|
I would like to add that according to a PM that I received from the OP that the trust is only positive when the trust depth is set to '4', however when it is set to '2' (the default) the trust rating is 0/0/0/0
|
|
|
|
Are you going to use escrow to guarantee that everyone will get their payment if they make he required number of posts? Without it I don't think you will be able to get man people to join no matter how much you pay
He has been on for the hours since i post and has either missed the post 'unlikely' or ignored so i have to ask why would he ignore perfectly valid questions/worries for those who join. He now has a respected member asking and painting the picture so i hope he sorts it out before anyone signs up  If you follow threw with what is being asked you will more than likely have a successful campaign so happy days. We wernt trying to avoid anyones question we were handling the escrow and got a manager, it will be updated in the OP The escrow and manager should be verified as soon as they post. What is the name of the escrow holder? (if you have not yet arranged for one then I would be willing to act as escrow for you) |
|
|
|
I can't do an escrow transaction at the moment, but I can exchange your moneypak for bitcoins in under 10 minutes. However, I completely understand if you don't want to go first. if you would like to do future transactions using escrow, I will have more BTC on-hand on Monday.
If you can't use escrow then you should be willing to trade with a trusted member and be willing to send first (The person above is nowhere near the level that you should be dealing with when you must send first). |
|
|
|
You guys are not honest, you are not playing fair
You are banning people just because you dont want to pay
My brothers account is just been temporarily banned for spam! My brothers account is RD965
I INVITE ANY MOD TO REVIEW HIS POSTS AND THEY WILL SEE THEY ARE CONSTRUCTIVE
He is been enrolled in many signature campaigns, and he is very active in the forum, and he is never been banned because there is no reason to
If you guys dont want to pay dont offer the service, but this is not fair
Please people be aware who your dealing with, this is not HONEST
Wait. Are you talking about forum ban? Or campaign denied his payment? I am confused here. If he was banned by forum mod, signature campaign has nothing to do with it. As you can see even manager of this signature campaign Marco is currently banned by the mods. Nobody is safe from the banhammer. Just because someone runs a signature campaign and pays a lot of people does not mean that they are exempt from the rules of the forum.
Looking at RD965's recent posts, I see a lot of two line posts (a few three line, but a good number of one line posts as well). The overall gist of the posts are that they are spammy. He is wearing a paid signature advertisement. I would say that the ban is valid assuming it is for insubstantial posts + paid signature ad |
|
|
|
|
I would generally agree that you are spamming. I was actually considering creating a thread in meta complaining about the low quality of your posts.
Generally speaking you should only be posting in marketplace threads if you are either knowledgable about a certain item/service/ect. being sold or if you have a genuine interest in trading with the OP of the thread, or are calling out a potential scam (this would be very similar to being knowledgable about what is being traded). I can say with a good amount of certainty that most of your posts in the marketplace meet none of the above criteria.
IMO you should be banned for at least a short period to allow you to have time to familiarize yourself with the various rules of the forum and the quality of posts that is expected of members of the community
|
|
|
|
Well when I seen the posts that where made by Troleybüs because he contacted me in PM saying he didn't get paid on posts and I gave reasons to as why didn't get paid as the posts that he or she made where very short posts. If their was some agreement in place for his posts to be paid on then maybe this should of been horned and even if agreements where made then proof of this should be spoke about in pm or if not delt with to then go public with proof of the post that Troleybüs was claiming should be paid on. From me as a member looking at his post they where very very short and would not qualify as quality in length post. Why did he contact you? And why/how would you give him an answer? Are you a representative of Marcotheminer and/or bit-x? If a post is made and only maybe 10 words or so or even less then it would not be paid in most signature campaigns and most managers of them would agree with what am saying. am not disagreeing on the posts that where indeed made by Troleybüs but theirs rules that each one has and me being in a lot of the signature campaigns over the last year or so he or she would of not been paid due to how short responses are in the post that Troleybüs had made. Again tho if Troleybüs marc had some arrangement and agreement in place to be paid then this should of at least been horned.
There is no rule regarding the min length that posts need to be in order to qualify for it to be counted. The only spam related rules that are in place are that regarding posts in specific sections, there are no rules regarding the min length that posts need to be.
Regardless, none of this matters, as the allegation of Marcotheminer evading his ban, if true is a violation of forum rules and is something that he shouldn't have done. He apparently had been banned previously for similar reasons in the past. |
|
|
|
i just dont know and wonder what is the benefit if we use an avatar?
None! Everyone could have avatars in the next update of bitcointalk. There are no benefits with avatars. That is not true. Having an avatar means that you have some level of prestige and avatars are somewhat coveted by people who have actual interest in the forum and in bitcoin. You are however correct that they do not allow you to earn any additional amounts in signature deals so how do we get to setting an avatar? or maybe only for certain members You had to have had an avatar as of prior to when the forum was hacked in late 2013 (the attacker was able to hack the forum via the avatar system). As a result of the hack the changing of avatars (including the adding of one) is disabled, although you can PM theymos to have your avatar removed (but he will not add one) But can't the attacker simply use the members that currently have avatars to attack the forum? No. I am not 100% sure of the technical details behind the attack however I understand that the attacker was able to launch an attack doing something to do with how avatars are uploaded. |
|
|
|
i just dont know and wonder what is the benefit if we use an avatar?
None! Everyone could have avatars in the next update of bitcointalk. There are no benefits with avatars. That is not true. Having an avatar means that you have some level of prestige and avatars are somewhat coveted by people who have actual interest in the forum and in bitcoin. You are however correct that they do not allow you to earn any additional amounts in signature deals so how do we get to setting an avatar? or maybe only for certain members You had to have had an avatar as of prior to when the forum was hacked in late 2013 (the attacker was able to hack the forum via the avatar system). As a result of the hack the changing of avatars (including the adding of one) is disabled, although you can PM theymos to have your avatar removed (but he will not add one) |
|
|
|
im looking for Member or Full Member account with activity not less than 84 and not more than 154.. reply here or PM me for prices.. thanks!
I just sent you a PM. Below is my account sales thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704370.0 |
|
|
|
i just dont know and wonder what is the benefit if we use an avatar?
None! Everyone could have avatars in the next update of bitcointalk. There are no benefits with avatars. That is not true. Having an avatar means that you have some level of prestige and avatars are somewhat coveted by people who have actual interest in the forum and in bitcoin. You are however correct that they do not allow you to earn any additional amounts in signature deals |
|
|
|
Quickseller, any chance that you know one with a bitcoin related avatar would go for?
i answered your question via PM already. It would probably be a little bit more (10-20%) then the .4 to .6 or so depending on how close it is to a hero. |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
Just wondering how much is a 400+ senior member account going for currently, with an avatar?
Need a quick answer here, thanks guys.
(I'm not selling it, I'm purchasing.)
Lol you have been part of this forum all this time and you have never bothered to pay attention to prices, well between 0.4 - 0.5 for what you ask. I have one that is in a sig campaign without a avatar though and has negative that it should not that is why they allowed the account into the sig campaign i would accept 0.22 for it you can roi in 250 posts. EDIT: Only escrow deals safe for both and you could make sure from escrow that it was enrolled in a campaign before purchase if you was interested of course. Senior accounts with negative trust will likely not sell for anywhere near that much. I have seen them go for as little as .1 to .15 and that was when the market was much healthier |
|
|
|
Account is still available !
Member accounts are a big ripoff. The best you can get is approximately BTC 0.01 per week. His asking price is .03 BTC so you would achieve ROI within a month at that rate. Plus a member will eventually become a full member which earn a lot more from signature deals and is worth a lot more |
|
|
|
Selling it for 0.4 btc
That quite expensive for neutral trust That's what they usually sell for. Nothing unusual. Jorjito are selling it for 0.3, another guy was selling it for 0.25. Well the price varies from 0.2-0.55 . It's a free market,they can sell for what they want. It also depends on the activity and the community standards. Yeah that i agree with that price. i think 0.4 for sr. member is too high for that. if your account have a green feedback that's can In the past .4 was a starting price for a senior member. The prices have fallen somewhat but .4 is still a good price for an account with over 400 activity, especially considering that it could be very close to a hero (granted it could also be barely 400 activity) |
|
|
|
I don't understand the cause of your bluster, ArmoredDoge. Were you the one being sent unsolicited PMs?
Yes and also this marcotheminer guy caused alot of beef with me. After I exposed him for being the Escrow for more then 5 other Signature Campaigns and him just laughing it off like it's cool to basicly just be an Escrow Pump and Dumper I grew tired of his bullshit and decided to show him how it feels to be ripped off when he rips off others. What other signature campaigns did he escrow for? Why should I answer that when you won't admit to selling Bitcointalk Accounts you don't own?.... PS: You can just look in his trust rating Klouge has posted a few of his alts he has many more though... I will take a look at kluge's sent ratings. I do own the bitcointalk accounts that I sell. All the accounts that I sell were paid for and ownership was confirmed via a signed message prior to me buying them (with one exception when I was still a "newbie" to the account selling game and didn't know any better - the account was not hacked though and was sold to me by the rightful owner) |
|
|
|
I don't understand the cause of your bluster, ArmoredDoge. Were you the one being sent unsolicited PMs?
Yes and also this marcotheminer guy caused alot of beef with me. After I exposed him for being the Escrow for more then 5 other Signature Campaigns and him just laughing it off like it's cool to basicly just be an Escrow Pump and Dumper I grew tired of his bullshit and decided to show him how it feels to be ripped off when he rips off others. What other signature campaigns did he escrow for? |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinwisdom is showing an estimated next difficulty of +1.13% and the spreadsheet is showing that the network is on pace for a 1.05% increase, but the 3 day moving average is -2.79% so the estimate is on a downtrend. With only 123 blocks to go I would say the chances of the difficulty adjustment falling within the unclaimed range of +.5 to +1.0% is pretty high right now.
|
|
|
|
I'm curious, is that mean marcotheminer's all accounts will be permanently banned?
If he'll be permanently banned and as we know he controls yussuf89 hero account which was stollen and prooved ownership by Zeki.
Can this account be given back to Zeki who's the real owner?...
Generally speaking if you have a relatively short ban then ban evading will likely only get your ban extended, probably to something along the lines of 30 or 60 days, however repetitive ban evasions will likely eventually lead to a perm ban. According to the above he banned and evaded his ban previously so it could be a perm ban. I think the chances of zeki getting his account back unscathed would go up substantially if marco is perm banned. It would at least give zeki much more leverage in negotiating with marco regarding getting it back |
|
|
|
Do you think that enabling this function might negatively affect the privacy of some users? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
