0.025btc awarded to polynesia
97efdd32c3864b50ad56408830256a544689b576b18e8fe81eb7963fec4d78dc
edit: hehe.. you think you could define the bijection? i am literally incapable of doing anymore math today. my brain is reeling
Unfortunately, I don't get the notation required.  Let me try to define it X = [m] x [n] Y = [mn] For each i (1<= i <= m) and j ( 1 <= j <= n), let us define a function f (i, j) such that f(i,j) = (i−1)n+j f is bijective from X to Y |
|
|
|
For problem 5, does this work?
f(i,j)=(i−1)n+j
where i goes from 1 to m and j goes from 1 to n
yea i think thats exactly right as a matter of fact.. could you just be a little more explicit for defining the bijection of m and n with respect to f(i,j)? Thanks. Let me know a sample of the way you want to define the bijective function and I will help define it for you. My address: 1Nri6bYYB5jjVSQxum9jGkYNghqZHzUAfu  |
|
|
|
|
For problem 5, does this work?
f(i,j)=(i−1)n+j
where i goes from 1 to m and j goes from 1 to n
|
|
|
|
There is a new term for people like us....  http://www.thehindu.com/features/magazine/freedom-struggle-20/article7137585.ece
The battle for net neutrality, in India at least, looks to have exacerbated suddenly in the past few weeks. In truth, however, the issue has been brewing for quite a while, fanned by the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) penchant for preparing sheaves of rules and regulations, sundry disputes and discourses by the Reddit demigods and anyone who owns a blog or a YouTube channel, the Bitcoin mafia’s complacent insistence on being the saviour of the web as we know it, and the rumours and filtered nuggets of news surrounding Google’s plans for a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). |
|
|
|
Amount : 0.022BTC
Address: 34PcQgdjmU5fWPLiFpYvDTscXM33pNp3Vt
Interest : 10%
Will repay on : Friday (1 may 2015)
Reason : Want to buy a VPS
Thanks
I will do it. Will send across bitcoins and then post the transaction id. |
|
|
|
We could possibly move them to marketplace/ archive them, if there is no activity in these threads for a week.
Well you cannot archive them for no activity. That would be a bit harsh. Okay! Agree to you Benson. We don't have enough threads to make a new section out of them. Services are although almost fine. But I don't like giveaways here, they don't seem to be nice on the main board, cause I think the main board is meant for discussion and not attracting newbies by throwing freebies, why not move them to main giveaway section? I think polynesia's comment does make sense in terms of the marketplace move. I can move Giveaways to the marketplace after a week or so. I think most of the giveaways here are India centric, so not sure how effective it will be for the OP's on the main board. Could we allow the same for news articles? We can allow it in the main board and then move to the press & news section after 3-4 days. I feel this would get the articles more views and (possibly) increase discussion. |
|
|
|
Overall, the tone of the article about Bitcoin was positive. This was a pleasant surprise, given the doomsday articles which were written earlier. The last article in the Hindu had comments disabled. |
|
|
|
It’s growing, Bitcoin by Bitcoinhttp://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-growing-bitcoin-by-bitcoin/article7134704.eceIndia, however, has been slow in adopting this crypto currency system. The currency is highly volatile and India’s risk-averse culture is not helping give proper a perspective to people who have always preferred more stable and legally secure modes of transaction. In addition, Bitcoin’s inability to reverse or recall transactions presents a big physiological hurdle. Moreover, the question of educating a first-time account-holder about virtual currency always looms large.
On the other hand, other electronic payments initiatives like RTGS, NEFT, IMPS, and mobile wallets are well established, secured and regulated, which relegates Bitcoin to a miniscule share of the market.
|
|
|
|
Thanks! Payment received and positive trust feedback left. You may now lock this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Gentle reminder.
Repayment of loan due today.
Please repay to 1Nri6bYYB5jjVSQxum9jGkYNghqZHzUAfu
|
|
|
|
I can do this if you up the interest rate a little bit. Too low for my liking at the moment.  Let me know if you are interested. Ill do .07 for .06 intill april 22 is that okay? That is okay. I confirm that I will do this transaction. Will send across bitcoins and then post transaction id. |
|
|
|
Hello India!
Actually BTC is an anonymous currency. I'm right?
Then why should i verify myself to exchange BTC to INR? In all exchanges (here i'm mentioning india only and i don't know about other country's) why should i give PAN number? If BTC is anonymous, then no need of verifying my identity by KYC right?
~Rude Boy
The KYC is not for BTC, but for Fiat in most cases. Since the transaction will handle INR as well, regulations related to Fiat need to stay on record. This would not be the case in a crypto-crypto exchange, even in India. Thank you Benson. This is very enlightening. Hypothetically, if a commodities exchange or stock exchange were to use BTC instead of fiat, would stringent KYC norms still apply? |
|
|
|
London Stakes Its Claim as Global Bitcoin Hubhttp://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/features/london-stakes-its-claim-as-global-bitcoin-hub-682081British authorities have come out in support of digital currencies in the name of promoting financial innovation, while proposing that regulations should be drawn up to prevent their use in crime.
But it is technophiles who are leading the drive to make London a real-world hub for trade in web-based "cryptocurrencies", of which Bitcoin is the original and still most popular.
|
|
|
|
I can do this if you up the interest rate a little bit. Too low for my liking at the moment. Let me know if you are interested. |
|
|
|
1) I don't have to pay tax when buying Bitcoins because i buy them with my salary which has already been taxed before reaching me. Is this statement correct?
That is correct. No direct taxes. 2) When i sell the Bitcoin i own, i will only then need to pay my taxes on the profits.
That is correct. 3) Is there not a way to write off my losses against Bitcoin trading like professional stock market traders do? If yes, what proofs do i need to furnish? Will LocalBitcoins records do to prove my purchase of coins?
It may be possible to offset losses from Bitcoin trading against specific heads (i.e. short term capital gains against short term capital losses). I am not sure how extensive LocalBitcoin records are. Is it like a statement? Bank records (money going in / out) + Blockchain evidence + LocalBitcoin records should be enough. 4) What about Bitcoin that i have earned through signature campaigns? Do they come under a different type of tax? If yes, what records do i show to prove i earned these Bitcoins?
Income from other sources. 5) I assume we need to declare the profits from Bitcoin trading as "Income from other sources" while filing my returns but then if it is treated like an asset then it is subject to Capital Gains Tax which is not normally declared under the head Income from other sources?
I think it would come under Capital Gains unless you are a professional trader. Not sure about this. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
