3rd EDIT
Feeleep is online but hasn't responded to my PM. I'm pulling my miners and going elsewhere until my account is properly credited for the the shares I've mined, which looks like every single one going back thru my transaction history. I'd recommend avoiding this pool until the issue is resolved, which is kind of a pity because the only other pushpool listed in post #2 of this thread is closed to registrations.
I am sorry that you are having issues with the other pool. I would like to open registrations on mine, but unfortunately the network hash rate has dropped to the point that even though my pool has dropped to 40MH/s at the moment we are still more than 45% of the network. Registrations will automatically unlock when the network hash has increased such that we are less than the limit of 45% of total network hash. Given all the troubles that FTC encountered yesterday it's more obvious than ever how important it is to keep any one pool from taking too much of the network hash and that sort of thing is why the automatic limit was instituted in the first place. I really expected there would be more good pools to use by this point. The only other option that I have would be to open a new and entirely separate pool for SBC in addition to my regular one, which I really wasn't planning on doing, but it wouldn't be difficult. Thoughts ? http://silverwolf.ath.cx/sbcyou misunderstand what a 51% attack is, it does not require 51% of the network, nor does 51% of the network ensure success. Such an attack is possible with 40% or even 30% of the network. Its likelihood of success is just relative to the percentage. Thus there is really no reason to shut registration on your pool I appreciate your input here. I know you are a coin developer and you know the ins and outs of coin development far better than myself. Strictly speaking perhaps I don't have to cap registrations at 45%, but I still don't think it's particularly good idea for the coin to have so much of the entire network running through only one pool. Since we have differing opinions in this matter I will ask the advise off the SBC developers and see what they want me to do.
Can a developer chime in here ? Should I leave the cap at 45% or should I raise it ?I would set up an entirely different pool, on a dfferent host, if possible. The issue with one pool having too much hashing power is that it becomes very easy to DDOS the network. Are there still issues with the other pools, or have they been resolved? |
|
|
|
|
Hello all, some quick updates.
1) We're currently working on an updated client, and will be pushing that out sometime this week hopefully
2) Work on the shop continues. Should be ready to launch not too long after SBC has a stable price on the exchanges. I've heard Vern is strongly considering putting SBC on cryptsy. Show your support!
|
|
|
|
Updating the pool list now. Hashrate is currently floating around 250MH. Some serious interest in this coin  |
|
|
|
35 confirmations are required for a block to mature.
Awesome! Updated it to 35 confirms required. Did you guys edit the description just now or did I just read it wrong ? I'm just curious. You must have read it wrong! I typed the post up at midnight, it was a mistake on my part. |
|
|
|
It has been 5 hours since launch. A total of 12080 coins have been minted. 24/5 * 12080 = 57984 expected coins to be created today. Target daily daily output is 1.5 * 25 * 60 * 24 = 54000 coins. We were pretty damn close! That means StableCoin has cemented itself as having the fairest launch of any coin. Most coins generate at least a highly disproportionate amount of coins during the first day. Good job guys. |
|
|
|
|
35 confirmations are required for a block to mature.
|
|
|
|
building from current git repo.. need remove hardcoded windows crap if not on windows
stablecoin-qt.pro:
It auto pushed when I recompiled to change the units, it's reverted now. It changed to generate between 34 and 37. Strange.... Setting required confirms to 37 for the time being.
It is 35, that was a typo in the OP. My apologies. why window binary does not include the daemon??
I can compile that for you real fast if you require it. |
|
|
|
|
Added all pools to the main post. Github fixed.
Quick heads up, will be changing the 3 letter abbreviation from STC to SBC. This will help the coin stand out more as there is already some coins that end in TC (LTC, FTC). A redownload is not necessary as this change is entirely cosmetic.
|
|
|
|
|
Cool, added you the P2Pool list in the original thread.
|
|
|
|
How much? I just found a block for 25 after about 45. Wondering if the pool would be better.
Over a period of time your expected payout is the same, pools are just more steady. |
|
|
|
|
Before I add it to the OP, has anyone got a payout from that pool yet?
|
|
|
|
Network is chugging along. Coins created is almost exactly at the point that we expected. Everything is going well |
|
|
|
EagleEye, from what I understand, you hijacked a coin from another developer, and redirected the address that he had set up to send 50% of all mined coins to yourself. You're hardly in a position to say half the things that you have. That being said, I don't crap in your thread, so I ask you politely not to crap in mine. Thank you. |
|
|
|
It is hard to take you seriously with your ZenithCoin avatar... I wonder where your interests lie? We have big plans for this coin, the mixing service is the least of them. More details on the shop will be released in the coming days. |
|
|
|
i can't seem to get more than 8 connections on the wallet
Have you forwarded port 17500? I also added additional nodes, check the OP for them. I am stuck on 8 connections as well. Port is forwarded + I have added the additional nodes. A full list of 63 peers can be pulled from here: http://pastebin.com/ZcKPAxF5 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 COINS PREMINED
STOP OF WASTING TIME
This has already been addressed. As described in the OP, these funds represent 0.5% of total coins and will be used as the basis for a coin mixing service. More info: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227766.msg2397962#msg2397962Premines are typically used to line someone's pocket, not launch a service, so I think it's a bit disingenuous to call it that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
