Bitcoin Forum
June 09, 2024, 05:14:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »
121  Economy / Speculation / Re: Experts: Investing in Bitcoin now? on: March 10, 2018, 06:02:27 PM
Investing in bitcoin is GAMBLING that some day it can do more than 14 transactions per second ON CHAIN. And I'm not talking about Lightning Network because that's just a dumb system that will never work like I explained before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2792933.0

Maybe some day a genius will stand up and invent a new blockchain algo. Then again, that day may never happen. But that's what you're betting on when you buy bitcoin for the long term.
122  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 10, 2018, 05:59:17 PM

You did read my previous post? SWIFT actually agrees with the author that blockchain in its current state is NOT suitable for payment systems (which is no surprise given the current 14 tx/sec limit for bitcoin for example). Maybe some day someone will invent a new algo and it will work. But who knows if that's even possible. Until that day bitcoins is worthless as a payment system.

Author of the original article was almost certainly clueless about Swift's project and probably moreso about the hacks they suffered.

As for FT piece - There's a difference between 'not ready yet' and 'inherently useless or inferior to current systems'. There's a difference between 'not suitable for payment systems' and 'not yet ready to support all 11,000 banks'.

According to Swift, test went 'extremely well' and are 'convinced that these obstacles will be overcome'. Change the title and you have pretty bullish piece.

Ok wake me up when bitcoin can do more than 14 transactions per second. Something like the 65.000 per second that VISA currently processes. And don't start about LN, because that's just the dumbest system ever that won't work, like I explaind before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2792933.0
123  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 10, 2018, 04:02:57 PM
It's a strong indicator that they find the technology useful. I don't expect Swift is spending shitloads on blockchain solutions just to bump their stock price, because they are a Society and don't even have a listed stock + probably they would be the first to debunk the blockchain tech if it was indeed useless (as it's a direct competition to their service). Just as I find it hard to believe that Blockstream would manage to sell their private blockchain solutions to any business if it was indeed inferior to the existing tech etc.
You did read my previous post? SWIFT actually agrees with the author that blockchain in its current state is NOT suitable for payment systems (which is no surprise given the current 14 tx/sec limit for bitcoin for example). Maybe some day someone will invent a new algo and it will work. But who knows if that's even possible. Until that day bitcoins is worthless as a payment system.
124  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 09, 2018, 05:41:28 PM
OP's must be another dumb article from a dumb author.
What part particularly struck you as dumb?

Quote
If OP can see this as the best written article ever, I wonder how the level of your intelligent quotient is,
Last time I tested it was 140. Is that enough for you?

Quote
The mistake he even made was comparing with SWIFT. The same swift that sees greatness in blockchain and trying to explore it or another one? Well, good for him since the article was at least able to help someone like him.

LOL. Did you even read what SWIFT said? Yesterday they said: "Blockchain technology needs to make more progress before it can handle the billions of dollars of daily cross-border payments between the world’s banks" https://www.ft.com/content/966f5694-22c6-11e8-ae48-60d3531b7d11 which is EXACTLY the author's point too. Blockchain tech as it is is NOT suitable for payment systems. Maybe some day in a future it will be. But who knows when that day will arrive and IF that day will arrive. Right now it's worthless as a payment system.
125  Economy / Speculation / Re: Just drew this out. I'm hopeful its wrong, but found this curious. on: March 09, 2018, 05:05:23 PM
people were certain we were on the way up - everyone was saying 'this is a healthy correction, look at the consolidation blah blah'.

Welcome to bitcointalk, where people will tell you ANY time is a GREAT time to buy some more! Smiley
126  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 08, 2018, 09:37:47 PM
Your argument relies on others' opinions and is therefore weak. If you want to argue about the merits of blockchain as a distributed database versus, say, an actual distributed database, then I'm happy to have that conversation. I work with software and databases so I would be happy to help you understand why it is so much less efficient than something like Cassandra or even regular SQL databases.

I always find it very interesting how the technically skilled are very wary of crypto's, while the noobs, who really don't understand it, are bullish.
127  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why is Bitcoin price tanking down? There seems to be no respite in the pricing? on: March 08, 2018, 09:16:16 PM
1) Noobs go to bitcoinwisdom
2) Noobs see big candle starting because of the dumping of Goxcoins
3) Noobs panic and google "Bitcoin news"
4) Noobs see the SEC news, see the Binance hack news, see the MtGox news... the spiral to FUDland begins and it's just a domino effect of selling

And 5) Noobs sell their whole position (being 0.002 BTC). Come on Noobs dont make the market. Big money makes the market.
128  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 08, 2018, 05:20:05 PM
LN removes obstacles such as transaction precessing speed, confirmation times, costly fees, etc. You however fail to see the value in it, because for some reason you keep hammering on that second layer like it's something that can't and won't work, while it does already deliver an outstanding job.
No LN will never work because it's a really stupid system. If you were to build a payment system from the ground up you'd NEVER EVER design a system like LN. The whole reason LN exists is that people saw that blockchain is not suitable for payments, it's too slow, so they figured we need to find a way to allow for payments outside the blockchain but something that we can integrate within the blockchain system. That's when somebody thought "hey wait a minute, let's use multisig wallets where we can just change how much each party owns in that multisig wallet, that way we don't need the blockchain to perform a payment". And while it's actually a very smart idea, *given those constraints*, it's a stupid idea outside those constraints and people would NEVER even think of it when building a system from the ground up. It's some hippy idea that people will be part of payment routes and use their accounts for that but that will never work of course for reasons I've outlined in my topic.
129  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 08, 2018, 05:13:54 PM
how can bitcoin not worth it? I think bitcoin is a very useful and very successful digital currency because if you know it with bitcoin you can trade in different countries easily and you can use it for other highly secure payments.

Yes you can trade but you can not pay anything. I don't know any shop at all in my country that accepts bitcoin. That's the whole key here, the author in the article explains why blockchain is not suitable at all for a payment system. It's way too slow.
130  Economy / Speculation / Re: Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 06, 2018, 11:48:36 PM
Yes blockchain and Bitcoin maybe a little being overhyped, but it's the one that make people interested, at least something new was introduced and people was excited to see new things and as far as I know blockchain and Bitcoin is very useful and can help a lot of people, the technology maybe not yet perfect and consume a lot of energy, but it's a promising technology that can change the world

Well as the author says, it not only consumes tons of energy, it's just not usable as payment system because of the extreme slow processing speed. I think a lot of people have some dream about how bitcoin is going to change the world. But it's also important to look at the technology and what it can and can NOT do. That's why I think it's such a good article, it lays out why blockchain can not be used as an international payment system.
131  Economy / Speculation / Why bitcoin is worthless on: March 06, 2018, 03:28:57 AM
I just stumbled upon this article that The Guardian published today, I think it's the best ever written on bitcoin, really good sum-up about blockchain and bitcoin: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/mar/05/bitcoin-is-based-on-the-blockchain-pipe-dream
132  Economy / Speculation / Re: What's going on with the dump? on: February 25, 2018, 05:05:12 PM
Do we have a weaker demand at the moment?
Of course. Bitcoin usage is only a fraction of what it was before, that's why it's now much cheaper and faster. Currently 150k transactions/day vs almost 500k in december. We're now almost at the lowest amount of bitcoin usage since 12 months.
133  Economy / Speculation / Re: What's going on with the dump? on: February 25, 2018, 03:18:56 PM
Well let's face it, BTC doesn't scale so on-chain itself per definition can NEVER become a success. I mean, even after segwit, the maximum amount of transactions is only 14 per second worldwide (before segwit it was only 7: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Maximum_transaction_rate). For a payment system to become a success, it should be at least 5000x more (VISA does 65.000 per second currently). So that's a HUGE problem.

Now, when people realized that BTC will never become a success with blockchain payments because of this limit, they figured that they needed to move transactions off the chain and invented Lightning Network. But that too is a horrible & stupid idea like I explained here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2792933.0

So BTC is a really nice idea in theory but just doesn't work in practice. That's why it's going to fail. And I think more and more people are starting to realize that. I mean look do you see any shops adopting BTC payments in the last few months? Quite the contrary, big shops like Steam have actually STOPPED using bitcoins (https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/6/16743220/valve-steam-bitcoin-game-store-payment-method-crypto-volatility), because of the scaling problems (and volatility). So that realization is kicking in slowly and will eventually lead to the death of BTC. It's like socialism, it may sound nice in theory but if you look at the practice (Venezuela) it just never works. If it doesn't work, eventually it will die. And that's what we're seeing now.
134  Economy / Speculation / Re: Debunking the waste of energy argument against Bitcoin on: February 25, 2018, 03:09:51 PM
How do people not realize that moving metal and paper across the country and creating it so sooooo expensive!?
Such a nonsense. Besides, people actually USE paper money. Nobody uses bitcoin. 150k BTC transactions per day currently, remove the broker/trading related transactions, how many are left to actually pay for goods? Pretty much nobody uses it, yet it already costs 51 Twh/year, more than a country like Portugal uses!
135  Economy / Speculation / Re: Have the fees gone down? on: February 24, 2018, 09:57:45 PM
,the transaction charges have come down considerably and even if you are not using segwit the charges are lower now,it looks like the old days are coming back,the age when there was no charges basically

Someone just sent me btc, I had it within a few minutes in my account ! Man if BTC would always work like this I'd actually be a strong believer Smiley But fact of the matter is that it doesn't scale and that LN sucks so it's a great idea but just won't work for mass usage.
136  Economy / Speculation / Re: Debunking the waste of energy argument against Bitcoin on: February 24, 2018, 06:04:46 PM
And no, not all users using LN have to be online all the time, only those that want to be part of the infrastructure. LN could also run on a smartphone or on another low-powered device that is always online (routers!).
But in order for the network to become a success it NEEDS users online. So it can only become a success with high energy costs. Sure, people could start selling custom LN devices but I think it's reasonable to assume a lot of people would just use their PC. Smartphone would be possible too indeed, but it would drain a lot of battery. Most phones die within 5-6 hours of activity already.

Quote
The source I used, Marc Bevand, believes the Digiconomist calculation to be false - but even then: it uses TWh/year, not TWp. Values are not so different between both sources if you take this "little fact" into account: The 500 MWp that Bevand assumes to be the consumption of BTC mining mean it consumed 4,38 TWh/year in February/March 2017. Digiconomist calculated 9 TWh/year for this point in time - about doubling Bevand's average calculation, and only about 1,33 times above his upper bound.

Obviously it's hard to really calculate it correctly. But fact of the matter is that it's a HUGE waste of energy, just because someone invented a strategy that pays more if you spend more energy. I really hope that, and assume, that the winning coin will use something like PoS instead of PoW. This is really unsustainable.
137  Economy / Speculation / Re: Debunking the waste of energy argument against Bitcoin on: February 24, 2018, 05:14:31 PM
PS: Maybe you meant "Bitcoin could never reach 25K  tx/s"

Exactly. BTC can, since segwit, do a maximum of 14 transactions per sec, nowhere near 25.000.

Quote
but read the phrase before this assumption - these 25 tx/s can be carried out on-chain, off-chain, on sidechains and even on pegged coins that are not sidechains (like the BitBTC on the Bitshares platform).

Ok but off-chain is a whole different beast. You're interpolating on-chain but who knows how much electricity LN transactions will costs. As a device NEEDS to be online in order to be part of a LN payment route and tons of info need to continually pass through the network (for routing purposes), this is really a whole different calculation. Where people now mostly power down their pc's at night, with LN they'll probably keep them running 24 hours/day. IF LN would ever to become a success (which I highly doubt for reasons I've laid out already: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2792933.0)

Besides, BTC is currently doing 51 Tw/year already: https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
138  Economy / Speculation / Re: Debunking the waste of energy argument against Bitcoin on: February 24, 2018, 04:41:29 PM
- Necessary transaction rate: ~25000 tx/sec (2,16 billion/day)

You do realize bitcoin has a maximum of 7 tx/sec ? Well ok in all fairness, 14 tx/sec after segwit.
139  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin price increase slowly... on: February 24, 2018, 04:25:59 PM
but it show an indications from recovering.

Hmm I must have missed that.
140  Economy / Speculation / Re: 2018 Cryptocurrency Crash (Elliott Wave) on: February 24, 2018, 04:11:26 PM
And another reason why I'm so bearish: in the last crash, the one until $6000, there was a HUGE buyer, who kept the market alive on his own, on bitfinex. He easily bought 25.000 BTC when it started tanking within 24 hours, using hidden orders. I made a topic about it when it happened: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2864671.0 And he kept buying after the first 24 hours too, all the way up to 10k. Without this guy the markets would have tanked to $3000-$4000. And the thing is, I haven't seen this guy in a while. So it seems he's done. Without him, the markets will die way harder than last time if it starts tanking.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!