as I realized there is an issue. It's been a learning curve for me too, and it will take some time before all mechanisms and scripts are ironed out of every coin deviation out there. If you don't want CEX.IO - just disable it and it won't be part of the calculation. The price that comes from it is not wrong, just the Asia market is almost always above the rest of the exchanges. If you want coinmarketcap - just leave it enabled and you will see the price on it. CMC actually do a mean value based on the higher volumes on some exchanges. But if you have your funds in CEX.IO, then you don't care that that KRAKEN is at 18K, as you are at 20K. You want to have exchange fees, BTC TX fees and more variables - well I want to see at least something that will pay for the servers in the donations addresses, but they are all still at 0. You can keep using the free service that the site provides, ask for improvements, point out wrong calculations, etc. but in the end it's a free service. The main goal of the site is to help people discover new coins and where the profits are. So much people have discovered the new NeoScrypts, Lyra2z, Lyra2v2 and so on coins that otherwise no one was going to see on the WTM or other sites. I will continue to add new coins and try to expose as much new coins as possible to the users. Cheers bhteam |
|
|
|
Hello BHTeam,
i am attaching the screenshots,with actual results
1.with 230Ghs. actually i have 241GHS ..but to calculate i used the minimum average hash rate i ever seen .so lowest hast rate i get with my setup.
2. look at the BR in main calc image MAg-2, there your calc shows BR:-100, but magnet block reward is 200. but in the mag specific calc it shows 200.
3. according to your calc in MAGnet X11 calc MAG-1 image...daily yeild is around 784, but in image 2- you can see that yeild/day is 1569.9 MAG, almost twice.so i guess you are using BR=100 in main, & 200 in next screen.
4 so in any casing i am not getting closer to what i see in calc. i have connected to miningpool.shop, i have connected for 38hrs exactly and the return is around 690MAG. so not even close to 24hr calculations.. i know based on averate hashrate ,the yeild will differ,and calc gives estimations based on at the moment hashrate..but still its too far away..
i would like to know,whether its calc issue,
or am i getting very low on the pool.
and you can see my hash rate at 240GHS on pool, steady hash rate not down to 230GHS,and 24hrs up.
Hi, You are correct. Please test now, the calculation should be correct. 1. The dedicated page had a wrong value of 200. The BR is actually split between miners and MN 50/50, like it was configured on the main calculator. 2. The Calculation for MAG and Needle were taking the total sum of blocks generated from their networks, and they have a hybrid POS that was not accounted for. Now the hybrid POS blocks have been excluded from the calculations. Thank you for been stubborn and pointing out the error to a point that I had went and double checked the data with the MAG Dev and on both MAG and Needle explorers. I went over the calculations for the rest of the coins and there should not be any other Hybrid POS blocks been counted. For Elements - my node is acting up and not reporting every block that is on the network. I will build a fresh binary now and should be up and running again shortly. Thank you guys for pointing the issues. Keep this up and the page will be even better then before. BR bhteam |
|
|
|
Hello,
the crypto coinz calculater is really good.and i was searching for some thing like this from last november..but i found it recently. but i see that,some calculaters are giving false information.for example,MAGNET coin,it was showing almost 2X to 3X more than the actual returns i am getting..now i doubt whether the calculater is wrong or am i getting low MAG with my hardware..but i cross checked with my friends, returns. and returns are same as i got.so i doubt calculator is misleading.please check it.
with regards
Cryptocoinz user
Yes calculator is really way off, i tried bulwark for 24hours. site stated i could get 2bulwark, yet i didnt even get past 1 bulwark On which pool? What was the reported Hash/rate on the pool? You know that the Miner Hash/rate is just the rate at which you search for shares and the actual found shares are what counts. Try a different pool. I mined BWK myself for some time and I am pretty sure the calc is correct. Also, are you using the cards predefined settings on the site to calculate? Did you achieve those values of hashrates on the miners and do you see them on the pool as well? Share some pictures. |
|
|
|
Hello,
the crypto coinz calculater is really good.and i was searching for some thing like this from last november..but i found it recently. but i see that,some calculaters are giving false information.for example,MAGNET coin,it was showing almost 2X to 3X more than the actual returns i am getting..now i doubt whether the calculater is wrong or am i getting low MAG with my hardware..but i cross checked with my friends, returns. and returns are same as i got.so i doubt calculator is misleading.please check it.
with regards
Cryptocoinz user
Yes calculator is really way off, i tried bulwark for 24hours. site stated i could get 2bulwark, yet i didnt even get past 1 bulwark On which pool? What was the reported Hash/rate on the pool? You know that the Miner Hash/rate is just the rate at which you search for shares and the actual found shares are what counts. Try a different pool. I mined BWK myself for some time and I am pretty sure the calc is correct. |
|
|
|
Hello,
the crypto coinz calculater is really good.and i was searching for some thing like this from last november..but i found it recently. but i see that,some calculaters are giving false information.for example,MAGNET coin,it was showing almost 2X to 3X more than the actual returns i am getting..now i doubt whether the calculater is wrong or am i getting low MAG with my hardware..but i cross checked with my friends, returns. and returns are same as i got.so i doubt calculator is misleading.please check it.
with regards
Cryptocoinz user
Well, MAGNET is producing twice as much blocks as it should be and the calculations represent what the network is telling it. I have told the MAG Dev already that the Diff algo is not compensating good enough. If you are not getting that amount - try a different pool. |
|
|
|
Would you consider making a discord? Could have a channel for each algorithm.
Not for now. I don't have the time to watch that discord |
|
|
|
|
Update:
Site Search engine updated
- Faster search and order. The average calculation of 15 to 20 coins now take less then 5 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
Update:
Added new coin
CROWD COIN
In all calculators and monitoring.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys,
can you help me our here?
TXID: 7fbd92bcc35d2f0c43d497d079ed94ca295bca6b78287bd2eee89baef7b6807a
|
|
|
|
|
Update
Added coin
GALACTRUM
Lyra2v2 - new Algorithm
Masternodes - really profitable.
|
|
|
|
Recommended pools? Are you kidding me - only dead pools. why do you recommended solo mining?
There is no dead pools on the list. All are verified, tested for mining and the payments they make compared to the % they take. |
|
|
|
|
Update:
New Coin added:
ASPECTCOIN
X11
Masternodes - actually cheap now. Can be good opportunity to get in while it is still new. 6 Days since the start so far.
|
|
|
|
i just found your site recently but i have a major concern why is your reward in 24hrs are all greater almost 20% than whattomine.com?
I find whattomine pretty accurate, but im willing to follow your site more if you can give a detail explanation in how you compute the rewards.
Like explained in the previous posts, I run my own nodes for each coin and collect info on each block, hashrate, difficulty, block number and masternodes if available. My calculations are based on the real data, and I don't do mean values. WTM does provide mean values of the networks. So mean that 5+ hours after NiceHash has stopped he was showing it as the most profitable to mine on  . With my site you can see the change in the network of the coin instantly. This means that the latest values coming from the blockchain are used. The revenue calculation is based on the current block data, while the 24 hours revenue is based on all the blocks data for the last 24 hours. AS you know all Crypto is volatile in nature, so networks change, and also the prices. Also most calculators don't have all the data for the blocks for the last 4 hours, meaning that they trust the coin Devs that the Difficulty algorith will work as expected and the network will produce the exact number of blocks for 24 hours. And in reality a lot of them can't achieve that and miners produce more blocks to what the network is supposed to produce for 24 hours. So if you have a site that wants to show profits, you can: a/ Configure the amount of blocks that are supposed to be mined and calculate on that number - trusting the Devs of the coin that is will happen, OR b/ Run a node, collect the data and base your calculation on the amount of blocks that really get mined. REgarding Needle coin and other smaller coins - The calculation of the finale revenue is based on the latest price of the exchange they are on. When you go on the exchange you will see that the price is high but there is no one buying any more and the buy orders are really low. So you have to set your coins on the exchange and wait. The calculation of the blocks and rewards are also done the same way as for all other coins taking in mind the MN rewards, POS, floating Block Rewards and so on. As Needle coin floats a lot in network speeds, check the 24 hours calculation and you can see how much did you mine and how much the calc says. Also, tonight - a new X11 will be added. |
|
|
|
Is it possible to use https://www.crypto-coinz.net/crypto-calculator/ with http GET url ? Like in WhatToMine Got several different rigs (red's and green's) - and need to check different params (hashrates and wattage). It will be way better to have saved URL links for complete data for each RIG (with it's own set of hashrates and power consumptions)... not at the moment, should be available after some time. |
|
|
|
I love you so much. You're saving my life. I would be so lost without you. And way more broke. You should remind people to shut off their ad blockers on your page, I just did.
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Update:
New Exchange added
- Bitfinex
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
