The power efficient 750 Ti now does 11.5 MHash/s
Heh. Almost as much as the whole Amazon cloud I was running for the launch.  |
|
|
|
Yes, but if you look for example at address 1EPhEgXRs9WybWqF1mWwG627h89KmsVuZQ (my address) then there is no transaction with received time 2014-03-21 10:22:45. Payouts from 2014-03-19 and 2014-03-24 are there, but nothing between them.  You need to talk to blockchain.info about it, if you are using their wallet. Nothing Eligius can do about it. http://blockr.io/address/info/1EPhEgXRs9WybWqF1mWwG627h89KmsVuZQThe payment on 3-21 was paid and is in block chain with 812 confirmations. |
|
|
|
i try to cpu mine some spaincoi, but i only get booos...
Are you posting this to the wrong thread? It's not related to the pools we mentioned or to Vertcoin... |
|
|
|
of course this difference is not huge but in the end it makes some $. only advantage of big pools was that i did not have to check and restart my miners every week. in p2pool i had to check all the time how my miners were working, restart them or even change the node (there are not many stabile nodes out there - sad but truth).
I don't know Acejam, but he runs a load balancing cluster of p2pool nodes here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422242.0 |
|
|
|
Edit: I answered my 3rd question you just append +xxx to your user name for the miner pool credentials and it adjust the difficulty accordingly...
Remember this changes pseudo share difficulty to report to node, but doesn't change the share difficulty for actual shares on the share chain. For that you need to use /DIFF. |
|
|
|
Anyone try using CloudFlare to protect their p2pools? Would it work? Any measurable performance issues? Thanks in advance  I'm interested in that too. |
|
|
|
|
MultiBit sounds cool too and is in a sticky someone as the "official" recommended wallet, I believe. it doesn't require special servers like Electrum. I've not tried it myself yet, I like and use Electrum, but MultiBit is another reasonable choice for a node-less wallet.
|
|
|
|
I'd like to touch on something i read a while back in this thread.. (around pg 47 i think..)
Someone else reported receiving a payout and it not showing up in their wallet. I too am having a similar problem.. On 3-21-14 @ 10:22:45 my stats page shows Eligius making a payout to me but it has yet to show up in my Blockchain wallet. Any knowledge as to why this may be happening?
thanks for any intel
You could try searching for the transaction here as a secondary source of info: http://blockr.io/ |
|
|
|
Ah! I missed the 'might be down for a bit'. Thanks.
Quick question: What are folks second favorite pools to mine? I usually hit BTC Guild or BitMinter. Are there other pools that folks who have been mining a lot longer than I have prefer?
Thanks
bitparking is a quality smaller pool with merge mining. And there's always p2pool. |
|
|
|
I'm thankful Avalon did finally ship the chips (many months late) so I got my miner. Lost months of income off of it, but at least it works great. |
|
|
|
what is the problem with the pools?
Pool works, but must be still tested. Also sgminer has two bugs. One fixed, other I'll check tomorrow. I will open the pool if I found the first block and see that pool works really. Does Fuguecoin have a testnet you can use to test it more quickly? |
|
|
|
Problem with p2pool is simple. It is too large. That leads to high share difficulty which causes low hashrate miner very low probability of getting share. Yes, if you hash for example a month, your income 'should be' average, but with bad luck, you may also get almost nothing. Or if you mine few days without luck, not getting share, and then left, you just wasted your hashrate completely. This is caused by nature how p2pool is working. Only solution I see is to create more than one p2pool network to allow hashrate redistribution. At current time, forget about mining on p2pool if you have less than about 1Mhs, coz probability of getting share at such hashrate is about 3 hours.
Then you trade off small miners getting more shares but the pool finding less blocks. Still results in variance for the small miners. The author of p2pool is working on a new version of p2pool for the future which will have better support for smaller miners, but that isn't a near-term solution. p2pool does work differently than normal pools and people who don't like that should use a pool they feel comfortable with. Because it can take a while to find shares, p2pool maybe isn't good for smaller miners that jump around coins based on which coin is most profitable at that moment. But if you are mining vertcoin long-term in a "fire and forget" sort of way, the variance will even out over a long enough period of time. |
|
|
|
|
Amazon web servers can do 2FA with a gemalto physical device, so it's not possible to defeat the 2FA without the actual little device fob.
|
|
|
|
Isn't 1gh a version of p2pool? I don't have a worker and I am using my hvc address....
Other pools do that too that aren't using p2pool. |
|
|
|
|
Is there an existing p2pool network for heavycoin?
|
|
|
|
You need to get the vertcoin p2pool code. Sorry I'm on mobile or I would post a link. Google will get you to the proper github fork for scrypt-n p2pool. Also, I'm pretty sure that fork already has settings for gpucoin. Good luck.
Yup, here it is https://github.com/donSchoe/p2pool-n |
|
|
|
|
Remember BCT was broken into a long time ago, maybe they are emailing all BCT users off of that list of emails.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
