Does the problem only occur on the registration page or does it affect the entire site?
You can try accessing the registration directly using this URL: https://megapari.com/registration.

Anyway, I didn't notice any errors, it's possible that the issue has already been resolved. Also, since you're using Linux, it's possible that the certificate issue only impact Linux machines.

But be careful with this site. It appears that they are affiliated with the 1xBET parent company, which has a bit of a reputation in the gambling community for being involved in some pretty shady practices and selective scamming. If you ever face any issues and the casino decides to confiscate your funds, don't expect much help or an explanation from their customer support or security department. So, be cautious if you decide to engage with them.

Well, if someone gains remote access to your computer without your knowledge, anything is possible, including changing your local DNS settings that can lead you to a phishing scam without you even realizing it. However, statistically speaking, the likelihood of this happening is much lower compared to the risks associated with clicking on links in email messages or performing Google searches that lead to phishing site. Typing the exact URL into the browser's address bar is considered the safest way to access websites, although it can be time-consuming for many users.

Paranoia can cloud your judgment. It's good to be cautious, though.


There is no direct threat to your Ledger Nano S at this time. Nevertheless, if you feel uneasy or don't feel safe with your current storage solution, it's always a good idea to explore other options.

---

If he keeps using the Ledger Nano with Electrum software, he won't need to upgrade the firmware unless he chooses to do so. Firmware updates are exclusively carried out via Ledger Live.

Well, maybe you have a point there. It wouldn't be the first time I've put my faith in people and ended up feeling let down, and I have a sneaky suspicion it won't be the last either...

Nevertheless, I must admit, even though he can be stubborn at times, I do believe his heart is generally in the right place (well, most of the time, at least). But hey, we all have our stubborn moments, right?

I agree. I was trying to explain to tenant48 that his idea about each Ledger device having a unique key pair doesn't hold up because it would render the decryption of shreds on a new device impossible. It just doesn't make logical sense in that context.


Absolutely! The whole idea behind a hardware wallet is to eliminate as many potential attack points as you can, not to introduce new ones, no matter how insignificant they might seem. Safety first, no compromises!

OzoneChain | OZO | Signature Campaign još ima slobodnih mjesta za jednog Full i jednog Sr. Member-a

Minimalno 10 a maksimalno 20 postova tjedno. Local postovi se NE broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions:
Sr. members - 2.5$/post
Full members - 1.75$/post

Dodatni bonus od $20 za dva najkvalitenija člana svaki tjedan.

Hmm, I'm not sure if I should share this secret, but let's just say that you're not entirely correct. Each platform typically operates independently and has its own systems and databases. However, there are indeed scenarios where casinos have the ability to track your gambling activities across multiple platforms, particularly in the case of sportsbooks. If you're curious, you can do some research on your own to dig deeper into this.

I don't see how one has to do with the other. If gambling is legal and something I enjoy, I will continue to play regardless of my country's stance on the Bitcoin cryptocurrency. The regulations surrounding Bitcoin and the legality of gambling are separate matters. As long as the casino permits players from my country and there are no specific restrictions, I can engage in gambling activities without any hindrance.

In that case, the main change would be the method I use to exchange cryptocurrency for my local fiat currency. If my country has restrictions or regulations on the use of Bitcoin, it will surely affect the availability of cryptocurrency exchanges or the ease of converting Bitcoin into my local currency. So I'll probably have to look into alternative exchange methods.

But that's not how it's supposed to work, according to Ledger. They state that the seed phrase undergoes encryption and is divided into three shreds. These shreds are then directly sent to the three custodians from the Ledger device itself. When a recovery is requested, these encrypted parts are sent back to the new or old hardware device and decrypted back in the recovery seed. Nowhere does it mention that the shreds must pass through any Ledger server for encryption or decryption during recovery. Additionally, the process you described would imply that Ledger stores all private encryption keys from every device they have ever produced on their servers, which would create a single point of failure. It wouldn't make sense to keep such a system in place, and the entire process of splitting the recovery seed into shreds and distributing them to three different custodians wouldn't make sense in that case.

It depends on the specific context and requirements of the task you have in mind. There are indeed tools and systems available that can assist with verifying whether people who write comments are completing the assigned tasks. These tools can automate certain aspects of the process, reducing the need for manual labor. As he already mentioned, LoyceV provides a reputable service for signature campaign managers that can help track and evaluate user contributions, while ninjastic.space offers API endpoints that can be used with a little bit of programming knowledge to streamline the verification process. But it really depends on what you want to automate and the specific needs you have. While there are tools available, you have to understand that not everything can be fully automated. For example, tasks like evaluating the quality of posts will likely require manual intervention. So, if you could provide more details about what you specifically want to automate?

I decided to give Wallet of Satoshi a try to withdraw sats from these games, and I can verify that it does indeed work. However, personally, I find the wallet to be too simplistic for my liking. I might explore other alternatives in the future that better suit my preferences.

The connection between 1xbit and 1xbet, along with several other brands, goes beyond mere speculation and has been extensively documented. Multiple reliable sources and discussions in many gambling communities confirm that both platforms share the same parent company and are managed by the same owners. If you're interested in verifying this information, you can easily find supporting evidence with a simple search.

When it comes to celebrities promoting and advertising 1xbet, it doesn't automatically mean the company is legit. We've seen plenty of times where celebrity endorsements have been questioned or caused concerns. It is best to approach these endorsements with a critical eye. But let's not overlook the fact that gambling regulators from various jurisdictions have actually banned 1xbet. So, when it comes to forming an opinion, considering both celebrity endorsements and regulatory actions, I'd say the regulators provide a more solid foundation and hold more "serious street cred." These regulators, operating worldwide, have imposed restrictions and bans on 1xbet due to reasons like non-compliance with regulations or unethical practices. This is likely the reason why they created the 1xbit brand, which operates without any license and separately from their main brand, so that they can avoid the scrutiny that comes with operating within established regulatory frameworks.

You can still do this, even if you use different addresses every time. There's absolutely no need to use the same address for  "a lot of stuff", as your wallet can generate an endless number of addresses at no cost whatsoever. And even if your funds are spread out across multiple wallet addresses, you can still consolidate and spend them in a single transaction by combining multiple inputs.

I must admit that I wasn't aware of this case before, as I'm not a regular on the Lending board. However, after reviewing the evidence presented, I couldn't find enough convincing proof to support the claim that these are alt accounts of the same user. Therefore, I don't believe that the flag against these users is justified. In my opinion, it's important to give users the benefit of the doubt unless there is substantial proof indicating otherwise. False accusations can harm individuals and their reputation, so it's crucial to exercise caution when making judgments.

While I opposed the flags, I don't want to lose trust in Timelord2067 just yet. I truly appreciate his dedication to the forum and his efforts in combating fraudulent activities, and I believe that he will ultimately do what is right and consider removing the negative trust.

Yep, you'll need to download each game individually from the App Store. Also, you'll need to have a Lightning wallet on your device if you want to withdraw sats. Just remember, the rewards you earn will start to decay after a few days, so make sure to withdraw them to your wallet regularly.

There are hardware wallets that are designed to be completely air-gapped and employ technology which eliminates any possibility of online connectivity. Transactions are signed exclusively through SD cards or QR code scanning, leaving no room for private keys or seed phrases to be exposed. With these security measures in place, governments have no means to compromise the security of your assets stored within such wallets. Oh, and don't forget to ensure that the wallet software is open source, thoroughly tested, and verified, and I think you're pretty safe.

Your account was banned about four years ago, during a wave of permanent bans primarily related to plagiarism. Once banned, you cannot use any other accounts on the forum except for one to create a ban appeal thread in the meta section. Creating additional posts in other threads with other accounts is also a bannable offense.

Regarding your claim of being banned for excessive bumping of Solarex_ICO, it is incorrect. Upon reviewing your post history, I found at least two clear cases of copy-paste plagiarism, which you seem to have forgotten.

An example:


Source: https://www.smart-energy.com/features-analysis/electricity-theft-south-africa/

Instances of copy-paste plagiarism like yours usually led to permanent bans. And, appealing such bans rarely resulted in them being lifted. What complicates your case even further is the fact that you resorted to "borrowing" other people's accounts to continue posting on the forum after your main account was banned. People have also discovered more of the alt accounts you've used in the past, which doesn't look good for you. Even though you deny association with some of the mentioned accounts, especially the ones that are already banned, the evidence suggests otherwise.

For example, you claim you don't know why BTCedgar (alt of btsjimin and btsjungkook) used your BTC address, but the timestamps of these posts clearly show that you copied his message, not the other way around.



You two are the only ones on the forum who have ever used that specific phrase: "Sir, I put my eth address but I want bitcoin as payment.", and his message came first. So, even if it were true that he used your address, for some inexplicable reason, it is highly unlikely that you wouldn't have noticed it since you copied his message.

Besides, your account barlo357 and btsjungkook (alt of BTCedgar) were created on the same day, which makes this kind of coincidence even less likely.



Considering all the factors at hand, as much as I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, it appears that your case for appeal is quite weak. Sorry.

If you bought those wallet files from someone and actually paid for them, you totally got scammed. Those things are straight-up fake.

I don't have anything against using Bitcoin for everyday transactions since that's its intended purpose. Personally, I rely on it for some of my regular payments. However, I make an effort to choose moments when the network congestion is low to avoid high fees. As you said, every bit counts, particularly when it comes to donations. And, as you experienced yourself, Bitcoin may not be the most ideal solution for small transactions. Unless, of course, you consider switching to Lightning Network transactions.

I can understand the desire for using VPN to bypass restrictions, but I don't believe it's a good idea in the long run and using a VPN against the site's Terms of Service is a risky move. If the casino blocks your account and confiscates your balance, you have no grounds for argument. If a casino explicitly forbids VPN usage, it's generally best to respect their policies to avoid potential repercussions and it's better to focus on finding reputable platforms that provide a hassle-free gambling experience without the need for VPNs.