No one will open that "video" link of yours, it might be a real video or a malware, not sure, didnt bother checking.

if it happens on multiple environments, chances are
1. Wrong password, you trying to access an account not yours or yours but wrong credentials
2. Your account might be flagged and disabled, not sure if blockchain.info does that

Your only way to resolve, contact blockchain.info

Do we look like we own that web wallet?

Also, this would teach you to use a desktop wallet like electrum or a hardware one if you have many bitcoins.

Cheers!

For the tx you gave, the fees in sats/byte was 265, not super low, nor high, it was in the probability of getting mined in 3-15 blocks.
There are certain miners who do not choose transactions, they merely include transactions as they come randomly.
Most big miners do have a transaction piority system whereby their own txes and high fees txes have piority.

Winning the jackpot once or a few times means nothing in terms of probability, doesnt mean you will win forever and always.

Transaction fees is based on sized of transaction which depends on number of inputs, if you keep receiving inputs from small amounts, when you try to send a big transaction, this is what we call a dust transaction, your transaction size would be huge because of too many inputs. For the last time , no such thing as always giving the same amount of fees.

Or to use an example you like so much, assume that you are paying for a 1 million usd house, the seller of the house will increase fees based on number of notes you use with each note increasing your fees by 2%.

If you pay with a fictional 1 million dollar note, you only pay 2% of that 1 million in fees as only 1 note.
If you pay with 2 dollar notes, your total fees might be higher than the price of the house.

I recommend you using electrum wallet and enabling the dynamic fees feature. It automatically calculates your transaction size and gives you a small slider. Once again, no such thing as a static fee, optimal fees all depends on transaction sizes which in turn depends on number of inputs to the transaction. Assuming you know the size of your transaction, consult https://bitcoinfees.21.co for the optimal fee in sats/ byte and calculate from there, or simply using the electrum dynamics fees calculation feature.

Not sure what you mean on money being gone. For the last time try not to see cryptos in fiat... Even in a double spend, assuming it was made by you, only one or the other would get confirmed ultimately, how is the bitcoins lost? In a double spent, you use the same inputs for two transactions, nothing is lost even if only 1 confirms, it is usually not possible to do a double spend accidentally from common desktop wallets anyways.

GAMORA is not linked to viabtc nor does he own viabtc, do not pm him and offer to pay him. He will probably use the viabtc free accelerator anyways.

You mean users wont be able to withdraw coins to other places until there are 6 blockchain confirmations? Every transaction happens on the blockchain in a normal wallet anyways, do you even know the technical details to your suggestion? Even web wallets like coinbase provides links to your transaction and shows you number of transactions. Why would a user trust you enough to use your service instead of the plethora of already existing and trusted web wallets, case in point Coinbase?

If you do not know how much any idea you want to implement costs, you do not have the capability to do it.

TLDR: Similar services already exists, why reinvent the wheel?

If you treat fees in fiat, let me tell you what will happen. You basically just treated yourself to slow confirmation times.

I would love to see your transaction with $2 fee though, maybe I can tell you why it confirmed so quickly.

It is not to say that there is no chance of low fee transaction being confirmed quickly, just that the odds isnt exactly in your favor with low odds.

Like that 2nd transaction you posted in your op, that 49 sats/byte tx probably has a lower chance of getting mined in the next 5 blocks than you getting struck by a meteor from the van allen belt.

To miners, no one cares about fees in fiat, they look at the sats/byte. You pay more fees than others, I mine your transaction.

Viabtc only mines one block every 6 or so hours, and every block has a max  number of txes mined. The accelerator accepts a fixed amount of transactions to accelerate each hour, and has a limit to how many they accept, even if accepted, it is placed in the queue with other previously accepted transactions. Many people like you who refuse to send txes with a reasonable fee to miners are spamming the free service the moment the hourly quota resets, which is why the limit problem arises.

You can choose to wait for your transactions or do a replace by fee / child pays for parent transaction.

Fair warning though, waiting for your 2nd transaction to get confirmed without doing anything will take super long, assuming it doesnt drop out of the mempool in the first place

Your thread should not be posted here, this is for bitcoin only

Next time ask in the altcoin discussion board.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=unread;board=67.0

You cannot find older wallets on the net, something must be wrong with google. Oh wait no, its the first search result as expected
https://github.com/rubycoinorg/rubycoin/releases

Ok your first one tx 6fdd998794209cc98735102e7612a00b0d0bcd307e6f5c78a0f608ba90e5d035
https://blockchain.info/tx/6fdd998794209cc98735102e7612a00b0d0bcd307e6f5c78a0f608ba90e5d035

304 satoshis / byte, not exactly what you call high fee, its kinda the average fee to get into next 15 blocks , use https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ for fatest and cheapest reccomended fees, currently at 420 sats/byte

Your second transaction has a fee of 49 sats/ byte, it belongs to the kind of tx that miners wont even look at, I give you an estimate of forever for that tx to be confirmed.

You are not paying high fees at all, what result do you hope to achieve by complaining?

Also, if you are that desperate , use the viabtc accelerato, that or do a replace by fee tx or a child pay for parent tx.

I think you mean wallet as in across all platforms including web and desktop and cold storage?

To keep bitcoin safe, obviously the answer would be a hardware wallet like Trezor.

No such thing as avoiding high transaction fee, more inputs = bigger tx size = more fees paid. The sats/byte you pay depends solely on the mempool, if the network is not saturated , you can pretty much pay super low sats/byte, but as mempool is stuck and lots of txes like now, and block has fixed tx mined = high sats/byte fees

You know that moment when fools prove how foolish they are with their own actions? ^ Best example right there.

I haved used Viabtc accelerator both free and premium donation acceleration , it works. Viabtc only mines a block every few 6 hours or so, you think they mine a new block every minute? You think a block has unlimited tx mined?

The rest of your questions can be answered simply using a brain. We honestly do not need bitcoin adopters like yours truly.

Well if you are using faucets which send you small amounts of bitcoins, you might be getting alot of dust , as the fees by coinbase depends on size of tx which is affected by number of inputs, your fees to even deposit your small amounts might have super huge fees.

Why dont you download the electrum desktop wallet? It is super lightweight and does not need to download the entire blockchain so file size and space usage is super small.


So you are the kind of people who goes to a bank to buy fruits because the bank has money and you can use money to buy fruits eh. At least answer the op question instead of gibberish.

pooya that is NOT his only choice. Please refrain from giving absolute answers unless you are absolutely sure that is the only option.

He can still wait for his transaction to drop out of the mempool.

In addition, it would be nice if you did not jump to conclusions. OP already stated the receiving party "cancelled" his payment which probably means the receiving party no longer wants this payment.

With regards to the 360 sats/byte, be advised that that is not the definitive fee to get your tx mined in the next block, the recommended fees changes every transaction. Use https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ for more concrete values.

No one can tell you that, anyone who can claim to predict Bitcoin prices in the short term is lying.

As we always say around here, if you HODL enough you are guaranteed to have a profit since bitcoin has a max number of mined coins

I think you got the answer from the error itself? Haha, you just registered, it works as there had been no cookie before

Hi Peter S, I think you are confused how this works.

You see when someone askes for payment using bitcoin, and payment is sent to him , as in a transaction has been created in the mempool and relayed to the receiving party, the only way to "cancel" a payment using bitcoin is if the transaction has too little fees and drop off the mempool, or in the case of a double spend, if the double spent tx is confirmed and mined before the first one, in which case the first one "is cancelled" as the 2nd tx is now the authoritative ones.

When you make a purchase or something using bitcoin and the other party says they have cancelled the payment after you have sent a transaction. It means that they will refund you bitcoins to your address if it somehow gets confirmed in a block.

i think it is high time you update your electrum client, we are now at 2.8.2 with a lot of fixes and improvements

https://electrum.org/#download

In the latest version, you should be able to enable Child Pays for Parents transactions in settings (it might be enabled by default), in which case if similar cases happen you can bump up fees with another transaction with higher fees to do what we call paying fees for parent tx also.

You can also enable dynamic fees in which a slider would appear when sending txes, according to how fast you want your tx to confirm. Although I strongly suggest using https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ to check the cheapest fees at any time to get confirmed quickly.

Personal thoughts, I have been using 320 sats/byte fees for a month or so and they seem to be confirmed within 5 mins to an hour.

Chances are until the segwit with 2MB hard fork is released, the mempool congestion should continue for quite awhile.

Each erc20 token issued will have one sjxc counterparty token burned.

No need tokens were created. The correct term is actually a coin swap, just that storj is selling some tokens they own to increase liquidity

I offer 0.000001 BTC , you will pay fees. So you will actually pay me for your newbie account which is totally worthless , heck I can get a script to create a thousand newbie accounts for much less than 0.008.

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/6d0927409f7f3850bb2f917ebe2f39d0f109dcaf9e84b7c1c365cee70208b650
https://blockchain.info/tx/6d0927409f7f3850bb2f917ebe2f39d0f109dcaf9e84b7c1c365cee70208b650

Seems like your transaction never dropped of the mempool because some nodes are somehow still relaying it. Is it not possible for you to do a Child pay for parents tx with higher fees?

There are some people who will suggest to you to restore your wallet using your seed words which should clear any unconfirmed txes but i doubt it will work as the server you are connected to will replay the unconfirmed tx back to you anyways as it is in the mempool

Could you give us the relevant addresses and transaction in particular.

Sometimes this happens if txes get dropped of the global mempool but somehow is still in the mempool of the electrum server you are connected to.

Could it also be that it is a new tx?

Well seeing that your tx with a pretty low fee was mined in block 468071 by ViaBTC according to  https://blockchain.info/block-index/1511141.

I would say it worked.

Not even part of the Storj team, but you certainly did not read the TOS or the specific details of the sale.

From the start, the terms were already set that tokens distributed would be based on btc or eth or altcoins exchanged at the time of payment

People like you would only complain when thinks doesnt go the way you want it to. You basically wants the price of eth or btc to remain stagnant instead of rising, because you now lost money in your previously held btc/eth stocks? Given that if btc or eth prices crashes after you made the token payment, I am pretty darn sure you would have reversed all your statements about how good the ico was.

Conversely, if token distributed was pegged to prices when token sale ends, you would still complain if somehow btc or eth crashes before the token sale ends, you would than complain about how you are receiving less tokens because of the price pegged to when token sale ends.

I agree that storj is poorly managed and has no transparency, therefore i propose to buy all your storj tokens bought in the sale at $0.01 cent per token, since storj would be worthless according to you anyway.

Investors are people who stick with their investments through thick or thin, like early bitcoin adopters, not people like you who treats icos like ponzis and gambles on getting quick returns only instead.