•I have plenty of Facebook pages myself and guess what? I never had an issue of hundreds of fake profiles following them....

Cool did you run a bounty? Foul play is obviously expected.


•I'm sorry if this made you doubt my credibility (no I'm not), I didn't get the full story as I was r-e-m-o-v-e-d from the group as soon as I asked them a few tough questions about the ICO and the product.

Yeah, that was the effin point........... If you dont know what you are talking about just be quiet. (Your child like boisterous behavior is what caused the ban in my opinion)


•30% active users is healthy and normal - Take a look at Ethereumproject or NEO_Blockchain or any other project you find reputable" - point taken although this wasn't exactly the main argument.

Okay then. - even though invalidating the social media ties was like 65% of your article.

•"There are missing links in some websites and completely obscured motives for some of these partners (keep in mind these projects are still fairly new)" - these arnt projects, these are jokes or outright scams. you can't call a website with a few pictures, no product, no team, and no credible info a "partner". sorry, it just doesn't work that way...

There are linkedin links and there is some information regarding these websites, but more or less - i agree to an extent - it looks sloppy. Like I stated earlier this is probably the only semi credible part of your statement.

•"juvenile demeanor" - that's me, nice to meet you

Aw, How cute, nice to meet you too.

•Things do change, but comparing this to Amazon, really? I liked the comparison to Mt. Gox better... usually ICO sites remain consistent with their idea, here it just looks like CREDITS is pilling on logos and websites with no substance to give them back some credibility they are clearly missing.

Yeah, you aren't understanding my point if you are comparing Amazon to these websites in a literal sense. To add, these websites weren't ICO's before, the subject of their project remain consistent since being public as an ICO.

•If the team had a shred of integrity they would delay the ICO by another 2 weeks, release the alpha and a github to let us see what exactly of their claims are real, and then let people invest while knowing a little more about what they're getting in to. .  

This is where we can both agree, I completely understand that and only time will tell at this point.

Ok,

1. You review that the majority of Facebook profiles are fake, to prove this you are giving a screen shot of profile pictures?? Where is the proof in that? Give me concrete evidence. I consider that pure speculation (all the while, YES I believe there are definitely fake profiles involved, just not the majority.  it's inevitable in any social media outlet)

2. There are 25k telegram users, and most are quite active (which gives some validity to the facebook users). A new message practically occurs every 3 seconds and mob mentality will kick in for any subject of conversation - it's literally an echo chamber, feelings of any group in conversation this large will be steered by that factor.

Also your statement that "the whitelist has been hacked" is incorrect - What was hacked were the credentials of an admin account on telegram who's purpose on telegram was to inform the chat of the whitelist terms (Which has since been cleared). This is where you lost a ton of your credibility to me, you lacked sincere research here.

3. 30% active users is healthy and normal - Take a look at Ethereumproject or NEO_Blockchain or any other project you find reputable.

4. Your review on Credit's partners is somewhat credible, at some points I agree - it's lackluster. There are missing links in some websites and completely obscured motives for some of these partners (keep in mind these projects are still fairly new). Although some of your points are mediocre (no offense) - with phrases like "don't get me started" without even divulging in evidence or "enough said" after pointing out grammatical inconsistencies... It's just juvenile demeanor.

Also to your point of websites changing use-cases - Some websites served a different purpose before, so? Amazon was a bookstore and Mt. Gox was a trading card exchange.. Things change.

Now I completely understand the concern on alpha and the disorganized approach towards objectives - Frankly, I agree. Alpha is not out yet, it should have been released by now and it is concerning. I totally adhere to the response of avoiding this ICO if Alpha isn't released, but the team is pushing back the ICO for a reason (if it were a scam don't you think they would just run the ICO and cash out? Don't you think that Igor wouldn't have gone to expos and interviews?).

Just be patient.

The writer of that article is basing everything off speculation, it's asinine - just a bunch of accusations with no basis. To top it off the writer's lack of understanding of the technical whitepaper is emphasized in his own article.

It doesn't phase me, I'll gladly wait a couple days for a fully functional alpha.

Go here :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2241121

Scroll down to signature , Read the rules. You will be paid after the round up of stakes (which is after ICO.)

>>>>>>• Payment will be done after stake calculation, after the end of the ICO<<<<<<

Speadsheet of participants are here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-_xmcF8Aw1Y2I1v8u44s-UICn94JhSKcEOidtGPfEbs

Go to the signature tab, if that's what you are speaking of.

It's obvious that you didn't take the time to read.. That fault lies on your own incompetence, so it's not anyone's fault for ignoring you.

Yeah, I saw that too. Nothing of value was lost though. Only the credentials to an admin account on telegram was compromised.

Red isnt something to frown about, if you've been playing your cards right you should be riding the waves. This is great opportunity. Dont be greedy if you are trading (and not long term hodling) just sell at profit and buy on red.

I barely ever touch ICOs anymore. There are far too many ICOs at the moment, and at least 90% of them will be a fading blip in the long run for crypto.

If it was built by humans it can be broken by humans. I'm not sure why the volume is showing its down, it might be a simple error because its running fine for me at the moment.

This is great news. Lisk may be more advantageous than ETH being that dAPPS can be written in Javascript, i dont think i can begin to fathom the diversity of applications that will be created.

LMAO! When I saw this moon I literally thought for a second that the wash trading was a sort of insane advertisement for the show Mr. Robot.

Yeah, It's a premine - regardless of what the shills say (devs or miners i dont care), just remember that it was a premine by all technicalities.
Feel free wasting mining power on this if you'd like just know that there are a handful of people that have bags x20 your size ready to dump when and if this coin reaches any potential.

PS: Since when does a blog and a website constitute as a whitepaper?

The only way to really evaluate that is when the ico is in action and what cap is met. Also, to add on to the Russian stereotype everyone keeps talking about, remember that Vitalik Buterin is Russian.

Did you optimize your gpu's timing strap bios? Are you undervolting your cards? Because 500 watts for 2 480's is ridiculous, I have a 6 GPU rig of 580's that have bios modified and are undervolted and i'm pulling a fluctuation of around 950-1050 watts from the wall. (5xx series draw more power than 4xx series). Also be sure that your GPU temps are limited not to run over 65 degrees celsius, if you run any card over 65 constantly - it causes major damage.

With .13 KWH I spend close to 100 a month but i'm mining around 6-8 pirl a day and it's still profitable, even if pirl dropped to $1 it will still be mildly profitable.

Oh my, the pure hostility in that comment made me chuckle really hard. I have a dark humor. A part of me wants to tell you to calm down but... eh, BCC is a travesty...

Ooooookay............ You seem high maintenance......

You DO realize that there is a support webpage "https://support.supernet.org/support/home", there is also an option to e-mail the devs, a reddit, and this ANN you are currently talking on. So just ask away at any one of these places and I'm sure you'll get whatever you need done. No need to stomp your feet around in a tantrum like a child - just communicate.


PS: I definitely thought you meant an ACTUAL private key when you were commenting about not getting into slack, that isn't a good analogy at all...

If you think the word "private key" can be interpreted in the context of someone's private life/identity on a forum where we strictly speak about cryptocurrencies, you are dead wrong. It's misleading and inaccurate. Saying that either makes the slack invite look like a scam, or it makes you look uneducated.

Yeah, that's just shitty planning. They opened main net before launching the website and ANN. I get that they believe they had a "catch 22" situation, but the whole ordeal was just made possible by the team's incompetence and it's obvious to see the motives of the shills defending this incompetence.

Yeah, agreed. Dev should have included that information in the ANN. The idea for the project is nice but it wasn't thoroughly planned. Half of the info on the website is still placeholder text and there is yet to be a white paper.

Thanks for saying that for me, These ICO's are getting crappier by the hour.

uhh, what makes this different from any other equihash coin?.... seriously, some one fill me in.

Hmm wow ok, random picture of a man with a 19 century mustache as the ICO mascot neato! White paper is literally a copy paste of a picture only with different words but only taking up 1/4 of the pages, Awesome! Such a useful coin! this will be top10! no doubt about! wowgreatjob!