Dealhunter, Install the wallet. Click continue Click settings tab Enter your bitcoind.exe location in bitcoind.exe field Enter your rpc user name and password also Click update Restart the program. http://www.mymastercoins.com/MyMSCWallet.aspx
|
|
|
Romaticon,
If it cant connect to the bitcond.exe please renter your password. (Don't cut and paste)
sorry didn't work , another strange thing is the bitcoind that I fill in also is not recognized E:\WorkingArea\Mastercoin\bitcoin-0.8.5-win32\bitcoin-qt.exe The file it is looking for is bitcoind.exe not bitcoin-qt.exe. Try E:\WorkingArea\Mastercoin\bitcoin-0.8.5-win32\daemon\bitcoind.exe
|
|
|
I use the -datadir option for bitcoin, so my blockchain is not in the default place. Is it possible to "tell" MyMastercoins Wallet where to search the data?
Is it possible to use MyMastercoins Wallet as portable software?
The wallet will get data directly from mymastercoins.com sql server. It just needs to know where bitcoind.exe is located so that it can send transactions.
|
|
|
Romaticon,
If it cant connect to the bitcond.exe please renter your password. (Don't cut and paste)
|
|
|
Click continue. You will be able to enter the settings tab. Enter your rpc password Restart the program. I get that one , in addition to the fact that the file can't be found and the RPC server can't be connected System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: InvalidArgument=Value of '0' is not valid for 'index'. Parameter name: index at System.Windows.Forms.ComboBox.ObjectCollection.get_Item(Int32 index) at MyMastercoinsTCW.Form1.Form1_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.EventHandler.Invoke(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.OnCreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl(Boolean fIgnoreVisible) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.CreateControl() at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmShowWindow(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WmShowWindow(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Form.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)
|
|
|
Hey I am trying to run MMW and it refuse to connect to my local wallet. the wallet do run in server mode. and here is the conf file. My data is in E:\msc rpcuser=mastercoin_user rpcpassword=mastercoin_pw rpcport=8332 rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
http://imgur.com/CcP17tg[/ur
Your settings looks correct. Please close the program then run it again. It should connect to your bitcoin wallet.
|
|
|
Yes, I've run setup.exe before. I did all the steps you mentioned prior to that.
I'll try to install they file from GitHub in a new computer to see if I can reproduce the error. What windows version are you using?
|
|
|
This pops up first after I run the .exe: I can't set the language to english unfortunately, but it says: System can't find requested file.
Did you run setup.exe? After getting the zip file from GitHub. Extract it to a folder. you will see a mymastercoinstwc.zip Extract this file to a folder Run setup.exe
|
|
|
I couldnt get Bitoy's MyMscWallet to work. I get 'Exception thrown:File not found' every time I run the executable. I've tried it on a 32bit and 64bit system, getting the same problem. When I update the settings(which seems to work, since the values are persistent), I get the same error twice.
Hi jakecnn Please post a screen shot of the error to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355739.0After updating, close then try to restart the program. (When I post the files directly to github, the setup doesn't work something to do with file checksum. So I zipped it before sending to github.)
|
|
|
Tachikoma,
Please check 8d47449b082ffe6f6b2adad327591778c43bf984e84062fb1cb13320b47ccbbd
I'm also getting this as invalid.
Date: 1/11/2014 5:20:31 AM Remarks: Sender 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j doesn't have 0.1 TMSC. Bal:0.096 Sale:0 Pend:0
Edit Only 8 address left to sync
MM=0.096 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j ME=0.02 MM=536.90527669 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 ME=0 MM=0.2 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT ME=1.537 MM=2.9643 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN ME=1.8273 MM=70.91312399 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb ME=89.00112399 MM=1 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ ME=1.00002089 MM=106.12380845 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm ME=107.12380845 MM=0.006 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc ME=0.106
|
|
|
This is a very fast synch only 10 address left (from 22 a few minutes ago =)
MM=0 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P ME=0.4 MM=0.096 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j ME=0.02 MM=536.90527669 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 ME=0 MM=0.2 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET ME=0 MM=0.2 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT ME=1.537 MM=0.2 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC ME=0 MM=2.9643 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN ME=1.8273 MM=70.91312399 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb ME=89.00112399 MM=1 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ ME=1.00002089 MM=0.006 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc ME=0.106
|
|
|
For the address 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P
Mymastercoins has 0 TMSC.
Master Explorer has .4 TMSC Due to the following simple send trans 95ce712e72c4ab26201d89bab21219f090a9ee873b5edab375a3b416cb1509de 0a8be4a7e57ee12e30695a3d34c17959ec7fe5931ce06ccac88f262e2d4a30cb
MyMastercoin implementation 95ce712e72c4ab26201d89bab21219f090a9ee873b5edab375a3b416cb1509de is a simple send to 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET 0a8be4a7e57ee12e30695a3d34c17959ec7fe5931ce06ccac88f262e2d4a30cb is a simple send to 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC
|
|
|
Mine show only 22 differences. MM=0 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P ME=0.4 MM=0.096 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j ME=0.02 MM=536.90527669 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 ME=0 MM=0.2 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET ME=0 MM=0.2 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT ME=1.537 MM=0 1MCHESTxYkPSLoJ57WBQot7vz3xkNahkcb ME=-1 MM=0.2 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC ME=0 MM=9 1MCHESTbJhJK27Ygqj4qKkx4Z4ZxhnP826 ME=8 MM=2.9643 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN ME=1.8253 MM=0 1EdAjiApS5cCpHdH4RKPMab1xmMVRWjLvk ME=-10 MM=70 15QBPtyFR76ak2NvdfKbgYNp7HtB3tbtRd ME=-80 MM=0 1PaPeaZKfNzc7uD8VvXLKyEbxc3roHNzEn ME=-1E-08 MM=70.91312399 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb ME=71.00112399 MM=1 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ ME=-0.08797911 MM=0 1Q7soqFvsSkhNy5GdVw1oSm9KVpgzHA9Zk ME=-0.1001 MM=20 1HfXDX3ALapNebQC8stTdd5zK7kiCgvX9n ME=18 MM=0 1EAuHj8Z6rTCHPxXfaGzzPsZevC2mg1XAj ME=-9.89899999 MM=9.47471458 1J2svn2GxYx9LPrpCLFikmzn9kkrXBrk8B ME=8.47471458 MM=107.12380845 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm ME=106.12380845 MM=1.2 182osbPxCo88oaSX4ReJwUr9uAcchmJVaL ME=0.9 MM=0.006 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc ME=0.106 MM=0 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV ME=-0.1
|
|
|
MyMastercoin vs MSCE Test differences If you guys can give me a attribute I can supply to your address verification URLs I can add yours as well. Bitboy has -0.1 for 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV but Mastercoin explorer has 0 Bitboy has 0.106 for 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc but Mastercoin explorer has 0.006 Bitboy has 0.9 for 182osbPxCo88oaSX4ReJwUr9uAcchmJVaL but Mastercoin explorer has 1.25 Bitboy has 106.12380845 for 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm but Mastercoin explorer has 107.12380845 Bitboy has 8.47471458 for 1J2svn2GxYx9LPrpCLFikmzn9kkrXBrk8B but Mastercoin explorer has 10.47471458 Bitboy has -9.89899999 for 1EAuHj8Z6rTCHPxXfaGzzPsZevC2mg1XAj but Mastercoin explorer has 0 Bitboy has 0.7 for 17RVTF3vJzsuaGh7a94DFkg4msJ7FcBYgX but Mastercoin explorer has 0.5 Bitboy has 18.0 for 1HfXDX3ALapNebQC8stTdd5zK7kiCgvX9n but Mastercoin explorer has 22 Bitboy has -0.1001 for 1Q7soqFvsSkhNy5GdVw1oSm9KVpgzHA9Zk but Mastercoin explorer has 0 Bitboy has -0.08797911 for 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ but Mastercoin explorer has 1 Bitboy has 71.00112399 for 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb but Mastercoin explorer has 38.91312399 Bitboy has -0.00000001 for 1PaPeaZKfNzc7uD8VvXLKyEbxc3roHNzEn but Mastercoin explorer has 0 Bitboy has -80.0 for 15QBPtyFR76ak2NvdfKbgYNp7HtB3tbtRd but Mastercoin explorer has 70 Bitboy has -10.0 for 1EdAjiApS5cCpHdH4RKPMab1xmMVRWjLvk but Mastercoin explorer has 0 Bitboy has 1.8253 for 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN but Mastercoin explorer has 2.9643 Bitboy has 8.0 for 1MCHESTbJhJK27Ygqj4qKkx4Z4ZxhnP826 but Mastercoin explorer has 9 Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2 Bitboy has -1.0 for 1MCHESTxYkPSLoJ57WBQot7vz3xkNahkcb but Mastercoin explorer has 0 Bitboy has 1.537 for 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2 Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2 Bitboy has for 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 but Mastercoin explorer has 536.90527669 Bitboy has 0.02 for 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j but Mastercoin explorer has 0.096 Bitboy has 0.4 for 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Tachikoma, I think you have it backwards. ex. Mastercoin has -0.1 for 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV but Bitboy has 0
|
|
|
Hey Bitoy,
That's a normal Class B transaction - first multisig is sender (for redemption), second and third multisigs are 1st and 2nd packet.
Thanks Zathras, I'll get 2nd and 3rd multisigs and see what happens. (Blockchain.org is down = Mymastercoins is down =(
|
|
|
I'm having a problem parsing this multisig transaction http://blockexplorer.com/tx/309cfaa34c85326dd483544a130f4c1337c29599b720538acbc68fa28dced0ffThere seems to be 3 multisig 027fff7acd96c7a4c36ab7515ce5c25d49caf9bd16084a2b1eeccde30dc6c8c995 028710f318fa37e6d84c5f6f0d830d73104d00d4da7e539c8ad7f30689c9f25c95 0264e9d0d88cc3defc8855cabdb31d362747292f815149c72464847dfb2c034c95 I tried the 1st 2 but the transaction came out invalid. Do we have to use "peek and decode" here also?
|
|
|
Seems like I am slipping out on Exodus dev vesting every now and then by one willet (colloquial term or official btw?).
Must be rounding, will check my types and formulas to see what I can come up with.
Thanks Zathras
Zathras, Maybe we can remove the Exodus address from the consensus % calculations since we are getting from different sources and there will be a block difference somewhere. One willet difference in the exodus address is not a problem.
|
|
|
|