But if a have 0 fee per 1byte in transaction, haw accelerate this transaction ?
Thanks for your help!
Since if you have an premium access to antpool mining, it can be possible to push it . How can I do this, more specifically? You shouldn't, as it would be unfair to people who genuinely need their transactions accelerated and/or are transferring smaller amounts for which the fee is huge.
If you really need to for any reason, you'd probably do best by trying to set a fee of about 10 satoshi/byte then accelerating it with ViaBTC. But their accelerator has extremely high demand and is clogged, so you would have to submit your transaction right at the start of the hour (within the first few seconds). |
|
|
|
Robert X. Cringely wrote a very interesting article, called How to get rich trading Bitcoin, which shows that, basically, you really can't lose money investing in this cryptocurrency, as long as you don't buy when it peaks. Because it will drop in value sharply right after.
No one can tell when it peaks, that's why loads of people lose money. It's just another way of phrasing "buy low, sell high", which is basically the aim of every single trader ever. Whether they actually end up doing it out of panic or because they don't know when the peak is, that's another matter.
Naturally, I had assumed that the price of Ether was reaching its peak when it stabilised around $60, but I was completely wrong. |
|
|
|
Are there no mods on this website... Which has a received MANY MILLIONS in donations...
Racism is outdated, cavemen rid themselves of the idea, perhaps it's time you did too?
Stop being racist. Some of us like being racist. So, when you and those of your fellow anti-racist race talk against us of the racist race, you are showing yourself to be racist. Stop it. The mods will get you.  No one is doing that. We're simply pointing at your stupidity and you're lack of abilities to use the brain you probably have that's all. But don't worry, we point at each of you individually. You're simply the proof that stupidity is everywhere in humanity  And you might like being racist but that doesn't mean it's right. I could like raping children that wouldn't make it right. Just be glad nobody is pointing at YOUR stupidity. There would be volumes of it compared with my little one line or so. Amen. No one should be making ad hominems in this thread, attack the ideas, not the people. You can't fight racism. But you can understand it, which is key to being prepared. No mods on here, if you haven't noticed, other poster. This is why the Politics section looks like it does. I'm working on it  Everyone is RACIST ..It's programmed into humans to make you survive ..It's a form of jealousy . It's so if someone from a distance tries to take your food you attack..RACIALISM .. Those people from a distance could take my food take my women and kill the rest of us.. It's programmed in most species on this planet.. RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED will help species to survive to eat.. Now as we humans don't hunt for food anymore we hunt for MONEY to eat it becomes a predators ground for money.. RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED will all come into play to get money.. Now in this day and age we have JOBS so most don't feel the RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED ... But how many people out there who work for a boss who showed these feeling to become the boss RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED.. Some people work for bosses who have destroyed other businesses so they can take all the work in there line of business JEALOUSY ENVY GREED.. So everyone is racist really you do get many a black people who hate whites RACIALISM ..WHITE HONKY  .. And on a last note about racialism.. In Africa they kill each others villages so just think what chance as a white man got if they lived next door?..So who is racist .. Now we whites had many wars ww1 ww2 and we killed many our own colour people SO what chance as the black man got if they lived next door?.. So you see if we kill our own colour people DOESN'T THAT MAKE EVERYONE RACISTS .. Because if you kill your own colour you will kill any colour .. And if you look at AFRICA to many kings of the village ..So what happens when people think they are the kings they steal and kill each others villages .. My king believes this NO but my king believes in that then before you know it they attack each other .. And AFRICA as millions of villages ..So loads of kings of the village so loads of war.. people are only another colour because of the weather ..STILL FUCKING HUMANS ..dip shits To say it a different way, humanity is all of the same race as human beings. We all have heads, bodies, arms and hands, legs and feet, torsos, minds, emotions, and spirits/souls. There should be respect for each other simply because all are human beings. At the same time, there are great diversities in customs and traditions. Because of the customs and traditions ingrained into each of us, we should not be forced to live in the customs and traditions that don't agree with ours. IMO this is the most important part. I find it extremely annoying when some groups like to argue against racism with things like "there's only one race, the human race", or "race doesn't even exist" - this pedantic argument doesn't consider the separation of cultures. The reason that racist threads like this are wrong is because they're arguing against what they (wrongly) perceive to be a culture. If they believe that a race has a culture, the solution is to help them integrate with a more liberal culture of your own instead of being extremely close-minded yourself. Respect people because they are people, even if you can't respect their customs and traditions.
This is an interesting point for you to make. Considering the theme of most of your other posts, I would have thought you would be against Muslims or other hated groups, but apart from homosexuals I might have been wrong. Almost 100% of people have self protection ingrained into them through training and nature. Anybody who does not respect the other person's self protection nature by wanting to harm the other person, is where true evil lies. Respect of such a person is not required if you are out to protect yourself. If you look through the "Islam" threads, my posts state to hate Islam, not Muslims. However, if a Muslim does not recognize the self protective nature in all people to respect them for it, then the Muslim is evil rather than simply a Muslim. There are many times when I would separate "culture" from "religion". For example, Islam's main point about women is that it argues they should be "modest". While I don't agree with this, it's not completely terrible, while the actions of some Muslim countries are. Burqas, for example, are not actually referenced in the Qur'an. Often you have to consider that people who associate themselves with a religion are actually doing so because that's what their culture suggests, when in fact their belief systems don't actually have to relate to the religion. For example, homosexuality is now legal in most dominantly Christian countries, despite the Bible arguing that it is "detestable". Sometimes these people are actually just independent theists exercising their own thoughts, rather than actual Muslims or Christians. |
|
|
|
|
It would make more sense to link directly to the article rather than just to the site.
What's important is who's implementing this proposal. It's fine in itself, but it has to be properly peer reviewed in enough time, rather than just some bulletpoints on a board.
It's a shame that Core doesn't seem willing to implement this themselves. It would stop all these fringe attempts at scaling like BIP 148 from trying to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few cloud services which are "legitimate", albeit some of them can be shady. A few of them are:
-Hashnest.
-Hashflare.
-Genesis Mining.
-ViaBTC.
Cloud mining is far from dead. The problem is that people don't actually get ROI on it.
With Genesis Mining for example, people sign up to loads of two-year altcoin contracts, and then they end up actually losing money because every time the difficulty catches up with the price after a few months. These surges in price don't make cloud mining profitable in the long term, because Bitcoin and (stable) altcoin mining is now matured enough that mining remains barely profitable, and only goes beyond that after a significant rise in price.
When companies have to make profit, this makes the actual money for the investor about zero. Not to mention that you're buying hashrate, so price rise = difficulty rise = hashrate means less in the cryptocurrency, since you're actually investing using cryptocurrencies in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Are there no mods on this website... Which has a received MANY MILLIONS in donations...
Racism is outdated, cavemen rid themselves of the idea, perhaps it's time you did too?
Stop being racist. Some of us like being racist. So, when you and those of your fellow anti-racist race talk against us of the racist race, you are showing yourself to be racist. Stop it. The mods will get you. No one is doing that. We're simply pointing at your stupidity and you're lack of abilities to use the brain you probably have that's all. But don't worry, we point at each of you individually. You're simply the proof that stupidity is everywhere in humanity And you might like being racist but that doesn't mean it's right. I could like raping children that wouldn't make it right. Just be glad nobody is pointing at YOUR stupidity. There would be volumes of it compared with my little one line or so. Amen. No one should be making ad hominems in this thread, attack the ideas, not the people. You can't fight racism. But you can understand it, which is key to being prepared. No mods on here, if you haven't noticed, other poster. This is why the Politics section looks like it does. I'm working on it Everyone is RACIST ..It's programmed into humans to make you survive ..It's a form of jealousy . It's so if someone from a distance tries to take your food you attack..RACIALISM .. Those people from a distance could take my food take my women and kill the rest of us.. It's programmed in most species on this planet.. RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED will help species to survive to eat.. Now as we humans don't hunt for food anymore we hunt for MONEY to eat it becomes a predators ground for money.. RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED will all come into play to get money.. Now in this day and age we have JOBS so most don't feel the RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED ... But how many people out there who work for a boss who showed these feeling to become the boss RACIALISM JEALOUSY ENVY GREED.. Some people work for bosses who have destroyed other businesses so they can take all the work in there line of business JEALOUSY ENVY GREED.. So everyone is racist really you do get many a black people who hate whites RACIALISM ..WHITE HONKY .. And on a last note about racialism.. In Africa they kill each others villages so just think what chance as a white man got if they lived next door?..So who is racist .. Now we whites had many wars ww1 ww2 and we killed many our own colour people SO what chance as the black man got if they lived next door?.. So you see if we kill our own colour people DOESN'T THAT MAKE EVERYONE RACISTS .. Because if you kill your own colour you will kill any colour .. And if you look at AFRICA to many kings of the village ..So what happens when people think they are the kings they steal and kill each others villages .. My king believes this NO but my king believes in that then before you know it they attack each other .. And AFRICA as millions of villages ..So loads of kings of the village so loads of war.. people are only another colour because of the weather ..STILL FUCKING HUMANS ..dip shits To say it a different way, humanity is all of the same race as human beings. We all have heads, bodies, arms and hands, legs and feet, torsos, minds, emotions, and spirits/souls. There should be respect for each other simply because all are human beings. At the same time, there are great diversities in customs and traditions. Because of the customs and traditions ingrained into each of us, we should not be forced to live in the customs and traditions that don't agree with ours. IMO this is the most important part. I find it extremely annoying when some groups like to argue against racism with things like "there's only one race, the human race", or "race doesn't even exist" - this pedantic argument doesn't consider the separation of cultures. The reason that racist threads like this are wrong is because they're arguing against what they (wrongly) perceive to be a culture. If they believe that a race has a culture, the solution is to help them integrate with a more liberal culture of your own instead of being extremely close-minded yourself. Respect people because they are people, even if you can't respect their customs and traditions.
This is an interesting point for you to make. Considering the theme of most of your other posts, I would have thought you would be against Muslims or other hated groups, but apart from homosexuals I might have been wrong. |
|
|
|
unlike the egyptians which measured gold in tonnes people now measure gold in counces and soon grams will become common.
as for the bitcoin world bits (100sats) will become common
You obviously forget about fees Fees are completely irrelevant to this in every possible way. They have no relation to whether someone is considering buying 1 BTC or 1,000,000 "bits".
Of course, a "Bitcoin", is just 100,000,000 spendable units. If the Bitcoin price were $100,000 for example, they'd be spending 1000 bits when they spend $100. That makes way more sense than spending 0.001 BTC, which is annoying to deal with and for people to get their head around when they're used to spending fiat currency. |
|
|
|
If they legalize/regulate bitcoin, how are they going to collect taxes from the sellers? As bitcoins? Sounds dumb and sensible at the same time. As FIAT? Then how? Bitcoins price is volatile as hell. One day the seller might be looking at profits and the other day it may disappear.
Regulating Bitcoin would require global cooperation. This means regulation of mixing services, extreme regulation of exchanges with KYC laws, and lots of other work from governments to trace the blockchain. If there's just one place offshore where people can base these businesses and there's still accessible on the Internet, regulation has failed. Global adoption can happen without it but the reality is that it'll coincide with that adoption. It'll happen at the same time because adoption = regulation. Governments can make it appear like support while still monitoring most things closely. If people want to do illegal things with Bitcoin, they'll probably be able to regardless of regulation, so it's just to do with how governments can handle this situation. |
|
|
|
|
Cryptocurrencies are basically a wealth reserve in that they have a limited supply - the fact that they are easily accessible to people online and easier to secure than gold in the case of chaos means that they would dramatically benefit from a global financial crash.
Right now it's not very clear, because we haven't seen a significant wobble in the financial system since Bitcoin was created. 2008 might have been enough to have an effect, but it was too early for us to know.
Nothing is a safe haven forever of course - dinofelis is right to suggest that a safe haven can end up being a cause of a crash later, when it gets that far. But we aren't at that point yet.
|
|
|
|
for a better security? Hah, you wish.
Depends what altcoin you're talking about. This is about altcoins becoming bigger, and when some of them basically copy Bitcoin's security systems anyway, they can be pretty secure. for a more peer reviewed and bug free code? absolutely not!
Obviously Bitcoin is the most "matured" cryptocurrency so to speak - but this doesn't mean the code has to be bad. The code will get better as more ex-Bitcoin users start to get involved (which they already are). for cheaper transactions? not really, because the only time they use it is when they send coins to and from exchanges to trade them!
Completely unrelated points. Transactions are still cheaper in many alts. The question is more about whether they would withstand the pressure of having as many transactions as Bitcoin.
The problem is that you're looking at current problems with some alts, which results in a lot of vague arguments. You need to look at arguments for the future of Bitcoin instead. Bitcoin is not just automatically great all the time. |
|
|
|
What can we do? Buy cloud mining power in a mining pool that wants what you want.
This is truly a non statement. Buying yourself into cloud mining makes you nothing more than a slave of the pool that you have given your precious coins to. It's just you having a contract or hashshare that represents a certain hight of hashpower, and that's it. Some cloud mining services allow you to choose which pools you mine at. This would make sense for people who have moral principles on this debate but don't want to mine at home. You can also run nodes and support what you want
Doesn't change anything in current situation. Not much, but it can be a signal of strength for each group. Often people will count the amount of UASF nodes, for example. This will only be solved through mining power I think.
UASF. UASF requires a lot of support which it doesn't have. Not too likely. |
|
|
|
Who cares about reddit anyway? just read the information you need and evaluate it yourself to know if it's bullshit or not.
Sure, but you have to ask youself: is one side is SO deathly afraid of the truth that you can't even be allowed read the whitepaper? I think you should rephrase that question to: "Do the moderators of a subreddit on one side of a debate try to pressure readers into supporting their point of view?" The answer is, you guessed it, yes. Then you just have to ask: "Do the moderators of a subreddit on one side of a debate represent the entire 'side'?" The answer is, you guessed it, no. |
|
|
|
|
I think the demand for this type of microearnings site (faucets, PTC, etc), with Bitcoin is just going to be decreasing more and more. With the current transaction fees someone would have to work for weeks just to get an amount of Bitcoin that they would actually be able to spend - all the while the site could end up a scam like epay.info.
I've seen some complaints against the dominant one BTCClicks recently though so there could be a gap in the market if they end up scamming. Just don't expect your returns to be too stable.
|
|
|
|
I didn't invest nor did I said I will, I just like testing out services and pointing out scams or legit ones here. Take note that there's no actually a legit cloud mining that you can get back all your investment wuth just a couple of days. Like genesis mining that have been turned as scam not actually scam but it's too hard to predict in any cloud mining if wr still get back all our investment. Much better to invest it in a right one.
Well not right now to be precise. A few years back I've invested in cex.io and one more cloud mining services that I can't remember the name of but in both I've got ROI and that's when the diff was lower. Now, I'd never invest into any cloud mining service because I know what's going on. Don't worry about me. >Mining "calculator", misleading about how mining ROI would actually work >The calculator shows 720% ROI in a year. Compounded, that would be completely insane. Furthermore, it's 2% per day which is several times more suspicious. >Referral program offering >3% of the referral's investment >Accepts Perfect Money, Payeer and Advcash Definite scam. |
|
|
|
a) My government restricts all bitcoin related fundings across my local banks:- If this happens, even if I manage to sell the bitcoins at an exchange, they would not be able to remit the money to my accounts
You could sell P2P for cash on LocalBitcoins. In most urban areas there are plenty of people to trade with. b) Trevzor wallet gets damaged and 10 years later Trevzor company is defunct. I am not sure how I can retreive my Bitcoins with my SEED. Would another similar device be able to restore them?
This is a list of compatible wallets, including many major software wallets. You're safe if Satoshi Labs stops maintaining the software or if your TREZOR breaks. c) An issue I see with regards to depositing/withdrawing Bitcoins seems to be the transaction fees. While bitcoin is touted as virtually free, this does not seem to be the case. I have seen multiple complains where transactions do not get processed due to insufficient fees. What happens if one day miners ask for 50% fees just to process your bitcoins?
Users set their fee. Miners are incentivised to include the transactions with higher fees earlier, but naturally if capacity exceeded demand (hopefully with a scaling solution implemented it would), the fees would be very low. Given my above mindset, how dumb is it to spend money in this. Of course I will only be investing money I can afford to lose
As long as you've considered it carefully yourself, I'm all for it and I'm sure other people on this Bitcoin forum would be too (they're here, so most of them obviously support it). |
|
|
|
|
Sort of.
"A broad swath of asset prices has surged in recent weeks, extending a strong 2017 for stocks, bonds, gold and bitcoin".
I would call this maturity. If there was a big front page about Bitcoin I'd actually be worried, because it implies that there's a bubble going on as there would be too much hype and temporary exposure which could be prone to a crash.
When something like this happens it suggests a slow mainstream acceptance as cryptocurrencies continue to soar.
|
|
|
|
So why are you focusing only on Bitcoin's price on exchanges?
1. Bitcoin's price on exchanges indicates its level of adoption and how much people have supported it. 2. The price represents what you can buy with it, it's just a way of measuring Bitcoin's value. With its current volatility you can't just pretend the value has stayed the same, and that's essential when buying something. 3. Storing value in Bitcoin will be essential in the future because it helps to keep the price stable. But now, Bitcoin has becomed just a digital asset.
This is just capitalism. As long as people continue to think there's a "greater fool" to buy it off them for more, there will be more users and eventually this will make it revolutionary again. |
|
|
|
I have zero trust left for Jihan Wu and Bitmain. I do not believe they have the best interests of the Bitcoin community in mind.
True. All polls I've seen before have suggested that the Bitcoin community is largely in favour of SegWit, such as ViaBTC's poll which resulted in over 80% SegWit support. They[...] try to deflect blame on people who get none of those fees whatsoever.
False. SegWit supporting pools still receive transaction fees. F2Pool, for example, has been receiving transaction fees while supporting SegWit. Who leads the pool and whether they're a figurehead for all evil doesn't really make a difference to this at all. Furthermore, BU would result in fees being lower, at least in the short term. But, few of those who cheered in 2013 remain in bitcoin. Many of them left during spring last year. Most of the rest followed this spring, joining a community that continues that 2013 cheering, ethereum.
Baseless claim. Bitcoin is still extremely popular. Because, on a social, rather than technical, level, bitcoin has failed – objectively speaking. It failed the moment Michael Marquardt, the top moderator of r/bitcoin, who gained such moderatorship in unclear circumstances, began using censorship and banning, after advocating for years anarcho-capitalism and NAP.
Anarcho-capitalism (fake anarchism), has no relation to what someone does on a private forum. Furthermore, censorship on a private forum would not violate the NAP. |
|
|
|
Given the size of your investment ($1300), I'd consider going all in on Ether.
Bitcoin and Ethereum both have very good long term growth opportunity, the challenge is that Ether is way earlier in its run than Bitcoin. With Ether currently trading at ~$250 you can buy more Ether than you can bitcoin and it's the number of "shares", coins you own that will give you real leverage to gain return on investment from any price growth in the future.
It's feasible that Ether gets up to the $2000s level and beyond (just as Bitcoin has). And with a cost bases of $250 you stand to make a 10x return on investment. However it's less likely that Bitcoin would take the same 10x run over the same time period...do you think Bitcoin could hit $25000 in just 3 years?
This is a terrible, terrible explanation of Bitcoin's relation to Ether and their respective prices. Ether's supply is more than four times higher than Bitcoin and its market cap is more than half that of Bitcoin. Therefore a price of $2000 would only be practical if Either ended up being worth about four times more in market cap than Bitcoin is now. Also, who's to say that Ether isn't "the one" and that another cryptocurrency doesn't have everyone throwing all their money in a few years later? If we were actually judging new coins based on merit this would happen 24/7. Not to mention that Ether's transaction fees are much higher than several other coins, that problematic bugs have been found in it and that it's not a Bitcoin competitor but a platform for decentralised blockchain applications. Ether could go higher but the two are not in the same boat. In the end you need to be happy with your investment, and diversification definitely plays a part.
It does indeed. With a small investment like that just Bitcoin and Ether is okay - if you were investing more I'd consider several others too. I just wanted to add my thoughts as someone who knows a lot professionally about these sorts of things.
I honestly doubt this. |
|
|
|
Labour have pulled off a top-notch election campaign and Corbyn's vote share will undoubtedly be higher than Miliband's pathetic 30% or so in 2015 which would stop people from avoiding voting Labour because they're "unelectable"... That said, it's far too easy to overestimate the number of young people which will actually go and vote. The Tories' vote share tend to be more "reliable" voters so to speak, and they've just received a big boost from UKIP (expelled Tories who were too evil even for them). Labour's vote share could be pushed either side of the margin of error. The only reason the tories called the election was because they thought it was a done deal and they could potentially increase their majority, but now it's likely they're actually going to lose seats. Also, a tory MP has finally been charged with election fraud, accused of falsely declaring expenses in the previous election. Took the CPS long enough, but at least it will hopefully ruin his campaign. The entire Conservative Party should be fucked from these electoral fraud allegations, but it looks like they're managing to cling on without enough publicity even happening due to the bastards in the Murdoch press and Daily Mail. I don't think it'll have too much of an impact for now. If you vote for any party other than Tories you will be supporting Islamists. Everyone who is not Muslim MUST vote Tories. There is no other party to slow down the Islamization. Yeah, the Iraq, Syria and Libya wars have done so much to help stem the flow of terrorism haven't they? The West have been so altruistic when pointlessly switching sides and fighting everyone at once, haven't they? Don't try to convince yourself that 1.6 billion people are terrorists, which is clearly what you mean by "Islamization". Do you even know what Muslims coming to the West as refugees are running away from? It's a mixture of terrorism against them from "Muslims" (since the biggest victims of terrorism are Muslims by far), and terrorism from the West. It might work with traumatized Germans or British but it will not work in the US or Eastern Europe. Ah hah. Here's what it is - you don't even have connections to Britain or Germany. You've made it clear with that little slip of yours, using the third person to refer to British people. All you've been doing is reading bullshit in the press about Britain being "taken over" or something, and you've exaggerated minor events in your pitiful mind. This helps you delude yourself into a victim mentality which creates an endless cycle of hatred - this can only ever be stopped when one self-proclaimed "side" actually looks inward instead of outward when considering emotions. Furthermore, Sharia Law is a vague term referring to laws based on the Qur'an - Sharia courts in the UK are not official courts and cannot override real courts, they're just for domestic disputes for personal business which is why they're allowed. Furthermore, the countries and governments which have implemented Sharia Law have not implemented it based on the same ideals which Western Muslims typically have. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
