86GH/s at 30 btc max cost

I'd like one, if you still have them...!

You probably need 1 GH/sec per $40 spent if you start mining right now to break even.

0.0000001 GH/s.

You'd immediately start making a profit if you're getting free mining hashpower and have zero electric costs.

Armory, safest and most feature rich for advance users.

Nobody gives shit about the trust system which is being abused by people who got positive trust and give +rep to their friends and -rep to people they don't know like.
What matters is escrow, and explanations.


As long as mods can't arbitrate on fake trust ratings and remove them, it will be worthless.

i ran into that kind of problem when rewriting my own pool engine. It appears miners expects "mining.notify" notifications at various minimum intervals before considering a pool as dead, interrupting connection.

for example, cgminer 3.3.3 source code include the following comment:

my rewritten pool now notifies miners at 45 seconds interval (without asking them to discard previous jobs in this case).


If you're running into that "stratum connection to pool xx interrupted" problem, there are chances the chosen pool just waits for new transactions or new blocks before notifying miners.
(i must admit i was first doing the same thing, as i could not see any minimum notification delay in specifications)

In the reference software defaults to zero fees,  except when a transaction fails to meet it's own tests that would qualify it as a free transactions for relay (implying that its peers would also not relay the transaction). In that case, it uses the minimum fees which would satisfy the relay rules— 0.0001 BTC/kb of txn data.  The amounts you're showing indicate that you're making rather large transactions!

(search for nMinRelayTxFee in the codebase)

Reducing it further will just result in stuck transactions, since your peers won't relay them.

There was someone around that buys accounts if that's what you're looking for.  Haven't seen much with that since the change to activity though.

I see all this talk about SATA III SSD`s. If you are going big, why not go for a PCI-e OCZ Revodrive? At least two times faster than any SATA SSD.

@The Goat Master
 How much does it cost to you, and what crypto are you going to mine?

YAI you using such expensive parts? If its a mining rig don't "trick" it out unnecessarily

1.9k?  i thought they were only 1.4
"only"  

If you really want an epic machine, look at the server board section on newegg.

http://www.newegg.com/Server-Motherboards/SubCategory/ID-302

So, for example here's a board: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131861 with dual LGA 2011 slots and 6x 16x PCIe slots

Slap two of these chips in there: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117272

And you'll have 16 cores at 3.8 Ghz Unfortunately each of those chips is $1.9k a peice.

On the other hand, if you go AMD you can get much lower cost chips.  So for example here is an 8 core, 3.1Ghz chip for $345, which you could slap on this board.  Unfortunately it only has 2x 16x PCI express slots though. But definitely cheaper then intel in terms of CPU strength.

(although remember Intel does more per core then AMD, so an 8x Intel will be about as fast as 16x AMD cores - but probably much more expensive)

Ir you are looking for ideas, a data mining application build using SQL Server Enterprise with Full Text Search enabled will easily burn through 512GB of RAM and bog down 64 cores.