Start a new forum with different admins?
Everyone is free to do that, in fact I think some already have. If this forum is run as badly as a lot of people keep making out then a new, better forum could quickly arise and dominate. |
|
|
|
It is not because the coin is not improving a technical aspect that it is not useful. Granted, there are too many coins out there already. Also for our goal there is already SexCoin and TittieCoin. However, it is not because people are later to launch a coin that they are more or less crap than any of the earlier coins. We saw great potential in SexCoin and saw some flaws in the management which is why we are working for months already to involve industry partners before we launch this coin. We are aiming to make a coin for a specific group that benefits from it, make it fair, promote it with the right people, don't just launch it and hope people pick up (there are too many coins for this tactic to work) make sure businesses have a personal interest in the coin and most of all not abandon the coin. Saying all 200 coins you list there are all crap coins without better investigation in what they are trying to achieve is a bit... of a shortcut. In any case I agree that there are too many coins and yet I believe in the one I am promoting enough to join their team.. which is maybe a bit ironic  . PS: we are releasing the coin soon, more information can be found here: http://forum.cryptolife.net/index.php?topic=66.0Twitter @OfficialTitcoin Facebook http://www.facebook.com/titcoin Subscribe to Mailing list http://[Suspicious link removed]/N4KET Yeah, you say all that but your coin is called Titcoin, so all of what you just said is probably the same hot air and ideals all devs claim initially, so yeah, probably ironic (unless your post was meant to be entirely ironic (hard to tell these days  )). Valid point, then again, welcome to the internet which is even worse than real life to determine whether someone is lying or not. With AltCoins, you can never be sure.. there is money involved and personally I also don't trust people when money is involved.. only time will tell which coins are still supported by their team and which are not. We are in every case really doing an effort to get industry partners involved which is far from easy and explains why we didn't launch 4 months ago. Also it actually works against the idea of what most guys want..... your gf finds bitcoin, litecoin etc on you pc fine.... finds titcoin with it being known for use with sex sites ...starts moaning. Stupid idea and pointless. Yup, that was my point with Sexcoin. Bitcoin is innocuous and what you use it for will be pretty ambiguous, but that's not really the case with Titcoin now is it? It's really not going to catch on within the industry and if they were going to use any crypto it'd almost certainly be BTC. |
|
|
|
I saw this a while ago, JP Morgan answered her like a boss, I doubt anyone with the criteria she is asking for will marry her (she is clearly stating she wants to marry a wallet and not the guy) unless he is a desperate 80 yo guy.....
She can get guys to go out with her and buy her expensive stuff but that's another story
It's a theoretical response, did you even read the thread It's a sad state of affairs when people see these sorts of stories and instantly believe they're true. I see the like (and much worse) being shared on Facebook by plebs operating under the assumption that they're true. It's a nice little story though. Any smart guy with doubts about marrying this type of woman would just say, "sure I'll get married, so long as you sign a Pre-nup"  . You'd certainly see their true colours then. |
|
|
|
|
I used to like it a lot but I think it's had its day now (or maybe I've just outgrown it?). The last couple of seasons haven't been that great to be honest. Think it kinda peaked around series 5 or so.
|
|
|
|
It is not because the coin is not improving a technical aspect that it is not useful. Granted, there are too many coins out there already. Also for our goal there is already SexCoin and TittieCoin. However, it is not because people are later to launch a coin that they are more or less crap than any of the earlier coins. We saw great potential in SexCoin and saw some flaws in the management which is why we are working for months already to involve industry partners before we launch this coin. We are aiming to make a coin for a specific group that benefits from it, make it fair, promote it with the right people, don't just launch it and hope people pick up (there are too many coins for this tactic to work) make sure businesses have a personal interest in the coin and most of all not abandon the coin. Saying all 200 coins you list there are all crap coins without better investigation in what they are trying to achieve is a bit... of a shortcut. In any case I agree that there are too many coins and yet I believe in the one I am promoting enough to join their team.. which is maybe a bit ironic . PS: we are releasing the coin soon, more information can be found here: http://forum.cryptolife.net/index.php?topic=66.0Twitter @OfficialTitcoin Facebook http://www.facebook.com/titcoin Subscribe to Mailing list http://[Suspicious link removed]/N4KET Yeah, you say all that but your coin is called Titcoin, so all of what you just said is probably the same hot air and ideals all devs claim initially, so yeah, probably ironic (unless your post was meant to be entirely ironic (hard to tell these days )). Valid point, then again, welcome to the internet which is even worse than real life to determine whether someone is lying or not. With AltCoins, you can never be sure.. there is money involved and personally I also don't trust people when money is involved.. only time will tell which coins are still supported by their team and which are not. We are in every case really doing an effort to get industry partners involved which is far from easy and explains why we didn't launch 4 months ago. I'm sure there's some devs that have the best intentions, but often their claims or aspirations turn out to be pretty naive and/or grossly overblown. I think with most of the alts that try capture a niche market or use a gimmick the question why not just use Bitcoin? comes into play. |
|
|
|
Attention: Livejasmin is a porn site.
Global rank of Livejasmin is 106. I have spent hundreds of dollars there.
I want to help Bitcoin to succeed, so I put on this bounty.
Please contact Livejasmin and ask them to accept bitcoin, don't forget to put on evidence in the reply.
If Livejasmin definitely decides to accept bitcoin in 3 months from now, then all people who are qualified before livejasmin's announcement will share this bounty.
first 3 people will get additional 0.1 btc each.
So total is 0.8 btc.
Sign a message with an address with 0.8 BTC , that would atleast prove that you have the BTC... I think this should be the least of your concerns. It's unlikely LJ will listen to a few emails from Bitcoiners, unless they were already planning or thinking about it. But if you did get them to accept it it'd be a win-win for the BTC community . |
|
|
|
i think ritz can add those people in his trust circle to cancel the red one?
It'll show up to him as cancelled probably but not to everybody else unless they've got them in their trust circle as well. |
|
|
|
Bump, I'll open this up to really any cans that people have for sale. If you've got decent head phones for sale, offer up, pm, etc. I'll look into pretty much anything.
I've got some Sennheiser HD595's if you're interested? I'd sell if the price was right as I hardly use them. They haven't left the house as I find them a bit cumbersome for walking about it tbh. |
|
|
|
|
Pre-mined coins shouldn't even be listed, or maybe given their own little shitty scamcoin section to compete against each other.
|
|
|
|
It is not because the coin is not improving a technical aspect that it is not useful. Granted, there are too many coins out there already. Also for our goal there is already SexCoin and TittieCoin. However, it is not because people are later to launch a coin that they are more or less crap than any of the earlier coins. We saw great potential in SexCoin and saw some flaws in the management which is why we are working for months already to involve industry partners before we launch this coin. We are aiming to make a coin for a specific group that benefits from it, make it fair, promote it with the right people, don't just launch it and hope people pick up (there are too many coins for this tactic to work) make sure businesses have a personal interest in the coin and most of all not abandon the coin. Saying all 200 coins you list there are all crap coins without better investigation in what they are trying to achieve is a bit... of a shortcut. In any case I agree that there are too many coins and yet I believe in the one I am promoting enough to join their team.. which is maybe a bit ironic . PS: we are releasing the coin soon, more information can be found here: http://forum.cryptolife.net/index.php?topic=66.0Twitter @OfficialTitcoin Facebook http://www.facebook.com/titcoin Subscribe to Mailing list http://[Suspicious link removed]/N4KET Yeah, you say all that but your coin is called Titcoin, so all of what you just said is probably the same hot air and ideals all devs claim initially, so yeah, probably ironic (unless your post was meant to be entirely ironic (hard to tell these days )). |
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly, except megaupload founder is more of a nobody. I thought he was in prison anyway?
He has lots of cash with him. So he avoided the prison, just like Mark Kerpeles. Prison is only for the poor and the middle-class. But there is still an US extradition warrant against him existing (over Megaupload). However, I disagree that he is a virtual nobody. Right now, he is very well known all across the globe, thanks to the Megaupload fiasco. And he's vigorously fighting that extradition and I hope he wins. I also disagree that he's a nobody. He might not be an international celeb but he seems to be fighting for all the right causes and isn't afraid to stand up and voice his opinion, especially against the mighty USG. They're not a nice enemy to have especially when they've got a grudge behind them. |
|
|
|
|
The future. I don't know where it'll take us, but if people had any sense it would be (though it still is IMO) a truly revolutionary concept. It makes me excited for the future of payments though. I think it's also inevitable that some form of crypto or payment system based on or around the idea will become prevelant sooner or later, but hopefully within our lifetime.
|
|
|
|
Award Satoshi the Nobel Prize in economics, that 'll flush him out!  You know, he or they would probably be a worthy winner, but would they give or nominate the prize to an anonymous pseudonym? |
|
|
|
not sure if ascii art is allowed
__ /\ \ __
_____ _ __ /\_\ ___ ___ __ \_\ \/\_\ ___ __
/\ '__`\/\`'__\/\ \ /' __` __`\ /'__`\ /'_` \/\ \ /'___\ /'__`\
\ \ \L\ \ \ \/ \ \ \/\ \/\ \/\ \/\ __//\ \L\ \ \ \/\ \__//\ __/
\ \ ,__/\ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \_\ \_\ \____\ \___,_\ \_\ \____\ \____\
\ \ \/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/____/\/__,_ /\/_/\/____/\/____/
\ \_\
\/_/ ★ I PLAY @PRIMEDICE.COM ★ FREE 100 SATOSHIS FAUCET ★ DICE ★ AUTOPLAY AND MORE
I doubt that's going to fit in the sigs. Maybe Stunna could use it for his threads though . Can ascii art be colored in? That would look so epic. Seems it can. I think it'd need to be to stand out. |
|
|
|
|
What would be a better solution for a safer option? I think it's better that we have a trusted list and putting certain long-standing and (apparently) more trustable people on it is beneficial, but it can also be easily abused and taken advantage of and the people on the trusted list can sometimes seem to have a mafia-like rule over it whether unspoken and enforced or not, but I can't think of a way that would be foolproof. It reminds me of the trouble with the old style feedback on eBay where the seller could also leave feedback. If the buyer left negative feedback for whatever reason then the favour was usually just quickly returned.
|
|
|
|
I think pvp on dice game is pretty more cool and much more fair, good work stunna
Well, I don't think it will be popular though... What are the rules? Martingale? Then the winner is the one who has more on his deposit. Makes no sense to me, boring and tiresome without bet multiplication...  And I leave the question of fairness. If this pvp will be much more fair (or even fairer), it plain shit means that now the rolls are not  I don't think it will be more popular, but it'll certainly be used and is a bit more fun for the PD community. There will definitely be a lot of people that would rather lose to another user than the house, but I bet there'll be a fair share of sore losers trying to guilt the winner into sending at least some of their money back haha. And with Martingale the winner is always the one who has the most in his account, or knows when to quit whilst ahead . That part about quitting will be the most interesting to see (and how it will be done), especially when the winner tries to leave with all the coins he won... Yeah, I'm sure the winner will be badgered by the butthurt loser. "Please, just one more roll" haha. Addict vs. Addict I often wonder how many emails PD gets from sore losers asking for their money back in one way or another. |
|
|
|
Trust: -4: -1 / +0(0) Warning: Trade with extreme caution! What happened to you?  Just the trolls. The entire trust thing is floored. One guy even asked/blackmailed us for 0.1 btc for his neg to be removed. It really doesn't bother us, as we have more players than ever on our casino. And most come back for more. Best, Ritz The trust system isn't perfect and those who are on the trusted list have a monopoly on the power and effectiveness of it, but people can read it and make their own mind up and will see it's not for anything related to the trustworthiness of the deal. If you can get one or two people from the trusted list to leave you positive I think it might cancel it out though. |
|
|
|
not sure if ascii art is allowed __ /\ \ __
_____ _ __ /\_\ ___ ___ __ \_\ \/\_\ ___ __
/\ '__`\/\`'__\/\ \ /' __` __`\ /'__`\ /'_` \/\ \ /'___\ /'__`\
\ \ \L\ \ \ \/ \ \ \/\ \/\ \/\ \/\ __//\ \L\ \ \ \/\ \__//\ __/
\ \ ,__/\ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \_\ \_\ \____\ \___,_\ \_\ \____\ \____\
\ \ \/ \/_/ \/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/____/\/__,_ /\/_/\/____/\/____/
\ \_\
\/_/ ★ I PLAY @PRIMEDICE.COM ★ FREE 100 SATOSHIS FAUCET ★ DICE ★ AUTOPLAY AND MORE I doubt that's going to fit in the sigs. Maybe Stunna could use it for his threads though . |
|
|
|
I think pvp on dice game is pretty more cool and much more fair, good work stunna
Well, I don't think it will be popular though... What are the rules? Martingale? Then the winner is the one who has more on his deposit. Makes no sense to me, boring and tiresome without bet multiplication... And I leave the question of fairness. If this pvp will be much more fair (or even fairer), it plain shit means that now the rolls are not I don't think it will be more popular, but it'll certainly be used and is a bit more fun for the PD community. There will definitely be a lot of people that would rather lose to another user than the house, but I bet there'll be a fair share of sore losers trying to guilt the winner into sending at least some of their money back haha. And with Martingale the winner is always the one who has the most in his account, or knows when to quit whilst ahead . |
|
|
|
|
Voted. I actually think you might have a good chance with that one haha. I was expecting it to be just a typical student shithole kitchen, but yours literally does need need renovating. It just looks like a garage with a kitchen sink.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
