Your account was banned about four years ago, during a wave of permanent bans primarily related to plagiarism. Once banned, you cannot use any other accounts on the forum except for one to create a ban appeal thread in the meta section. Creating additional posts in other threads with other accounts is also a bannable offense.

Regarding your claim of being banned for excessive bumping of Solarex_ICO, it is incorrect. Upon reviewing your post history, I found at least two clear cases of copy-paste plagiarism, which you seem to have forgotten.

An example:


Source: https://www.smart-energy.com/features-analysis/electricity-theft-south-africa/

Instances of copy-paste plagiarism like yours usually led to permanent bans. And, appealing such bans rarely resulted in them being lifted. What complicates your case even further is the fact that you resorted to "borrowing" other people's accounts to continue posting on the forum after your main account was banned. People have also discovered more of the alt accounts you've used in the past, which doesn't look good for you. Even though you deny association with some of the mentioned accounts, especially the ones that are already banned, the evidence suggests otherwise.

For example, you claim you don't know why BTCedgar (alt of btsjimin and btsjungkook) used your BTC address, but the timestamps of these posts clearly show that you copied his message, not the other way around.



You two are the only ones on the forum who have ever used that specific phrase: "Sir, I put my eth address but I want bitcoin as payment.", and his message came first. So, even if it were true that he used your address, for some inexplicable reason, it is highly unlikely that you wouldn't have noticed it since you copied his message.

Besides, your account barlo357 and btsjungkook (alt of BTCedgar) were created on the same day, which makes this kind of coincidence even less likely.



Considering all the factors at hand, as much as I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, it appears that your case for appeal is quite weak. Sorry.

If you bought those wallet files from someone and actually paid for them, you totally got scammed. Those things are straight-up fake.

I don't have anything against using Bitcoin for everyday transactions since that's its intended purpose. Personally, I rely on it for some of my regular payments. However, I make an effort to choose moments when the network congestion is low to avoid high fees. As you said, every bit counts, particularly when it comes to donations. And, as you experienced yourself, Bitcoin may not be the most ideal solution for small transactions. Unless, of course, you consider switching to Lightning Network transactions.

I can understand the desire for using VPN to bypass restrictions, but I don't believe it's a good idea in the long run and using a VPN against the site's Terms of Service is a risky move. If the casino blocks your account and confiscates your balance, you have no grounds for argument. If a casino explicitly forbids VPN usage, it's generally best to respect their policies to avoid potential repercussions and it's better to focus on finding reputable platforms that provide a hassle-free gambling experience without the need for VPNs.

Clearly, the screenshots you provided fail miserably in proving any racist or disrespectful behavior towards you. On the contrary, what is evident is that they took the necessary step of blocking you from the customer support chat due to your own blatant lack of respect towards their support agents. Customer support representatives are there to assist and provide solutions, not to endure unwarranted abuse. I can understand that you may feel frustrated and disappointed by your financial losses, but it's important to approach the situation with a level-headed mindset. Your inability to approach the situation with courtesy and decency led to the consequences you now face.

AIs, or machine learning, are really good at looking at lots of information and figuring things out. They can analyze huge amounts of data and find patterns or make predictions based on what they've learned from the data. But when it comes to beating the casino, it's a different story. Casino games, like slot machines, blackjack, or roulette, are designed with specific probabilities and odds that favor the house. These games operate on the principle of randomness and chance, making it difficult for any AI to consistently predict or manipulate outcomes in their favor. The element of luck and the casino's odds are always in play, making it a tough challenge for any AI to overcome.

Even if you want honest feedback, it's not allowed to give rewards or incentives to people for posting in your ANN thread. There are actually specialized boards designated for campaigns and promotions. I get that you think genuine reviews are important, but it's actually against forum rules to offer incentives for users to write in your thread. I suggest you check out the Services and Games and rounds boards.

You might want to check out a couple of options:

• Sportsbet.io has an Android app that you can find at https://sportsbet.io/promotions/sportsbetio-app
• Another option is Bitcasino.io, which also has an Android app available. You can find it at https://bitcasino.io/promotions/introducing-bitcasino-android-app.

Having said that, most online casinos these days have responsive design, which means their websites adapt to different screen sizes. Whether you're on a desktop, tablet, or mobile, you should have access to all the features and games without any issues. I've played at quite a few online casinos, and I've never had a problem with my mobile browser.

When you're picking an altcoin with low transaction fees, go for the stable and less crazy ones instead of just focusing on being "valuable." You want a cryptocurrency that doesn't have big price swings all the time. That way, your transactions will be more consistent and predictable. So, if you're looking for a reliable option with relatively low fees, Litecoin is definitely worth considering. Due to its popularity and established reputation, Litecoin is supported by a wide range of platforms, wallets, exchanges, and payment processors.

This can be easily avoided by keeping multiple copies of the private key in different locations.


You're totally right! It's definitely not safe at all. Don't ever store anything valuable in the cloud, like your emails, cloud storage, or online databases. You never know who else might have access to that stuff besides you.


It's actually a good thing to have a bit of doubt about the safety of your valuable information. It keeps you on your toes and encourages you to take necessary precautions and be mindful of potential risks.

I believe any wallet that has Lightning Network (LN) functionality installed on your smartphone should be supported. According to their help pages:


Currently, I'm using Blue Wallet on my device, but I get a weird error from the wallet's side while attempting to withdraw, specifically when creating the LNURL. I'll give it a shot with another wallet to see if the issue persists.

Considering that BRC-20 tokens are built on the Bitcoin network, it can be reasonably assumed that a casino accepting such tokens would still fulfill the requirement of being connected to Bitcoin. Although, I am not sure how the moderators would look at this.



Well, I would disagree with this. Nowadays, the majority of web2 online casinos actually demand KYC (Know Your Customer) verification from their customers. This is mainly because they operate as licensed platforms and are obligated to comply with legal regulations. However, it's worth mentioning that the crypto gambling community, in general, is not particularly fond of KYC procedures. Consequently, if web3 casinos manage to provide a secure and trustworthy environment for players while also addressing the concerns surrounding privacy and KYC, they could potentially gain a significant advantage in attracting users.

I don't know if it's guaranteed, but as far as I've seen, I get tickets depending on the gameplay, and after the draw, they always reward me with some sats. I haven't quite figured out all the intricacies yet, but what matters to me right now is that the games are enjoyable to play (I'm into this kind of stuff anyway), and the ads aren't too intrusive or distracting.

---

It's worth noting that not all games are equally cluttered with ads. You should try some other games if you haven't already.

Forgive me if I wasn't clear earlier, but allow me to simplify my question for you. Considering that you're operating under complete anonymity and lack any established reputation within the community, why should individuals place their hard-earned money to your custody? I simply cannot fathom the rationale behind such a decision. What safeguards are in place to prevent you from executing a good old-fashioned rug pull at any given moment? After all, in this delightful arrangement, you have absolutely nothing to lose, while your hapless users are left to bear the brunt of the risks and potential losses.

I hope you understand the gravity of the situation and can shed more light on your background, qualifications, or any measures you have in place to mitigate the concerns surrounding this arrangement. Up until now, it's been rather... well, let's just say lacking in that department.

Well, obviously, members who confine themselves to participating solely in local board activities might not receive much recognition on the forum. However, I wouldn't go as far as to say that they are unwelcome. At least, that's not the vibe I got from this place. Besides, even with all those cultural differences and language barriers, nowadays people have got plenty of tools and stuff to help bridge those gaps and make understanding and communication easier.

However, that doesn't give these members a free pass to disregard the basic etiquette of good community practice or violate forum rules. Regardless of their origin or activities, there are certain standards of behavior that apply to everyone. It's like a common code of conduct that we all should abide by, right? Now, I'm not sure what negative tags specifically we're referring to, but I haven't noticed a practice of labeling members negatively solely based on cultural diversity or misunderstandings. I could be mistaken, but I haven't come across any instances of this behavior from any DT members. So, it would probably help here if we knew which specific cases we are talking about.

Are you seriously suggesting that your custodial wallet and mixing service, operating on a clearnet domain and server located in Moldova, can guarantee privacy and security from government agencies? That's quite amusing! But let's consider a scenario: what happens if such an agency issues an order to freeze someone's funds? Can you assure your users that their assets won't be compromised under such circumstances?

Furthermore, I've noticed that you have opted for complete anonymity, with no legal information provided about your company on the website. This raises an important question: If, at some point, you choose to disappear with users' funds, what safeguards are in place to protect them from such a potential rug pull?

Self-custody refers to the practice of personally holding and managing your private keys, which are used to access and control your funds. By entrusting your private keys to someone else, such as a custodial service or third-party provider, you are effectively giving up control and relying on them to safeguard your assets. It's safe to say that it's no longer a self-custody wallet. Plain and simple.

So, let me get this straight: if someone dares to question your credibility or expertise, they're immediately deemed unworthy of your teachings? How delightful! It seems that in your world, the only deserving students are those who unquestioningly accept everything you say without any critical thinking or independent thought. How fortunate they must be to bask in the glow of your all-knowing wisdom.

I can only imagine the wealth of knowledge and wisdom that I'm now deprived of. Truly, it's a loss for the ages. Hahahaha!

You believe? And what actions do you propose?

Btw, there are only 12 posts in this thread prior to yours. I would highly recommend taking a moment to read at least a few of them. Who knows, you might discover some valuable insights that could help you contribute something more meaningful to the discussion.

Here's a temporary solution you can try while waiting for TryNinja to fix the issues. Visit this link: https://ninjastic.space/search?topic_id=631891. On the right side of the screen, select the "Users" tab and click on the "generate" button. This should give you a list of all the users who have ever participated in that topic.

You also have the option to apply filters for a specific time period, which can come in handy when generating monthly reports, for example.