I refuse to accept this Babu thing is a human, and not an improperly programmed AI.
 |
|
|
|
It’s just a wallet on exodus, if you can direct me to where I can go to sign a message, gladly. I also think forum mods can confirm it via my IP address. This is what I’m hoping can be used to grant access back to my personal account.
Import the seed phrase in Electrum and you can sign it And follow the steps in this thread to recover your own account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089777 |
|
|
|
In this position, we never understand, whether the user recieved the product or pretends to... OgNasty couldn't do anything because he had already provided services according to the policy he had
....demand responsibility from OgNasty to return the money, because that is no longer possible, and this is not ognasty fault.
I didn't say it was OG's fault ! Just thought it would be a good idea for OP to prove he is the owner of the scott2k account in a more credible way, not just confirming some shipping addresses that anyone who had access to his account could probably see in the PMs |
|
|
|
And Og no longer will reply to me on this account... because "he doesn't even know who I am"
Even though I explained clearly that I am Scott2k and provided confidential info that only Scott2k would know (like the original shipping address).
OP, can you please sign this message "Today is 17 Aug 2022 and I am the owned of the account scott2k" from the address you sent OG the coins ? Either to him in a PM and he can confirm or in this thread But considering that he uses a single address for escrow one might assume your address is https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/bc1qk8skrwwuegucy796gmfmfc7zxy0d0pll6aysk2 |
|
|
|
1) I had a paid escrow deal for some mining hardware with user Burky155.
2) OgNasty was our escrower and he confirmed that he had received the funds (about 0.46~ btc)
...
7) At 9:16 mountain time, the funds were sent from Og's wallet, to Burky155's wallet.
When they asked me to release funds I even made the buyer double confirm that everything was ok and to release funds... The release approval was from the right account
A signed message from the buyer's used address or the refund one (if different) should be a MUST for any confirmation to release funds to the seller IMO. Did not use any escrow service (yet) and don't know first hand the whole process but seems to be a necessary practice if it's not already a requirement. Waiting to see what/if Burky155 replies in this thread... |
|
|
|
I would like to post some threads with my thread designs on them, I need 1 merit however to post my images, how do i get this?
Either someone enjoys your posts and gives you some merit (the bitcointalk version of upvote  ) or buy copper membership and post the images https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2385104.0 |
|
|
|
"Nu renunţa. De obicei ultima cheie din mănunchi este cea care deschide uşa." - Paulo Coelho Una calda, una rece... Conform acestui tweet scris de contul Universal Postal Union (am ajuns pe taramuri ciudate in aceasta cautare) reies doua lucruri: 1 - procesul de mint a fost externalizat si site-ul ar fi https://oveit.com/nft-romanian-post-160-years/ . Un fel de iabilet.ro din alta tara care are in portofoliul de servicii si cateva legate de spatiul crypto. Aparent oveit foloseste Polygon (MATIC) pentru NFT deci presupun ca nu au facut vreo exceptie in cazul asta Pe langa plata cu cardul mai folosesc Crypto.com PAY ... procesatorul de plati al celor de la Crypto.com (duh !!). Doar ca aparent merge doar daca ai cont...  Au pe site si un Litepaper, desi nu zice cu mult mai mult decat articolul din Adevarul 2 - contul de twitter al Postei Romane este @PostaRomana1 si la site au trecut un site moca facut (prost) si hostat pe wix.com ( https://postaromana1.wix.com/postaromana ... dubios !). Cont cu doar 2 tweet-uri in 2013. WTF ? Desi am mai aflat cateva detalii parca tot e ceva ciudat... Macar sa fi facut pe elrond! Ar fi fost mult mai transparent si promovat !
|
|
|
|
Also: username : rindo
rank : Hero member
Current post : 2258
BTC address : 15AsNqvY5zKxwFFpuQy2e9hTFzM7umyun9
Denied Btctalk name : mia_houston
Rank : Full member
Post count : 147
Btc address : 15AsNqvY5zKxwFFpuQy2e9hTFzM7umyun9
Wear sig code : Yes
|
|
|
|
FWIW the frontend is pretty much ported with the last pull request and work will start on the backend / server side. That will definitely take less times to port the route files and the rest. ... In case you were wondering |
|
|
|
I agree, I did not find anything anywhere which stated bans were just two types in either permanent or temporary but when posting I missed the other type of ban ...
There is no such ban. They pretty much just actively delete his posts in that board... If banning a member from specific boards is considered the appropriate solution to an issue then at least they can continue posting elsewhere until the ban is lifted and if this was decided by theymos as a result of fluidity and flexibility (tweaking and/or creating new rules) sure it is a good thing.
Can't say how appropriate this decision is but ... This is, in fact, still being enforced.
|
|
|
|
so for that 1 btc in 1 year you need maybe 8 machines doing 900 th each.
merely an estimate guess etc but ball park.
Is pretty close to ... ~10 years if you're lucky
... with 1 machine Glad to see my guesstimation was not that off after all |
|
|
|
Let's take the Antminer S19 XP (140Th) as en example: We'll disregard price fluctuation or electrical price, because you asked how long would it take to mine 1 full BTCSo the remaining variables are difficulty adjustments & halvings (in ~2 years the reward will decrease to 3.125 per block) If today you would start pool mining, a 101% guesstimation would be ~10 years if you're lucky (there is no exact math formula for this) P.S - My guesstimation can have some errors of +/- 99%, but mostly + - This is not the way you analyze if mining would work for you ! Electrical price and eventual BTC fluctuations need to be taken into account and many other aspects ! |
|
|
|
Well, you are "back" in a wrong profile. I am the original jkoil. How have you been "helped"  ?? jkoil (original) Apparently he had access to the email account and just changed his password by himself. If you say that the account is actually yours follow the steps in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089777.0It appears nothing is that simple around here... |
|
|
|
Why not macOS VM since OP currently use that OS?
You are right but just thought that if OP wants to... play around the open source code.
... he might as well go the whole nine yards and use an open source OS as well. IMO it just seems wrong not to |
|
|
|
What inevitable360 "made" isn't actually an NFT -- its simply an image hash embedded in the OP_RETURN field of a Dogecoin transaction, which is actually the field Counterparty (and Dogeparty) uses for its transaction data. The main difference is Counterparty/Dogeparty data is encrypted and interpreted by a protocol run by a node.
CMIIW but you can pretty much do that with any NFT. The way to spot the real one is to find the first one or the one that is linked with the known address/smart contract that "minted" the original one Or am I over simplifying it ? |
|
|
|
Here's some free alpha in the meanwhile: 1. Download the Counterparty Freewallet, 2. buy some XCP from a Dispenser, and 3. search the Exchange markets for deals on Rare Pepes. Is still Counterparty the way to go in regards to BTC NFTs ? (genuinely curious)What about staks or others... even this one ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
