I did 10.000+ searches and not even 1 1EEVEE!, must be something in the bitcoin address structure that doesnt allow this combination, if u dont belive me try it yourself. This took a few seconds: ./oclvanitygen 1EEVEE -ik
Difficulty: 15956296
Pattern: 1EEVEE
Address: 1EeveeUmLzb4XrR5ig38uARZPBvMGHENrU
Privkey: 5J5Wj1EQsXi5o8iSmvnExs22DWDfXmYqvvFHNeQSypvM7JyuQya
Pattern: 1EEVEE
Address: 1EEVEELTN8APXaASXQrPE1QVFzANJxuXfS
Privkey: 5HtbZPDRA1Q17nQAwcydfQJtoyZV3a2B3xLK1jnyi89dWQX871z
Pattern: 1EEVEE
Address: 1EevEEmC5FVMfs52b4S167UE6X69BgQ5T
Privkey: 5KgxnjfLNuoDdVb2KPrHQoHMmHWptwBkTy2fCcDUE9dNQwkAN82 |
|
|
|
Hi, i try to generate a address that starts with 1eevee, after 3000+ results there is no address that starts with 1 EEVEE. (so all capital lettes)
I use: oclvanitygen.exe -v -i -D 0:0,grid*1024x1024 -f names7.txt -o eevee.txt
When i change it to:
oclvanitygen.exe -v -D 0:0,grid*1024x1024 -f names7.txt -o eevee.txt (so without -i), he founds it after 10 seconds!,
can someone explain this? Option "-i" makes your search case-insensitive, so you can expect many more results. But if you find 1EEVEE without "-i", that means you entered 1EEVEE in full caps in names7.txt. It's very unlikely to find 3000+ variations of "eevee" without one in full caps though. |
|
|
|
I can't really post any follow-up to what I wrote earlier - the more senior ranked you are, the more multiple posts in a row you can get away with. Lesser ranked, or, not as well liked by those in admin/mods and they will "monitor" you and will delete at any opportunity. Usually months after the event occurred. I don't think the Mods are to blame for this. It depends on the posts getting reported. I often get away with multiple posts in a row, but usually there's either a week in between updates, or the posts are too long to fit in one post (I wish my post limit would be increased to 640 kB). Most higher ranked members know the rules by now, so they don't often "multipost" in a what that makes Mods act on it. So the maximum plenty for violation of this rule is the deletion of posts or is there any example if anyone is temporary or permanent ban if any low ranked person is found violating this rule few times ? If they're spamming they might get banned, but some users have many hundreds of deleted posts without getting banned. |
|
|
|
How about the other users opposing the flag on the casino account? I'm just leaving this here: 2021-02-13 Sat 09.46hsource: loyce.club2583 Active. ( Support | Oppose) realscout flagged AdkinsBET (type 3, see why). Supported by LoyceV, examplens, dbshck, actmyname, marlboroza, stompix, JollyGood, El duderino_, Royse777, Steamtyme, DireWolfM14, ScamViruS, GazetaBitcoin, icopress, FatFork, CryptoYar, TheUltraElite, RapTarX, NotATether, scammed-by-nitro, LEVSKI7, h4ns, barbaron, realscout, Maasdamer, oz.kashi, nikica99, Adzivu. Opposed by BlackFor3st, ronaldo40, wildan88, sempak, Cacingkemi, BitcoinAccepted, MI6, deadthings, aomakun, BTCGOLD, imutlinda, cutesgirl, codegnome, coin.princess. |
|
|
|
Let's say that each UTXO holds 0.001 BTC, in that case he would need 100 times that amount to meet the conditions to partake in a CoinJoin. That would still link all addresses together. There's not really a point in doing this unless many other people join with many small transactions too. |
|
|
|
I assume @eddie13 meant Cøbra. Let's see if he uses a notification service before I PM him  @eddie13: you may want to check this There's a new case: |
|
|
|
So, if I spent $1100 to get you kicked out of the ChipMixer campaign that would not be "punishment"
If I started a bunch of alt accounts that I deliberately got banned and had funds could be tied to them also get tied to your addresses so you get banned from here that would not be punishment? You missed this part: I'm not afraid at all of any accusations. I like to think you can't fabricate hard evidence this way. I've seen fabricated plagiarism too. My only gripe with you is the post scraper that archives all my misspellings and grammar mistakes before I can edit them. ;-) Lol |
|
|
|
I've added OP's first transaction: This transaction is being accelerated. It was fight with captcha, and it took me over 30 seconds, but the 100 spots weren't full yet. If ViaBTC includes this transaction, the second transaction (with much higher fee) should confirm on it's own. Update: ViaBTC confirmed the transaction. |
|
|
|
Electrum is a very bad Wallet... No it's not. Electrum is a trash please help. i have put A BIG AMOUNT OF FEE Stop blaming Electrum for transaction fees. You paid 20 sat/byte on your first transaction, which isn't enough. Replaced by fee TXID - b2f6c6e0a6648da9d60c42799cbb163b1cc759e2bf86d0bfff1f5b41555bab03 Your second transaction is showing 261 sat/byte, but has to do CPFP (Child Pays For Parent) so it's still not that much. For future transactions, you should read how to consolidate your small inputs when fees are low. You're wasting a lot of money on fees this way. |
|
|
|
October 7, 2022: I've consolidated a few posts here, so that I can remove Vod's post (sorry Vod) and have the second post in this topic for myself. Spam discussion/question. The page mentions 10 kb/s - is there any cost or requirement for the 100? The page mentions 10 kb/s - is there any cost or requirement for the 100? At some point they increased the speed limit, but didn't update their Readme. The fool speed is a tad above my budget for this: I just contacted Blockchair for an API key, which enables people to download at the fast rate, and a support rep told me they cost $500/month. Bump: This directory is now 349 GB in size. It's almost complete
|
|
|
|
I would try that instead of -blocksdir use a blocks symlink to the actual blocks folder. This is what I use, without any changes to my config file. I used to have a different setup with wallet symlinks, but at some upgrade that stopped working because Bitcoin Core decided to no longer accept my symlink choices. My current setup has worked ever since. I actually wanted to know/understand why -blocksdir is not working. I'm just guessing here: maybe because it's on a different disk. |
|
|
|
Please don't spend money on making a gift for me as I cannot receive it since I will not disclose my physical location. The same for me |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
