Feedback means nothing under proof. And all the links left by Ratimov in Russian, have you read them? If not how can you then say that the feedback left by him is justified. You trust suchmoon opinion and he understands Russian like    Royse777 too. Formally, this means that you can trust their opinion regarding exceptions.

To convince you, you can choose any feedback left by him and I will translate the evidence for you and suchmoon will certify their authenticity.

Darkstar is very tolerant so he will not disclose the reason. But you should have guessed anyway, he even condescendingly reacted to the fact that Ratimov created the FUD regarding the alleged national injustice.

---

Could you explain the difference between the fact that you excluded legendster and the fact that you do not see abuse in Ratimov's actions? If it's not difficult for you, then answer.

How to join a cult? Do new members need to pass any tests?

well, or at least the pronunciation of some kind of oath, something like that.

madnessteat, I have no doubt that D.S. he did the right thing, given that Ratimov is exposing his PMs with the campaign manager to the public and throwing firewood on the fire of reputation, trying to shift the responsibility for his personal failures to the entire Russian community. ...

Trust list for: Steeley (Trust: awaiting update) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2021-03-06_Sat_04.07h)
Back to index

Steeley Trusts these users' judgement:
-

Steeley Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


Steeley's judgement is Trusted by:
1. NEW MoparMiningLLC (Trust: +34 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 805 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Steeley's judgement is Distrusted by:
-


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

Why do you constantly mention that I sent you PM?, second time. I showed you the big picture and you were only hooked on the neutral tag.

I recently read a fairly large thread in which you spoke negatively about leaving frivolous feedback, but in this situation, everyone, including you, is silent. Even LoyceV said that he would watch the situation, and if Ratimov's position falls, he will exclude him. It looks like everyone can only talk, but no one but suchmoon wants to take the first step by clearly showing how to defend their beliefs.

I don't want to judge anyone, but sometimes it seems to me that people are afraid to do the right thing, as Ratimov can do to them as he did to eddie13.

Marcel, Marie.

I didn't know that, when then should we expect while you hack a wallet with a million bitcoins? Or are you a first generation artificial intelligence?

I'm sure that user ~Ratimov is mistakenly in DT1 because:

Stupid idiot, troll, son of a bitch, schizophrenic, Idiot with a broken head, this is how the text of the majority of feedback left by Ratimov begins. Ratimov regularly resorts to reciprocal exceptions and feedback abuse. In addition to this, the user left 35 positive reviews with praise, which have nothing to do with real transactions, except for reviews to the BestChange manager.

I believe in LoyceV religion, believe that the Trust System should not be used to indicate that someone is a troll and Idiot, and I believe that the Trust System should not be used as a weapon. This vengeful attitude of Ratimov demonstrates how he really understands the basics of the trust system, demonstrates with what arrogance he really treats the community.

eddie13 expressed his opinion and Ratimov added him to the list of distrust.


fxpc quoted Ratimov and received an unreasonable red label



I published evidence of plagiarism using Google translator and Ratimov offended me right away.



Ratimov Left Nullius with an insulting feedback.



There are dozens of reviews of this kind!

Marcel, Marie.

Summary

Patoshi is the name I gave to the prominent miner that in 2009-2010 mined about 1.1M bitcoins, and that some people associate with Satoshi Nakamoto. Last time I wrote about Patoshi was in April, 2019. At that time, I posted in order to clarify what we know, technically, about how Patoshi mined. Impossible was for me to foresee that one of the early coinbase being spent recently would cause such an impact in the crazy and uninformed market and the Patoshi pattern would be on the news. Nor I could foresee that a anonymous person would be signing 145 of the early coinbase keys to show a US court how Faketoshi committed fraud, and again everyone would go to check if those coinbases belonged to the Patoshi set.

These events triggered an impressive number of tweets, posts and videos about Satoshi. A new wave of Satoshi hunters appeared. But how many people actually pay attention to the technical details? Back in April I posted the following table showing the events where the timestamps of two consecutive blocks were reversed, and by how much time, in average, during the first years of Bitcoin mining:

Inversion of timestamps in consecutive blocks


You can see that the average timestamps deltas (when timestamps are inverted) largely differ between Patoshi and non-Patoshi blocks. I realized in 2019 this was far from normal, but I waited for somebody else to notice the oddity. In 2014, I published about the strange timestamp gaps. Well, it seems that few people reads my post until the end 🙂 Only one person (that preferred to remain anonymous) also detected the anomaly in Patoshi’s timestamps. Now enough time has passed, and still I don’t have a good explanation for the strange way Patoshi timestamped his blocks. Therefore in this post I will expand that research so that more people can think on this. I’ll also summarize possible (some maybe surprising) explanations. Let’s begin with an histogram of how timestamps differences (or “deltas”) are distributed between consecutive blocks in the first 50K blocks, when none of the blocks belong to the Patoshi pattern. In the X-axis we show buckets of 10 seconds each, so the labels on the X-axis show time in seconds divided by 10. In the Y-axis, we show the number of events counted for that slot.

Timestamp deltas between Non-Patoshi blocks in the first 50K blocks


Curved traced by the bar graph looks like an exponential distribution, as it should. There curve may not be a perfect exponential, as distributed timestamps are not fetched from an unique global clock, and also timestamps in nodes are not updated in a continued basis during mining, but only every few seconds. Nevertheless the graph looks as one would expect, and the average timestamp delta is 654 seconds.

It seems that most block timestamps generally start 312 (about 5 minutes) s seconds after the previous timestamp. Also it appears as if Patoshi refused to mine many blocks after 25 minutes (1500 seconds). This strange pattern is a new way to distinguish the Patoshi pattern from all other coinbase sets. We had three methods already (steep fast extranonce increment, reduced nonce LSB range, no timestamp reversals), and now we add a fourth (and in a next post I will show a fifth!). So why timestamp deltas are oddly distributed is a new unsolved mystery for our large collection. In my opinion, the existence of so many distinguishers is an indicator that Patoshi wanted his/her blocks to be identified.

If you look carefully at the timestamp delta distribution, there are a high number of timestamp deltas before 312 seconds that make for me even more difficult to explain the steep cliff shape. Luckily this one puzzle we can unravel with some information we already know. The reason of this “noise” is a segment in the Patoshi pattern that I named “Double Helix”, because it looks graphically as DNA. Here is a graph of this segment:

The double-helix interval in Patoshi pattern (blocks 1400-1916)


You can explore this pattern in SatoshiBlocks website. The double-helix pattern was probably caused by two instances of the Patoshi software/hardware running in parallel. We don’t know if this was a mistake made by Patoshi or it was intended for testing an improved mining setup. But the timestamps between blocks of the two Patoshi lines of the double-helix do not show the same delta distribution, as if internally, maybe due to physical proximity, there was no delay between blocks. Still it’s possible that Patoshi just turned off his mining equipment for about 5 minutes after mining a block. Is that plausible? How can we explain the differences in timestamp deltas?

• Patoshi turned off his mining equipment for about 5 minutes after mining a block. Maybe this was required in order to broadcast the block. Or maybe he was doing it to let other miners mine following blocks. The fact that Patoshi reduced his hashrate in several steps during the first year indicates that he may well be able to do it also at the block granularity. It’s even possible that the increased his hashrate if a block was delayed longer than 12 minutes, which could explain the strange timestamp delta distribution.
• Patoshi software avoided two blocks having the same timestamp. Therefore if a block was mined locally and immediately the mining of a following block began, then the following block timestamp would be artificially incremented a random number not less than 300 seconds.

The artificial addition time to the timestamp seems to be a better overall explanation, because it could also explain why after 25 minutes it seems that Patoshi reduces the number of mined blocks. Because we’re living difficult times, and since science without joy is too boring, I give you some far-fetched and fun explanations of the timestamp delta phenomenon:

• Patoshi was mining from outer space, somewhere in our solar system. It took approximately 150 seconds for the radio signals to travel to his spaceship. To compensate for the delay, and avoid being detected, he/she/it used a real-time clock being 300 seconds ahead of time in earth. His timestamps were faked but that was not noticed on earth. That worked well when mining on top of a block he didn’t create. However, Patoshi didn’t realize that the round-trip time of transmission of his own blocks to and from earth would generate a gap in the timestamps, if not specifically compensated. That’s why we see the gap only between his own blocks.
• Although timestamp LSB (nor the byte with mask 0xff00) in Patoshi blocks have uniform distributions, somehow grinding the timestamp was used to obtain blocks that were more favorable to find solutions for.

+1 WOsMerit what does this mean?

It is foolish to compare me to this profile, but if you listed 10 people, I could say if I am on this list or not.


marcel

ScumBuster, Please refrain from posting in my topic.

You create FUD, and against the background of your messages people can perceive my arguments with disdain.

1. Hello LoyceV, Can I speak in this thread if the post will not include any FUD, but only arguments?
2. Сan you tell me how to add a feedback clipping? I can't add a screenshot so I'm looking for another option to post an example feedback.

I expected someone to share the analysis and not just words.

When, then, do you think an 80% correction will occur?

Are you saying that lovesmayfamilis is now exposing what he was banned for earlier? Link please

I would never say that, I just didn't have enough dollars when bitcoin was at the bottom.

I hope you are wrong dude, I pray to god that bitcoin goes back to 10 thousand and can buy more.

You are right, if BestChange signed the message using the Bitcoin address indicated on their website, I would be calm.

Marcel

Quoting for historical reference.