Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 09:27:01 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 200 »
121  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: what is the biggest risk that bitcoin is facing at present? on: December 22, 2017, 06:42:17 PM
The big blockers, trying to take the power of full validating nodes from users and putting it into the hands of government-controlled corporations, so they can control both the mining and the validation of transactions.

Bitcoin can never work with big blocks, it opens a can of worms you don't want to open. Peter R and Andrew Stone, Craig Wright and Roger Ver... all scammers.

Core added segwit, which you can ignore if you don't like, but you can't ignore big blocks. Good luck with that.
122  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [News Mode] The UFC Info and Prediction Thread on: December 21, 2017, 04:02:42 PM
I mean the card is decent, nothing worth for me to stay up watching it live let alone paying for it, but I want to see the Khabib fight, hopefully he remains undefeated. He shouldn't much problems with Barboza. I really want to see how he does against Conor. Conor has abnormally long arms with insane reach, Khabib has short t-rex arms, Conor is one of best strikers in UFC, Khabib is one of the best in the ground. A nice chess match between two warriors. The problem is Conor needs to fight Ferguson fight, and if he loses it would suck, so hopefully both Khabib and Conor get their next fights right to meet after that in an epic card.
123  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: So why is bitcoin cash a shitcoin? on: December 21, 2017, 03:35:22 PM
So many times on the web, i have seen people claiming bitcoin cash is a shitcoin.
Yet its a coin of the BTC team itself. Its a followup, with good developments incoming, and it carries the bitcoin name.

Note that while there are other alternatives that sure- are better then bitcoin cash.... They do not have the popularity. And this is important, because this attracts stores to start accepting it.
Furthermore alot of investors switched to bitcoin cash.

So what makes this a shit coin?
Are these people just spitting out garbage purely in hopes people will invest more into BTC again? or....?

Bcash is imho a shitcoin because it doesn't really bring anything new.
By your definition if I'd make a clone or fork of Bitcoin and name it Bitcoin Mickey Mouse it wold be a great coin because it has bitcoin in its name and inherits some good code. Ah, and I have to pay here and there to create hype.

Sorry, imho a good coin has to do more, it has to bring something new, offer something interesting on the new platform.

BCash has a role: to pursue the "onchain scaling roadmap" and also do it without segwit, which is criticized as some people as a "disaster waiting to happen".

Compared to other forks, BCash is an hostile one since it competes for the same cake (sha256 hashrate) and im not sure if the game theory in here would allow both to survive long term, and also just claims to "be the real bitcoin". You don't need to be genius to know it isn't tho, it's a different network, different consensus rules and a different blockchain, therefore not real bitcoin.

We'll see what happens. Have a bag of it just in case, Ver and co will keep pumping it on every difficulty readjustment on BTC + bribing mainstream news to pump it could bring nice profits.
124  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Roger Ver almost broke Trading View with his BCash pump on: December 21, 2017, 03:18:53 PM
Some more charts from the pump and dump:



What is this? looks like a fucking Picasso to me.

Anyway, how bad is the dump going to be when millions of people in Shitbase get credited free bcash during a bitcoin dip? will they dump for bitcoin? will they buy bcash because "it's like bitcoin but cheaper?" get your popcorns up.
125  Other / Meta / Re: My bitcointalk.org account was stolen. Where can i write to admin? on: December 20, 2017, 03:41:11 PM
Thanks dude so my account is clearly gone, i can't sign a msg. Nice...

One strange thing is that i received no mail about the email change, isn't that normal right?
I'm sure about this 'cause i check in spam too every hours (yes not by day but hours due to my work).

Hope Cyrus could write me back. Hope for the best. Thanks again Cry

Edit: Hope that i've not just to make a useless denounce to italian police and let the thief scam with my account.
At least delete or ban it. Let a thief scam with this account (so scammed people can denounce my person) is really a bad joke (be sure that if happens i make an other useless denounce - to btctalk.org) when in 5m we can solve.

This situation really piss me off. Why btctalk have no a support mail to write to?

Emails were completely irrelevant in this forum until recently, when theymos added the email block protection (if your account gets hacked, you get an email and you can block your account) so you didn't receive that.

Of course, you would still need to be able to sign a bitcoin address, and you would still need to go through the ridiculous process of account recovery which is nothing but a lottery apparently, even with proof.
126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Best time to buy alts- on the up or on the down? on: December 20, 2017, 03:34:56 PM
Just curious whether people see a spike happening and jump on it in the hope or anticipation that the spike will continue, or wait until it plateaus or drops again?

I see things spike like Verge for example and the temptation is to jump on it but my gut tells me that by the time it is spiking it's too late really.

Any thoughts?

I would usually look at the fundamentals of a project first. If it has potential to pump, I look at previous pumps and I would make sure that the graph is calm and horizontal. I don't like buying into pumps unless it's for short term gains where a resistance is broken and a breakthrough is happening, but these don't last so I load my bags fast for profits.

Also dont be the idiot that buys a coin that only goes up against USD and is obviously losing value against BTC.
127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Roger Ver almost broke Trading View with his BCash pump on: December 20, 2017, 03:12:06 PM
Once again, on the difficulty readjustment of bitcoin, we saw Bcash shenannigans. Totally certified organic growth:




Seriously, what the fuck even is this? there are missing candles there from the flash pump and dump.

This time not only the mempool was being spammed while BTC was getting dumped, but it also coincidentally happened when Coinbase made the announcement.

Nice insider trading at play.



128  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Is it a good time to start buying bitcoins? on: December 19, 2017, 11:11:45 PM
Well that was a sweet dip if you were on cash. I didn't even flinch I was expecting a $16,000 ish dip. We now rebounded and are back to $17,300 ish. So we did the whole dance again as we've been doing rebounding on this trend line since the $9000 dip. Things are ok as long as we stay around there. If we go below the trendline we may go as low as $12,000.

Im not going to risk my position, just will buy these dips and accumulate as usual, another day in the btc office.
129  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [News Mode] The UFC Info and Prediction Thread on: December 19, 2017, 05:12:38 PM
Here are some of the upcoming events that have been booked as confirmed recently.  But they still might be subject to change as we've seen happen in the past.

Cris Cyborg vs. Holly Holm at UFC 219.   Undecided

Stipe Miocic vs. Francis Ngannou at UFC 220.  Smiley

Robert Whittaker vs. Luke Rockhold at UFC 221.  Smiley

Did you made threads for these already?

UFC 219 and UFC 220 main cards are pretty solid. I think Cyborg will smash Holm unfortunately, and I think Ngannou will end Miocic's win streak, that guy is a monster... but Miocic is a real viking, it will be a clash of titans. Ngannou put to sleep Overeem so easy to the other day, I remember watching Miocic vs Overeem and he had some problems until he took him out, we'll what happens. And I just saw DC is fighting again on 220, that's pretty nice. The guy was devastated after the Bones fight. I think he will win Volk and he will continue fighting hoping to fight Bones again eventually. Oh and Khabib is fighting in 219, may throw a couple bucks on this one for a win, should be easy money.
130  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: December 19, 2017, 04:40:16 PM
Where's the Sidhujag cure to fix this problem that makes bitcoin worthless?

I already talked about why it's not fixable, because anyone that can create a miner and have it spit out rewards to you while on cruise control without you doing anything is the same thing as INTEREST.  Then instead of one man one vote, you get to scale your interest generating machine to one man infinite votes.  The only way to stop that would be forcing people to do manual labor to solve blocks (captchas), but people would just create bots to solve the captchas and you're back to square one.

Or this other rather impossible to fix problem?

The r0ach report 29: Bitcoin is similar to the double slit experiment in practice - It only works if you don't use it

http://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-29-bitcoin-is-similar-to-the-double-slit-experiment-in-practice-it-only-works-if-you-don-t-use-it

At it's heart, bitcoin is nothing more than a variable number multisig. With current mining centralization, it's probably a 2 of 3 or 3 of 5 multisig. So the only question is how big of a multisig is needed for it to be considered "decentralized"?

The fact that bitcoin is nothing more than a multisig in practice also makes it kind of bogus because a multisig is obviously not an open entropy system. For it to be an open entropy system, instead of using 6 confs, you would probably need to use literally infinite confs. That's kind of how bitcoin is a con in practice, because given an infinite timeline, you can attempt to make the claim bitcoin is a decentralized, open entropy system, but if you actually try to use it on a finite timeline, it morphs into nothing more than a centralized multisig. People claim that's "probabilistic", but no, it's just a centralized multisig when a finite timeline is applied.

So there you go folks, the only way for bitcoin to properly function is by not using it because the act of a human using it applies a fixed timeline and makes it's mechanics fall apart.

(and anonymint is going to argue the confs can be rolled back at any time during the middle of this process making whatever number of confs pointless in the first place)
For our lifetimes it is adequate. It is a paradaigm shift for money. It solves the generals problem without completing it in a way where 51% consensus is required to attack it. Incentives for attacks not to occur are builtin and are functioning as it has been proven since 2009. There will be no paradaigm shift ontop of bitcoin for a long time. Competing currencies will have to settle for other niches (other than the complete sov) which bitcoin wins hands down.


I am of the opinion that bitcoin is something big enough that for a completely new iteration of technology to happen that would leave it oudated and objectively useless compared to this new one (and therefore one would be stupid to have a big part of your networth there when something objectively better in every aspect exists), it would require at least several decades to come, but at the same time I remain openminded. Who is to say someone else cannot come up with another breakthrough in a shorter time? Better keep an eye on alternative projects as they come. Crypto is a booming field, millions all over the world are trying to beat bitcoin and come up with something epic. It could be someone here, or it could be someone we have no idea about that releases it out of nowhere satoshi style. The job is to do research on all these alts trying to find the hidden gem. If you are not a genius creating your own project then the next best thing to do is to act as a pirate trying to find the next treasure. Of course one would need to be near genius to discern all these complex new cryptos that end up being scammy or flawed but you must do whatever you can to find out, outsource analysis to other people expert in the crypto field if needed. In the small chance a big discovery happens that it's implemented and works, you want to have some BTC exposure there, because the gains could be massive, and one thing I know: we all like gains.
131  Economy / Economics / Re: Money printing exploded when BTC was released on: December 18, 2017, 04:45:32 PM
That should be the opposite, unless some people are trying to scam naive people buying their bitcoins with false money

Bitcoin limit is 21 million units no matter what. Fiat limit is... unknown, and as we can see on the graph, totally unpredictable. To bail-in "too big too fail" institutions, the money printing goes insane at any given time, I guess that money printing event was due 2008's crisis. We all know what will happen on the next crisis. I expect another one of these big ass spikes, and BTC price should follow going up.

And yes, the money printing started before BTC was release, but BTC was released around the crisis time, or at least the earlier BTC documents are found still in 2008.
132  Other / Meta / Re: Images from imgur are not loading on bitcointalk! on: December 18, 2017, 04:41:04 PM
same for imageshack image hosting, Bitcointalk block (or don't recreate ?).

example :

Image with BB code >>>
Direct Link >>> http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img922/5391/Ryv6aR.png

Yep, there are a ton of sites that don't properly show the image when using the "img" tags.

For example, I embedded some images to explain this guy something about a wallet here:

You could try checking out the network activity here:


(https://i.imgur.com/acbKYWE.png)

Im assuming your client has this since it looks like a bitcoin-qt or bitcoin core fork judging from your screenshot, so click on help, debug window and then network traffic tab:


(https://img07.rl0.ru/6aca0a19d4d4d1b6b9154abe65c69f22/c837x471/bitcoindaily.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/bitcoin-core-debug-window-guide.jpg)

And if you are seeing green lines then you are on a doing ok. If you don't see green lines you aren't downloading anything which could be due lack of peers.. so contact developers for that.

None of these links work when embedded so I had to add direct links. Also images from twitter such as

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQvftdRUMAEOxfJ.jpg)

do not show up.

It's really annoying. You either get an invisible image that doesn't show up, or you get the "blocked by proxy" or whatever in red font with white background image.

I think it's better to stick to posting direct links until it gets fixed.


133  Economy / Economics / Money printing exploded when BTC was released on: December 18, 2017, 04:29:10 PM
I was looking at some charts and I just saw this one:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQvftdRUMAEOxfJ.jpg

I mean look at the year... around 2008-2009 Bitcoin was released... suddenly money printing goes full retard creating that massive spike. Why is the media pointing at Bitcoin as a bubble while never talking about that? really makes you think. In my book, Bitcoin is just a counter reaction of that, which is one of the reasons to hold BTC even after such an increase in price. I mean BTC all time chart my look like a bubble, but in the same timeframe, FED printed 2000 billion dollars. BTC is worth 315 billion at the moment. Not taking into account all the trillions out there that could come in.. I mean there's too much money out there, a lot of it sitting on dumb shit which could be sitting on BTC. It's really hard to assess when BTC is or isn't at the top of a bubble with these fundamentals.
134  Economy / Speculation / Re: Now that BITCOIN hits the 18K$ USD LEVEL.... When will this GIANT BUBBLE burst? on: December 18, 2017, 03:03:08 PM
people are hyped in this forum, no discussion about technology details, development and real application. No one cares anything but the number before $. In my opinion, bitcoin is a great potential project, but it does not worth hundreds of billion dollars, the price is just because ppl are FOMO and everyone want to make free money out of it. Bitcoin has many challenges and threats, but most people here are just not able to see it or choose to ignore. Just my two cents.

Bitcoin's first application and most valuable yet is to put X amount of wealth on it and wake up and see you still have X amount of wealth in it (as in same amount of BTC you went to sleep last night). This is security, this is a store of value. Most people don't even transact that much, they just buy and hold it. Seeing it grow is a real application.. it's a savings account. Getting rich by holding BTC is the killer app of BTC. I mean look at your nickname.


It has Risen wayyyyy to fast. The transactions are slow the fees are high to send. This is a disaster for BTC. Enjoy it while it lasts because this is not sustainable.

Like i said before, most people don't transact, so most people don't care. People that want to make tons of smaller payments will have to wait for widespread LN implementation, assuming it works out in the long term.
135  Economy / Speculation / Re: Legacy addresses > speculation of fees in the next two years on: December 17, 2017, 05:03:18 PM
Not necessarly. A lot of people thought bitcoin was dead after mtgox, so from 2014 to 2015 a lot of people saw bitcoin sit on that nice 150-300 USD range and nobody bought or nobody bought that much.

As far as fees goes... they will keep going up, since I don't see a blocksize increase anytime soon. And no, I wouldn't cold storage in segwit, too paranoid for that. You can still send transactions for like 4 bucks too (legacy transactions). I think people exaggerate when they say "it's $30 now". That must be during peak mempool times, recently I just spent 4 bucks on a transaction.

Fees are a bitch for everyone, but I'm guessing that many of the high fee screamers are people who gathered a shit ton of dust from sig campaigns, faucets and trading and only now figured out that's it data not value that costs.

What's the basis for your Segwit paranoia?

Well, signature campaigns can make you a couple hundred bucks with high level campaigns, so that could be a small business. So anyone making a couple hundred selling products and whatever in exchange of bitcoin is going to have a ton of different smaller payments, it's a problem. Of course faucets are out of the question. But then again, it depends. People used to get 1 BTC from faucets back then, so you could easily move that.. things self-balance over time as price goes up. Even smaller amounts, for a long time faucets used to give 0.1 BTC too, 0.05... 0.01.. these amounts are all decent to hold in an address. The problem is, once the price has gone up, if you are still getting small payments, you will be left with amounts that you can't barely move.

The segwit thing has been discussed extensively, it's the possibility of stolen funds by colluding miners basically. So better be safe than sorry, in case it happens, you want to have your cold storage in legacy addresses. What are the chances of it happening? I guess rather low, who knows. Everyone in Core denies it would ever happen.
136  Economy / Speculation / Re: Legacy addresses > speculation of fees in the next two years on: December 17, 2017, 04:46:51 PM
So if you have that wallet since 2014 it means that you are storing a huge amount of money right now, at which rate did you bought those bitcoins? Because the price was less than $250 by those times if my memory is not broken.

Admittedly 30-60 dollars is not that much for a largish transaction today. But what will the fees be later? Any guesses??

I didn't knew that the legacy addresses were still online, i thought that everybody who had bitcoins had already moved their funds to a segwit address.

Why dont you do it? Maybe you are going to pay $30 of fees right now, but in the future you will only have to pay less.

And if the lightning network gets implemented you will need to switch your balance to update to it.


Not necessarly. A lot of people thought bitcoin was dead after mtgox, so from 2014 to 2015 a lot of people saw bitcoin sit on that nice 150-300 USD range and nobody bought or nobody bought that much.

As far as fees goes... they will keep going up, since I don't see a blocksize increase anytime soon. And no, I wouldn't cold storage in segwit, too paranoid for that. You can still send transactions for like 4 bucks too (legacy transactions). I think people exaggerate when they say "it's $30 now". That must be during peak mempool times, recently I just spent 4 bucks on a transaction.
137  Economy / Speculation / Re: WILL BITCOIN HIT 24K AS BITCOIN IS LISTING ON CME EXCHANGE TOMORROW 17TH DEC ? on: December 17, 2017, 04:27:47 PM
It's not listed on the 17th, we have still hours to go because it's listed on the 18th, particularly today at 12 PM it will start. I have already got some popcorns to see some candles. Let's see what they can do. The first part will be the offline hours for the contracts, as BTC market continue moving without them, that will be fun to watch.

I have concluded that both CBOE and CME are irrelevant for other than BTC holders themselves speculating about how much of an impact they will have, but long term I don't see much relevancy once the novelty factor wears out.
138  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin will surpass $500,000 by the end of 2018 on: December 16, 2017, 02:06:37 PM
Nice conspiracy theory, but I don't see how people would exchange their coins for "cryptoyuans", at least all at once to create a crash. I don't see how "Then when the chinese government gets all its people's bitcoin" this works. People could keep their coins in cold storage and sell it elsewhere. This is just dumb to be honest.

And even if China got all those coins, the market would be liquid enough to absorb a big dump once BTC is worth a million bucks. At that point BTC will be seen as a super stock similar to berkshire hattaway type A. People will just buy the dip. It takes more than your theory to create a mega bear market.
139  Economy / Speculation / Re: Official Bear Camp Thread (late-2017 edition) on: December 16, 2017, 01:59:05 PM
I expect January 2018 to be the beginning of a bear market. Nothing lasts forever, whatever goes up must come down. Even bitcoin isn't immune to these natural laws. It's just a matter of time.

Trend reversal confirmed. Watchout below.

[EDIT: Updated chart below thru to early December (BTC performance now +1700%):



It doesn't matter - Indonesians will still buy, hold and sell.



I'm rooting for Bitcoin Gold! Also mining it.
[SNIP]
...
Thus I predict a hard fall in relative terms for BCH
...

UPDATE:
[SNIP]
...

UPDATE:


as noted above 'combination' = BTG + litecoin + monero + vertcoin + groestlcoin
predicted to be become 5x BCH's market value

Predicting Bitcoin Cash (BCH) will be the worst and will fall in relative terms while everything else grows.

This week: Brazil and Canada

update live weekly p2p cash trades on LBC: https://coin.dance/volume/localbitcoins

Right now is your last chance to get out. Otherwise it will be too late.








Lol, the bear bulllish indicator is right once again:



You are already down big time since OP made the thread, and even lower if you sold at the dip instead of buying it as you should. There have been several all time highs since your bear market prediction. Admit it, you fucked up, better luck next year. If you keep calling for a bear market monthly you will eventually be right.
140  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin Futures Market and Affect on Volatility on: December 16, 2017, 01:43:42 PM
Some believe that the CME Futures and other acceptance or trading of Bitcoin will make have less volatility on Bitcoin.

As traders, we actually like volatility. Will bitcoin become more stable in the coming months?

Nobody is trading actual bitcoin on these markets, im not worried. CBoe was irrelevant, in fact it created a pump. Of course CME are the big boys, but so what, they could fuck themselves up real bad if they short it and some billonaire decides to buy a bunch of bitcoin destroying their short contracts and causing a total disaster. Seriously I don't think these future markets matter that much if at all. Who is going to be stupid enough to short bitcoin anyway. And if you short, you better don't aim too low.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 200 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!