You must understand that you can't deactivate a bitcoin address and prevent it from receiving bitcoin. What you can do is check where you are sending your coins. I know that you don't want to hear this and that it might feel like kicking you while you are down, but this is all your fault. You should have verified the address you wanted to send to before confirming/broadcasting the transaction. Sadly, it's too late now. 

Bitcoin requires you to be your own cashier, security department, monitoring service, financial consultant, etc. It's tricky in the beginning, and that's why care and attention to detail are a must.

Support personnel only have the very basic understanding of how crypto works. They were probably trying to say that neither you or them have access to private keys. However, someone set up their systems and private keys are being saved by someone and somewhere.

I understand. It was worth a shot.
Once the book is finished, will it only be available in physical form as a hardcover or have you thought about releasing it as an e-book as well? You know how bitcoiners and members of this community are about their privacy and not sharing their personal information (including addresses) with anyone.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Have you shared this information and proof with the Casino Guru team? I know you said you did, but in the thread (https://casinoguru-en.com/bc-game-casino-player-s-withdrawal-is-delayed-and), your reply is still being awaited, and the countdown shows a little under two days remaining. Maybe their specialist, Peter still hasn't taken a look at the data to update the topic and confirm that you sent the proof that they requested. 

I am afraid you won't receive a lot of support and users for a piece of software that stores recovery phrases digitally on a smartphone. I wouldn't be interested in doing it, regardless if it's your app or one created by a more popular brand or individual. Offline paper and metal backups should always have priority in my opinion. But don't get discouraged, and keep working on the ideas you have. Who knows, your next project and creation could be a real killer. Keep up the good work. 

Not all the news articles have visible images on the landing page but I can see it's because those particular articles don't even have images when you open them. But it looks a little unusual to come across articles with only a documents icon visible where there should be a picture. To prevent that, I think it's best to add an image to each article visible on the main page.

The main page begins with general news and then goes on to single out Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin-related content. The section that follows is called Altcoins. Maybe a more appropriate name would be Other Altcoins because ETH and LTC are also altcoins, and we see them before the Altcoins section.

Good luck with the site!
Hopefully you can fix the loading times and add a dark mode.

I don't know why, but I have always liked when the books I read begin with an extra large letter for the first word in a new section.
For instance, your first section titled Registration of the bitcoin.org Domain Name begins with From late 2007 to 2009...
Instead of that, I would prefer From late 2007 to 2009...
I obviously don't expect you to make that change. Just providing some feedback on what I find more visually appealing.

Right. Coin control only provides you with more possibilities and a chance to select those specific outputs that you want to use instead of allowing the software to make that selection. It's in no way essential though, just like you said. But it could make things more difficult. If you have a new wallet with multiple incoming unconfirmed transactions, not having coin control and the ability to select a UTXO could make it more challenging when figuring out the new fee rate for your CPFP transaction.   

I would also like to ask the BC.Game forum representative if they can post some evidence in this thread to back up their claims that they had listed Azuki with more than a 3 times higher price than it should be? They will probably be sharing it with CasinoGuru and AskGamblers, but I don't believe it's sensitive information that shouldn't be posted publicly. 

I have never used it nor do I know how it works without looking it up on the Internet, but Armory used to have its own unique backup solution I believe. They called it root keys. Not only that, but there were different versions of these keys, adding more complexity to the backup process.

nc50lc talks about root keys, a chaincode, and a SecurePrint for Armory in this post:

---

OP seems to have disappeared after creating this thread. He either figured out what to do himself or gave up.

Good addition. I had that in mind, but didn't consider mentioning it because my guess is that the most popular wallets most of us use and those that are being recommended on this forum, would have the option to allow users to spend unconfirmed outputs. I am not big on experimenting with new software just for the sake of using something new. Perhaps you can tell us if you are aware of any non-custodial wallets with coin control where it isn't possible to spend unconfirmed outputs?

Bitcoin uses a public ledger. You can always follow your coins on the blockchain. You deposited them into your LocalBitcoins account by mistake and from time to time you can check if the coins are transferred to a different address than the one you initially used. That would be a clear sign that someone is still checking and moving coins from the LB team. But even if the don't move, they surely haven't deleted their keys.

Thanks for accepting me Royse777. Unfortunately, I have to turn it down.
icopress accepted me in the MixTum campaign starting today. I should have deleted my [banned mixer] application but forgot to. The payrate is excellent but it would be unfair of me to change campaigns just because of that.

I hope we can work together in the future. Sorry for the inconvenience caused by not deleting my application!

Cheers!   

At the moment, we are waiting for the BC.Game team to supply the 3rd-party arbitrators with the requested evidence that shows there was a discrepancy in the allocated Azuki NFTs, that the majority of the player's bets were in the mentioned NFTs, and lastly that he was aware of the casino's mistake with the token allocation. If BC.Game can provide that and 3rd-party meditators accept the evidence, it will be enough for me not to think that the OP has a valid case here or that the casino is at fault.   

It's possible, but in that case OP would probably have seen the notifications on the official website that the service has been shut down. It's more likely that he saved the LocalBitcoins address somewhere on his computer (email, personal notes) and mistakenly sent the coins to it thinking they were going elsewhere.

A wallet doesn't need to show a unique CPFP button or feature for you to create a CPFP transaction. Electrum has such an option if you right-click on a coin where that is suitable to be used. But if you have a non-custodial wallet with coin control and you are the recipient of the unconfirmed transaction, you can bump its fees by creating a new transaction from the unconfirmed coins and pay enough to incentivize miners to include both the parent and child transactions in a block. The same is true if you have change from the original unconfirmed parent transaction that you can then spend in a new transaction with higher fees. 

It could prove to be expensive and not really worth it if you are going to give most of the money to the law firm to handle your case. I would again advice you to contact the Finish Financial Authority and see what they have to say. It's a serious country and regulator; we aren't talking about Curacao or the Seychelles Islands. Check with them, and you can always go back to discussing the matter with a law firm if they can't do anything.

I also think it was accelerated and probably with the service that Mempool.space provides. The fee rate was too low for a free ViaBTC acceleration and OP already confirmed he didn't have the money to pay for the paid service. He was also on the waiting list on Mempool.space, but we don't know how all that ended.

ViaBTC has its own pool, just like you mentioned. Plus, submitted transactions to them can also be accelerated via partner pools. Mempool.space doesn't have its own pool, at least not under that name. That's why I wanted to know more about how the service works exactly and what OP paid for and to whom.

Thanks for the suggestions. Hopefully it can come in handy for those who need it.

This is for Bitcoin Core and those running their own nodes. Any idea which Electrum nodes one could connect to for similar results?

This is good and anyone could do it who created the transaction. Alternatively, you can get it from a block explorer if it was broadcasted-

@Biancamason940
Your 7 sat/vByte transaction confirmed, which is a bit surprising to me. Did the mempool empty to the point where it confirmed manually or did you accelerate it with Mempool.space? Some feedback would be appreciated because it can help others who are in the same situation as you. It would also give credibility to Mempool.space and it's acceleration service. I don't remember seeing a post where someone wrote about their experience using Mempool.space tx acceleration yet.

Obviously, each node owner can decide for themselves whether or not they will support full RBF. But is there a way for a 3rd-party (like you or me) to know which node supports full RBF? It could help when you need to create such a doublespend transaction.

Even though the purging rate is 10 sat/vByte right now and OP only pays 7, Mempool.Space hasn't dropped his transaction. I am guessing many other nodes still have it in their memory even now. Knowing exactly where to go would speed things up.